Hillary – Too Many Guns

[longknife]

We all know she speaks out both sides of her mouth on the subject. But, here's something to mull over;

Furthermore, Clinton is a supporter of the Center for American Progress (CAP), founded by her anti-gun husband’s White House Chief of Staff and funded in part by anti-gun billionaire George Soros and the anti-gun Joyce Foundation. CAP, which also has very close ties to the Obama White House, advocates background checks on all firearm transfers and a ban on “assault weapons” and ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. It also opposes Right-to-Carry and Stand Your Ground laws, and it boasts that “progress on stronger gun laws is within reach” because “Democrats and progressives are re-engaged.” Needless to say, CAP doesn’t speak for all Democrats on the issue, but Clinton is obviously not being shy about attaching gun control to her own political brand.

The question is just how will the media skew this to make sure her anti-gun stance for private individual is either played down or covered up? All we have to do is watch the reactions of her supporters on this forum to see. [Every wonder if so many jump on a topic like this just because the world Hillary pops up?]

Read more @ NRA-ILA | Hillary On guns We're way out of balance and Doug Ross @ Journal: Hillary: Americans don't need guns!

 

[jon_berzerk]

she should openly run on that

 

[The T]

We all know she speaks out both sides of her mouth on the subject. But, here's something to mull over;

Furthermore, Clinton is a supporter of the Center for American Progress (CAP), founded by her anti-gun husband’s White House Chief of Staff and funded in part by anti-gun billionaire George Soros and the anti-gun Joyce Foundation. CAP, which also has very close ties to the Obama White House, advocates background checks on all firearm transfers and a ban on “assault weapons” and ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. It also opposes Right-to-Carry and Stand Your Ground laws, and it boasts that “progress on stronger gun laws is within reach” because “Democrats and progressives are re-engaged.” Needless to say, CAP doesn’t speak for all Democrats on the issue, but Clinton is obviously not being shy about attaching gun control to her own political brand.

The question is just how will the media skew this to make sure her anti-gun stance for private individual is either played down or covered up? All we have to do is watch the reactions of her supporters on this forum to see. [Every wonder if so many jump on a topic like this just because the world Hillary pops up?]

Read more @ NRA-ILA | Hillary On guns We're way out of balance and Doug Ross @ Journal: Hillary: Americans don't need guns!

We're Way Out Of Balance? Really? What would she consider 'BALANCE'?

 

[Katzndogz]

The media should investigate and question, but they are no longer objective.

 

[jon_berzerk]

The media should investigate and question, but they are no longer objective.

what are you crazy

the only thing the media will do is

report how republicans are bigots for questioning

her anti gun stance