Hilary Clinton/Bernie Sanders vs. Rand Paul/Jeb Bush

hangover

Gold Member
Oct 8, 2013
5,734
642
190
How's that for an election? Yes, no? Who's got a better scenario? The really big question is, can cons comment on this without using sandbox banter as their main argument? Pft!
 
Hillary is too mainstream for today's Democrat Party and has no chance at getting the nomination

Bernie Sanders/Raoul Castro is more likely
 
How's that for an election? Yes, no? Who's got a better scenario? The really big question is, can cons comment on this without using sandbox banter as their main argument? Pft!

Lets see its going to be 72.5 degrees next July 4th,the winning loto numbers are...................
 
Hillary is too mainstream for today's Democrat Party and has no chance at getting the nomination

Bernie Sanders/Raoul Castro is more likely

Because she is mainstream, she WILL get the nomination. And that's why the dems will win, they give voters what they want. Cons try to force feed voters what cons want, that's why they lose.

Lets see its going to be 72.5 degrees next July 4th,the winning loto numbers are...................
Plenty of places in Colorado, Wyoming, Montana and the west coast, it will be. Nice guess.
 
Last edited:
I could see Rand picking Jeb, but no way Jeb accepts. Clinton would never pick Sanders, however.
 
How's that for an election? Yes, no? Who's got a better scenario? The really big question is, can cons comment on this without using sandbox banter as their main argument? Pft!

If there is no better scenario than that - I guess I'll be voting for some obscure candidate.
 
Not in a million alternate Universes would Hillary ever choose Bernie Sanders as her running mate.
 
Hillary is too mainstream for today's Democrat Party and has no chance at getting the nomination

Bernie Sanders/Raoul Castro is more likely

Because she is mainstream, she WILL get the nomination. And that's why the dems will win, they give voters what they want. Cons try to force feed voters what cons want, that's why they lose.

Lets see its going to be 72.5 degrees next July 4th,the winning loto numbers are...................
Plenty of places in Colorado, Wyoming, Montana and the west coast, it will be. Nice guess.

ya guessing is kind fun ,right?
 
If Hillary runs, I would be certain the VP would be a far left loon, probably Latino.
Especially the Latino. It is what I would do. Leftys vote for things like that.
 
Hillary is too mainstream for today's Democrat Party and has no chance at getting the nomination

Bernie Sanders/Raoul Castro is more likely

Because she is mainstream, she WILL get the nomination. And that's why the dems will win, they give voters what they want. Cons try to force feed voters what cons want, that's why they lose.

Lets see its going to be 72.5 degrees next July 4th,the winning loto numbers are...................
Plenty of places in Colorado, Wyoming, Montana and the west coast, it will be. Nice guess.

ya guessing is kind fun ,right?

It's more challenging to make one that isn't so obvious. Castro is so far out in left, it's not even on the planet. Sanders has said that if they want him, he'll run. Didn't say as which party. I'm sure cons wish he'd run as INDEPENDENT. Don't think he'd do that. Cons may be skeerd Paul will run as one. But really, what con ticket could beat Clinton/Sanders? I really don't see one.
 
Last edited:
Hilary Clinton/Bernie Sanders


Wow - an all-Socialist ticket?

One of whom can't even spell her own name on a campaign brochure?

This I gotta see.
 
Walker/Paul

Seriously, do you really believe that ticket could win against..... anyone?

Obama /Biden they pulled it off twice,so did GWB so ya its so up in the air.

Never make political guesses this early, but my guess is nobody listed will be in the fall election.

Particularly Hillery she is done,Dems never let a looser run again.
 
I don't see Hillary choosing Sanders unless there was a real fear that he'd run as an Independent and siphon enough votes to threaten her chances...which I highly doubt.
 

Forum List

Back
Top