Hillary ahead by 15% (!!!) in first fully post-convention poll

[Neotrotsky]

founded in 2016

--LOL

even
Nate Silver says from his Twitter:
"They're new-ish so don't know much about em. "

so he will post results anyway
too funny

 

[jon_berzerk]

founded in 2016

--LOL

even
Nate Silver says from his Twitter says

"They're new-ish so don't know much about em. "

so he will post results anyway
too funny

yeah that is

--LOL

 

[buckeye45_73]

According to Liberals polls didn't count last week. Now all of a sudden they count.

to anyone with a brain, polls have very little bearing on anything at all.
I bet I could take a poll and have Trump winning by over 90%.

No shit, Drudge is an online poll.

 

[Iceweasel]

A new Raba Research poll shows Hillary Clinton defeating Donald Trump by a humongous 15%.

http://www.rabaresearch.com/documents/RABA-Updated-National-Survey-July-2016-2.pdf

I assume that the convention per se isn't the reason Trump is crumbling, but also his ties to Russia's Vladimir Putin.

Fast affordable research huh? They do polling via robocalls and interactive voice software. I don't know about you but I never answer those and nobody with any sense does.

Trump is crumbling? You libtards sling your soiled diapers around and claim victory. It's just shit slinging and you look like complete idiots to think it would work. My dog is smarter than that.

 

[Iceweasel]

It is an internet poll

"956 interviews among voters were conducted July 29, 2016 via internet survey"
non-scientific
Democrats party of science- yeah right



Like your local TV station says
go to our website and vote on something




Democrats desperation is too
funny

but it does look like Queen Hillary has gotten a traditional convention bump
small one so far- which must explains the Democrats desperation to use non-scientific polls


Real Clear Politics
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton- oddly enough RABA is not to be found in the mix
funny that works


RCP Average 7/18 - 7/29 -- -- 43.7 43.3 Clinton +0.4
Reuters/Ipsos 7/25 - 7/29 1050 LV 3.5 40 35 Clinton +5
LA Times/USC 7/23 - 7/29 2188 LV -- 42 47 Trump +5
Rasmussen Reports 7/26 - 7/27 1000 LV 3.0 43 42 Clinton +1
Economist/YouGov 7/23 - 7/24 1057 RV 4.5 47 42 Clinton +5
CNN/ORC 7/22 - 7/24 882 RV 3.5 45 48 Trump +3
CBS News 7/22 - 7/24 1118 RV 4.0 43 44 Trump +1
NBC News/SM 7/18 - 7/24 12931 RV 1.2 46 45 Clinton +1

It is a scientific poll. Unscientific polls are the ones that do not control for race, gender, etc. HuffPo only lists scientific polls, but you pretended that RCP is the only poll aggregator in the world RABA Research (7/29 2016)
HuffPo included RABA

Since when does science conduct research with robo call voice software? Is that how NASA does it now?

 

[Maryland Patriot]

A new Raba Research poll shows Hillary Clinton defeating Donald Trump by a humongous 15%.

http://www.rabaresearch.com/documents/RABA-Updated-National-Survey-July-2016-2.pdf

I assume that the convention per se isn't the reason Trump is crumbling, but also his ties to Russia's Vladimir Putin.

Fast affordable research huh? They do polling via robocalls and interactive voice software. I don't know about you but I never answer those and nobody with any sense does.

Trump is crumbling? You libtards sling your soiled diapers around and claim victory. It's just shit slinging and you look like complete idiots to think it would work. My dog is smarter than that.

and your dog most likely has health care.
Personally, I feel much better paying a vet bill than I do paying for a liberal to see a doctor.

 

[Neotrotsky]

Hillary ahead by 15% (!!!) in first fully post-convention poll

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Op vanished lol

 

[Iceweasel]

A new Raba Research poll shows Hillary Clinton defeating Donald Trump by a humongous 15%.

http://www.rabaresearch.com/documents/RABA-Updated-National-Survey-July-2016-2.pdf

I assume that the convention per se isn't the reason Trump is crumbling, but also his ties to Russia's Vladimir Putin.

Fast affordable research huh? They do polling via robocalls and interactive voice software. I don't know about you but I never answer those and nobody with any sense does.

Trump is crumbling? You libtards sling your soiled diapers around and claim victory. It's just shit slinging and you look like complete idiots to think it would work. My dog is smarter than that.

and your dog most likely has health care.
Personally, I feel much better paying a vet bill than I do paying for a liberal to see a doctor.

I've got it. Let's send libs to the vet. We'll tell them it's the Veterinarian's Administration.

 

[Neotrotsky]

Op vanished lol

 

[Iceweasel]

founded in 2016

--LOL

But they're affordable!

 

[A Perez]

It is an internet poll

"956 interviews among voters were conducted July 29, 2016 via internet survey"
non-scientific
Democrats party of science- yeah right



Like your local TV station says
go to our website and vote on something




Democrats desperation is too
funny

but it does look like Queen Hillary has gotten a traditional convention bump
small one so far- which must explains the Democrats desperation to use non-scientific polls


Real Clear Politics
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton- oddly enough RABA is not to be found in the mix
funny that works


RCP Average 7/18 - 7/29 -- -- 43.7 43.3 Clinton +0.4
Reuters/Ipsos 7/25 - 7/29 1050 LV 3.5 40 35 Clinton +5
LA Times/USC 7/23 - 7/29 2188 LV -- 42 47 Trump +5
Rasmussen Reports 7/26 - 7/27 1000 LV 3.0 43 42 Clinton +1
Economist/YouGov 7/23 - 7/24 1057 RV 4.5 47 42 Clinton +5
CNN/ORC 7/22 - 7/24 882 RV 3.5 45 48 Trump +3
CBS News 7/22 - 7/24 1118 RV 4.0 43 44 Trump +1
NBC News/SM 7/18 - 7/24 12931 RV 1.2 46 45 Clinton +1

It is a scientific poll. Unscientific polls are the ones that do not control for race, gender, etc. HuffPo only lists scientific polls, but you pretended that RCP is the only poll aggregator in the world RABA Research (7/29 2016)
HuffPo included RABA

Since when does science conduct research with robo call voice software? Is that how NASA does it now?

Since when does HuffPo include non-scientific polls in its list? You won't say.
And responding to your answer as to who does robo-calls: Team Aiona responds to results of Rasmussen's robo-call polling > Hawaii Free Press

 

[A Perez]

According to Liberals polls didn't count last week. Now all of a sudden they count.

to anyone with a brain, polls have very little bearing on anything at all.
I bet I could take a poll and have Trump winning by over 90%.

No shit, Drudge is an online poll.

does Druge control for gender, race, etc.?

 

[Fang]

According to Liberals polls didn't count last week. Now all of a sudden they count.

to anyone with a brain, polls have very little bearing on anything at all.
I bet I could take a poll and have Trump winning by over 90%.

I just took a poll in my hotel. Hillary won with 75% of the vote.

 

[A Perez]

founded in 2016

--LOL

even
Nate Silver says from his Twitter:
"They're new-ish so don't know much about em. "

so he will post results anyway
too funny

did Nate say anything about whether it's scientific or not? You're losing this one, my friend.
We're not discussing new-ish vs. old-ish. We're discussing scientific vs. unscientific.

 

[A Perez]

According to Liberals polls didn't count last week. Now all of a sudden they count.

"Liberals" didn't say that. You made that up.

 

[Neotrotsky]

Nate Silver-
no he admitted he knew nothing about them


Dude
the poll sucks
give it a rest

 

[A Perez]

no he admitted he knew nothing about them
Dude
the poll sucks
give it a rest

No? Thanks for the answer.

 

[Iceweasel]

It is an internet poll

"956 interviews among voters were conducted July 29, 2016 via internet survey"
non-scientific
Democrats party of science- yeah right



Like your local TV station says
go to our website and vote on something




Democrats desperation is too
funny

but it does look like Queen Hillary has gotten a traditional convention bump
small one so far- which must explains the Democrats desperation to use non-scientific polls


Real Clear Politics
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton- oddly enough RABA is not to be found in the mix
funny that works


RCP Average 7/18 - 7/29 -- -- 43.7 43.3 Clinton +0.4
Reuters/Ipsos 7/25 - 7/29 1050 LV 3.5 40 35 Clinton +5
LA Times/USC 7/23 - 7/29 2188 LV -- 42 47 Trump +5
Rasmussen Reports 7/26 - 7/27 1000 LV 3.0 43 42 Clinton +1
Economist/YouGov 7/23 - 7/24 1057 RV 4.5 47 42 Clinton +5
CNN/ORC 7/22 - 7/24 882 RV 3.5 45 48 Trump +3
CBS News 7/22 - 7/24 1118 RV 4.0 43 44 Trump +1
NBC News/SM 7/18 - 7/24 12931 RV 1.2 46 45 Clinton +1

It is a scientific poll. Unscientific polls are the ones that do not control for race, gender, etc. HuffPo only lists scientific polls, but you pretended that RCP is the only poll aggregator in the world RABA Research (7/29 2016)
HuffPo included RABA

Since when does science conduct research with robo call voice software? Is that how NASA does it now?

Since when does HuffPo include non-scientific polls in its list? You won't say.
And responding to your answer as to who does robo-calls: Team Aiona responds to results of Rasmussen's robo-call polling > Hawaii Free Press

The fact that it's on HuffPo doesn't impress, sorry. Rasmussen doesn't mean much to me either, he got out of the game a while back, I have no idea how it's run now.

 

[konradv]

All three of Nate Silver's methods have Hillary in the lead.

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#now
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#plus

What a difference a week makes!