Hillary continues her blame game, says Bernie inflicted "lasting damage" on her campaign

Indeed, because none of today's "conservatives" are actually against "big government..." or something like that....

"Conservative" is this label whose parameters seem to change depending on how the wind's blowing. I think today's Conservatives are no different than those Conservatives during Bush the Dumber, who were no different than Conservatives during Bush the Elder, who were no different than Conservatives during Reagan, who were no different than Conservatives during Nixon, who were no different than Conservatives during Goldwater.

Conservatives are just awful people with even worse ideas and a litany of failed policies in their wake.


IThe House under Newt would've repealed O-Care on day 1.

All these Republicans are the same, they all believe the same things, they all want the same things. The only difference among them is how overt they are about their own racist, dogmatic belief systems.
 
Bernie Sanders, COME ON DOWN....

You're the next contestant on "You Cost Me My Election, You B@st@rd!"

:lmao:
Bwuhahahahahaha!
 
"Conservative" is this label whose parameters seem to change depending on how the wind's blowing. I think today's Conservatives are no different than those Conservatives during Bush the Dumber, who were no different than Conservatives during Bush the Elder, who were no different than Conservatives during Reagan, who were no different than Conservatives during Nixon, who were no different than Conservatives during Goldwate


LOL!!!!


The Reagan/Gingrich crowd was for limited government and proved it, especially when Gringrich put tax and spending cuts on Clinton's desk.

Since 1998, the "conservatives" haven't cut any spending...

and you never noticed....


Anyone who doesn't notice a difference between Bush 41 and Bush 43 is either a sub human incapable of observing reality, or a liar...
 
Conservatives just want to repeal Obamacare because Obama did it.



Indeed, because none of today's "conservatives" are actually against "big government..." or something like that....


The House under Newt would've repealed O-Care on day 1.

The House under Ryan does nothing good for America.

What do these assholes even do? It seems like they just fund raise to stay in office,
 
their own racist,


Why did David Duke get only 3% in a state where Trump got 58% if everyone who voted for Trump is "racist" as you claim??

Don't start applying sound logic to their bullshit.

They lie all day,every day.

Look at their legal defense of the DNC primaries in the lawsuit from Bernie supporters.

They told all of us that it was not rigged...but then in court they said, "Yes, we fucking rigged it, we can do whatever we want."

...and it worked...it's the truth.
 
Has Hillary yet taken any blame herself or her loss? Her identity politics? The many names she has called half of Republican voters? Having on the DNC stage the mothers of black "super predators"?
 
The Reagan/Gingrich crowd was for limited government and proved it, especially when Gringrich put tax and spending cuts on Clinton's desk.

There are at least 5 things wrong with this statement, so let me break them down:

1. Reagan was not for limited government as he increased government spending by 69% from 1981 - 1989
2. The Clinton budget Newt agreed to ended up with $300B more in spending than Conservatives wanted.
3. Clinton raised taxes in 1993, which you Conservatives said would destroy the economy (SPOILER: It didn't)
4. The only tax cut Conservatives passed were the 1997 Capital Gains Tax Cut which caused the dotcom bubble.
5. Clinton vetoed a Conservative tax cut in 1999 that would have erased the nascent surplus. That tax cut would be passed in 2001 and are referred to as The Bush Tax Cuts. The result? The erasing of a surplus, a loss of 460,000 net private sector jobs, an economic collapse, and a doubling of the debt.


Anyone who doesn't notice a difference between Bush 41 and Bush 43 is either a sub human incapable of observing reality, or a liar...

There is no difference. Both were miserable failures who had no right to sit in the Oval Office.
 
What do these assholes even do?


A much better question is WHO TF ARE THEY???


Most of them are JDAACs, Jews disguised as "christians," which should explain everything, assuming you aren't dumb enough to believe a 757 can go 500 mph at ground level with its nose 8 feet off the ground....
 
Reagan was not for limited government as he increased government spending by 69% from 1981 - 1989


No, retard, the Congress does the budget, just as everything you ascribe to Clinton was really from Gingrich. Reagan had to deal with crook House Speaker Jim Wright (d) who went to prison, and your biggest hero ever, former Klansman and KKKing of Pork Dem Senate Majority leader Robert Byrd. Wright and Byrd took Reagan's budget requests and loaded them up with spending.



There is no difference


Your credibility just went to absolute zero....

Bush 41 was the last US President to insist Israel get out of the occupied territories.
 
Last edited:
Has Hillary yet taken any blame herself or her loss? Her identity politics? The many names she has called half of Republican voters? Having on the DNC stage the mothers of black "super predators"?

Of course it's not her fault. She was the perfect candidate and did everything 100% perfectly.

 
No, retard, the Congress does the budget,

Jesus Christ...then you can't say Reagan was for "limited government" since he's the one who signed those budgets. What a fucking loser. Conservatives absolutely refuse to take responsibility for anything.


just as everything you ascribe to Clinton was really from Gingrich

No, it was thanks to the Democratic Congress Clinton had from 1993-1995 that increased taxes, added regulation, and poured money into research and development. Gingrich and the Conservatives passed only one major piece of legislation; welfare reform. Welfare that today Conservatives still complain about despite reforming it 20 years ago. SO what that means is either you all were bullshitting about reforming welfare in the 90's, or you're bullshitting about welfare today. So which is it?


Reagan had to deal with crook House Speaker Jim Wright (d) who went to prison, and your biggest hero ever, former Klansman and KKKing of Pork Dem Senate Majority leader Robery Byrd. Wright and Byrd took Reagan's budget requests and loaded them up with spending.

Reagan didn't have to sign them. But he did. And what pork spending was there, for example? The budget increases were almost entirely in defense, not social spending.


Bush 41 was the last US President to insist Israel get out of the occupied territories.

But did nothing about it. I agree that Israel needs to leave the territories, by the way.
 
What do these assholes even do?


A much better question is WHO TF ARE THEY???


Most of them are JDAACs, Jews disguised as "christians," which should explain everything, assuming you aren't dumb enough to believe a 757 can go 500 mph at ground level with its nose 8 feet off the ground....

I would like to see them represent their constituents. Their interests seem self serving.
 
History shows no real spending increases for Clinton's first six years in office...


Total-Federal-Outlays-1000.jpg
 
Reagan was no conservative. He could have vetoed those budgets. And, his strong desire to grow the military trumped any interest he might have had in smaller government.

Don't you know? Everyone's a Conservative until they're not. Or rather, until the results of their policies become clear that the policies failed. "Conservative" is an ever-moving target.
 
The budget increases were almost entirely in defense, not social spending.


You lie. Defense spending under Reagan never got near the % of the total budget it did under JFK, for example. Your side just lied, and you still parrot those lies...
 

Forum List

Back
Top