Hilary...has always been a liar, and corrupt...since she worked on Watergate...and was fired...

[2aguy]

Yes...hilary is corrupt through and through......

Hillary Clinton fired for lies unethical behavior

The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

********************************************

“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.

The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.

 

[jknowgood]

We need Obama to secretly release it to the press. Liberal media won't touch it without Obama's permission.

 

[Pogo]

Yes...hilary is corrupt through and through......

Hillary Clinton fired for lies unethical behavior

The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

********************************************

“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.

The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.

Ah good. Today's viral e-mail mythology.

>> The notion Hillary Clinton was fired by Jerry Zeifman for "lying" and "unethical behavior" has circulated across social media and in e-mails for years. The belief that Clinton's early career was marked by this buried scandal is widespread, but is there any merit to the claim?

By Zeifman's own admission there is not. Statements made by Zeifman himself contradict the claim he fired Hillary Clinton. During a 1998 interview with the Sacramento Bee in which he discussed his work with Clinton on Watergate, Zeifman not only stated he hadn't fired her, but he didn't even have the authority to fire her << -- Snopes
​

Search took 0.76 seconds.
Not only debunked but debunked seventeen years ago.

What the fuck is it with you asshats who traffic in easily-debunked mythology thinking you can rewrite history?

Really, how do you imagine it's going to work? Essplain your thought process. I just don't get it.

Yes.... somebody here is corrupt through and through but it ain't "hilary" [sic].

/thread

 

[jwoodie]

Here is the plan for Hillary's Email-gate: The State Dept. will announce that it has misplaced Form 109 and Hillary will announce that she can't remember if she signed one. (Remember the phony bump on the head/facelift?) This sets up a clever legal argument that there is a 50/50 probability that she either signed or didn't sign it. As a result, there will not be a preponderance of evidence necessary to prosecute her for either criminal act.

Is this a great country or what!

 

[2aguy]

Yes...hilary is corrupt through and through......

Hillary Clinton fired for lies unethical behavior

The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

********************************************

“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.

The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.

Ah good. Today's viral e-mail mythology.

>> The notion Hillary Clinton was fired by Jerry Zeifman for "lying" and "unethical behavior" has circulated across social media and in e-mails for years. The belief that Clinton's early career was marked by this buried scandal is widespread, but is there any merit to the claim?

By Zeifman's own admission there is not. Statements made by Zeifman himself contradict the claim he fired Hillary Clinton. During a 1998 interview with the Sacramento Bee in which he discussed his work with Clinton on Watergate, Zeifman not only stated he hadn't fired her, but he didn't even have the authority to fire her << -- Snopes
​

Search took 0.76 seconds.
Not only debunked but debunked seventeen years ago.

What the fuck is it with you asshats who traffic in easily-debunked mythology thinking you can rewrite history?

Really, how do you imagine it's going to work? Essplain your thought process. I just don't get it.

Yes.... somebody here is corrupt through and through but it ain't "hilary" [sic].

/thread

Ah....shame you didn't look through that snopes article.....it reeks of left wing ass covering...including the Zeifman guy.....he said she was let go...yeah right...but for some reason he couldn't give her a recommendation.......just like the women bill clinton sexually assaulted...who were harrassed by private detectives and audited by the IRS, hilary covered her tracks well....

Ten years later, Zeifman's story had shifted. When asked by radio host Neal Boortz in April 2008 if he had fired Hillary Clinton from the Watergate investigation, Zeifman hedged by stating Clinton had been let go, but only as part of a layoff of multiple personnel who were no longer needed:
Well, let me put it this way. I terminated her, along with some other staff members who were — we no longer needed, and advised her that I would not — could not recommend her for any further positions.

Yeah.....he lied to his diary......

When will you lefties stop protecting this criminal.....

 

[2aguy]

When are you lefties going to just let hilary get convicted and sent to prison...it would make your lives much more honest and much easier...you wouldn't have to lie as often...

Fact Check Was Hillary Clinton fired from Watergate investigation jacksonville.com


Calabrese’s information came from Democrat Jerry Zeifman, a counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Clinton on the Watergate investigation. Zeifman’s 2006 book, “Hillary’s Pursuit of Power,” states that she “… engaged in a variety of self-serving unethical practices in violation of House rules.”

On his now-shuttered website, Zeifman said, “Hillary Clinton is ethically unfit to be either a senator or president — and if she were to become president, the last vestiges of the traditional moral authority of the party of Roosevelt, Truman and Johnson will be destroyed.”

Specifically, Zeifman contends that Rodham and others wanted Richard Nixon to remain in office to bolster the chances of Sen. Ted Kennedy or another Democrat being elected president.

Zeifman said that in 1974 a young lawyer who shared an office with Clinton came to him to apologize that he and Clinton had lied to him. The lawyer, John Labovitz, is quoted as saying that he was dismayed with “… her erroneous legal opinions and efforts to deny Nixon representation by counsel — as well as an unwillingness to investigate Nixon.”

Yes.....now he lied to his diary.....

 

[Pogo]

Yes...hilary is corrupt through and through......

Hillary Clinton fired for lies unethical behavior

The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

********************************************

“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.

The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.

Ah good. Today's viral e-mail mythology.

>> The notion Hillary Clinton was fired by Jerry Zeifman for "lying" and "unethical behavior" has circulated across social media and in e-mails for years. The belief that Clinton's early career was marked by this buried scandal is widespread, but is there any merit to the claim?

By Zeifman's own admission there is not. Statements made by Zeifman himself contradict the claim he fired Hillary Clinton. During a 1998 interview with the Sacramento Bee in which he discussed his work with Clinton on Watergate, Zeifman not only stated he hadn't fired her, but he didn't even have the authority to fire her << -- Snopes
​

Search took 0.76 seconds.
Not only debunked but debunked seventeen years ago.

What the fuck is it with you asshats who traffic in easily-debunked mythology thinking you can rewrite history?

Really, how do you imagine it's going to work? Essplain your thought process. I just don't get it.

Yes.... somebody here is corrupt through and through but it ain't "hilary" [sic].

/thread

Ah....shame you didn't look through that snopes article.....it reeks of left wing ass covering...including the Zeifman guy.....he said she was let go...yeah right...but for some reason he couldn't give her a recommendation.......just like the women bill clinton sexually assaulted...who were harrassed by private detectives and audited by the IRS, hilary covered her tracks well....

Ten years later, Zeifman's story had shifted. When asked by radio host Neal Boortz in April 2008 if he had fired Hillary Clinton from the Watergate investigation, Zeifman hedged by stating Clinton had been let go, but only as part of a layoff of multiple personnel who were no longer needed:
Well, let me put it this way. I terminated her, along with some other staff members who were — we no longer needed, and advised her that I would not — could not recommend her for any further positions.

Yeah.....he lied to his diary......

When will you lefties stop protecting this criminal.....

"His diary"? What diary?

You made it up, dood. Or rather you parroted (verbatim) something somebody else made up, because you're too dim to know any better. Do you have a link to this "diary"? No. Do you have a link to this interview? No. Do you have any background to conclude why a guy who did not have the authority you claimed he did, also "could not recommend her" for other positions? You do not. In fact you started out citing Zeifman with an Appeal to Authority premise, now you're poisoning your own well. The fact is you have nothing here.

Further, one of your ipse dixit ramblings is refuted in your own blog link:

Labovitz said he has no knowledge of Hillary having taken any files, and defended her no-right-to-counsel memo on the grounds that, if she was assigned to write a memo arguing a point of view, she was merely following orders.​

-- Your own link.


As I said this was debunked back in the 20th century. Yet you choose to keep diggin'.

 

[Hossfly]

Yes...hilary is corrupt through and through......

Hillary Clinton fired for lies unethical behavior

The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

********************************************

“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.

The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.

Ah good. Today's viral e-mail mythology.

>> The notion Hillary Clinton was fired by Jerry Zeifman for "lying" and "unethical behavior" has circulated across social media and in e-mails for years. The belief that Clinton's early career was marked by this buried scandal is widespread, but is there any merit to the claim?

By Zeifman's own admission there is not. Statements made by Zeifman himself contradict the claim he fired Hillary Clinton. During a 1998 interview with the Sacramento Bee in which he discussed his work with Clinton on Watergate, Zeifman not only stated he hadn't fired her, but he didn't even have the authority to fire her << -- Snopes
​

Search took 0.76 seconds.
Not only debunked but debunked seventeen years ago.

What the fuck is it with you asshats who traffic in easily-debunked mythology thinking you can rewrite history?

Really, how do you imagine it's going to work? Essplain your thought process. I just don't get it.

Yes.... somebody here is corrupt through and through but it ain't "hilary" [sic].

/thread

Pogo Just 2 examples of "debunking lies." When a person has a death threat hanging over his head he will retract anything he ever said. Examples of this include Barry Sotero's mailman who claimed he made a mistake that Sotero told him he was a foreign exchange student and Obama's Grandmother saying (with family members agreeing), that "Barack was born right here in this house" only to retract the statement because Granny was "confused." I saw all those events on TV news and now they are "debunked lies." BTW, my favorite is the retired Secret Service agent from Rock Hill, SC who said on CBS Channel 3 in Charlotte one evening that when he was on Hillary's detail and she traveled, his job was to go on the advance party and find female "companions" for Hillary at each hotel. Naturally next day he made a retraction. When death is staring you in the eye then a person will deny and curse God and his own mother.

 

[Pogo]

Yes...hilary is corrupt through and through......

Hillary Clinton fired for lies unethical behavior

The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

********************************************

“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.

The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.

Ah good. Today's viral e-mail mythology.

>> The notion Hillary Clinton was fired by Jerry Zeifman for "lying" and "unethical behavior" has circulated across social media and in e-mails for years. The belief that Clinton's early career was marked by this buried scandal is widespread, but is there any merit to the claim?

By Zeifman's own admission there is not. Statements made by Zeifman himself contradict the claim he fired Hillary Clinton. During a 1998 interview with the Sacramento Bee in which he discussed his work with Clinton on Watergate, Zeifman not only stated he hadn't fired her, but he didn't even have the authority to fire her << -- Snopes
​

Search took 0.76 seconds.
Not only debunked but debunked seventeen years ago.

What the fuck is it with you asshats who traffic in easily-debunked mythology thinking you can rewrite history?

Really, how do you imagine it's going to work? Essplain your thought process. I just don't get it.

Yes.... somebody here is corrupt through and through but it ain't "hilary" [sic].

/thread

Pogo Just 2 examples of "debunking lies." When a person has a death threat hanging over his head he will retract anything he ever said. Examples of this include Barry Sotero's mailman who claimed he made a mistake that Sotero told him he was a foreign exchange student and Obama's Grandmother saying (with family members agreeing), that "Barack was born right here in this house" only to retract the statement because Granny was "confused." I saw all those events on TV news and now they are "debunked lies." BTW, my favorite is the retired Secret Service agent from Rock Hill, SC who said on CBS Channel 3 in Charlotte one evening that when he was on Hillary's detail and she traveled, his job was to go on the advance party and find female "companions" for Hillary at each hotel. Naturally next day he made a retraction. When death is staring you in the eye then a person will deny and curse God and his own mother.

Where do you see any "death threat" -- either here or in your example (which is also embellished btw*)...

Let's face it -- the poster ran with a viral e-mail that's already debunked, and got busted.



*that purported quote from the grandmother came from Ron McRae, a demented street preacher who put up a YouTube video purporting to record a phone call to Kenya to talk to her -- trouble is, (a) all we get is McRae's repetition of the voice of a translator -- we never hear her voice directly; and (b) McRae tries to lead her into making the association. And even McRae doesn't claim that she claims a birth "right here in this house" -- that's been added on since. Again, this is how myths get started.

Nobody's under any "death threats". Unless you want to bring those in as myths to support other myths.

 

[2aguy]

Yes...hilary is corrupt through and through......

Hillary Clinton fired for lies unethical behavior

The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

********************************************

“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.

The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.

Ah good. Today's viral e-mail mythology.

>> The notion Hillary Clinton was fired by Jerry Zeifman for "lying" and "unethical behavior" has circulated across social media and in e-mails for years. The belief that Clinton's early career was marked by this buried scandal is widespread, but is there any merit to the claim?

By Zeifman's own admission there is not. Statements made by Zeifman himself contradict the claim he fired Hillary Clinton. During a 1998 interview with the Sacramento Bee in which he discussed his work with Clinton on Watergate, Zeifman not only stated he hadn't fired her, but he didn't even have the authority to fire her << -- Snopes
​

Search took 0.76 seconds.
Not only debunked but debunked seventeen years ago.

What the fuck is it with you asshats who traffic in easily-debunked mythology thinking you can rewrite history?

Really, how do you imagine it's going to work? Essplain your thought process. I just don't get it.

Yes.... somebody here is corrupt through and through but it ain't "hilary" [sic].

/thread

Ah....shame you didn't look through that snopes article.....it reeks of left wing ass covering...including the Zeifman guy.....he said she was let go...yeah right...but for some reason he couldn't give her a recommendation.......just like the women bill clinton sexually assaulted...who were harrassed by private detectives and audited by the IRS, hilary covered her tracks well....

Ten years later, Zeifman's story had shifted. When asked by radio host Neal Boortz in April 2008 if he had fired Hillary Clinton from the Watergate investigation, Zeifman hedged by stating Clinton had been let go, but only as part of a layoff of multiple personnel who were no longer needed:
Well, let me put it this way. I terminated her, along with some other staff members who were — we no longer needed, and advised her that I would not — could not recommend her for any further positions.

Yeah.....he lied to his diary......

When will you lefties stop protecting this criminal.....

"His diary"? What diary?

You made it up, dood. Or rather you parroted (verbatim) something somebody else made up, because you're too dim to know any better. Do you have a link to this "diary"? No. Do you have a link to this interview? No. Do you have any background to conclude why a guy who did not have the authority you claimed he did, also "could not recommend her" for other positions? You do not. In fact you started out citing Zeifman with an Appeal to Authority premise, now you're poisoning your own well. The fact is you have nothing here.

Further, one of your ipse dixit ramblings is refuted in your own blog link:

Labovitz said he has no knowledge of Hillary having taken any files, and defended her no-right-to-counsel memo on the grounds that, if she was assigned to write a memo arguing a point of view, she was merely following orders.​

-- Your own link.


As I said this was debunked back in the 20th century. Yet you choose to keep diggin'.

The Diary reference was during the filegate scandal....or the FBI scandal.....when one of the clinton renfields said they had lied in their own diary.........

not debunked, squashed by the clintons......

 

[HenryBHough]

Those women were not sought out for sex.

Just to prevent spilling Bill's cigar ashes on the expensive carpet.

 

[Hossfly]

Yes...hilary is corrupt through and through......

Hillary Clinton fired for lies unethical behavior

The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

********************************************

“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.

The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.

Ah good. Today's viral e-mail mythology.

>> The notion Hillary Clinton was fired by Jerry Zeifman for "lying" and "unethical behavior" has circulated across social media and in e-mails for years. The belief that Clinton's early career was marked by this buried scandal is widespread, but is there any merit to the claim?

By Zeifman's own admission there is not. Statements made by Zeifman himself contradict the claim he fired Hillary Clinton. During a 1998 interview with the Sacramento Bee in which he discussed his work with Clinton on Watergate, Zeifman not only stated he hadn't fired her, but he didn't even have the authority to fire her << -- Snopes
​

Search took 0.76 seconds.
Not only debunked but debunked seventeen years ago.

What the fuck is it with you asshats who traffic in easily-debunked mythology thinking you can rewrite history?

Really, how do you imagine it's going to work? Essplain your thought process. I just don't get it.

Yes.... somebody here is corrupt through and through but it ain't "hilary" [sic].

/thread

Pogo Just 2 examples of "debunking lies." When a person has a death threat hanging over his head he will retract anything he ever said. Examples of this include Barry Sotero's mailman who claimed he made a mistake that Sotero told him he was a foreign exchange student and Obama's Grandmother saying (with family members agreeing), that "Barack was born right here in this house" only to retract the statement because Granny was "confused." I saw all those events on TV news and now they are "debunked lies." BTW, my favorite is the retired Secret Service agent from Rock Hill, SC who said on CBS Channel 3 in Charlotte one evening that when he was on Hillary's detail and she traveled, his job was to go on the advance party and find female "companions" for Hillary at each hotel. Naturally next day he made a retraction. When death is staring you in the eye then a person will deny and curse God and his own mother.

Where do you see any "death threat" -- either here or in your example (which is also embellished btw)...

Let's face it -- the poster ran with a viral e-mail that's already debunked, and got busted.

I didn't embellish anything. Those 3 examples I saw on live news plus the retractions when they were reported. There are many dead persons who have incurred the wrath of the Clintons and Obamas. Everybody knows it is the truth, even if it has been covered up.

 

[Pogo]

Yes...hilary is corrupt through and through......

Hillary Clinton fired for lies unethical behavior

The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

********************************************

“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.

The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.

Ah good. Today's viral e-mail mythology.

>> The notion Hillary Clinton was fired by Jerry Zeifman for "lying" and "unethical behavior" has circulated across social media and in e-mails for years. The belief that Clinton's early career was marked by this buried scandal is widespread, but is there any merit to the claim?

By Zeifman's own admission there is not. Statements made by Zeifman himself contradict the claim he fired Hillary Clinton. During a 1998 interview with the Sacramento Bee in which he discussed his work with Clinton on Watergate, Zeifman not only stated he hadn't fired her, but he didn't even have the authority to fire her << -- Snopes
​

Search took 0.76 seconds.
Not only debunked but debunked seventeen years ago.

What the fuck is it with you asshats who traffic in easily-debunked mythology thinking you can rewrite history?

Really, how do you imagine it's going to work? Essplain your thought process. I just don't get it.

Yes.... somebody here is corrupt through and through but it ain't "hilary" [sic].

/thread

Ah....shame you didn't look through that snopes article.....it reeks of left wing ass covering...including the Zeifman guy.....he said she was let go...yeah right...but for some reason he couldn't give her a recommendation.......just like the women bill clinton sexually assaulted...who were harrassed by private detectives and audited by the IRS, hilary covered her tracks well....

Ten years later, Zeifman's story had shifted. When asked by radio host Neal Boortz in April 2008 if he had fired Hillary Clinton from the Watergate investigation, Zeifman hedged by stating Clinton had been let go, but only as part of a layoff of multiple personnel who were no longer needed:
Well, let me put it this way. I terminated her, along with some other staff members who were — we no longer needed, and advised her that I would not — could not recommend her for any further positions.

Yeah.....he lied to his diary......

When will you lefties stop protecting this criminal.....

"His diary"? What diary?

You made it up, dood. Or rather you parroted (verbatim) something somebody else made up, because you're too dim to know any better. Do you have a link to this "diary"? No. Do you have a link to this interview? No. Do you have any background to conclude why a guy who did not have the authority you claimed he did, also "could not recommend her" for other positions? You do not. In fact you started out citing Zeifman with an Appeal to Authority premise, now you're poisoning your own well. The fact is you have nothing here.

Further, one of your ipse dixit ramblings is refuted in your own blog link:

Labovitz said he has no knowledge of Hillary having taken any files, and defended her no-right-to-counsel memo on the grounds that, if she was assigned to write a memo arguing a point of view, she was merely following orders.​

-- Your own link.


As I said this was debunked back in the 20th century. Yet you choose to keep diggin'.

The Diary reference was during the filegate scandal....or the FBI scandal.....when one of the clinton renfields said they had lied in their own diary.........

not debunked, squashed by the clintons......

You're rambling incoherently now. Where do you see any "Renfields" in this?

Btw we capitalize proper names in English. Learn to speak it.

 

[Pogo]

Yes...hilary is corrupt through and through......

Hillary Clinton fired for lies unethical behavior

The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

********************************************

“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.

The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.

Ah good. Today's viral e-mail mythology.

>> The notion Hillary Clinton was fired by Jerry Zeifman for "lying" and "unethical behavior" has circulated across social media and in e-mails for years. The belief that Clinton's early career was marked by this buried scandal is widespread, but is there any merit to the claim?

By Zeifman's own admission there is not. Statements made by Zeifman himself contradict the claim he fired Hillary Clinton. During a 1998 interview with the Sacramento Bee in which he discussed his work with Clinton on Watergate, Zeifman not only stated he hadn't fired her, but he didn't even have the authority to fire her << -- Snopes
​

Search took 0.76 seconds.
Not only debunked but debunked seventeen years ago.

What the fuck is it with you asshats who traffic in easily-debunked mythology thinking you can rewrite history?

Really, how do you imagine it's going to work? Essplain your thought process. I just don't get it.

Yes.... somebody here is corrupt through and through but it ain't "hilary" [sic].

/thread

Pogo Just 2 examples of "debunking lies." When a person has a death threat hanging over his head he will retract anything he ever said. Examples of this include Barry Sotero's mailman who claimed he made a mistake that Sotero told him he was a foreign exchange student and Obama's Grandmother saying (with family members agreeing), that "Barack was born right here in this house" only to retract the statement because Granny was "confused." I saw all those events on TV news and now they are "debunked lies." BTW, my favorite is the retired Secret Service agent from Rock Hill, SC who said on CBS Channel 3 in Charlotte one evening that when he was on Hillary's detail and she traveled, his job was to go on the advance party and find female "companions" for Hillary at each hotel. Naturally next day he made a retraction. When death is staring you in the eye then a person will deny and curse God and his own mother.

Where do you see any "death threat" -- either here or in your example (which is also embellished btw)...

Let's face it -- the poster ran with a viral e-mail that's already debunked, and got busted.

I didn't embellish anything. Those 3 examples I saw on live news plus the retractions when they were reported. There are many dead persons who have incurred the wrath of the Clintons and Obamas. Everybody knows it is the truth, even if it has been covered up.

Sorry but "everybody knows" has never been an argument and never will be.
Wasn't saying you embellished it, but somebody did. I've been aware of that YouTube video since it came out.

That's why I keep marveling that an entire political myth is founded on a YouTube video (1), made by no less an authority than a demented Pittsburgh street preacher (2), claiming to record (3) a phone call to Kenya and relaying the voice of a translator (4) interpreting the voice of O'bama's grandmother, whose voice is not even audible (5) responding to a leading question (6).

That's six degrees of Bullshit.

Conspiracy theorists will swallow whatever feeds the fantasy. Paul McCartney told me that just before he died.

 

[Hossfly]

Yes...hilary is corrupt through and through......

Hillary Clinton fired for lies unethical behavior


Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

********************************************

“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.

The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.

Ah good. Today's viral e-mail mythology.

>> The notion Hillary Clinton was fired by Jerry Zeifman for "lying" and "unethical behavior" has circulated across social media and in e-mails for years. The belief that Clinton's early career was marked by this buried scandal is widespread, but is there any merit to the claim?

By Zeifman's own admission there is not. Statements made by Zeifman himself contradict the claim he fired Hillary Clinton. During a 1998 interview with the Sacramento Bee in which he discussed his work with Clinton on Watergate, Zeifman not only stated he hadn't fired her, but he didn't even have the authority to fire her << -- Snopes
​

Search took 0.76 seconds.
Not only debunked but debunked seventeen years ago.

What the fuck is it with you asshats who traffic in easily-debunked mythology thinking you can rewrite history?

Really, how do you imagine it's going to work? Essplain your thought process. I just don't get it.

Yes.... somebody here is corrupt through and through but it ain't "hilary" [sic].

/thread

Pogo Just 2 examples of "debunking lies." When a person has a death threat hanging over his head he will retract anything he ever said. Examples of this include Barry Sotero's mailman who claimed he made a mistake that Sotero told him he was a foreign exchange student and Obama's Grandmother saying (with family members agreeing), that "Barack was born right here in this house" only to retract the statement because Granny was "confused." I saw all those events on TV news and now they are "debunked lies." BTW, my favorite is the retired Secret Service agent from Rock Hill, SC who said on CBS Channel 3 in Charlotte one evening that when he was on Hillary's detail and she traveled, his job was to go on the advance party and find female "companions" for Hillary at each hotel. Naturally next day he made a retraction. When death is staring you in the eye then a person will deny and curse God and his own mother.

Where do you see any "death threat" -- either here or in your example (which is also embellished btw)...

Let's face it -- the poster ran with a viral e-mail that's already debunked, and got busted.

I didn't embellish anything. Those 3 examples I saw on live news plus the retractions when they were reported. There are many dead persons who have incurred the wrath of the Clintons and Obamas. Everybody knows it is the truth, even if it has been covered up.

Sorry but "everybody knows" has never been an argument and never will be.
Wasn't saying you embellished it, but somebody did. I've been aware of that YouTube video since it came out.

That's why I keep marveling that an entire political myth is founded on a YouTube video (1), made by no less an authority than a demented Pittsburgh street preacher (2), claiming to record (3) a phone call to Kenya and relaying the voice of a translator (4) interpreting the voice of O'bama's grandmother, whose voice is not even audible (5) responding to a leading question (6).

That's six degrees of Bullshit.

Conspiracy theorists will swallow whatever feeds the fantasy. Paul McCartney told me that just before he died.

O.K. I retract and deny everything I said. I just got a call from someone from DC named The Plumber Made me an offer I can't refuse.

 

[Rambunctious]

Her own party is about ready to dump her. They know she can't get any other support than the commie kook leftest. The thinkers and the moderates will go GOP this time if she is the Democrat party's choice.

 

[Pogo]

>> .... an alarming number of people asked why I hadn’t mentioned that Mrs. Clinton was fired for misconduct when she worked as a staff lawyer for the House Judiciary Committee investigating Richard Nixon during Watergate.

For the record, the reason is that she wasn’t fired from that job. It didn’t happen. I knew where that rumor originated—it’s not a new story—because it first arose in Bill Clinton’s second term, when I covered the White House. But I was curious how it flew around the world so fast. The short answer is Rush Limbaugh. The longer answer is the way Americans communicate with each other these days.

First, a brief recitation of the back story:

It begins in 1973, when a government lawyer named Jerome Zeifman started making entries in his diary. It was a momentous time in his career. Zeifman, a Democrat, was chief counsel to the House Judiciary Committee. Investigating a sitting president required staffing, and one of those hired was a 27-year-old Yale Law School grad named Hillary Rodham.

At first, he was impressed, but in time Zeifman soured on her. He began, as he wrote in a 1996 book, to suspect her of collaborating with Democratic Senate aides loyal to Ted Kennedy. Their supposed aim was to keep the lid on the Watergate investigation out of fear Nixon would expose the “crimes of Camelot,” a phrase that appears in the book’s title. There are other subplots in his farfetched conspiracy theory, and other conspirators, including Judiciary Committee Chairman Peter Rodino—but little evidence for any of it.

The book reads like a Hollywood intrigue, which apparently occurred to Zeifman’s publisher, who promised on the book jacket to reveal “truths even more startling than those brought out in Oliver Stone’s movies Nixon and JFK.” Those films, remember, were works of fiction.

This titillating tale was reprised in 2008 when Clinton ran for president, thanks to conservative columnist Dan Calabrese, who embellished it a tad, introducing Jerry Zeifman as “the guy who fired Hillary Clinton.” A catchy line, but untrue: Zeifman lacked the authority to terminate her, and it’s a matter of historic record that she wasn’t fired.

Nonetheless, at the height of the 2008 primary season, Rush Limbaugh repeated it to his millions of listeners. Today, with Clinton prepping for another presidential campaign, the old canard is being passed around again, this time in a “viral” email. Viral is the right word: One reader who read my assessment of Clinton’s 2016 chances sent an email asking if I was “going easy” on her “because she donates to your publication.”

My pen pal is a working-class guy, a carpenter by trade, who doesn’t know any better. << --The Smear Factor: Why We Hate Politics

Lush Rimjob. Imagine that. Golly jeepers, sure didn't see that one coming.

 

[jwoodie]

>> .... an alarming number of people asked why I hadn’t mentioned that Mrs. Clinton was fired for misconduct when she worked as a staff lawyer for the House Judiciary Committee investigating Richard Nixon during Watergate.

For the record, the reason is that she wasn’t fired from that job. It didn’t happen. I knew where that rumor originated—it’s not a new story—because it first arose in Bill Clinton’s second term, when I covered the White House. But I was curious how it flew around the world so fast. The short answer is Rush Limbaugh. The longer answer is the way Americans communicate with each other these days.

First, a brief recitation of the back story:

It begins in 1973, when a government lawyer named Jerome Zeifman started making entries in his diary. It was a momentous time in his career. Zeifman, a Democrat, was chief counsel to the House Judiciary Committee. Investigating a sitting president required staffing, and one of those hired was a 27-year-old Yale Law School grad named Hillary Rodham.

At first, he was impressed, but in time Zeifman soured on her. He began, as he wrote in a 1996 book, to suspect her of collaborating with Democratic Senate aides loyal to Ted Kennedy. Their supposed aim was to keep the lid on the Watergate investigation out of fear Nixon would expose the “crimes of Camelot,” a phrase that appears in the book’s title. There are other subplots in his farfetched conspiracy theory, and other conspirators, including Judiciary Committee Chairman Peter Rodino—but little evidence for any of it.

The book reads like a Hollywood intrigue, which apparently occurred to Zeifman’s publisher, who promised on the book jacket to reveal “truths even more startling than those brought out in Oliver Stone’s movies Nixon and JFK.” Those films, remember, were works of fiction.

This titillating tale was reprised in 2008 when Clinton ran for president, thanks to conservative columnist Dan Calabrese, who embellished it a tad, introducing Jerry Zeifman as “the guy who fired Hillary Clinton.” A catchy line, but untrue: Zeifman lacked the authority to terminate her, and it’s a matter of historic record that she wasn’t fired.

Nonetheless, at the height of the 2008 primary season, Rush Limbaugh repeated it to his millions of listeners. Today, with Clinton prepping for another presidential campaign, the old canard is being passed around again, this time in a “viral” email. Viral is the right word: One reader who read my assessment of Clinton’s 2016 chances sent an email asking if I was “going easy” on her “because she donates to your publication.”

My pen pal is a working-class guy, a carpenter by trade, who doesn’t know any better. << --The Smear Factor: Why We Hate Politics

Lush Rimjob. Imagine that. Golly jeepers, sure didn't see that one coming.

Do you realize how disingenuous your remarks appear? You deliberately avoid the underlying issues of how and why Hillary stopped working for the Senate Committee and instead try to redirect this thread into a discussion of media coverage. Aren't you interested in discovering the truth?

 

[Vigilante]

 

[RandallFlagg]

Yes...hilary is corrupt through and through......

Hillary Clinton fired for lies unethical behavior

The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

********************************************

“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.

The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.

Ah good. Today's viral e-mail mythology.

>> The notion Hillary Clinton was fired by Jerry Zeifman for "lying" and "unethical behavior" has circulated across social media and in e-mails for years. The belief that Clinton's early career was marked by this buried scandal is widespread, but is there any merit to the claim?

By Zeifman's own admission there is not. Statements made by Zeifman himself contradict the claim he fired Hillary Clinton. During a 1998 interview with the Sacramento Bee in which he discussed his work with Clinton on Watergate, Zeifman not only stated he hadn't fired her, but he didn't even have the authority to fire her << -- Snopes
​

Search took 0.76 seconds.
Not only debunked but debunked seventeen years ago.

What the fuck is it with you asshats who traffic in easily-debunked mythology thinking you can rewrite history?

Really, how do you imagine it's going to work? Essplain your thought process. I just don't get it.

Yes.... somebody here is corrupt through and through but it ain't "hilary" [sic].

/thread

Ah....shame you didn't look through that snopes article.....it reeks of left wing ass covering...including the Zeifman guy.....he said she was let go...yeah right...but for some reason he couldn't give her a recommendation.......just like the women bill clinton sexually assaulted...who were harrassed by private detectives and audited by the IRS, hilary covered her tracks well....

Ten years later, Zeifman's story had shifted. When asked by radio host Neal Boortz in April 2008 if he had fired Hillary Clinton from the Watergate investigation, Zeifman hedged by stating Clinton had been let go, but only as part of a layoff of multiple personnel who were no longer needed:
Well, let me put it this way. I terminated her, along with some other staff members who were — we no longer needed, and advised her that I would not — could not recommend her for any further positions.

Yeah.....he lied to his diary......

When will you lefties stop protecting this criminal.....

"His diary"? What diary?

You made it up, dood. Or rather you parroted (verbatim) something somebody else made up, because you're too dim to know any better. Do you have a link to this "diary"? No. Do you have a link to this interview? No. Do you have any background to conclude why a guy who did not have the authority you claimed he did, also "could not recommend her" for other positions? You do not. In fact you started out citing Zeifman with an Appeal to Authority premise, now you're poisoning your own well. The fact is you have nothing here.

Further, one of your ipse dixit ramblings is refuted in your own blog link:

Labovitz said he has no knowledge of Hillary having taken any files, and defended her no-right-to-counsel memo on the grounds that, if she was assigned to write a memo arguing a point of view, she was merely following orders.​

-- Your own link.


As I said this was debunked back in the 20th century. Yet you choose to keep diggin'.

Let me ask you a question - and please leave your partisan BS at the door (if you are able). Be honest now. (1) Do you REALLY and truly believe that this woman is qualified to be President of the United States? and (2) Could you REALLY trust her judgement in a crisis or hell, for that matter even in domestic affairs? (3) Do you HONESTLY expect her to live up to the oath of that office? And finally (4) Do you believe her to be an honest person?