Grizz
Gold Member
- Jun 27, 2015
- 2,440
- 312
- 160
What law was that?If she deleted emails, I suspect they were personal and she didn't want to share them. Who cares her daughter stopped taking birth control because she wanted a baby? Or her son in law had to switch to boxers.OMG. Emails! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Just the email scandals that slam into the whacko leftists who bury their head into sand and close their ears. That's all. They make themselves look pitiful.
When in anger, fear, or doubt,
run in circles, scream and shout.
Yes, R-Derp...emails! Emails that by law the people who work for us are required to preserve so we can be sure they aren't doing things that they shouldn't. Emails that Hillary Clinton first hid...and then destroyed. At least 50,000 of her emails...not to mention the emails of her inner circle who's private email exchanges with Clinton have also been destroyed. What these people did is against the law.
If she had done something illegal, then all those GOP investigation' spending taxpayer money over 8,000 dollars a day for years, something would have turned up. If all they did was write about it and nothing happened, then so what? You could instigate a crime through emails, but what kind of crime could you commit that didn't affect anything?
Come on you guys. Start thinking and quit letting conspiracy theorists ruin you're tiny minds.
You DO realize that she did NOT follow the Law?
She did not have the AUTHORITY to "decide" that she could simply set up her own server and use her own system?
The "tiny minds" are those that excuse every stupid thing that this woman does.
.
Another rant by another member of the crazy right wing - what a surprise! Notice people, once again a series of allegations are made without a shred of evidence. The sad thing is this dolt may actually believes it.
Oh, so now you're going to claim that the Clintons haven't taken in millions in donations to their "foundation"? Let me guess...you actually bought that story from Hillary about how she and Bill were broke when they left the White House? How naive are you, Wry?
Not to mention that only 15 cents goes to the "charity".
Lies parroted like this are the useless grist which sustains the Crazy Right Wing.
In the interest of honesty let's look at the Clinton Global Foundation:
Charity Navigator Profile - Bill Hillary Chelsea Clinton Foundation
Here is a detailed account of the CGF written it seems with neutrality. It is noted that the Crazy Right Winger's source is Rush Limbaugh. Taking the WSJ Editiorial and Rush Limbaugh as his source - which he doesn't disclose - is an example of a series of lies of omission:
Rush Limbaugh says Clinton Foundation spends just 15 percent on charity 85 percent on overhead PunditFact
Charity watchdog Clinton Foundation a slush fund New York Post
The Clinton Foundation Only Spent 10 Percent On Charity In 2013
The Philanthropic Problem with Hillary Clinton s Huge Speaking Fees Nonprofit Quarterly
See?
I can use these sources to "debunk" your "sources"
You can try. I read through them and if the reader critically examines both of our sources they can come to their own conclusion. In all honesty, if you read both yours and my sources, and you have average reading comprehension, you would recognize propaganda and partisan editorials as opinions.
It is my belief you choose to believe the allegations implied in your sources simply because they fit your preconceived prejudices. Try to read past the headlines and put your biases aside, you might learn something.
Obviously you do not, CN won't grade them but if you read the page it paints a sketchy picture of the foundation, sorry.
I believe the "allegations" because everything bout the Clinton's is sleazy at best, disgusting at worst.
I've ben watching them since the 90's so spare me the thinly veiled intellectual aspersions.
Bill and Hillary both disgusting individuals.