Hillary and Margaret Sanger

[Redfish]

access to BC is good, access to abortion on demand aimed at limiting the birth rate of those classified as "undesirable" is not. Why is that so hard for you to grasp?

Then why are you attacking Sanger?

She advocated birth control for women.

She didn't advocate for abortion.

she was a racist, Hillary thinks she was wonderful. She founded PP, PP is an abortion mill aimed at minorities.\.

Martin Luther King Jr. admired her the same way that Clinton does.
She founded Planned Parenthood- an organization that has provided free contraceptives and healthcare to millions of women.

No wonder you despise her.

MLK was mistaken or mislead about Sanger and PP. Sanger was a racist and a eugenicist. She, and Hillary, think that certain populations must be controlled by the government. Slave owners and Nazis held those same beliefs, as do today's radical muslims.

So you think you are just smarter than Martin Luther King Jr?

That he was just another one of those black people that are so much more ignorant than you are?

Please- continue to try to sell your message to the African American community that you know more than Martin Luther King Jr.- nothing could help the rejection of the Conservative anti-woman agenda more.

Meanwhile- MLK Jr. comments again


There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts. She, like we, saw the horrifying conditions of ghetto life. Like we, she knew that all of society is poisoned by cancerous slums. Like we, she was a direct actionist - a nonviolent resister. She was willing to accept scorn and abuse until the truth she saw was revealed to the millions. At the turn of the century she went into the slums and set up a birth control clinic, and for this deed she went to jail because she was violating an unjust law. Yet the years have justified her actions. She launched a movement which is obeying a higher law to preserve human life under humane conditions. Margaret Sanger had to commit what was then called a crime in order to enrich humanity, and today we honor her courage and vision; for without them there would have been no beginning. Our sure beginning in the struggle for equality by nonviolent direct action may not have been so resolute without the tradition established by Margaret Sanger and people like her. Negroes have no mere academic nor ordinary interest in family planning. They have a special and urgent concern.

when he said that, PP had not yet become an abortion mill that specialized in killing unborn black babies.

 

[Redfish]

access to BC is good, access to abortion on demand aimed at limiting the birth rate of those classified as "undesirable" is not. Why is that so hard for you to grasp?

Then why are you attacking Sanger?

She advocated birth control for women.

She didn't advocate for abortion.

she was a racist, Hillary thinks she was wonderful. She founded PP, PP is an abortion mill aimed at minorities.

If Sanger lived today she would be an abortion advocate. Virtually no one advocated for abortion when she lived,,,,,,, those were much saner times in many ways.

So, regardless of your idiotic vies on Planned Parenthood, when it comes down to Margaret Sanger your big problem with her is her advocacy for abortion?

Who is feeding you "facts"?

wrong, its her racial eugenics and her beliefs that some people should not be ALLOWED to reproduce. The Nazis held the same beliefs.

Once again, where is all this racism? How did Sanger victimize blacks?

where have you been? that question has been answered many times already.

 

[Jack4jill]

Then why are you attacking Sanger?

She advocated birth control for women.

She didn't advocate for abortion.

she was a racist, Hillary thinks she was wonderful. She founded PP, PP is an abortion mill aimed at minorities.

If Sanger lived today she would be an abortion advocate. Virtually no one advocated for abortion when she lived,,,,,,, those were much saner times in many ways.

So, regardless of your idiotic vies on Planned Parenthood, when it comes down to Margaret Sanger your big problem with her is her advocacy for abortion?

Who is feeding you "facts"?

wrong, its her racial eugenics and her beliefs that some people should not be ALLOWED to reproduce. The Nazis held the same beliefs.

Once again, where is all this racism? How did Sanger victimize blacks?

where have you been? that question has been answered many times already.

Sanger wanted to eliminate white people, she gave them birth control.

 

[Jack4jill]

Then why are you attacking Sanger?

She advocated birth control for women.

She didn't advocate for abortion.

she was a racist, Hillary thinks she was wonderful. She founded PP, PP is an abortion mill aimed at minorities.\.

Martin Luther King Jr. admired her the same way that Clinton does.
She founded Planned Parenthood- an organization that has provided free contraceptives and healthcare to millions of women.

No wonder you despise her.

MLK was mistaken or mislead about Sanger and PP. Sanger was a racist and a eugenicist. She, and Hillary, think that certain populations must be controlled by the government. Slave owners and Nazis held those same beliefs, as do today's radical muslims.

So you think you are just smarter than Martin Luther King Jr?

That he was just another one of those black people that are so much more ignorant than you are?

Please- continue to try to sell your message to the African American community that you know more than Martin Luther King Jr.- nothing could help the rejection of the Conservative anti-woman agenda more.

Meanwhile- MLK Jr. comments again


There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts. She, like we, saw the horrifying conditions of ghetto life. Like we, she knew that all of society is poisoned by cancerous slums. Like we, she was a direct actionist - a nonviolent resister. She was willing to accept scorn and abuse until the truth she saw was revealed to the millions. At the turn of the century she went into the slums and set up a birth control clinic, and for this deed she went to jail because she was violating an unjust law. Yet the years have justified her actions. She launched a movement which is obeying a higher law to preserve human life under humane conditions. Margaret Sanger had to commit what was then called a crime in order to enrich humanity, and today we honor her courage and vision; for without them there would have been no beginning. Our sure beginning in the struggle for equality by nonviolent direct action may not have been so resolute without the tradition established by Margaret Sanger and people like her. Negroes have no mere academic nor ordinary interest in family planning. They have a special and urgent concern.

when he said that, PP had not yet become an abortion mill that specialized in killing unborn black babies.

It doesn't specialize, it's just good at it. More birth control, fewer abortions, just as Sanger preached.

 

[Redfish]

she was a racist, Hillary thinks she was wonderful. She founded PP, PP is an abortion mill aimed at minorities.\.

Martin Luther King Jr. admired her the same way that Clinton does.
She founded Planned Parenthood- an organization that has provided free contraceptives and healthcare to millions of women.

No wonder you despise her.

MLK was mistaken or mislead about Sanger and PP. Sanger was a racist and a eugenicist. She, and Hillary, think that certain populations must be controlled by the government. Slave owners and Nazis held those same beliefs, as do today's radical muslims.

So you think you are just smarter than Martin Luther King Jr?

That he was just another one of those black people that are so much more ignorant than you are?

Please- continue to try to sell your message to the African American community that you know more than Martin Luther King Jr.- nothing could help the rejection of the Conservative anti-woman agenda more.

Meanwhile- MLK Jr. comments again


There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts. She, like we, saw the horrifying conditions of ghetto life. Like we, she knew that all of society is poisoned by cancerous slums. Like we, she was a direct actionist - a nonviolent resister. She was willing to accept scorn and abuse until the truth she saw was revealed to the millions. At the turn of the century she went into the slums and set up a birth control clinic, and for this deed she went to jail because she was violating an unjust law. Yet the years have justified her actions. She launched a movement which is obeying a higher law to preserve human life under humane conditions. Margaret Sanger had to commit what was then called a crime in order to enrich humanity, and today we honor her courage and vision; for without them there would have been no beginning. Our sure beginning in the struggle for equality by nonviolent direct action may not have been so resolute without the tradition established by Margaret Sanger and people like her. Negroes have no mere academic nor ordinary interest in family planning. They have a special and urgent concern.

when he said that, PP had not yet become an abortion mill that specialized in killing unborn black babies.

It doesn't specialize, it's just good at it. More birth control, fewer abortions, just as Sanger preached.

funny, you obviously have not listened to the news for the last few years. PP is an abortion mill and then they sell the body parts. It may not have been that when Sanger started it, but it is today.

Sanger wanted to reduce the birth rate of people she considered inferior or "human weeds".

 

[Redfish]

she was a racist, Hillary thinks she was wonderful. She founded PP, PP is an abortion mill aimed at minorities.

If Sanger lived today she would be an abortion advocate. Virtually no one advocated for abortion when she lived,,,,,,, those were much saner times in many ways.

So, regardless of your idiotic vies on Planned Parenthood, when it comes down to Margaret Sanger your big problem with her is her advocacy for abortion?

Who is feeding you "facts"?

wrong, its her racial eugenics and her beliefs that some people should not be ALLOWED to reproduce. The Nazis held the same beliefs.

Once again, where is all this racism? How did Sanger victimize blacks?

where have you been? that question has been answered many times already.

Sanger wanted to eliminate white people, she gave them birth control.

only white people that SHE considered inferior. Why can't you lefties understand that?

 

[Jack4jill]

So, regardless of your idiotic vies on Planned Parenthood, when it comes down to Margaret Sanger your big problem with her is her advocacy for abortion?

Who is feeding you "facts"?

wrong, its her racial eugenics and her beliefs that some people should not be ALLOWED to reproduce. The Nazis held the same beliefs.

Once again, where is all this racism? How did Sanger victimize blacks?

where have you been? that question has been answered many times already.

Sanger wanted to eliminate white people, she gave them birth control.

only white people that SHE considered inferior. Why can't you lefties understand that?

Nah, Your kind thinks anyone she gave birth control she wanted to eliminate.

She was pro-life, yet you call her Hitler.

 

[Jack4jill]

Martin Luther King Jr. admired her the same way that Clinton does.
She founded Planned Parenthood- an organization that has provided free contraceptives and healthcare to millions of women.

No wonder you despise her.

MLK was mistaken or mislead about Sanger and PP. Sanger was a racist and a eugenicist. She, and Hillary, think that certain populations must be controlled by the government. Slave owners and Nazis held those same beliefs, as do today's radical muslims.

So you think you are just smarter than Martin Luther King Jr?

That he was just another one of those black people that are so much more ignorant than you are?

Please- continue to try to sell your message to the African American community that you know more than Martin Luther King Jr.- nothing could help the rejection of the Conservative anti-woman agenda more.

Meanwhile- MLK Jr. comments again


There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts. She, like we, saw the horrifying conditions of ghetto life. Like we, she knew that all of society is poisoned by cancerous slums. Like we, she was a direct actionist - a nonviolent resister. She was willing to accept scorn and abuse until the truth she saw was revealed to the millions. At the turn of the century she went into the slums and set up a birth control clinic, and for this deed she went to jail because she was violating an unjust law. Yet the years have justified her actions. She launched a movement which is obeying a higher law to preserve human life under humane conditions. Margaret Sanger had to commit what was then called a crime in order to enrich humanity, and today we honor her courage and vision; for without them there would have been no beginning. Our sure beginning in the struggle for equality by nonviolent direct action may not have been so resolute without the tradition established by Margaret Sanger and people like her. Negroes have no mere academic nor ordinary interest in family planning. They have a special and urgent concern.

when he said that, PP had not yet become an abortion mill that specialized in killing unborn black babies.

It doesn't specialize, it's just good at it. More birth control, fewer abortions, just as Sanger preached.

funny, you obviously have not listened to the news for the last few years. PP is an abortion mill and then they sell the body parts. It may not have been that when Sanger started it, but it is today.

Sanger wanted to reduce the birth rate of people she considered inferior or "human weeds".

Sanger never said human weeds. Stop lying.

 

[Redfish]

wrong, its her racial eugenics and her beliefs that some people should not be ALLOWED to reproduce. The Nazis held the same beliefs.

Once again, where is all this racism? How did Sanger victimize blacks?

where have you been? that question has been answered many times already.

Sanger wanted to eliminate white people, she gave them birth control.

only white people that SHE considered inferior. Why can't you lefties understand that?

Nah, Your kind thinks anyone she gave birth control she wanted to eliminate.

She was pro-life, yet you call her Hitler.

In her time everyone was pro-life, abortion was illegal. Read her words, she wanted to find ways to reduce the birth rate of humans that she considered undesirable or "human weeds".

If she was alive today she would be running the abortion mill called PP, and you fricken well know it.

 

[Redfish]

MLK was mistaken or mislead about Sanger and PP. Sanger was a racist and a eugenicist. She, and Hillary, think that certain populations must be controlled by the government. Slave owners and Nazis held those same beliefs, as do today's radical muslims.

So you think you are just smarter than Martin Luther King Jr?

That he was just another one of those black people that are so much more ignorant than you are?

Please- continue to try to sell your message to the African American community that you know more than Martin Luther King Jr.- nothing could help the rejection of the Conservative anti-woman agenda more.

Meanwhile- MLK Jr. comments again


There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts. She, like we, saw the horrifying conditions of ghetto life. Like we, she knew that all of society is poisoned by cancerous slums. Like we, she was a direct actionist - a nonviolent resister. She was willing to accept scorn and abuse until the truth she saw was revealed to the millions. At the turn of the century she went into the slums and set up a birth control clinic, and for this deed she went to jail because she was violating an unjust law. Yet the years have justified her actions. She launched a movement which is obeying a higher law to preserve human life under humane conditions. Margaret Sanger had to commit what was then called a crime in order to enrich humanity, and today we honor her courage and vision; for without them there would have been no beginning. Our sure beginning in the struggle for equality by nonviolent direct action may not have been so resolute without the tradition established by Margaret Sanger and people like her. Negroes have no mere academic nor ordinary interest in family planning. They have a special and urgent concern.

when he said that, PP had not yet become an abortion mill that specialized in killing unborn black babies.

It doesn't specialize, it's just good at it. More birth control, fewer abortions, just as Sanger preached.

funny, you obviously have not listened to the news for the last few years. PP is an abortion mill and then they sell the body parts. It may not have been that when Sanger started it, but it is today.

Sanger wanted to reduce the birth rate of people she considered inferior or "human weeds".

Sanger never said human weeds. Stop lying.

that quote has been posted several times already, stop lying.

 

[Jack4jill]

Once again, where is all this racism? How did Sanger victimize blacks?

where have you been? that question has been answered many times already.

Sanger wanted to eliminate white people, she gave them birth control.

only white people that SHE considered inferior. Why can't you lefties understand that?

Nah, Your kind thinks anyone she gave birth control she wanted to eliminate.

She was pro-life, yet you call her Hitler.

In her time everyone was pro-life, abortion was illegal. Read her words, she wanted to find ways to reduce the birth rate of humans that she considered undesirable or "human weeds".

If she was alive today she would be running the abortion mill called PP, and you fricken well know it.

She wasn't pro-life because it was illegal. And she never called anyone a human weed.

 

[Jack4jill]

So you think you are just smarter than Martin Luther King Jr?

That he was just another one of those black people that are so much more ignorant than you are?

Please- continue to try to sell your message to the African American community that you know more than Martin Luther King Jr.- nothing could help the rejection of the Conservative anti-woman agenda more.

Meanwhile- MLK Jr. comments again


There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts. She, like we, saw the horrifying conditions of ghetto life. Like we, she knew that all of society is poisoned by cancerous slums. Like we, she was a direct actionist - a nonviolent resister. She was willing to accept scorn and abuse until the truth she saw was revealed to the millions. At the turn of the century she went into the slums and set up a birth control clinic, and for this deed she went to jail because she was violating an unjust law. Yet the years have justified her actions. She launched a movement which is obeying a higher law to preserve human life under humane conditions. Margaret Sanger had to commit what was then called a crime in order to enrich humanity, and today we honor her courage and vision; for without them there would have been no beginning. Our sure beginning in the struggle for equality by nonviolent direct action may not have been so resolute without the tradition established by Margaret Sanger and people like her. Negroes have no mere academic nor ordinary interest in family planning. They have a special and urgent concern.

when he said that, PP had not yet become an abortion mill that specialized in killing unborn black babies.

It doesn't specialize, it's just good at it. More birth control, fewer abortions, just as Sanger preached.

funny, you obviously have not listened to the news for the last few years. PP is an abortion mill and then they sell the body parts. It may not have been that when Sanger started it, but it is today.

Sanger wanted to reduce the birth rate of people she considered inferior or "human weeds".

Sanger never said human weeds. Stop lying.

that quote has been posted several times already, stop lying.

No, no one can quote Sanger saying that because she never did. Feel free to try but you will discover anyone who does is lying.

 

[Syriusly]

MLK was mistaken or mislead about Sanger and PP. Sanger was a racist and a eugenicist. She, and Hillary, think that certain populations must be controlled by the government. Slave owners and Nazis held those same beliefs, as do today's radical muslims.

So you think you are just smarter than Martin Luther King Jr?

That he was just another one of those black people that are so much more ignorant than you are?

Please- continue to try to sell your message to the African American community that you know more than Martin Luther King Jr.- nothing could help the rejection of the Conservative anti-woman agenda more.

Meanwhile- MLK Jr. comments again


There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts. She, like we, saw the horrifying conditions of ghetto life. Like we, she knew that all of society is poisoned by cancerous slums. Like we, she was a direct actionist - a nonviolent resister. She was willing to accept scorn and abuse until the truth she saw was revealed to the millions. At the turn of the century she went into the slums and set up a birth control clinic, and for this deed she went to jail because she was violating an unjust law. Yet the years have justified her actions. She launched a movement which is obeying a higher law to preserve human life under humane conditions. Margaret Sanger had to commit what was then called a crime in order to enrich humanity, and today we honor her courage and vision; for without them there would have been no beginning. Our sure beginning in the struggle for equality by nonviolent direct action may not have been so resolute without the tradition established by Margaret Sanger and people like her. Negroes have no mere academic nor ordinary interest in family planning. They have a special and urgent concern.

when he said that, PP had not yet become an abortion mill that specialized in killing unborn black babies.

It doesn't specialize, it's just good at it. More birth control, fewer abortions, just as Sanger preached.

funny, you obviously have not listened to the news for the last few years. PP is an abortion mill and then they sell the body parts. It may not have been that when Sanger started it, but it is today.

Sanger wanted to reduce the birth rate of people she considered inferior or "human weeds".

Sanger never said human weeds. Stop lying.

If Redfish stopped posting lies, he wouldn't have anything to post.

 

[Jack4jill]

So you think you are just smarter than Martin Luther King Jr?

That he was just another one of those black people that are so much more ignorant than you are?

Please- continue to try to sell your message to the African American community that you know more than Martin Luther King Jr.- nothing could help the rejection of the Conservative anti-woman agenda more.

Meanwhile- MLK Jr. comments again


There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts. She, like we, saw the horrifying conditions of ghetto life. Like we, she knew that all of society is poisoned by cancerous slums. Like we, she was a direct actionist - a nonviolent resister. She was willing to accept scorn and abuse until the truth she saw was revealed to the millions. At the turn of the century she went into the slums and set up a birth control clinic, and for this deed she went to jail because she was violating an unjust law. Yet the years have justified her actions. She launched a movement which is obeying a higher law to preserve human life under humane conditions. Margaret Sanger had to commit what was then called a crime in order to enrich humanity, and today we honor her courage and vision; for without them there would have been no beginning. Our sure beginning in the struggle for equality by nonviolent direct action may not have been so resolute without the tradition established by Margaret Sanger and people like her. Negroes have no mere academic nor ordinary interest in family planning. They have a special and urgent concern.

when he said that, PP had not yet become an abortion mill that specialized in killing unborn black babies.

It doesn't specialize, it's just good at it. More birth control, fewer abortions, just as Sanger preached.

funny, you obviously have not listened to the news for the last few years. PP is an abortion mill and then they sell the body parts. It may not have been that when Sanger started it, but it is today.

Sanger wanted to reduce the birth rate of people she considered inferior or "human weeds".

Sanger never said human weeds. Stop lying.

If Redfish stopped posting lies, he wouldn't have anything to post.

So it seems? I hate dishonest anti-abortion types.

 

[Syriusly]

Martin Luther King Jr. admired her the same way that Clinton does.
She founded Planned Parenthood- an organization that has provided free contraceptives and healthcare to millions of women.

No wonder you despise her.

MLK was mistaken or mislead about Sanger and PP. Sanger was a racist and a eugenicist. She, and Hillary, think that certain populations must be controlled by the government. Slave owners and Nazis held those same beliefs, as do today's radical muslims.

So you think you are just smarter than Martin Luther King Jr?

That he was just another one of those black people that are so much more ignorant than you are?

Please- continue to try to sell your message to the African American community that you know more than Martin Luther King Jr.- nothing could help the rejection of the Conservative anti-woman agenda more.

Meanwhile- MLK Jr. comments again


There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts. She, like we, saw the horrifying conditions of ghetto life. Like we, she knew that all of society is poisoned by cancerous slums. Like we, she was a direct actionist - a nonviolent resister. She was willing to accept scorn and abuse until the truth she saw was revealed to the millions. At the turn of the century she went into the slums and set up a birth control clinic, and for this deed she went to jail because she was violating an unjust law. Yet the years have justified her actions. She launched a movement which is obeying a higher law to preserve human life under humane conditions. Margaret Sanger had to commit what was then called a crime in order to enrich humanity, and today we honor her courage and vision; for without them there would have been no beginning. Our sure beginning in the struggle for equality by nonviolent direct action may not have been so resolute without the tradition established by Margaret Sanger and people like her. Negroes have no mere academic nor ordinary interest in family planning. They have a special and urgent concern.

when he said that, PP had not yet become an abortion mill that specialized in killing unborn black babies.

It doesn't specialize, it's just good at it. More birth control, fewer abortions, just as Sanger preached.

funny, you obviously have not listened to the news for the last few years. PP is an abortion mill

I don't listen to Fox News, so I don't suck up all the right wing lies.

Remember- you are the one who is convinced you know more than Martin Luther King Jr.

That he was just another one of those black people that are so much more ignorant than you are?

Please- continue to try to sell your message to the African American community that you know more than Martin Luther King Jr.- nothing could help the rejection of the Conservative anti-woman agenda more.

Meanwhile- MLK Jr. comments again


There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts. She, like we, saw the horrifying conditions of ghetto life. Like we, she knew that all of society is poisoned by cancerous slums. Like we, she was a direct actionist - a nonviolent resister. She was willing to accept scorn and abuse until the truth she saw was revealed to the millions. At the turn of the century she went into the slums and set up a birth control clinic, and for this deed she went to jail because she was violating an unjust law. Yet the years have justified her actions. She launched a movement which is obeying a higher law to preserve human life under humane conditions. Margaret Sanger had to commit what was then called a crime in order to enrich humanity, and today we honor her courage and vision; for without them there would have been no beginning. Our sure beginning in the struggle for equality by nonviolent direct action may not have been so resolute without the tradition established by Margaret Sanger and people like her. Negroes have no mere academic nor ordinary interest in family planning. They have a special and urgent concern

 

[Syriusly]

Then why are you attacking Sanger?

She advocated birth control for women.

She didn't advocate for abortion.

she was a racist, Hillary thinks she was wonderful. She founded PP, PP is an abortion mill aimed at minorities.\.

Martin Luther King Jr. admired her the same way that Clinton does.
She founded Planned Parenthood- an organization that has provided free contraceptives and healthcare to millions of women.

No wonder you despise her.

MLK was mistaken or mislead about Sanger and PP. Sanger was a racist and a eugenicist. She, and Hillary, think that certain populations must be controlled by the government. Slave owners and Nazis held those same beliefs, as do today's radical muslims.

So you think you are just smarter than Martin Luther King Jr?

That he was just another one of those black people that are so much more ignorant than you are?

Please- continue to try to sell your message to the African American community that you know more than Martin Luther King Jr.- nothing could help the rejection of the Conservative anti-woman agenda more.

Meanwhile- MLK Jr. comments again


There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts. She, like we, saw the horrifying conditions of ghetto life. Like we, she knew that all of society is poisoned by cancerous slums. Like we, she was a direct actionist - a nonviolent resister. She was willing to accept scorn and abuse until the truth she saw was revealed to the millions. At the turn of the century she went into the slums and set up a birth control clinic, and for this deed she went to jail because she was violating an unjust law. Yet the years have justified her actions. She launched a movement which is obeying a higher law to preserve human life under humane conditions. Margaret Sanger had to commit what was then called a crime in order to enrich humanity, and today we honor her courage and vision; for without them there would have been no beginning. Our sure beginning in the struggle for equality by nonviolent direct action may not have been so resolute without the tradition established by Margaret Sanger and people like her. Negroes have no mere academic nor ordinary interest in family planning. They have a special and urgent concern.

when he said that, PP had not yet become an abortion mill that specialized in killing unborn black babies.

And Planned Parenthood still isn't, despite the right wing lies.

Remember- your very first post- the OP- started with a lie by you.

And you just continue on in your tradition of lying.

 

[Syriusly]

If you knew what a negative eugenist is, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

In her works; The Pivot of Civilization, she wrote this:
The emergency problem of segregation and sterilization must be faced immediately. Every feeble-minded girl or woman of the hereditary type, especially of the moron class, should be segregated during the reproductive period. Otherwise, she is almost certain to bear imbecile children, who in turn are just as certain to breed other defectives. The male defectives are no less dangerous. Segregation carried out for one or two generations would give us only partial control of the problem. Moreover, when we realize that each feeble-minded person is a potential source of an endless progeny of defect, we prefer the policy of immediate sterilization, of making sure that parenthood is absolutely prohibited to the feeble-minded.

"we prefer the policy of immediate sterlization of the feeble minded- 'of the heriditary type.

If you knew what a negative eugenist is, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

In her works; The Pivot of Civilization, she wrote this:
The emergency problem of segregation and sterilization must be faced immediately. Every feeble-minded girl or woman of the hereditary type, especially of the moron class, should be segregated during the reproductive period. Otherwise, she is almost certain to bear imbecile children, who in turn are just as certain to breed other defectives. The male defectives are no less dangerous. Segregation carried out for one or two generations would give us only partial control of the problem. Moreover, when we realize that each feeble-minded person is a potential source of an endless progeny of defect, we prefer the policy of immediate sterilization, of making sure that parenthood is absolutely prohibited to the feeble-minded.

Oh you mean the same chapter of the same book where she says Eugenists don't have the answer?

But in its so-called "constructive" aspect, in seeking to reestablish the dominance of healthy strain over the unhealthy, by urging an increased birth-rate among the fit, the Eugenists really offer nothing more farsighted than a "cradle competition" between the fit and the unfit. They suggest in very truth, that all intelligent and respectable parents should take as their example in this grave matter of child-bearing the most irresponsible elements in the community.

Article 8. Feeble-minded persons, habitual congenital criminals, those afflicted with inheritable disease, and others found biologically unfit by authorities qualified to judge should be sterilized or, in cases of doubt, should be so isolated as to prevent the perpetuation of their afflictions by breeding. I do not pretend in the above suggestions to have arrived at the formulation of a workable baby code, but my puzzling over the problem has convinced me that America needs such a code. I should be very much interested in hearing the suggestions of others.

The Public Papers of Margaret Sanger: Web Edition[/Q

I wonder if our liberal posters realize that many of them would never have been born if Sanger's policies had been adopted.

Many of Sanger's policies were adopted.

Which is why women have access to birth control today, and free or reduced healthcare costs at Planned Parenthood.

so, you are saying that the people that PP gives BC pills and free abortions to are undesirables who should not be allowed to reproduce?

So, you are saying that you don't want people to have access to birth control, or women to control their own reproduction and that you don't want the government to prevent women from having safe abortions?

 

[Papageorgio]

This from one of her many papers, the link and all.

Article 8. Feeble-minded persons, habitual congenital criminals, those afflicted with inheritable disease, and others found biologically unfit by authorities qualified to judge should be sterilized or, in cases of doubt, should be so isolated as to prevent the perpetuation of their afflictions by breeding. I do not pretend in the above suggestions to have arrived at the formulation of a workable baby code, but my puzzling over the problem has convinced me that America needs such a code. I should be very much interested in hearing the suggestions of others.

The Public Papers of Margaret Sanger: Web Edition


Anyone besides the nutters still think she wasn't for forced sterilization?

 

[Syriusly]

This from one of her many papers, the link and all.

Article 8. Feeble-minded persons, habitual congenital criminals, those afflicted with inheritable disease, and others found biologically unfit by authorities qualified to judge should be sterilized or, in cases of doubt, should be so isolated as to prevent the perpetuation of their afflictions by breeding. I do not pretend in the above suggestions to have arrived at the formulation of a workable baby code, but my puzzling over the problem has convinced me that America needs such a code. I should be very much interested in hearing the suggestions of others.

The Public Papers of Margaret Sanger: Web Edition


Anyone besides the nutters still think she wasn't for forced sterilization?

The nutters choose to ignore Margaret Sanger's own words saying she wasn't for forced sterlization

1951
From various of her many papers- link and all
he program in this country at least, does not involve compulsory features. No one here proposes that some official be endowed with the authority to order anyone to be sterilized. What we do contend for is the right of the individual to know what sterilization would mean to him or her, to have the facilities for: the operation if desired and to be protected in life afterwards.
The Public Papers of Margaret Sanger: Web Edition

1926
It now remains for the United States government to set a sensible example to the world by offering a bonus or a yearly pension to all obviously unfit parents who allow themselves to be sterilized by harmless and scientific means. In this way the moron and the diseased would have no posterity to inherit their unhappy condition. The number of the feebleminded would decrease and a heavy burden would be lifted from the shoulders of the fit.

1932
(e) to insure the country against future burdens of maintenance for numerous offspring as may be born of feeble-minded parents, the government would pension all persons with transmissible disease who voluntarily consent to sterilization.

1934
“I think California has the best law on sterilization and one that has been working over a period of five years,” she said. “It is one that can be followed with the greatest security for anyone who has fears of being taken advantage of. It goes hand in hand with an educational campaign for those who should be and are to be sterilized. Results are that there are more demands in California for sterilization by persons who are made to realize the benefit and why they should be, than can be met.


Meanwhile does anyone doubt that the reason why the OP started this thread was because he despises Margaret Sanger for promoting women's rights?

 

[Papageorgio]

This from one of her many papers, the link and all.

Article 8. Feeble-minded persons, habitual congenital criminals, those afflicted with inheritable disease, and others found biologically unfit by authorities qualified to judge should be sterilized or, in cases of doubt, should be so isolated as to prevent the perpetuation of their afflictions by breeding. I do not pretend in the above suggestions to have arrived at the formulation of a workable baby code, but my puzzling over the problem has convinced me that America needs such a code. I should be very much interested in hearing the suggestions of others.

The Public Papers of Margaret Sanger: Web Edition


Anyone besides the nutters still think she wasn't for forced sterilization?

The nutters choose to ignore Margaret Sanger's own words saying she wasn't for forced sterlization

1951
From various of her many papers- link and all
he program in this country at least, does not involve compulsory features. No one here proposes that some official be endowed with the authority to order anyone to be sterilized. What we do contend for is the right of the individual to know what sterilization would mean to him or her, to have the facilities for: the operation if desired and to be protected in life afterwards.
The Public Papers of Margaret Sanger: Web Edition

1926
It now remains for the United States government to set a sensible example to the world by offering a bonus or a yearly pension to all obviously unfit parents who allow themselves to be sterilized by harmless and scientific means. In this way the moron and the diseased would have no posterity to inherit their unhappy condition. The number of the feebleminded would decrease and a heavy burden would be lifted from the shoulders of the fit.

1932
(e) to insure the country against future burdens of maintenance for numerous offspring as may be born of feeble-minded parents, the government would pension all persons with transmissible disease who voluntarily consent to sterilization.

1934
“I think California has the best law on sterilization and one that has been working over a period of five years,” she said. “It is one that can be followed with the greatest security for anyone who has fears of being taken advantage of. It goes hand in hand with an educational campaign for those who should be and are to be sterilized. Results are that there are more demands in California for sterilization by persons who are made to realize the benefit and why they should be, than can be met.


Meanwhile does anyone doubt that the reason why the OP started this thread was because he despises Margaret Sanger for promoting women's rights?

Then why did she write differently? Are you denying what she said in the link I provided.