“Hell yes we are going to take your AR-15”

Alex Jones Warns Beto: Keep Your Filthy Hands Off Our 2nd Amendment!
Establishment puppet Beto O’Rourke has become the mouthpiece of the victim disarmament lobby and has pledged, quote “Hell yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47!” LMFAO!! you losers don't even know the half of reality..

Then Beto better be prepared to supply lots of body bags for all the dead people he is going to kill trying to take legal guns out of the hands of millions of peaceful, law-abiding people. I know the AK can carry a magazine that one alone can hold 100 rounds, and there are rifles out there capable of shooting a hole through an engine block, much less a man. Who are you going to send in first, Beto? Why not let it be you?
More justification why we need to take the guns

Anyone who reacts by wanting to kill people should not have guns

Then Come and get them, big man. I'd love to see you try. The world needs one less idiot like you who conflates defending yourself from attack and assault as "wanting to kill people." I've had dirt stuck to the bottom of my shoe with more brains than you.


And while you're at it, Big Mouth, let's see you disarm and take the guns off these good ol' boys. Do you have any idea how many people there are like this? These are private citizens shooting privately own guns licensed and sanctioned by the federal government. They could shoot a helicopter out of the sky. The Army's not going to commit posse commitatis because they want their guns too and so do the police. They ALL own guns.

So C'mon, Big Shot, come on and try to disarm America and come get some. I really want you to try. You be the first. Right there with Beto.



America. We are the largest standing army in the world. I suggest you leave well enough alone.

Just what I like to hear from gun owners......Threats

Every time banning a certain weapon is suggested, they proclaim
I am a responsible gun owner, why should I be punished?

In their next breath, they scream
Try to take my gun and I will kill you!

The very definition of responsible ownership
 
The country decided gay people had a right to get married, and we got gay marriage. The country decided weed should be legalized, and weed is being legalized. The country decided we need universal background checks and a ban on large capacity magazines and guns designed for combat. The NRA and gun nuts will whine, but we will achieve that too.
Come and take it snow flake
Oh, that would be easy. I could take away any of you nuts' guns using a baseball bat.
Is that a threat? Or just your typical Stoopid?
 
Founding fathers were talking about musket (not even considered firearms) armed militias, not assualt weapons for private citizens.
Really it comes down to this. We need to classify AR15's as title 2 weapons.
You cannot demonstrate the necessity you claim.

They are too dangerous. Same reason we classified machine guns as title 2 weapons. It wasn't "necessary" to put machine guns on the list but we did and when is the last time one was used to do a mass shooting? Exactly.

And sure, if we classify those as too dangerous to sell to the general public, nuts will just use glocks with 20 round magazines. That's why we need to limit the number of rounds a magazine can hold to 10. Trust me, it will save lives. You'll stumble trying to reload. And if you say it won't slow you down then you should have no problem turning in your 20 round magazine in exchange for a 10. Remember, it won't slow you down one bit.
 
If gun owners reacted by saying they will use their constitutional rights to fight bans in court or elect candidates who support them they would have credibility........that is what responsible American citizens do
Thanks. You just described what gun owners have been doing for years with the NRA and others like them!

But to react to a political loss by shooting people demonstrates what they are really about Violence
What political loss, you idiot? Shooting WHAT people, you fool? Who is doing that? The only violence out there are you and yours with talk of staging a coup against America and the Constitution. Go ahead, draw first blood, show us you really intend to usurp the US Constitution, and you'll have every soldier, every cop, every gun owner in the land defending themselves against dirt balls like you. You make me sick.

Funny, it was you Leftards who reacted to a political loss. You lost to Trump and what did you do? You've threatened people on the streets, in restaurants, and even shot them trying to kill them in baseball parks.

GO LOOK IN THE FUCKING MIRROR, ASSHOLE.
No

You just described the true feelings of gun owners

If I don’t get my way, I will start shooting people

You must be reading other people's posts. You need to get back on your meds quickly.

I guess you thinking the Jews complaining about Hitler's gas chambers was just a bunch of Semites whining too about not "getting their way."

You continually reinvent a new meaning to Idiot.

We already know what the Left does when they don't get their way:
  • They mob rallies with violence.
  • They throw food and spit at patrons.
  • They threaten and chase them in the streets.
  • They shoot them with rifles in baseball parks.
  • The Left continually describes their true feelings as political losers.
1-SKdJM9IMRcNC-RbXyDE6lg.jpeg
 
Don't need a car that goes 100mph either, but they make and sell them
And:

- heavily restrict where you can drive them
- restrict how fast you can drive them
- require written and performance tests for them
- register every sale and register every vehicle that leaves your property
- make you renew your license to operate them, requiring a relevant background check every time you renew

Yes, please, continue comparing cars and guns.
Which Amendment in the Bill of Rights covers driving cars?
Which amendment in the bill of rights covers buying long rifles without a universal background check, or mandatory registration?

None.

Wrong again Stoopid. The 2nd A says: SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. What part of that is too far over your head?
 
If gun owners reacted by saying they will use their constitutional rights to fight bans in court or elect candidates who support them they would have credibility........that is what responsible American citizens do
Thanks. You just described what gun owners have been doing for years with the NRA and others like them!

But to react to a political loss by shooting people demonstrates what they are really about Violence
What political loss, you idiot? Shooting WHAT people, you fool? Who is doing that? The only violence out there are you and yours with talk of staging a coup against America and the Constitution. Go ahead, draw first blood, show us you really intend to usurp the US Constitution, and you'll have every soldier, every cop, every gun owner in the land defending themselves against dirt balls like you. You make me sick.

Funny, it was you Leftards who reacted to a political loss. You lost to Trump and what did you do? You've threatened people on the streets, in restaurants, and even shot them trying to kill them in baseball parks.

GO LOOK IN THE FUCKING MIRROR, ASSHOLE.
No

You just described the true feelings of gun owners

If I don’t get my way, I will start shooting people

You must be reading other people's posts. You need to get back on your meds quickly.

I guess you thinking the Jews complaining about Hitler's gas chambers was just a bunch of Semites whining too about not "getting their way."

You continually reinvent a new meaning to Idiot.

We already know what the Left does when they don't get their way:
  • They mob rallies with violence.
  • They throw food and spit at patrons.
  • They threaten and chase them in the streets.
  • They shoot them with rifles in baseball parks.
  • The Left continually describes their true feelings as political losers.
View attachment 279884
Again you are making threats against our government if you don’t agree with a certain law

That is not responsible gun ownership

Beto is right about you guys
 
If gun owners reacted by saying they will use their constitutional rights to fight bans in court or elect candidates who support them they would have credibility........that is what responsible American citizens do
Thanks. You just described what gun owners have been doing for years with the NRA and others like them!

But to react to a political loss by shooting people demonstrates what they are really about Violence
What political loss, you idiot? Shooting WHAT people, you fool? Who is doing that? The only violence out there are you and yours with talk of staging a coup against America and the Constitution. Go ahead, draw first blood, show us you really intend to usurp the US Constitution, and you'll have every soldier, every cop, every gun owner in the land defending themselves against dirt balls like you. You make me sick.

Funny, it was you Leftards who reacted to a political loss. You lost to Trump and what did you do? You've threatened people on the streets, in restaurants, and even shot them trying to kill them in baseball parks.

GO LOOK IN THE FUCKING MIRROR, ASSHOLE.
No

You just described the true feelings of gun owners

If I don’t get my way, I will start shooting people

You must be reading other people's posts. You need to get back on your meds quickly.

I guess you thinking the Jews complaining about Hitler's gas chambers was just a bunch of Semites whining too about not "getting their way."

You continually reinvent a new meaning to Idiot.

We already know what the Left does when they don't get their way:
  • They mob rallies with violence.
  • They throw food and spit at patrons.
  • They threaten and chase them in the streets.
  • They shoot them with rifles in baseball parks.
  • The Left continually describes their true feelings as political losers.
View attachment 279884

Who said this? If Barack Obama becomes the president in November, again, I will be either be dead or in jail by this time next year.

He also recommends decapitating Democrats: "We need to ride onto that battlefield and chop their heads off in November."

Is this a threat? How else would Nugent have us understand it? It goes without saying that comments like this have no place in politics. Indeed, the Secret Service tells New York that they're investigating his statement (not that they don't have other things to worry about at the moment. Nugent will likely end up with a slap on the wrist, if that).
 
Don't need a car that goes 100mph either, but they make and sell them
And:

- heavily restrict where you can drive them
- restrict how fast you can drive them
- require written and performance tests for them
- register every sale and register every vehicle that leaves your property
- make you renew your license to operate them, requiring a relevant background check every time you renew

Yes, please, continue comparing cars and guns.
Which Amendment in the Bill of Rights covers driving cars?
Which amendment in the bill of rights covers buying long rifles without a universal background check, or mandatory registration?

None.

Wrong again Stoopid. The 2nd A says: SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. What part of that is too far over your head?
Are you in a militia? Is it well regulated?
 
He thinks it's a Military weapon. He knows nothing about it or guns in general. Would you hire someone to build your house that knows nothing about construction? What a fucking Dufus.

Beto went to school and can read...

What Is Different Between Ar15 Vs M4? - Daily Shooting | Shooting Tips And Reviews

But well done... My question is how many kids have to die before common sense gun laws come in?

We have too may gun laws. Getting rid of gun laws should be the order of the day.


Our problem isn't too many guns. It is all the leftist idiots running around who cannot be trusted to handled them responsibly. Anyone ever notice that the more gun laws the fearful Left write, the more gun violence goes up?

How many gun laws did they have in 1776? I only know of one:

second-amendment-SC.jpg
 
Reported that three children age 4years, 6 years and 8 years old shot in Tarrant county TX. Sunday before last, can any one confirm this.
No mater what, SECURE YOUR GUNS.
 
Alex Jones Warns Beto: Keep Your Filthy Hands Off Our 2nd Amendment!
Establishment puppet Beto O’Rourke has become the mouthpiece of the victim disarmament lobby and has pledged, quote “Hell yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47!” LMFAO!! you losers don't even know the half of reality..

Then Beto better be prepared to supply lots of body bags for all the dead people he is going to kill trying to take legal guns out of the hands of millions of peaceful, law-abiding people. I know the AK can carry a magazine that one alone can hold 100 rounds, and there are rifles out there capable of shooting a hole through an engine block, much less a man. Who are you going to send in first, Beto? Why not let it be you?


Responsible gun owner

Try to take my AR 15 and me and my buddies will kill you

Beto is right
Gun owners like this can’t be trusted
 
Don't need a car that goes 100mph either, but they make and sell them
And:

- heavily restrict where you can drive them
- restrict how fast you can drive them
- require written and performance tests for them
- register every sale and register every vehicle that leaves your property
- make you renew your license to operate them, requiring a relevant background check every time you renew

Yes, please, continue comparing cars and guns.
Which Amendment in the Bill of Rights covers driving cars?
Which amendment in the bill of rights covers buying long rifles without a universal background check, or mandatory registration?

None.

Wrong again Stoopid. The 2nd A says: SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. What part of that is too far over your head?

Did they infringe on your rights when the classified machine guns as Title 2 weapons? You seem to be suggesting that if they put AR15's on the list that they would be infringing on your rights. Well then they already infringed on your rights when they classified machine guns as title 2 weapons. Isn't that correct? So it looks like you accepted that infringement before and you will accept it again.

You can have a glock. You can even have a rifle that holds 10 rounds. No bump stocks and no automatics. Is that infringing on your rights? Then it seems like you'll bend over and take if if they do it again. Right?

I'm serious. If classifying machine guns as title 2 weapons is infringing on your rights, then they have already done that bro. And you did NOTHING about it. So we are going to eventually classify AR's as Title 2. Sorry, we don't want you having guns that powerful. You're too crazy.

Title II weapons, or NFA firearms, are restricted firearms and other devices regulated by the National Firearms Act (NFA). These items are only sold by specially licensed FFL dealers with a Class 3 Special Occupational Tax permit, which is why they are also often referred to as Class 3 weapons.
 
What is it about left tards who do not know the meaning of "shall not be infringed"?
It doesn’t mean weapon manufacturers can make wmds or that you can possess them.

How come you don’t cry about machine guns being classified and regulated differently than most other firearms? So just throw ar15s on that list.
You are a moron..

The founding fathers wanted the populace to be equally armed as any government entity.

...so a private stash of tanks, rockets and nuclear weapons is cool with you?

Founding fathers were talking about musket (not even considered firearms) armed militias, not assualt weapons for private citizens.

Really it comes down to this. We need to classify AR15's as title 2 weapons. Right wingers don't cry about the guns that are currently classified as title 2 weapons and they won't say a fucking thing when AR15's and guns like them are also put on this list.

Title II weapons, or NFA firearms, are restricted firearms and other devices regulated by the National Firearms Act (NFA). These items are only sold by specially licensed FFL dealers with a Class 3 Special Occupational Tax permit, which is why they are also often referred to as Class 3 weapons.

People looking to purchase these weapons must go through a licensed FFL Dealer who either has the item or can accept the transfer for the NFA device. After arranging with the dealer, it is then necessary to get approval for the transfer from the ATF. This is done by submitting an ATF Form 4. The cost to process the transfer is $200 and requires the applicant to submit identifying information. Approval for the item will come back in the form of a "tax stamp." Once the ATF approves the transfer, the buyer can then complete the transaction with their NFA Dealer.

So you can legally own a machine gun. But you have to go through all this to get one. That's why very few people today own them. And that's exactly what we want. No one needs to own an AR15 that holds 20 bullets. Too many nuts out there can get their hands on these wmd's.

Oh, and Beto O'Rorke is an idiot. If you have a AR15 feel free to keep it and you don't even have to register it as a title 2 weapon. BUT, if you want to go buy a new one, well, ou won't find them on the shelf at Dunhams.
what makes an AR15 "title 2" then vs any other semi-automatic rifle?

I have covered that over and over. If you have to ask, maybe you shouldn't own one in the first place.
 
Don't need a car that goes 100mph either, but they make and sell them
And:

- heavily restrict where you can drive them
- restrict how fast you can drive them
- require written and performance tests for them
- register every sale and register every vehicle that leaves your property
- make you renew your license to operate them, requiring a relevant background check every time you renew

Yes, please, continue comparing cars and guns.
Which Amendment in the Bill of Rights covers driving cars?
Which amendment in the bill of rights covers buying long rifles without a universal background check, or mandatory registration?

None.


the 2nd.

you should read it
Wrong. Wow, been in a coma? That argument lost long ago. The 2nd amendment does not guarantee you a right to own any firearm, nor a right to do so without a universal background check.

In fact, I could ban every single gun except for musket loaders, enforce the right of anyone to own one, and the second amendment will not have been violated, as stated.

7a.jpg



Jefferson Gun Carry.png
 
Did they infringe on your rights when the classified machine guns as Title 2 weapons?
Are machineguns , SBRs and SBSs in common use for traditionally legal purposes?
You seem to be suggesting that if they put AR15's on the list that they would be infringing on your rights.
Are machineguns , SBRs and SBSs in common use for traditionally legal purposes?

The answers to these questions address your argument, in toto.
 
Don't need a car that goes 100mph either, but they make and sell them
And:

- heavily restrict where you can drive them
- restrict how fast you can drive them
- require written and performance tests for them
- register every sale and register every vehicle that leaves your property
- make you renew your license to operate them, requiring a relevant background check every time you renew

Yes, please, continue comparing cars and guns.
Which Amendment in the Bill of Rights covers driving cars?
Which amendment in the bill of rights covers buying long rifles without a universal background check, or mandatory registration?

None.

Wrong again Stoopid. The 2nd A says: SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. What part of that is too far over your head?
Are you in a militia? Is it well regulated?

Without legal gun owners, there can be no Militia. Get it now?
 
Which Amendment in the Bill of Rights covers driving cars?
Which amendment in the bill of rights covers buying long rifles without a universal background check, or mandatory registration?

None.


the 2nd.

you should read it
Wrong. Wow, been in a coma? That argument lost long ago. The 2nd amendment does not guarantee you a right to own any firearm, nor a right to do so without a universal background check.

In fact, I could ban every single gun except for musket loaders, enforce the right of anyone to own one, and the second amendment will not have been violated, as stated.
Lol people own tanks you jizz monkey
And have to follow the rules of where and how they use them. Duh. Dang, this is like wrestling with 4 year olds.


Hey butthole. So do gun owners. They have more rules to follow than 10,000 car owners. And rules on how you keep and use your tank only apply in peace time. Let the government try to usurp authority over the Constitution to enact a tyranny and ALL BETS ARE OFF. Duh Dang. This is like talking to an idiot.
 
Last edited:
the 2nd.

you should read it
Wrong. Wow, been in a coma? That argument lost long ago. The 2nd amendment does not guarantee you a right to own any firearm, nor a right to do so without a universal background check.

In fact, I could ban every single gun except for musket loaders, enforce the right of anyone to own one, and the second amendment will not have been violated, as stated.
Lol people own tanks you jizz monkey
And have to follow the rules of where and how they use them. Duh. Dang, this is like wrestling with 4 year olds.
Rules really hahah you don’t say
Test them, if you don't believe me. One more crackpot gun nut off the streets, sounds good to me!

Funny, I've met and known THOUSANDS of firearms owners, gun collectors and NRA members and not one of them was a crackpot or a nut. Some of the most solid and down to earth people you could ever want to meet. How many do you know? Zero?
 

Forum List

Back
Top