Hillary Clinton lost her appeal, order stands to testify on private server and Benghazi emails

asaratis

Uppity Senior Citizen
Gold Supporting Member
Jun 20, 2009
18,663
7,655
390
Stockbridge
After losing an appeal to an order to testify in court about her emails and Benghazi, the untouchable crook is scheduled to be deposed beginning September 9, 2020. Part of her defense in trying to avoid the courts was her ridiculous claim (by her lawyers) that she's too important to be forced to testify. What a putz!

Perhaps she will wear that orange jumpsuit someday.


Clinton had argued that she shouldn't be required to testify because she was a former high-level government official and that the FBI already tried to retrieve her emails. Clinton's lawyers even mentioned some "indisputable right" allowing her not to appear in court, according to Judicial Watch. Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch president, said Clinton's lawyers' petition practically states that "she's too important to have to testify to us." "She's desperate to stop this questioning by Judicial Watch because no one has asked her questions like this before[.] ... We know what the issues are, and the court wants specific questions answered, but now she's seeking this extraordinary emergency intervention to stop us."
 
After losing an appeal to an order to testify in court about her emails and Benghazi, the untouchable crook is scheduled to be deposed beginning September 9, 2020. Part of her defense in trying to avoid the courts was her ridiculous claim (by her lawyers) that she's too important to be forced to testify. What a putz!

Perhaps she will wear that orange jumpsuit someday.


Clinton had argued that she shouldn't be required to testify because she was a former high-level government official and that the FBI already tried to retrieve her emails. Clinton's lawyers even mentioned some "indisputable right" allowing her not to appear in court, according to Judicial Watch. Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch president, said Clinton's lawyers' petition practically states that "she's too important to have to testify to us." "She's desperate to stop this questioning by Judicial Watch because no one has asked her questions like this before[.] ... We know what the issues are, and the court wants specific questions answered, but now she's seeking this extraordinary emergency intervention to stop us."
Wonderful news!
 
After losing an appeal to an order to testify in court about her emails and Benghazi, the untouchable crook is scheduled to be deposed beginning September 9, 2020. Part of her defense in trying to avoid the courts was her ridiculous claim (by her lawyers) that she's too important to be forced to testify. What a putz!

Perhaps she will wear that orange jumpsuit someday.


Clinton had argued that she shouldn't be required to testify because she was a former high-level government official and that the FBI already tried to retrieve her emails. Clinton's lawyers even mentioned some "indisputable right" allowing her not to appear in court, according to Judicial Watch. Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch president, said Clinton's lawyers' petition practically states that "she's too important to have to testify to us." "She's desperate to stop this questioning by Judicial Watch because no one has asked her questions like this before[.] ... We know what the issues are, and the court wants specific questions answered, but now she's seeking this extraordinary emergency intervention to stop us."
Yeah! :muahaha:
 
Are you right wing tools this stupid? Hillary had email - omg the horror. This simple shat sure keeps you fools looking in the wrong direction. Meanwhile your hero and liar in chief uses his position to exoneration the guilty. Seriously do you guys take stupid, play me pills or what.? Seems so.

"What is patriotism? Let us begin with what patriotism is not. It is not patriotic to dodge the draft and to mock war heroes and their families. It is not patriotic to discriminate against active-duty members of the armed forces in one's companies, or to campaign to keep disabled veterans away from one's property. It is not patriotic to compare one's search for sexual partners in New York with the military service in Vietnam that one has dodged. It is not patriotic to avoid paying taxes, especially when American working families do pay. It is not patriotic to ask those working, taxpaying American families to finance one's own presidential campaign, and then to spend their contributions in one's own companies. It is not patriotic to admire foreign dictators. It is not patriotic to cultivate a relationship with Muammar Gaddafi; or to say that Bashar al-Assad and Vladimir Putin are superior leaders. It is not patriotic to call upon Russia to intervene in an American presidential election. It is not patriotic to cite Russian propaganda at rallies." Timothy Snyder

 
I believe Hillary Clinton was absolutely guilty of deliberately mishandling of classified information. I also think she deliberately tried to destroy the subpoenaed evidence AND also deliberately broke the law regarding FOIA. No doubt in my mind about it at all, BUT here's the problem; in order to convict somebody of something in a court of law you gotta have sufficient admissible evidence. Notice those 2 words: 'sufficient' and 'admissible', therein lies the rub and that's where my doubts begin to surface. You gotta have a very strong case to get a Clinton into Court and then convict them, and the Court itself has to be at least non-partisan. I wouldn't bet money that a left-leaning judge will convict her even if enough evidence does exist.

And here's the deal: even if Hillary Clinton gets deposed, she doesn't have to answer any questions. 5th amendment, right? Or she says, "I don't remember that", or "I can't recall", and plays the befuddled old lady who is confused with all this high tech stuff. BS? Sure, no question. I truly believe that she and a number of others ought to see the insides of a prison cell, but in this country you gotta have proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Maybe the current investigations will yield something that we do not yet know, some information or evidence that is useful enough to make a difference. We'll see.

I do hope that the Durham investigation will result in people at least being indicted, but Barr isn't going to do that without enough evidence to win in court. Unlike the democrats, who would use anything whether it is true or not to slime somebody, witness Michael Flynn. But Barr isn't like that, he won't use the power of the DOJ to prosecute a democrat without sufficient, admissible evidence. Nor should he. But here again is another good reason not to vote for Biden, for to do so means a return to the old days when the DOJ becomes a political weapon.
 
Please say it will be televised!
I don't know that federal court proceedings are ever televised. The SCOTUS and District Courts often provide live audio, but no camera's in the court room.
You ruined my day. What about a transcript?
That will certainly be available. Some of the words may be redacted for national security reasons, but the essence of the testimony will available for the public. I'm sure the news hounds are salivating at the thought of being the first to publish the "red hot skinny".
 
After losing an appeal to an order to testify in court about her emails and Benghazi, the untouchable crook is scheduled to be deposed beginning September 9, 2020. Part of her defense in trying to avoid the courts was her ridiculous claim (by her lawyers) that she's too important to be forced to testify. What a putz!

Perhaps she will wear that orange jumpsuit someday.


Clinton had argued that she shouldn't be required to testify because she was a former high-level government official and that the FBI already tried to retrieve her emails. Clinton's lawyers even mentioned some "indisputable right" allowing her not to appear in court, according to Judicial Watch. Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch president, said Clinton's lawyers' petition practically states that "she's too important to have to testify to us." "She's desperate to stop this questioning by Judicial Watch because no one has asked her questions like this before[.] ... We know what the issues are, and the court wants specific questions answered, but now she's seeking this extraordinary emergency intervention to stop us."

Wow, another 33 years.
 
Are you right wing tools this stupid? Hillary had email - omg the horror. This simple shat sure keeps you fools looking in the wrong direction. Meanwhile your hero and liar in chief uses his position to exoneration the guilty. Seriously do you guys take stupid, play me pills or what.? Seems so.

"What is patriotism? Let us begin with what patriotism is not. It is not patriotic to dodge the draft and to mock war heroes and their families. It is not patriotic to discriminate against active-duty members of the armed forces in one's companies, or to campaign to keep disabled veterans away from one's property. It is not patriotic to compare one's search for sexual partners in New York with the military service in Vietnam that one has dodged. It is not patriotic to avoid paying taxes, especially when American working families do pay. It is not patriotic to ask those working, taxpaying American families to finance one's own presidential campaign, and then to spend their contributions in one's own companies. It is not patriotic to admire foreign dictators. It is not patriotic to cultivate a relationship with Muammar Gaddafi; or to say that Bashar al-Assad and Vladimir Putin are superior leaders. It is not patriotic to call upon Russia to intervene in an American presidential election. It is not patriotic to cite Russian propaganda at rallies." Timothy Snyder

dude you are just as sick and deranged as the rest of the democrats...you should explain that stealing is a democrat practice that they have no remorse for or intend to stop...wake up retard
 
Are you right wing tools this stupid? Hillary had email - omg the horror. This simple shat sure keeps you fools looking in the wrong direction. Meanwhile your hero and liar in chief uses his position to exoneration the guilty. Seriously do you guys take stupid, play me pills or what.? Seems so.

"What is patriotism? Let us begin with what patriotism is not. It is not patriotic to dodge the draft and to mock war heroes and their families. It is not patriotic to discriminate against active-duty members of the armed forces in one's companies, or to campaign to keep disabled veterans away from one's property. It is not patriotic to compare one's search for sexual partners in New York with the military service in Vietnam that one has dodged. It is not patriotic to avoid paying taxes, especially when American working families do pay. It is not patriotic to ask those working, taxpaying American families to finance one's own presidential campaign, and then to spend their contributions in one's own companies. It is not patriotic to admire foreign dictators. It is not patriotic to cultivate a relationship with Muammar Gaddafi; or to say that Bashar al-Assad and Vladimir Putin are superior leaders. It is not patriotic to call upon Russia to intervene in an American presidential election. It is not patriotic to cite Russian propaganda at rallies." Timothy Snyder

dude you are just as sick and deranged as the rest of the democrats...you should explain that stealing is a democrat practice that they have no remorse for or intend to stop...wake up retard

REally now. That 3 million fine that Rump had to pay was for double parking, right?
 
Are you right wing tools this stupid? Hillary had email - omg the horror. This simple shat sure keeps you fools looking in the wrong direction. Meanwhile your hero and liar in chief uses his position to exoneration the guilty. Seriously do you guys take stupid, play me pills or what.? Seems so.

"What is patriotism? Let us begin with what patriotism is not. It is not patriotic to dodge the draft and to mock war heroes and their families. It is not patriotic to discriminate against active-duty members of the armed forces in one's companies, or to campaign to keep disabled veterans away from one's property. It is not patriotic to compare one's search for sexual partners in New York with the military service in Vietnam that one has dodged. It is not patriotic to avoid paying taxes, especially when American working families do pay. It is not patriotic to ask those working, taxpaying American families to finance one's own presidential campaign, and then to spend their contributions in one's own companies. It is not patriotic to admire foreign dictators. It is not patriotic to cultivate a relationship with Muammar Gaddafi; or to say that Bashar al-Assad and Vladimir Putin are superior leaders. It is not patriotic to call upon Russia to intervene in an American presidential election. It is not patriotic to cite Russian propaganda at rallies." Timothy Snyder

:trolls:
 

Forum List

Back
Top