Hillary Signed "Islamaphobia" Treaty Last December. It's Done And Now We're Screwed

I support no regulation that hinders free speech, Mud.

You can talk bad about it all you want, who cares?

I can talk bad about Christianity, who cares?

The Rabbi can talk bad about Judaism, who cares?

And free speech means that I can talk bad about you talking bad about something else.

See how that works?

The Founders were wise.
 
I support no regulation that hinders free speech, Mud.

You can talk bad about it all you want, who cares?

I can talk bad about Christianity, who cares?

The Rabbi can talk bad about Judaism, who cares?

And free speech means that I can talk bad about you talking bad about something else.

See how that works?

The Founders were wise.

I work for the government. I cannot be vocal about my anti-terrorist views. They could send me home for 45 days and send me to counseling at EEO.
 
Yes the Founding Fathers were wise.

But they never envisioned that pornography and insulting religious personages where to be protected by so called free speech.

It was originally intended to be used by citizens to have freedom to complain about the government without fear of prosecution.
 
There is no free speech at the work place, you know that.

And neither one of us would have tolerated it in our units as well.

But not on mission? Of course we all talked. So are you saying you can't talk about All Muslims As Terrorists off the clock?

I support no regulation that hinders free speech, Mud.

You can talk bad about it all you want, who cares?

I can talk bad about Christianity, who cares?

The Rabbi can talk bad about Judaism, who cares?

And free speech means that I can talk bad about you talking bad about something else.

See how that works?

The Founders were wise.

I work for the government. I cannot be vocal about my anti-terrorist views. They could send me home for 45 days and send me to counseling at EEO.
 
The Founders, if they had film, would have happily gathered with popcorn and root beer to watch Mohammed with one or several of his wives.

You try limiting free speech in our communities, and you will be one unhappy guy.

Yes the Founding Fathers were wise.

But they never envisioned that pornography and insulting religious personages where to be protected by so called free speech.

It was originally intended to be used by citizens to have freedom to complain about the government without fear of prosecution.
 
I would like to go on record right now and exercise my wonderful 1st Amendment rights by stating that muhammed is in fact a FILTHY GOAT FUCKER. Furthermore, I encourage everyone to post muslim jokes, make cartoons insulting muslims and muhammed, and burn as many copies of the koran as you can find.

Unlike dumbocrats, I'll be damned if I'm going to piss on the US Constitution out of FEAR of some sand monkey's. Too many great American's died to grant me my 1st Amendment rights for me to not exercise it.

If any muslims have a problem with what I just stated here - I would like to officially invite you to go fuck yourself. Fuck your religion, fuck your muhammed, and fuck your people. You will NOT oppress us. Ever. Period.

Muslim joke?

Two mothers are sitting in Gaza, looking at photographs. The first mother shows a picture and says "This is my first son, little Mohammed, he was martyred two years ago and killed 7 Jews." The other mother beams "This is my first son, little Mohammed. He was martyred 1 year ago, and killed 9 Jews." The first mother points to a child playing soccer and says, " that is my second son, Ahmed, he is going to be martyred next week, and Allah willing, will kill many Jews." The other mother says "my Ahmed will martyr next month."

The two lean back and sigh in unison, "kids, they blow up so fast these days.."
 
There is no free speech at the work place, you know that.

And neither one of us would have tolerated it in our units as well.

But not on mission? Of course we all talked. So are you saying you can't talk about All Muslims As Terrorists off the clock?

I support no regulation that hinders free speech, Mud.

You can talk bad about it all you want, who cares?

I can talk bad about Christianity, who cares?

The Rabbi can talk bad about Judaism, who cares?

And free speech means that I can talk bad about you talking bad about something else.

See how that works?

The Founders were wise.

I work for the government. I cannot be vocal about my anti-terrorist views. They could send me home for 45 days and send me to counseling at EEO.

During the Olympics the thought police booted out athletes that made the mistake of voicing their opinions on twitter. All it takes is someone bringing it to the committee's attention. Here it hasn't gotten that far yet, but we have been notified that discussing politics, religion, or anything else that someone finds offensive is punishable under UCMJ. Even civilians.
 
Last edited:
Yes the Founding Fathers were wise.

But they never envisioned that pornography and insulting religious personages where to be protected by so called free speech.

It was originally intended to be used by citizens to have freedom to complain about the government without fear of prosecution.

Did you realize the building in your Avatar was originally a Christian church?
 
Yes the Founding Fathers were wise.

But they never envisioned that pornography and insulting religious personages where to be protected by so called free speech.

Yes, actually they did. In fact, Jefferson was accused of blasphemy for editing the Bible.

It was originally intended to be used by citizens to have freedom to complain about the government without fear of prosecution.

Was originally intended to be used by citizens to say whatever they liked.
 
Martial law has been imposed on civilians where you work?

Offensive speech is not protected speech in the work place.
There is no free speech at the work place, you know that.

And neither one of us would have tolerated it in our units as well.

But not on mission? Of course we all talked. So are you saying you can't talk about All Muslims As Terrorists off the clock?

I work for the government. I cannot be vocal about my anti-terrorist views. They could send me home for 45 days and send me to counseling at EEO.

During the Olympics the thought police booted out athletes that made the mistake of voicing their opinions on twitter. All it takes is someone bringing it to the committee's attention. Here it hasn't gotten that far yet, but we have been notified that discussing politics, religion, or anything else that someone finds offensive is punishable under UCMJ. Even civilians.
 
Not quite, bripat, but, yes,you are more right than Sunni Man, though I consider both of you outright loons.

Yes the Founding Fathers were wise.

But they never envisioned that pornography and insulting religious personages where to be protected by so called free speech.

Yes, actually they did. In fact, Jefferson was accused of blasphemy for editing the Bible.

It was originally intended to be used by citizens to have freedom to complain about the government without fear of prosecution.

Was originally intended to be used by citizens to say whatever they liked.
 
Not quite, bripat, but, yes,you are more right than Sunni Man, though I consider both of you outright loons.

Yes the Founding Fathers were wise.

But they never envisioned that pornography and insulting religious personages where to be protected by so called free speech.

Yes, actually they did. In fact, Jefferson was accused of blasphemy for editing the Bible.

It was originally intended to be used by citizens to have freedom to complain about the government without fear of prosecution.

Was originally intended to be used by citizens to say whatever they liked.

82f292a22966b857d968fb578ccbead9Moron_Button.jpg
 
Our freedoms permit the loons like Matthew, bripat, Sunni Man, etc, their free speech.

Rightfully so, and truly American, for in competition the best speech will win out, and these three will be leading contenders, along with Political Chic and daveman and bigrebnc and Yurt, for the Loony Speech Awards for 2012.
 
Pulling the Islamic Veil over Americas' Eyes


Why would U.S. diplomats apologize to violent Muslims, on of all days 9/11, for America's sacred right of free speech? They were following a new protocol negotiated between Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Saudi-based Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), an alliance of 56 Muslim nations.

In December, Clinton met behind closed doors in Washington with OIC officials to hammer out "mechanisms" for enforcing a U.N. resolution the administration signed to fight "Islamophobia" in America and other Western nations.

The three-day session was closed to the public.

However, the Homeland Security and Defense departments and the FBI have since purged thousands of counterterrorism training materials that Muslim reviewers complained pushed "negative stereotypes" of Islam.

Sanitized material included anything defining jihad as "holy war." In addition, courses on radical Islam have been canceled, and some instructors and trainers have been fired or disciplined.


U.S. Embassy Apologies Reflect Obama's Anti-'Islamophobia' Policy - Investors.com

a phobia is an unreasonable fear of something....

well... do you think our people in the embassy had unreasonable fear? How about the people who died...... did they have nothing to fear?


The truth is no a negative stereotype..... just becasue some are sensitive about how they act and don't want to be called on that.... is bullshit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top