Hillary Will Win

[Larkinn]

Why on earth would I not think O'Connor and the law are intimately related? Where did that come from?

I could have sworn we were discussing my opinion about O'Connor. I probably thought that because that's what we were discussing.

So..where were we actually discussing law? Because I sure haven't seen any legal arguments here.

All the drive-by inanity is making me dizzy....
Presidents get to choose justices. I don't want Hillary appointing any more liberal justices. Sorry you got sidetracked trying to shoot me down.

I didn't get sidetracked at all. Its obvious you have no idea what you are talking about. I think thats been shown quite well here.

 

[AllieBaba]

I don't think it's good policy to throw away your vote over semantics. I am diametrically opposed to a Democrat in the White House. I feel more strongly about that than Guiliani's ambiguous stance on abortion (I know how Hillary feels about it) or whatever.

I don't want any more liberal judges on the Supreme Court. That's what it comes down to. Those people break our backs if we let the wrong ones in.

That's the post that sidetracked Jillian. And subsequently, you were sidetracked by Jillian's nonsense. I know, it really shows how incredibly clueless I am about law, politics, how ignorant I am, and how I make crazy allegations.

Yup. I can see your point.

 

[Larkinn]

That's the post that sidetracked Jillian. And subsequently, you were sidetracked by Jillian's nonsense. I know, it really shows how incredibly clueless I am about law, politics, how ignorant I am, and how I make crazy allegations.

Yup. I can see your point.

I never said you didn't know politics, I said law. And obviously I wasn't referring to only the post that started the tangent but the subsequent posts as well.

 

[jillian]

That's the post that sidetracked Jillian. And subsequently, you were sidetracked by Jillian's nonsense. I know, it really shows how incredibly clueless I am about law, politics, how ignorant I am, and how I make crazy allegations.

Yup. I can see your point.

I think you're confused. You were the one who said you didn't want Hillary Clinton to be president because you don't want "any psychotic liberal judges" on the bench. I called you on that absurd statement and asked who you saw as being a psychotic.

Your answer was Sandra Day O'Connor. (who was actually the last person I'd expect since she was far from the most extreme person on either side). I even let slide the fact that the decision you related as being psychotic was joined by four other Justices... I believe in total, it was two republican appointees and three democratic appointees. Funny that non-partisanship on the bench would appear "psychotic" to you.

If you don't want to be proven ignorant, I'd suggest you not make absurd statements like that.

So, who sidetracked us again? Or should I have allowed your ignorance to pass?

 

[AllieBaba]

I don't want any more psychotic liberal judges on the Supreme Court. And O'connor is NOT the epitome of all that is measured and thoughtful in the law, and honestly, you are the only person I've ever heard say she is.

 

[DeadCanDance]

Thompson is probably the most qualified Republican to run, and he can actually carry the vote across the schism within the party, AND appeal to moderates.

Please, I'm begging you: no more dumb Presidents from the south. We can't afford anymore.


From the 1972 Nixon Tapes:

Nixon on Fred Thompson: "He's dumb as hell...but friendly"

 

[Ninja]

What does the Supreme Court do that breaks your back?

Heller vs. DC FTW!!!!!

 

[jillian]

Heller vs. DC FTW!!!!!

lol... you were actually going to be my point of reference if the conversation ever got around to Miller.

 

[Adam's Apple]

The Republicans BETTER put forth a TRUE CONSERVATIVE on our ticket, or a democrat WILL be back in the White House.

My way or the highway, huh? I am providing a link at the end of this post to an article directed to election-day-threatening conservatives like you.

Keep in mind that if Rudy is in the White House, conservatives have a chance to exert pressure and affect decisions on important decisions the president makes; with socialist Hillary in the White house, no chance in hell.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20071010/EDITORIAL01/110100005/1013

 

[JimH52]

Hillary will win. You know why? Because you frigin conservative sheep allowed george bush to lead you around by the nose for 8 years.

Now the country identifies conservativism and the GOP with george bush. So, in fact you prostitued yourselves to gain 8 years of corporate greed, corruption, and unchecked right wing pork.

Now it is time to pay the Piper and the Piper is Hillary and Bill by her side. No one is crazy about that duo but we can all thank the GOP greed.

 

[Annie]

Hillary will win. You know why? Because you frigin conservative sheep allowed george bush to lead you around by the nose for 8 years.

Now the country identifies conservativism and the GOP with george bush. So, in fact you prostitued yourselves to gain 8 years of corporate greed, corruption, and unchecked right wing pork.

Now it is time to pay the Piper and the Piper is Hillary and Bill by her side. No one is crazy about that duo but we can all thank the GOP greed.

Personally if she wins, I'm cool. At the end of 8, which I go in assuming, we will already be locked into socialism or ready for revolt, either way, I can deal with.

 

[AllieBaba]

I'm fairly certain that we're guaranteed a win with Hillary as the Dem nominee.

 

[JimH52]

I'm fairly certain that we're guaranteed a win with Hillary as the Dem nominee.

I assume the we you are speaking of is the Democrats. I usually vote the Demo ticket, but Hillary is so far to the left that I find my nose bleeding at times when she speaks.

Bill won with a moderate stance but it appears that Hillary doesn't even think she needs to lean to the middle to win. And you know what? I think she is right.

 

[AllieBaba]

I assume the we you are speaking of is the Democrats. I usually vote the Demo ticket, but Hillary is so far to the left that I find my nose bleeding at times when she speaks.

Bill won with a moderate stance but it appears that Hillary doesn't even think she needs to lean to the middle to win. And you know what? I think she is right.

Actually, the we I'm referring to is the Republicans....sorry. Should have been more clear.

 

[JimH52]

Okay...so which of the GOP hopefuls is going to defeat Hillary?

 

[AllieBaba]

I think Guiliani. We'll see.

 

[Annie]

Okay...so which of the GOP hopefuls is going to defeat Hillary?

So far? No one. Hillary wins.

 

[JimH52]

Guiliani is too liberal and many of the GOP faithful will stay at home. And the ones who do vote for him will be holding their noses. The evangelical voters are not very happy.

I thought Thompson was the answer but he seems as exciting as drying paint.

 

[Gunny]

I think Guiliani. We'll see.

Guilliani doesn't have a chance. Of them all, only Thompson is actually a Reagan conservative.

A Democrat will win only for the same reason they got seats in Congress last year ... if conservatives/Republicans stay home.

 

[Adam's Apple]

Hillary will win. You know why? Because you frigin conservative sheep allowed george bush to lead you around by the nose for 8 years.

We’ll see what kind of an actress the tightly scripted Hillary is, with her false laughing on cue, when the real debates begin. Remember when the MSM made it crystal clear that the “dummy” George W. didn’t have a chance against such “superior” debaters as Al Gore and John Kerry?

...you prostitued yourselves to gain 8 years of corporate greed, corruption, and unchecked right wing pork.

It seems to me that conservatives have challenged George W. in his second term far more often than the Democrats ever challenged Bill Clinton in his second term. When one or two (at most!) Democrats did stand up and speak out against Clinton, they were made pariahs in the party. Joe Lieberman even had to run as an independent to keep his Senate seat in CT.

Corporate greed, corruption and unchecked pork occurred during the Clinton administration as well as during Bush’s administration. Both sides are equally bad in that regard, so don’t pretend that it is only Republicans who have this problem.