Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's never illogical to imagine, but logic is not based on unsupported claims, otherwise known as "cheap talk".In a court of law...and that's presumed innocent. But, logically, yes. Also, logically, her claim is presumed bullshit until supported.Since when does a person have to prove their innocence? Isn't she innocent until proven guilty?
It's illogical to imagine that a 65 year old woman might ever get sick? Make that argument.
It's never illogical to imagine, but logic is not based on unsupported claims, otherwise known as "cheap talk".In a court of law...and that's presumed innocent. But, logically, yes. Also, logically, her claim is presumed bullshit until supported.
It's illogical to imagine that a 65 year old woman might ever get sick? Make that argument.
Logic also means that if the claim is made, the burden is on the claimer to support it. Otherwise it is just as rational to think it's a bullshit claim as it is to believe it.
Cheap talk.
If they have nothing to support her ailment, then it sure is.It's never illogical to imagine, but logic is not based on unsupported claims, otherwise known as "cheap talk".It's illogical to imagine that a 65 year old woman might ever get sick? Make that argument.
Logic also means that if the claim is made, the burden is on the claimer to support it. Otherwise it is just as rational to think it's a bullshit claim as it is to believe it.
Cheap talk.
So it's irrational of the committee not to hold her in contempt. lol
In a court of law...and that's presumed innocent. But, logically, yes. Also, logically, her claim is presumed bullshit until supported.
It's illogical to imagine that a 65 year old woman might ever get sick? Make that argument.
You keep harping on the sick angle when that's merely the precursor to the question why can't she testify when she's well.
It's illogical to imagine that a 65 year old woman might ever get sick? Make that argument.
You keep harping on the sick angle when that's merely the precursor to the question why can't she testify when she's well.
Who said she can't?
If they have nothing to support her ailment, then it sure is.It's never illogical to imagine, but logic is not based on unsupported claims, otherwise known as "cheap talk".
Logic also means that if the claim is made, the burden is on the claimer to support it. Otherwise it is just as rational to think it's a bullshit claim as it is to believe it.
Cheap talk.
So it's irrational of the committee not to hold her in contempt. lol
You keep harping on the sick angle when that's merely the precursor to the question why can't she testify when she's well.
Who said she can't?
Who said she will? I don't see nay press releases stating once better that she would be happy to testify, do you?
If they have nothing to support her ailment, then it sure is.So it's irrational of the committee not to hold her in contempt. lol
She has a doctor's diagnosis and recommendation. Are we now adding the doctors to the conspiracy theory?
You insult yourself with that remark.
Well, what you wrote really has little to do with my post.If they have nothing to support her ailment, then it sure is.So it's irrational of the committee not to hold her in contempt. lol
She has a doctor's diagnosis and recommendation. Are we now adding the doctors to the conspiracy theory?
John Bolton: Hillary Clinton Came Up With 'Diplomatic Illness' To Avoid Benghazi TestimonyBy: Nick Wing
18/12/12
John Bolton, former U.N. ambassador under President George W. Bush, suggested Monday night that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton fabricated a "diplomatic illness" in order to dodge scheduled testimony this week on the Sept. 11 anniversary attack in Benghazi, Libya.
Speaking on Fox News, Bolton claimed "every foreign service officer in every foreign ministry in the world" is familiar with coming up with such "diplomatic illnesses" when they "don't want to go to a meeting or a conference, or an event."
"And this is a diplomatic illness to beat the band," Bolton said of recent news that Clinton had fainted and suffered a concussion over the weekend after earlier battling a stomach virus that resulted in a rare cancellation of an overseas trip. He went on to add that he hoped Clinton wasn't going through anything "serious."
Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, responded to the report by insisting that Clinton not testify as planned on Thursday this week.
Despite Kerry's decision to call forth Clinton's deputies to testify in her place, Bolton said that he believed she'd have to testify at some point on the attack, which claimed the lives of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens.
.....
(Excerpt)
Read more:
John Bolton: Hillary Clinton Came Up With 'Diplomatic Illness' To Avoid Benghazi Testimony
Sounds like a repeat performance of the Vince Foster and Rose Law Firm Billing cover-up.
Who said she can't?
Who said she will? I don't see nay press releases stating once better that she would be happy to testify, do you?
Where have you looked for them?
Who said she will? I don't see nay press releases stating once better that she would be happy to testify, do you?
Where have you looked for them?
Don't get cute it causes your obtuseness to flare up...you have one post it.
Well, what you wrote really has little to do with my post.If they have nothing to support her ailment, then it sure is.
She has a doctor's diagnosis and recommendation. Are we now adding the doctors to the conspiracy theory?
Where have you looked for them?
Don't get cute it causes your obtuseness to flare up...you have one post it.
If you don't look for them how is it of any significance that you haven't seen one?
Actually, it's hearsay because her staff simply said it.Well, what you wrote really has little to do with my post.She has a doctor's diagnosis and recommendation. Are we now adding the doctors to the conspiracy theory?
Jeezus, you said if they have nothing to support her ailment.
She has a doctor's diagnosis and a doctor's recommendation. Is that not 'support'?
Actually, it's hearsay because her staff simply said it.Well, what you wrote really has little to do with my post.
Jeezus, you said if they have nothing to support her ailment.
She has a doctor's diagnosis and a doctor's recommendation. Is that not 'support'?
Let's not forget that she tossed Rice under the bus (and that Rice was too stupid to know that's exactly what was happening).Actually, it's hearsay because her staff simply said it.Jeezus, you said if they have nothing to support her ailment.
She has a doctor's diagnosis and a doctor's recommendation. Is that not 'support'?
It's really all about common sense. She knows what really happened. She also knew the deficiencies even if after the fact, so she knew the report would not be kind.
She's kept an extremeley low profile throught it all.
Then...she's suddenly ill. Okay, shit happens. No hospital visit and all we have are her aides word on her illness. Her illness's longevity is dubious.... at best .... and no offer to testify later.
I don't need a link to tell me what's going on here. Half of the he First Family of Lying...just being itself.
