Hilary Clinton/Bernie Sanders vs. Rand Paul/Jeb Bush

[LoneLaugher]

I gotta tell ya. It looks like feeling good is the prime motivator for nutters when it comes to their political predictions.

Some of you people ought to consider reality. You are wishing so hard. Remember how you felt on November 7th, 2012? You don't really want to relive that do you?

 

[Zander]

Wishing? Tell us lone wingnut, what happened to Hillary last time she was a LOCK to win? I seem to recall her getting beaten by an inexperience jr senator who spoke in metaphors and had a proclivity to vote "present" .....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[LoneLaugher]

Wishing? Tell us lone wingnut, what happened to Hillary last time she was a LOCK to win? I seem to recall her getting beaten by an inexperience jr senator who spoke in metaphors and had a proclivity to vote "present" .....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'd possibly bet my car that you did not predict an Obama win in that primary.

He voted "present"? Can you cite the cases?

 

[Zander]

Wishing? Tell us lone wingnut, what happened to Hillary last time she was a LOCK to win? I seem to recall her getting beaten by an inexperience jr senator who spoke in metaphors and had a proclivity to vote "present" .....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'd possibly bet my car that you did not predict an Obama win in that primary.

He voted "present"? Can you cite the cases?

Can't remember? Hillary brought it up during the primaries (while she was getting beaten for not being left enough). . Nothing has changed- Now Democrats don't believe Obama is "left" enough. You guys want a wingnut.....


Obama voted "present" 129 times in the Illinois Legislature.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Wishing? Tell us lone wingnut, what happened to Hillary last time she was a LOCK to win? I seem to recall her getting beaten by an inexperience jr senator who spoke in metaphors and had a proclivity to vote "present" .....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'd possibly bet my car that you did not predict an Obama win in that primary.

He voted "present"? Can you cite the cases?

Can't remember? Hillary brought it up during the primaries (while she was getting beaten for not being left enough). . Nothing has changed- Now Democrats don't believe Obama is "left" enough. You guys want a wingnut.....


Obama voted "present" 129 times in the Illinois Legislature.

In Illinois legislature? Is that what you meant? I don't think so. You are learning as you go, ain't ya?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Zander.......

Who do we want? A wingnut? Who is that?

 

[Borillar]

I would prefer never to see another Bush anywhere near the White House. Clinton too for that matter. Enough with political dynasties and nepotism. Time for new blood and new ideas.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Not in a million alternate Universes would Hillary ever choose Bernie Sanders as her running mate.

Agreed......Same types repeal each other. Put two magnets against each other and you will see.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Repel?

 

[birddog]

I agree. Jeb might pick Rand, but I doubt it. A Bush/Paul ticket would be much stronger than most think.

I don't see Jeb picking Rand under any circumstances.

Jeb could never get the nomination, under the current teabagger climate.

Well, most of us who believe in The Tea Party principles are also believers in the principles of Reagan. Reagan believed it was smart to get "part of the pie" instead of none.

Republicans will support Paul more than most think, especially since Rand is more flexible and more open to mainstream conservatism than Ron was.

These are different times, and I believe the liberals/progressives are FOS as usual!

 

[ScienceRocks]

Reagan believed in science, infrastructure and America being number fucking one! Something the tea party wouldn't know nothing of.

 

[Iceweasel]

Reagan believed in science, infrastructure and America being number fucking one! Something the tea party wouldn't know nothing of.

Huh? The Tea Party is a movement, not a person. And what is it with your incessant whining about funding? I've never seen anyone cry about other people's money so much.

 

[jillian]

How's that for an election? Yes, no? Who's got a better scenario? The really big question is, can cons comment on this without using sandbox banter as their main argument? Pft!

stupid matchup. bernie sanders would never be hillary's choice of running mate

and jeb bush would chew off his arm before he'd run as second to rand.

it's important when asking these questions that you exhibit some knowledge of political reality.

try again.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Van Jones has a real chance of getting the Nomination

 

[007]

Walker/Paul

Walker may not even win re-election for Governor. He's got too much baggage, with the recent revelations of misuse of power.

Bull shit. I live in Wisconsin and listen to the nightly news and read local articles on politics, and Walker is doing just FINE in Wisconsin, and if he can do fine here, he can do fine NATIONALLY.

In all actuality, you leftards have NO ONE decent to run for president, that's... NO ONE. Even as much as you all get wet over the thought of Hitlery running, she'd be once again shredded by her own party if she even thinks about it. She's done before she even gets started. In truth, the ONLY person that can win on the left is someone that's an even BIGGER RADICAL and SOCIALIST than OBAMA. You libtards have gone SOOOOO far out in the radical left, a main stream democrat now doesn't stand a chance. You're voter base is split worse than the conservative's is. There's no way in hell a dem will follow the kenyan into the white house.

 

[LoneLaugher]

It's crazy. The lack of awareness is just crazy.

 

[editec]

How's that for an election? Yes, no? Who's got a better scenario? The really big question is, can cons comment on this without using sandbox banter as their main argument? Pft!

Dump Hillary and I'm on board.

Hillary and Sanders DO NOT AGREE about much, lad.

They're not remotely on the same team.

She's a DEM and he is a REAL LEFTIST.

 

[jillian]

If Hillary runs, I would be certain the VP would be a far left loon, probably Latino.
Especially the Latino. It is what I would do. Leftys vote for things like that.

you seem to apply rightwingnut philosophy to the elections of others.

this is why you keep losing.

 

[jillian]

Van Jones has a real chance of getting the Nomination

no

 

[FJO]

Because she is mainstream, she WILL get the nomination. And that's why the dems will win, they give voters what they want. Cons try to force feed voters what cons want, that's why they lose.


Plenty of places in Colorado, Wyoming, Montana and the west coast, it will be. Nice guess.

ya guessing is kind fun ,right?

It's more challenging to make one that isn't so obvious. Castro is so far out in left, it's not even on the planet. Sanders has said that if they want him, he'll run. Didn't say as which party. I'm sure cons wish he'd run as INDEPENDENT. Don't think he'd do that. Cons may be skeerd Paul will run as one. But really, what con ticket could beat Clinton/Sanders? I really don't see one.

You are theorizing about someone as a potential VP candidate, which - of course - will never happen, because he is just too offbeat to be real. Sanders is a coward, and a spineless typical socialist who ALWAYS caucuses with the Democrats, freeloading off them, but never actually wants to be called a Democrat.

Let me theorize about a Republican VP candidate, whose name I have never heard from anyone as such, but would be - in my opinion - a valuable addition to ay Republican ticket: Judge Janine Pirro.