Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Would it interest you to know that registered Democrats still outnumber Republicans in the South?
No, I guess it wouldn't.
Which does nothing for your argument, as those states also have sizable African-American populations.
If that's the case then why are they all considered Red-States?
Make fucken sense......
Fact is, people who've had families here for about a couple hundred years still vote Democrat. They're the Dixicrats mentioned earlier. They still vote mostly Democrat locally but nationally they vote GOP.
Now why is that?
Could it be the fact that the Washington crowd has gone so far left that they can't relate to them anymore?
Obama is exacerbating this fact.
They're red states because the white people in those states are overwhelming Republican.
Which does nothing for your argument, as those states also have sizable African-American populations.
If that's the case then why are they all considered Red-States?
Make fucken sense......
Fact is, people who've had families here for about a couple hundred years still vote Democrat. They're the Dixicrats mentioned earlier. They still vote mostly Democrat locally but nationally they vote GOP.
Now why is that?
Could it be the fact that the Washington crowd has gone so far left that they can't relate to them anymore?
Obama is exacerbating this fact.
They're red states because the white people in those states are overwhelming Republican.
There is no Treaty, it would have to be ratified by the Senate.
There is no Treaty, it would have to be ratified by the Senate.
It has already been put into effect without ratification. The Senate still may ratify it but not before the election. That doesn't stop it from being active policy already, which it is.
No, I mean Republican.
50% of white voters in Georgia are Republicans, 18% are Democrats.
66% of white voters in Alabama are Republicans, 13% are Democrats.
46% of white voters in Texas are Republicans, 19% are Democrats.
No, I mean Republican.
50% of white voters in Georgia are Republicans, 18% are Democrats.
66% of white voters in Alabama are Republicans, 13% are Democrats.
46% of white voters in Texas are Republicans, 19% are Democrats.
You're lying.
They may vote GOP during national elections now but they call themselves Democrats. I know very few folks that were born here that are Republican. Hardly any.
Lies will not help your cause, PC.
Chief dixiecrat Strom Thurmond was one of the more notable of the crossovers.
You are boring.
Jake, you're a liar and a moron - so a pretty typical leftist democrat.
So Fakey, in what year did George Wallace become a Republican? How about Bull Connor? Orval Faubus? Robert Byrd? James Eastland?
You're just a lying puke, Fakey - a scumbag lying for your shameful party.
No one believes anything you post; ever.
They're red states because the white people in those states are overwhelming Republican.
Are you suggesting that white people be prohibited from voting?
There is no Treaty, it would have to be ratified by the Senate.
It has already been put into effect without ratification. The Senate still may ratify it but not before the election. That doesn't stop it from being active policy already, which it is.
No, I mean Republican.
50% of white voters in Georgia are Republicans, 18% are Democrats.
66% of white voters in Alabama are Republicans, 13% are Democrats.
46% of white voters in Texas are Republicans, 19% are Democrats.
You're lying.
They may vote GOP during national elections now but they call themselves Democrats. I know very few folks that were born here that are Republican. Hardly any.
I'm not lying. Those numbers come straight from exit polling.
Where does it say that it is effective American governmental policy?
The answer is going to be fun.
There is no Treaty, it would have to be ratified by the Senate.
It has already been put into effect without ratification. The Senate still may ratify it but not before the election. That doesn't stop it from being active policy already, which it is.
Where does it say that it is effective American governmental policy?
The answer is going to be fun.
It has already been put into effect without ratification. The Senate still may ratify it but not before the election. That doesn't stop it from being active policy already, which it is.
I doesn't say it anywhere yet, not anything public.
Around the first of the year the FBI was directed to end all terrorist training, all reference material and training manuals purged of derogatory references toward Islam. Then the administration stopped using words and phrases like "radical islamo-facsists" instead only mentioning al Qaeda as the only Islamic terrorism. This claim that some obscure video caused riots in dozens of countries on 9/11 is pure bunk but it keeps inside of their new policies. It's like Sharia Law has become part of our government.
Give the links.
Where does it say that it is effective American governmental policy?
The answer is going to be fun.
I doesn't say it anywhere yet, not anything public.
Around the first of the year the FBI was directed to end all terrorist training, all reference material and training manuals purged of derogatory references toward Islam. Then the administration stopped using words and phrases like "radical islamo-facsists" instead only mentioning al Qaeda as the only Islamic terrorism. This claim that some obscure video caused riots in dozens of countries on 9/11 is pure bunk but it keeps inside of their new policies. It's like Sharia Law has become part of our government.