HERE WE GO: House Democrats Launch Offensive to Force Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to Recuse Himself From Trump Immunity Case

[Robert W]

Thomas's wife is a interested person in the case... She could be prosecuted in the future over it... His wife's text messages are apart of evidence, seriously..

Thomas should recuse himself and the other Judges will be telling him that... Thee court has to look impartial despite what the MAGA lot say...

Are you trying to con us by alleging the lefts judges are not biased?

 

[Robert W]

Ginni Thomas text messages are apart of the evidence in the case...

Get real..

When we point out the crimes of Biden, you whimper, but there is no evidence. We tell you that Justice Thomas is innocent and you whimper, uh, no he is guilty. And you have absolutely no evidence. Since you guys can't pack the court, you want to yank off members of the court.

 

[CowboyTed]

Are you trying to con us by alleging the lefts judges are not biased?

You got that Mark Meadows texts are part of evidence. Ginni Thomas was texting Meadows running up to Jan 6th...

This is the Judge's wife... This far beyond left and right, this is the guy's wife...

 

[ColonelAngus]

But Judge Engeron’s wife can be as anti-Trump as she wants, right? No recusal. Remember how the most ethically-on-high Elena Kagan recused herself from all of the Obamacare cases? You know, the Obamacare she helped to create? No recusal!

Justice Thomas won't be intimidated by these fools.

HERE WE GO: House Democrats Launch Offensive to Force Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to Recuse Himself From Trump Immunity Case | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

Here we go.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

They can all suck a big fat dick.

Thomas has been on the bench since the early 1990s.

He has no cause to recuse himself. A lefty would never fucking recuse themselves. The left LOOKS FOR CORRUPT JUDGES.

FUCK ALL THE WAY OFF.

 

[CowboyTed]

When we point out the crimes of Biden, you whimper, but there is no evidence. We tell you that Justice Thomas is innocent and you whimper, uh, no he is guilty. And you have absolutely no evidence. Since you guys can't pack the court, you want to yank off members of the court.

Judge Thomas has a very material interest in the case... Judges have to have the appearance of impartiality..

Do you understand that Judges can't rule on cases where themselves or their family are apart off? It makes a a mockery of justice...

 

[Robert W]

You got that Mark Meadows texts are part of evidence. Ginni Thomas was texting Meadows running up to Jan 6th...

This is the Judge's wife... This far beyond left and right, this is the guy's wife...

I see, she belongs in the kitchen but can't talk to staff!!! Why don't those rules apply to the left?

 

[Robert W]

They can all suck a big fat dick.

Thomas has been on the bench since the early 1990s.

He has no cause to recuse himself. A lefty would never fucking recuse themselves. The left LOOKS FOR CORRUPT JUDGES.

FUCK ALL THE WAY OFF.

Can we agree that we are better than the way to talk like that? We can make points and bear in mind at times small kids are around posters as they read posts.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Can we agree that we are better than the way to talk like that? We can make points and bear in mind at times small kids are around posters as they read posts.

Feel free to put me on ignore. This is not a PG site.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

Judge Thomas has a very material interest in the case... Judges have to have the appearance of impartiality..

Do you understand that Judges can't rule on cases where themselves or their family are apart off? It makes a a mockery of justice...

Kagan was personally involved with Obamacare prior to becoming a Justice. She didn't recuse herself when voting for it to become law.

 

[CowboyTed]

I see, she belongs in the kitchen but can't talk to staff!!! Why don't those rules apply to the left?

She can do what she like but she is married to a judge. If here actions comes part of a case then the judge has to recuse himself... This would be the same County Judge, Judes can't adjudicate on cases involving their family.

 

[Robert W]

Judge Thomas has a very material interest in the case... Judges have to have the appearance of impartiality..

Do you understand that Judges can't rule on cases where themselves or their family are apart off? It makes a a mockery of justice...

What about the left justices? What if we commenced trying to run them off when they chat with those outside of the court?

 

[Robert W]

She can do what she like but she is married to a judge. If here actions comes part of a case then the judge has to recuse himself... This would be the same County Judge, Judes can't adjudicate on cases involving their family.

So are you saying she is your target? And Thomas has done no wrong.

 

[Mac1958]

The Dems are crazy! It's not as if his wife was some whacked out hardcore MAGA nutcase jihadi who tried to help the seditionists spit on the Constutution or sumpin'!

What are they thinking!

 

[CowboyTed]

Kagan was personally involved with Obamacare prior to becoming a Justice. She didn't recuse herself when voting for it to become law.

Go read her involvement in Obamacare prior to being a Judge... She appointed someone to attend meetings on how to handle Obamacare cases... That's it...
Seriously, is that the best you got... That is super weak..

 

[BackAgain]

Seriously

Yep.

Or. Maybe not.

Possibly.

Could be.

It doesn’t really matter.

I’ll go with my hunch.

 

[CowboyTed]

So are you saying she is your target? And Thomas has done no wrong.

Ginni Thomas actions mean Clarence give the appearance be impartial in adjudicating the case.

I don't think ye get it... It clearly states you can't be a judge in a case which involves your wife... Clarence or Ginni are guilty of nothing here, but Clarence can be considered as impartial..

This is the main reason wives of SC Judges don't text Chief of Staffs...

 

[ColonelAngus]

Ketanji Brown should recuse herself from any case involving a woman, because she does not even know whjat one is.

 

[Robert W]

The Dems are crazy! It's not as if his wife was some whacked out hardcore MAGA nutcase jihadi who tried to help the seditionists spit on the Constutution or sumpin'!

What are they thinking!

The so called left seems totally blind to the fact we do have a constitution. When they whine about Thomas, and they are attacking his wife, she does not make decisions on the supreme court. And Thomas should control his wife? What for? How many left wingers can order their own wives around? Are you truly that much of a misogynist?

 

[Robert W]

Ginni Thomas actions mean Clarence give the appearance be impartial in adjudicating the case.

I don't think ye get it... It clearly states you can't be a judge in a case which involves your wife... Clarence or Ginni are guilty of nothing here, but Clarence can be considered as impartial..

This is the main reason wives of SC Judges don't text Chief of Staffs...

Sounds misogynist to me.

 

[Robert W]

Ginni Thomas actions mean Clarence give the appearance be impartial in adjudicating the case.

I don't think ye get it... It clearly states you can't be a judge in a case which involves your wife... Clarence or Ginni are guilty of nothing here, but Clarence can be considered as impartial..

This is the main reason wives of SC Judges don't text Chief of Staffs...

This is about Trump. Can you swing with that?