Hatred or Anger?

[katsteve2012]

We? What makes you believe that the top 1% of wealthy white Americans feels any kinship towards you or believes that your "interests" are "theirs"?

Never claimed they did.

So please DO proceed with advancing your own "interests" instead of incessantly bitching and moaning about "Anti White Discrimination", and the cause any losses within the marginal ranks of the white population being favoritism shown to the Black population.

I will. With or without your approval.

You alt right, white nationalist types present the current greatest threat to the public.

Your complete inability to understand anyone that doesn't cow tow to your ideology is noted, as being very sad and pathetic.

Your outrage at being forced to compete on an equal basis, without favoritism by default make you a dangerous, unhinged segment of society.

Your need to lie about the current system of favoritism being shown to minorities shows that you are the dangerously unhinged segment of society.

Quite the opposite, Jr. I understand varying opinions and normally respect the right of most individuals to believe as they choose. I live a comfortable life because of the work that I did, not because of any flake like you being "victimized."

What I DO NOT respect or have tolerance for are incessantly whiny, weak men like you who are angry at an entire group of people over what are likely your own shortcomings, and in most cases have never experienced real discrimination in its worst form.

So save your words. I do not have a shred of empathy for your failures.

YOur behavior here makes your claims highly dubious.


YOur assumptions about my life mean less than nothing to me.

Im not making any claims here, you fool. Where have you seen me whining like you about being discriminated against?

And if my "assumptions" mean nothing, why do you insist on responding to my every word?

No self control?

You claimed to be respectful of others believing as they choose. That was a claim. I find it hard to believe I have to explain that to you.

Your claim, in light of your behavior here is highly dubious.




My reasons for being here are not relevant to our discussion.

You get what you put out there. Deal with it.

 

[IM2]

When whites are so obtuse to not see the person making these comments is a racist and reads the comments without immediately denouncing this person and what they say, then you allow such hate to continue.

.

I challenge you to explain what about my post was racist.

This challenge is rhetorical since I know that you cannot do it, because A. there is nothing racist about it, and B. you are stupid.

Assuming that you do as I predict and completely fail to support your insulting and asshole claim, everything I said, thus still stands.





Public discourse in this country, indeed in THE WHOLE FUCKING WORLD, has been full of black expressing their anger over slavery, and this and that for my entire adult life.


And you are acting like it is, what? 1925?


FYI, I celebrate behavior like yours, because I believe it will help wake up White Americas to the reality that multiculturalism and attempts to heal the past, have not only failed, but in some ways have made matters WORSE.

And that we should IMMEDIATELY cease all such efforts and start taking steps to protect and advance our interests.

Everything about your post was racist. Now look dumb ass yo dot want me to start posting up the illustrious history of white colonization of India, Asia, Africa and South America to shut you up . Second the public discourse you have heard for your whole life has not been blacks expressing their anger only but slavery. Slavery is just one section. Finally wen have whir snot protected their interests? If things have gotten worse because of the recognition of multiculturalism it is because you racists refuse to accept others. So then when you look at every statement you made, we see the entire post is racist.

1. Not sure how you think the colonial histories would support your position. Sure. It was bad. It was also mostly a long time ago, and still, by now, quite boring and used mostly to support current political bullshit.

2. Nope. Plenty of angry expression about just about everything, real or imagined.

3. Whites have not been protecting our interests as we have been supporting a system of discrimination in favor of blacks in order to make up for past disadvantage. And indeed, the very idea of discussing white interests has been taboo for generations.

4. And none of that is based on any idea that blacks are inferior, or that whites are superior. THus, not racist.

There has not been any supporting a system of discrimination in favor of anyone, most certainly not whites.

There has been bi-partisan support of discrimination in favor of blacks for generations.

I LOVE that you lie about this. I want you to keep lying about that.


Whites, cons AND libs need to wake up to the monster they have created.


Even stupid old whites like the lefty gay in in this video. Who is so dumbfounded when confronted by a lefty like you.

There has been no discrimination in favor of blacks. What there has been are attempts at equal opportunity whites like you call discrimination.

You cannot produce one policy that was written and enacted that discriminates against whites.

 

[Correll]

Never claimed they did.

I will. With or without your approval.

Your complete inability to understand anyone that doesn't cow tow to your ideology is noted, as being very sad and pathetic.


Your need to lie about the current system of favoritism being shown to minorities shows that you are the dangerously unhinged segment of society.

Quite the opposite, Jr. I understand varying opinions and normally respect the right of most individuals to believe as they choose. I live a comfortable life because of the work that I did, not because of any flake like you being "victimized."

What I DO NOT respect or have tolerance for are incessantly whiny, weak men like you who are angry at an entire group of people over what are likely your own shortcomings, and in most cases have never experienced real discrimination in its worst form.

So save your words. I do not have a shred of empathy for your failures.

YOur behavior here makes your claims highly dubious.


YOur assumptions about my life mean less than nothing to me.

Im not making any claims here, you fool. Where have you seen me whining like you about being discriminated against?

And if my "assumptions" mean nothing, why do you insist on responding to my every word?

No self control?

You claimed to be respectful of others believing as they choose. That was a claim. I find it hard to believe I have to explain that to you.

Your claim, in light of your behavior here is highly dubious.




My reasons for being here are not relevant to our discussion.

You get what you put out there. Deal with it.

NOpe. NOthing I said deserves your rudeness or false accusations.

YOu are the bad guy here.

 

[bgrouse]

There has been no discrimination in favor of blacks. What there has been are attempts at equal opportunity whites like you call discrimination.

You cannot produce one policy that was written and enacted that discriminates against whites.

Even NPR thinks so:

The majority opinion explicitly does not reverse the court's 2003 decision upholding the right of colleges and universities to use race as one of several factors in achieving a diverse student body.

Supreme Court Rules on Race and Schools

The rule started out with NOT allowing institutions to use race to decide who gets accepted. Obviously blacks weren't well-represented in too many places other than gangs and prisons, so the court changed the rules. Naturally, since the law applies to legal institutions, like colleges (where whites are well represented), and since it's generally the blacks that want integration, not the whites, it is inherently a pro-black rule.

 

[Correll]

I challenge you to explain what about my post was racist.

This challenge is rhetorical since I know that you cannot do it, because A. there is nothing racist about it, and B. you are stupid.

Assuming that you do as I predict and completely fail to support your insulting and asshole claim, everything I said, thus still stands.





Public discourse in this country, indeed in THE WHOLE FUCKING WORLD, has been full of black expressing their anger over slavery, and this and that for my entire adult life.


And you are acting like it is, what? 1925?


FYI, I celebrate behavior like yours, because I believe it will help wake up White Americas to the reality that multiculturalism and attempts to heal the past, have not only failed, but in some ways have made matters WORSE.

And that we should IMMEDIATELY cease all such efforts and start taking steps to protect and advance our interests.

Everything about your post was racist. Now look dumb ass yo dot want me to start posting up the illustrious history of white colonization of India, Asia, Africa and South America to shut you up . Second the public discourse you have heard for your whole life has not been blacks expressing their anger only but slavery. Slavery is just one section. Finally wen have whir snot protected their interests? If things have gotten worse because of the recognition of multiculturalism it is because you racists refuse to accept others. So then when you look at every statement you made, we see the entire post is racist.

1. Not sure how you think the colonial histories would support your position. Sure. It was bad. It was also mostly a long time ago, and still, by now, quite boring and used mostly to support current political bullshit.

2. Nope. Plenty of angry expression about just about everything, real or imagined.

3. Whites have not been protecting our interests as we have been supporting a system of discrimination in favor of blacks in order to make up for past disadvantage. And indeed, the very idea of discussing white interests has been taboo for generations.

4. And none of that is based on any idea that blacks are inferior, or that whites are superior. THus, not racist.

There has not been any supporting a system of discrimination in favor of anyone, most certainly not whites.

There has been bi-partisan support of discrimination in favor of blacks for generations.

I LOVE that you lie about this. I want you to keep lying about that.


Whites, cons AND libs need to wake up to the monster they have created.


Even stupid old whites like the lefty gay in in this video. Who is so dumbfounded when confronted by a lefty like you.

There has been no discrimination in favor of blacks. What there has been are attempts at equal opportunity whites like you call discrimination.

You cannot produce one policy that was written and enacted that discriminates against whites.

YOur absurd denial of reality is noted and laughed at.

 

[IM2]

There has been no discrimination in favor of blacks. What there has been are attempts at equal opportunity whites like you call discrimination.

You cannot produce one policy that was written and enacted that discriminates against whites.

Even NPR thinks so:

The majority opinion explicitly does not reverse the court's 2003 decision upholding the right of colleges and universities to use race as one of several factors in achieving a diverse student body.

Supreme Court Rules on Race and Schools

The rule started out with NOT allowing institutions to use race to decide who gets accepted. Obviously blacks weren't well-represented in too many places other than gangs and prisons, so the court changed the rules. Naturally, since the law applies to legal institutions, like colleges (where whites are well represented), and since it's generally the blacks that want integration, not the whites, it is inherently a pro-black rule.

All I can say is you white boys need to learn how to read.

The majority opinion explicitly does not reverse the court's 2003 decision upholding the right of colleges and universities to use race as one of several factors in achieving a diverse student body

One of several factors. But whites used race to deny blacks and everyone else not white from entering schools for about 2 centuries so this whining about use of race as a criteria coming from whites is a joke.

.Number 1 : The Supreme Court issued a series of far-reaching split decisions Thursday, limiting the use of race to assign public school enrollment

Supreme Court Rules on Race and Schools

The use of race was limited. Learn to read.
.

 

[IM2]

Everything about your post was racist. Now look dumb ass yo dot want me to start posting up the illustrious history of white colonization of India, Asia, Africa and South America to shut you up . Second the public discourse you have heard for your whole life has not been blacks expressing their anger only but slavery. Slavery is just one section. Finally wen have whir snot protected their interests? If things have gotten worse because of the recognition of multiculturalism it is because you racists refuse to accept others. So then when you look at every statement you made, we see the entire post is racist.

1. Not sure how you think the colonial histories would support your position. Sure. It was bad. It was also mostly a long time ago, and still, by now, quite boring and used mostly to support current political bullshit.

2. Nope. Plenty of angry expression about just about everything, real or imagined.

3. Whites have not been protecting our interests as we have been supporting a system of discrimination in favor of blacks in order to make up for past disadvantage. And indeed, the very idea of discussing white interests has been taboo for generations.

4. And none of that is based on any idea that blacks are inferior, or that whites are superior. THus, not racist.

There has not been any supporting a system of discrimination in favor of anyone, most certainly not whites.

There has been bi-partisan support of discrimination in favor of blacks for generations.

I LOVE that you lie about this. I want you to keep lying about that.


Whites, cons AND libs need to wake up to the monster they have created.


Even stupid old whites like the lefty gay in in this video. Who is so dumbfounded when confronted by a lefty like you.

There has been no discrimination in favor of blacks. What there has been are attempts at equal opportunity whites like you call discrimination.

You cannot produce one policy that was written and enacted that discriminates against whites.

YOur absurd denial of reality is noted and laughed at.

Laugh all you want but you can't produce an anti white discriminatory law or policy.

 

[bgrouse]

There has been no discrimination in favor of blacks. What there has been are attempts at equal opportunity whites like you call discrimination.

You cannot produce one policy that was written and enacted that discriminates against whites.

Even NPR thinks so:

The majority opinion explicitly does not reverse the court's 2003 decision upholding the right of colleges and universities to use race as one of several factors in achieving a diverse student body.

Supreme Court Rules on Race and Schools

The rule started out with NOT allowing institutions to use race to decide who gets accepted. Obviously blacks weren't well-represented in too many places other than gangs and prisons, so the court changed the rules. Naturally, since the law applies to legal institutions, like colleges (where whites are well represented), and since it's generally the blacks that want integration, not the whites, it is inherently a pro-black rule.

All I can say is you white boys need to learn how to read.

The majority opinion explicitly does not reverse the court's 2003 decision upholding the right of colleges and universities to use race as one of several factors in achieving a diverse student body

In other words, they can at the very least use it as a tiebreaker to discriminate against whites.

One of several factors. But whites used race to deny blacks and everyone else not white from entering schools for about 2 centuries so this whining about use of race as a criteria coming from whites is a joke.

No whining. Just telling you that you're wrong and don't know the law. Typical for blacks.

.Number 1 : The Supreme Court issued a series of far-reaching split decisions Thursday, limiting the use of race to assign public school enrollment

Supreme Court Rules on Race and Schools

The use of race was limited. Learn to read.
.

I already can. "Limited" doesn't mean nonexistent.

and it leaves public school systems with a limited arsenal to maintain racial diversity

Limited policies is not the same as no policies.

 

[katsteve2012]

Quite the opposite, Jr. I understand varying opinions and normally respect the right of most individuals to believe as they choose. I live a comfortable life because of the work that I did, not because of any flake like you being "victimized."

What I DO NOT respect or have tolerance for are incessantly whiny, weak men like you who are angry at an entire group of people over what are likely your own shortcomings, and in most cases have never experienced real discrimination in its worst form.

So save your words. I do not have a shred of empathy for your failures.

YOur behavior here makes your claims highly dubious.


YOur assumptions about my life mean less than nothing to me.

Im not making any claims here, you fool. Where have you seen me whining like you about being discriminated against?

And if my "assumptions" mean nothing, why do you insist on responding to my every word?

No self control?

You claimed to be respectful of others believing as they choose. That was a claim. I find it hard to believe I have to explain that to you.

Your claim, in light of your behavior here is highly dubious.




My reasons for being here are not relevant to our discussion.

You get what you put out there. Deal with it.

NOpe. NOthing I said deserves your rudeness or false accusations.

YOu are the bad guy here.

There were no false accusations on my part. It is not my problem that your fragile feelings are so easily wounded by a complete stranger.

 

[Correll]

1. Not sure how you think the colonial histories would support your position. Sure. It was bad. It was also mostly a long time ago, and still, by now, quite boring and used mostly to support current political bullshit.

2. Nope. Plenty of angry expression about just about everything, real or imagined.

3. Whites have not been protecting our interests as we have been supporting a system of discrimination in favor of blacks in order to make up for past disadvantage. And indeed, the very idea of discussing white interests has been taboo for generations.

4. And none of that is based on any idea that blacks are inferior, or that whites are superior. THus, not racist.

There has not been any supporting a system of discrimination in favor of anyone, most certainly not whites.

There has been bi-partisan support of discrimination in favor of blacks for generations.

I LOVE that you lie about this. I want you to keep lying about that.


Whites, cons AND libs need to wake up to the monster they have created.


Even stupid old whites like the lefty gay in in this video. Who is so dumbfounded when confronted by a lefty like you.

There has been no discrimination in favor of blacks. What there has been are attempts at equal opportunity whites like you call discrimination.

You cannot produce one policy that was written and enacted that discriminates against whites.

YOur absurd denial of reality is noted and laughed at.

Laugh all you want but you can't produce an anti white discriminatory law or policy.

YOur pretense of ignorance of the last 60-70 years is not credible.

 

[katsteve2012]

Everything about your post was racist. Now look dumb ass yo dot want me to start posting up the illustrious history of white colonization of India, Asia, Africa and South America to shut you up . Second the public discourse you have heard for your whole life has not been blacks expressing their anger only but slavery. Slavery is just one section. Finally wen have whir snot protected their interests? If things have gotten worse because of the recognition of multiculturalism it is because you racists refuse to accept others. So then when you look at every statement you made, we see the entire post is racist.

1. Not sure how you think the colonial histories would support your position. Sure. It was bad. It was also mostly a long time ago, and still, by now, quite boring and used mostly to support current political bullshit.

2. Nope. Plenty of angry expression about just about everything, real or imagined.

3. Whites have not been protecting our interests as we have been supporting a system of discrimination in favor of blacks in order to make up for past disadvantage. And indeed, the very idea of discussing white interests has been taboo for generations.

4. And none of that is based on any idea that blacks are inferior, or that whites are superior. THus, not racist.

There has not been any supporting a system of discrimination in favor of anyone, most certainly not whites.

There has been bi-partisan support of discrimination in favor of blacks for generations.

I LOVE that you lie about this. I want you to keep lying about that.


Whites, cons AND libs need to wake up to the monster they have created.


Even stupid old whites like the lefty gay in in this video. Who is so dumbfounded when confronted by a lefty like you.

There has been no discrimination in favor of blacks. What there has been are attempts at equal opportunity whites like you call discrimination.

You cannot produce one policy that was written and enacted that discriminates against whites.

YOur absurd denial of reality is noted and laughed at.

Then name a law or policy that specifically discriminates against white people and favors blacks?

Alternative facts and your imagination do not count.

 

[IM2]

There has been no discrimination in favor of blacks. What there has been are attempts at equal opportunity whites like you call discrimination.

You cannot produce one policy that was written and enacted that discriminates against whites.

Even NPR thinks so:

The majority opinion explicitly does not reverse the court's 2003 decision upholding the right of colleges and universities to use race as one of several factors in achieving a diverse student body.

Supreme Court Rules on Race and Schools

The rule started out with NOT allowing institutions to use race to decide who gets accepted. Obviously blacks weren't well-represented in too many places other than gangs and prisons, so the court changed the rules. Naturally, since the law applies to legal institutions, like colleges (where whites are well represented), and since it's generally the blacks that want integration, not the whites, it is inherently a pro-black rule.

All I can say is you white boys need to learn how to read.

The majority opinion explicitly does not reverse the court's 2003 decision upholding the right of colleges and universities to use race as one of several factors in achieving a diverse student body

In other words, they can at the very least use it as a tiebreaker to discriminate against whites.

One of several factors. But whites used race to deny blacks and everyone else not white from entering schools for about 2 centuries so this whining about use of race as a criteria coming from whites is a joke.

No whining. Just telling you that you're wrong and don't know the law. Typical for blacks.

.Number 1 : The Supreme Court issued a series of far-reaching split decisions Thursday, limiting the use of race to assign public school enrollment

Supreme Court Rules on Race and Schools

The use of race was limited. Learn to read.
.

I already can. "Limited" doesn't mean nonexistent.

and it leaves public school systems with a limited arsenal to maintain racial diversity

Limited policies is not the same as no policies.

Since whites have used race to determine everything I don't care about your sniveling, whiny garbage used to present a strawman built on false equivalences..

 

[Correll]

YOur behavior here makes your claims highly dubious.


YOur assumptions about my life mean less than nothing to me.

Im not making any claims here, you fool. Where have you seen me whining like you about being discriminated against?

And if my "assumptions" mean nothing, why do you insist on responding to my every word?

No self control?

You claimed to be respectful of others believing as they choose. That was a claim. I find it hard to believe I have to explain that to you.

Your claim, in light of your behavior here is highly dubious.




My reasons for being here are not relevant to our discussion.

You get what you put out there. Deal with it.

NOpe. NOthing I said deserves your rudeness or false accusations.

YOu are the bad guy here.

There were no false accusations on my part. It is not my problem that your fragile feelings are so easily wounded by a complete stranger.

You have repeatedly made false accusations.


Your pretense that there is something wrong with ME, that I call you on your rudeness is the Logical Fallacy of Proof by Ridicule and thus you point is invalid, you are wrong and you are dishonest.

 

[bgrouse]

There has been no discrimination in favor of blacks. What there has been are attempts at equal opportunity whites like you call discrimination.

You cannot produce one policy that was written and enacted that discriminates against whites.

Even NPR thinks so:

The majority opinion explicitly does not reverse the court's 2003 decision upholding the right of colleges and universities to use race as one of several factors in achieving a diverse student body.

Supreme Court Rules on Race and Schools

The rule started out with NOT allowing institutions to use race to decide who gets accepted. Obviously blacks weren't well-represented in too many places other than gangs and prisons, so the court changed the rules. Naturally, since the law applies to legal institutions, like colleges (where whites are well represented), and since it's generally the blacks that want integration, not the whites, it is inherently a pro-black rule.

All I can say is you white boys need to learn how to read.

The majority opinion explicitly does not reverse the court's 2003 decision upholding the right of colleges and universities to use race as one of several factors in achieving a diverse student body

In other words, they can at the very least use it as a tiebreaker to discriminate against whites.

One of several factors. But whites used race to deny blacks and everyone else not white from entering schools for about 2 centuries so this whining about use of race as a criteria coming from whites is a joke.

No whining. Just telling you that you're wrong and don't know the law. Typical for blacks.

.Number 1 : The Supreme Court issued a series of far-reaching split decisions Thursday, limiting the use of race to assign public school enrollment

Supreme Court Rules on Race and Schools

The use of race was limited. Learn to read.
.

I already can. "Limited" doesn't mean nonexistent.

and it leaves public school systems with a limited arsenal to maintain racial diversity

Limited policies is not the same as no policies.

Since whites have used race to determine everything I don't care about your sniveling, whiny garbage used to present a strawman built on false equivalences..

I know you don't care about the facts. Negroes and their liberal supports often like to make "factual" statements and then turn around and say they don't care about history once the REAL facts are brought to their attention.

 

[Correll]

1. Not sure how you think the colonial histories would support your position. Sure. It was bad. It was also mostly a long time ago, and still, by now, quite boring and used mostly to support current political bullshit.

2. Nope. Plenty of angry expression about just about everything, real or imagined.

3. Whites have not been protecting our interests as we have been supporting a system of discrimination in favor of blacks in order to make up for past disadvantage. And indeed, the very idea of discussing white interests has been taboo for generations.

4. And none of that is based on any idea that blacks are inferior, or that whites are superior. THus, not racist.

There has not been any supporting a system of discrimination in favor of anyone, most certainly not whites.

There has been bi-partisan support of discrimination in favor of blacks for generations.

I LOVE that you lie about this. I want you to keep lying about that.


Whites, cons AND libs need to wake up to the monster they have created.


Even stupid old whites like the lefty gay in in this video. Who is so dumbfounded when confronted by a lefty like you.

There has been no discrimination in favor of blacks. What there has been are attempts at equal opportunity whites like you call discrimination.

You cannot produce one policy that was written and enacted that discriminates against whites.

YOur absurd denial of reality is noted and laughed at.

Then name a law or policy that specifically discriminates against white people and favors blacks?

Alternative facts and your imagination do not count.

If I dismissed your buddies absurd denial of reality, what makes you think your would get any different treatment?

 

[IM2]

There has not been any supporting a system of discrimination in favor of anyone, most certainly not whites.

There has been bi-partisan support of discrimination in favor of blacks for generations.

I LOVE that you lie about this. I want you to keep lying about that.


Whites, cons AND libs need to wake up to the monster they have created.


Even stupid old whites like the lefty gay in in this video. Who is so dumbfounded when confronted by a lefty like you.

There has been no discrimination in favor of blacks. What there has been are attempts at equal opportunity whites like you call discrimination.

You cannot produce one policy that was written and enacted that discriminates against whites.

YOur absurd denial of reality is noted and laughed at.

Laugh all you want but you can't produce an anti white discriminatory law or policy.

YOur pretense of ignorance of the last 60-70 years is not credible.

.
You telling me what's not credible is laughable boy. You can't produce one anti white discriminatory policy and we all know it.

There hasn't been any move to anti white discrimination over the last 60-70 years.

 

[IM2]

There has been no discrimination in favor of blacks. What there has been are attempts at equal opportunity whites like you call discrimination.

You cannot produce one policy that was written and enacted that discriminates against whites.

Even NPR thinks so:

The majority opinion explicitly does not reverse the court's 2003 decision upholding the right of colleges and universities to use race as one of several factors in achieving a diverse student body.

Supreme Court Rules on Race and Schools

The rule started out with NOT allowing institutions to use race to decide who gets accepted. Obviously blacks weren't well-represented in too many places other than gangs and prisons, so the court changed the rules. Naturally, since the law applies to legal institutions, like colleges (where whites are well represented), and since it's generally the blacks that want integration, not the whites, it is inherently a pro-black rule.

All I can say is you white boys need to learn how to read.

The majority opinion explicitly does not reverse the court's 2003 decision upholding the right of colleges and universities to use race as one of several factors in achieving a diverse student body

In other words, they can at the very least use it as a tiebreaker to discriminate against whites.

One of several factors. But whites used race to deny blacks and everyone else not white from entering schools for about 2 centuries so this whining about use of race as a criteria coming from whites is a joke.

No whining. Just telling you that you're wrong and don't know the law. Typical for blacks.

.Number 1 : The Supreme Court issued a series of far-reaching split decisions Thursday, limiting the use of race to assign public school enrollment

Supreme Court Rules on Race and Schools

The use of race was limited. Learn to read.
.

I already can. "Limited" doesn't mean nonexistent.

and it leaves public school systems with a limited arsenal to maintain racial diversity

Limited policies is not the same as no policies.

Since whites have used race to determine everything I don't care about your sniveling, whiny garbage used to present a strawman built on false equivalences..

I know you don't care about the facts. Negroes and their liberal supports often like to make "factual" statements and then turn around and say they don't care about history once the REAL facts are brought to their attention.

Let me know when you produce those real facts.

 

[katsteve2012]

There has not been any supporting a system of discrimination in favor of anyone, most certainly not whites.

There has been bi-partisan support of discrimination in favor of blacks for generations.

I LOVE that you lie about this. I want you to keep lying about that.


Whites, cons AND libs need to wake up to the monster they have created.


Even stupid old whites like the lefty gay in in this video. Who is so dumbfounded when confronted by a lefty like you.

There has been no discrimination in favor of blacks. What there has been are attempts at equal opportunity whites like you call discrimination.

You cannot produce one policy that was written and enacted that discriminates against whites.

YOur absurd denial of reality is noted and laughed at.

Laugh all you want but you can't produce an anti white discriminatory law or policy.

YOur pretense of ignorance of the last 60-70 years is not credible.

ROFLMAO. 60-70 years ago it was 1947- 1957, dipstick.

If you had been black or anything other than white in America during that time with the same emotional fragility that you have now, you would have committed suicide.

 

[bgrouse]

.
You telling me what's not credible is laughable boy. You can't produce one anti white discriminatory policy and we all know it.

There hasn't been any move to anti white discrimination over the last 60-70 years.

You quoted one!

decision upholding the right of colleges and universities to use race as one of several factors in achieving a diverse student body

 

[IM2]

There has not been any supporting a system of discrimination in favor of anyone, most certainly not whites.

There has been bi-partisan support of discrimination in favor of blacks for generations.

I LOVE that you lie about this. I want you to keep lying about that.


Whites, cons AND libs need to wake up to the monster they have created.


Even stupid old whites like the lefty gay in in this video. Who is so dumbfounded when confronted by a lefty like you.

There has been no discrimination in favor of blacks. What there has been are attempts at equal opportunity whites like you call discrimination.

You cannot produce one policy that was written and enacted that discriminates against whites.

YOur absurd denial of reality is noted and laughed at.

Then name a law or policy that specifically discriminates against white people and favors blacks?

Alternative facts and your imagination do not count.

If I dismissed your buddies absurd denial of reality, what makes you think your would get any different treatment?

If this anti white discrimination is so real, you could produce at least 1 law that shows it.