Has anyone considered that Mueller may be working on a charge of treason against Trump?

People keep talking about collusion despite the fact that collusion is not a crime. However, conspiracy to hack into the DNC email system AND obstruction of justice are both crimes and would qualify as high crimes and misdemeanors for the purposes of impeachment.

But what if that's not the least of it?

After all, isn't it strange that Trump never says anything bad or negative about Putin? Isn't it also extremely odd that Trump keeps denying Russian interference in the 2016 election despite overwhelming evidence provided by numerous intelligence agencies? And why hasn't Trump enacted the sanctions that congress overwhelmingly voted on last year?

Let me propose a possible theory of what happened in the past and what's happening behind the scenes now: Years ago, Trump struck a bargain with the devil (so to speak). He agreed to help Russians launder money (which is, of course, illegal) in exchange for payment. For the most part, these transactions mostly flew under the radar. However, the Russians would certainly have evidence of all of these transactions although they would certainly have no incentive to blow the whistle on Trump. But once Trump ran for president and WON the election, the Russians would now have leverage over Trump. That leverage would give the Russians the power to blackmail Trump. At this point, Trump had a choice. One choice was the choice of a patriot: refuse to give in to the blackmail and risk the possibility that the money laundering scheme would go public. The other choice is the choice of a traitor who would place his own personal interest above the interests of the USA while also betraying his oath of office. In other words, Trump is quite possibly putting the interests of Putin and Russia above that of his own country and is essentially a foreign agent, and a turncoat. More plainly, it's quite possible that President Trump is a traitor.

What say you?



I’m, duh. Sad thing is Mewler will never get it.
 
People keep talking about collusion despite the fact that collusion is not a crime. However, conspiracy to hack into the DNC email system AND obstruction of justice are both crimes and would qualify as high crimes and misdemeanors for the purposes of impeachment.

But what if that's not the least of it?

After all, isn't it strange that Trump never says anything bad or negative about Putin? Isn't it also extremely odd that Trump keeps denying Russian interference in the 2016 election despite overwhelming evidence provided by numerous intelligence agencies? And why hasn't Trump enacted the sanctions that congress overwhelmingly voted on last year?

Let me propose a possible theory of what happened in the past and what's happening behind the scenes now: Years ago, Trump struck a bargain with the devil (so to speak). He agreed to help Russians launder money (which is, of course, illegal) in exchange for payment. For the most part, these transactions mostly flew under the radar. However, the Russians would certainly have evidence of all of these transactions although they would certainly have no incentive to blow the whistle on Trump. But once Trump ran for president and WON the election, the Russians would now have leverage over Trump. That leverage would give the Russians the power to blackmail Trump. At this point, Trump had a choice. One choice was the choice of a patriot: refuse to give in to the blackmail and risk the possibility that the money laundering scheme would go public. The other choice is the choice of a traitor who would place his own personal interest above the interests of the USA while also betraying his oath of office. In other words, Trump is quite possibly putting the interests of Putin and Russia above that of his own country and is essentially a foreign agent, and a turncoat. More plainly, it's quite possible that President Trump is a traitor.

What say you?


Boy.... you just joined the stupid club...


Trump....puts troops in Poland, hurts putin.

Trump makes deal to put 10.5 billion dollars of Patriot missiles in Poland..hurts putin.

Trump pushes American energy production...hurts putin.

Trump building up U.S. military....hurts putin.

Trump increases sanctions against Russian oligarchs...hurts putin.

Trump killed 200 Russian mercenaries working for putin... hurts putin.

Trump gave deadly weapons to Ukraine, to kill Russians.... hurts putin.

Trump told NATO to pay for and rebuild their militaries... hurts putin.

Trump told Germany to stop giving Russia billions of dollars...hurts putin.

Trump attacked Syria after chemical weapons attack...hurts putin.

Trump ended obama Iran deal...hurts putin.

Just gave 200 million more to Ukraine to fight putin.

Media Will Have A Hard Time Spinning Trump's Latest Move That Hurts Russia
U.S. troops head to Russian border in Poland as Trump shifts NATO view
US and Poland strike $10.5 billion missile defense deal | DW | 18.11.2017
 
People keep talking about collusion despite the fact that collusion is not a crime. However, conspiracy to hack into the DNC email system AND obstruction of justice are both crimes and would qualify as high crimes and misdemeanors for the purposes of impeachment.

But what if that's not the least of it?

After all, isn't it strange that Trump never says anything bad or negative about Putin? Isn't it also extremely odd that Trump keeps denying Russian interference in the 2016 election despite overwhelming evidence provided by numerous intelligence agencies? And why hasn't Trump enacted the sanctions that congress overwhelmingly voted on last year?

Let me propose a possible theory of what happened in the past and what's happening behind the scenes now: Years ago, Trump struck a bargain with the devil (so to speak). He agreed to help Russians launder money (which is, of course, illegal) in exchange for payment. For the most part, these transactions mostly flew under the radar. However, the Russians would certainly have evidence of all of these transactions although they would certainly have no incentive to blow the whistle on Trump. But once Trump ran for president and WON the election, the Russians would now have leverage over Trump. That leverage would give the Russians the power to blackmail Trump. At this point, Trump had a choice. One choice was the choice of a patriot: refuse to give in to the blackmail and risk the possibility that the money laundering scheme would go public. The other choice is the choice of a traitor who would place his own personal interest above the interests of the USA while also betraying his oath of office. In other words, Trump is quite possibly putting the interests of Putin and Russia above that of his own country and is essentially a foreign agent, and a turncoat. More plainly, it's quite possible that President Trump is a traitor.

What say you?


Boy.... you just joined the stupid club...


Trump....puts troops in Poland, hurts putin.

Trump makes deal to put 10.5 billion dollars of Patriot missiles in Poland

Trump pushes American energy production...hurts putin.

Trump building up U.S. military....hurts putin.

Trump increases sanctions against Russian oligarchs...hurts putin.

Trump killed 200 Russian mercenaries working for putin... hurts putin.

Trump gave deadly weapons to Ukraine, to kill Russians.... hurts putin.

Trump told NATO to pay for and rebuild their militaries... hurts putin.

Trump told Germany to stop giving Russia billions of dollars...hurts putin.

Trump attacked Syria after chemical weapons attack...hurts putin.

Trump ended obama Iran deal...hurts putin.

Just gave 200 million more to Ukraine to fight putin.

Media Will Have A Hard Time Spinning Trump's Latest Move That Hurts Russia
U.S. troops head to Russian border in Poland as Trump shifts NATO view
US and Poland strike $10.5 billion missile defense deal | DW | 18.11.2017



About those missiles in Poland, wasn’t that what Obama was telling Vlads puppet he would have more freedom to deal with after his election?
 
Says who? You? :laugh2:


The server was never central to the investigation. Only to your dopey narrative.
"the investigation" ? LOL. There is no "investigation", and never has been. In order for LE investigations to occur, crimes have to have occurred, and then those crimes are investigated. In this case, no one has identified any crime, and there is nothing to investigate.

All this is, is a ludicrous, sham witch hunt striving to bring down Trump's presidency. Sessions should never have been appointed AG. There never should have been any investigation. Mueller should have been in prison years ago for his own treasonous activities with CAIR, ISNA, MPAC, NAIT, HAMAS, OIC, etc.

Says ME. :biggrin:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...WSRGovtPurgeAndActiveMeasures5Dec2013.pdf?V=1
 
Last edited:
Tell us all how the server would in any way reveal the names of the russian intelligence officers behind the attack and the who ,how and in what ways it was then disseminated and ultimately financed.

You can't. Obviously the server was not required to assemble this detailed analysis.

It's a dopey narrative without thought or substance.

These latest indictments are soley about the 2016 election and the russian operation, dope. I suggest you read them.
The indictments are too late. The DNC (and the crooked Obama FBI)
already sealed their fate when they hid their server from the FBI (and the American people). They threw away any credibility they might have had. Anything that happens after that, is mush.​

The Demmies have already moved on from Russian collusion and meddling. Their issue now is going to obstruction of justice. I don't see how they're going to get anywhere with that, though.

Maybe Mueller can get his cozy buddies in the Muslim Brotherhood front groups to mount some kind of smear campaign against Trump. Mueller's probably just itching to do that, Islamist traitor that he is.

Now reply to my post about the Democrat riggers, Mr Dodge.

The indictments are too late

Says who? You? :laugh2:


The server was never central to the investigation. Only to your dopey narrative.
"the investigation" ? LOL. There is no "investigation", and never has been. In order for investigations to occur, crimes have to have occurred, and then those crimes are investigated. In this case, no one has identified any crime, and there is nothing to investigate.

All this is, is a ludicrous, sham witch hunt striving to bring down Trump's presidency. Sessions should never have been appointed AG. There never should have been any investigation. Mueller should have been in prison years ago for his own treasonous activities with CAIR, ISNA, MPAC, NAIT, HAMAS, OIC, etc.

Says ME. :biggrin:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...WSRGovtPurgeAndActiveMeasures5Dec2013.pdf?V=1


Sessions is Tom Hayden.... Trump needs Michael Corleone to be his AG.....
 
People keep talking about collusion despite the fact that collusion is not a crime. However, conspiracy to hack into the DNC email system AND obstruction of justice are both crimes and would qualify as high crimes and misdemeanors for the purposes of impeachment.

But what if that's not the least of it?

After all, isn't it strange that Trump never says anything bad or negative about Putin? Isn't it also extremely odd that Trump keeps denying Russian interference in the 2016 election despite overwhelming evidence provided by numerous intelligence agencies? And why hasn't Trump enacted the sanctions that congress overwhelmingly voted on last year?

Let me propose a possible theory of what happened in the past and what's happening behind the scenes now: Years ago, Trump struck a bargain with the devil (so to speak). He agreed to help Russians launder money (which is, of course, illegal) in exchange for payment. For the most part, these transactions mostly flew under the radar. However, the Russians would certainly have evidence of all of these transactions although they would certainly have no incentive to blow the whistle on Trump. But once Trump ran for president and WON the election, the Russians would now have leverage over Trump. That leverage would give the Russians the power to blackmail Trump. At this point, Trump had a choice. One choice was the choice of a patriot: refuse to give in to the blackmail and risk the possibility that the money laundering scheme would go public. The other choice is the choice of a traitor who would place his own personal interest above the interests of the USA while also betraying his oath of office. In other words, Trump is quite possibly putting the interests of Putin and Russia above that of his own country and is essentially a foreign agent, and a turncoat. More plainly, it's quite possible that President Trump is a traitor.

What say you?

You just outstupided Rdean. Congrats!
 
Sessions is Tom Hayden.... Trump needs Michael Corleone to be his AG.....
I could see a few good ATTORNEYS better for the job than Sessions. Rudy Guiliani, Chris Christie, Ted Cruz, Ann Coulter, or any of the judges on Trump's list for SCOTUS nominations. Any of these would have had Hillary behind bars by now.
 
Says who? You? :laugh2:


The server was never central to the investigation. Only to your dopey narrative.
"the investigation" ? LOL. There is no "investigation", and never has been. In order for LE investigations to occur, crimes have to have occurred, and then those crimes are investigated. In this case, no one has identified any crime, and there is nothing to investigate.

All this is, is a ludicrous, sham witch hunt striving to bring down Trump's presidency. Sessions should never have been appointed AG. There never should have been any investigation. Mueller should have been in prison years ago for his own treasonous activities with CAIR, ISNA, MPAC, NAIT, HAMAS, OIC, etc.

Says ME. :biggrin:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...WSRGovtPurgeAndActiveMeasures5Dec2013.pdf?V=1

Read the indictments, loser.

The "server" is irrelevant.
 
An American President convicted of treason would be quite a spectacle. Imagine the ratings!

The Constitution says you are barking up the wrong tree!
The Constitution prohibits broadcasting treason trials?

No, the Constitution prevents trials because no treason has occured by the definition contained in the document itself.
Oh...so you know all of what is there in the investigation, eh?
 
People keep talking about collusion despite the fact that collusion is not a crime. However, conspiracy to hack into the DNC email system AND obstruction of justice are both crimes and would qualify as high crimes and misdemeanors for the purposes of impeachment.

But what if that's not the least of it?

After all, isn't it strange that Trump never says anything bad or negative about Putin? Isn't it also extremely odd that Trump keeps denying Russian interference in the 2016 election despite overwhelming evidence provided by numerous intelligence agencies? And why hasn't Trump enacted the sanctions that congress overwhelmingly voted on last year?

Let me propose a possible theory of what happened in the past and what's happening behind the scenes now: Years ago, Trump struck a bargain with the devil (so to speak). He agreed to help Russians launder money (which is, of course, illegal) in exchange for payment. For the most part, these transactions mostly flew under the radar. However, the Russians would certainly have evidence of all of these transactions although they would certainly have no incentive to blow the whistle on Trump. But once Trump ran for president and WON the election, the Russians would now have leverage over Trump. That leverage would give the Russians the power to blackmail Trump. At this point, Trump had a choice. One choice was the choice of a patriot: refuse to give in to the blackmail and risk the possibility that the money laundering scheme would go public. The other choice is the choice of a traitor who would place his own personal interest above the interests of the USA while also betraying his oath of office. In other words, Trump is quite possibly putting the interests of Putin and Russia above that of his own country and is essentially a foreign agent, and a turncoat. More plainly, it's quite possible that President Trump is a traitor.

What say you?

I say that Trump is taking a hard line with Iran, which is an important Ally of Russia, which puts the whole "Trump is beholden to Russia" thing in Jeopardy.
 
People keep talking about collusion despite the fact that collusion is not a crime. However, conspiracy to hack into the DNC email system AND obstruction of justice are both crimes and would qualify as high crimes and misdemeanors for the purposes of impeachment.

But what if that's not the least of it?

After all, isn't it strange that Trump never says anything bad or negative about Putin? Isn't it also extremely odd that Trump keeps denying Russian interference in the 2016 election despite overwhelming evidence provided by numerous intelligence agencies? And why hasn't Trump enacted the sanctions that congress overwhelmingly voted on last year?

Let me propose a possible theory of what happened in the past and what's happening behind the scenes now: Years ago, Trump struck a bargain with the devil (so to speak). He agreed to help Russians launder money (which is, of course, illegal) in exchange for payment. For the most part, these transactions mostly flew under the radar. However, the Russians would certainly have evidence of all of these transactions although they would certainly have no incentive to blow the whistle on Trump. But once Trump ran for president and WON the election, the Russians would now have leverage over Trump. That leverage would give the Russians the power to blackmail Trump. At this point, Trump had a choice. One choice was the choice of a patriot: refuse to give in to the blackmail and risk the possibility that the money laundering scheme would go public. The other choice is the choice of a traitor who would place his own personal interest above the interests of the USA while also betraying his oath of office. In other words, Trump is quite possibly putting the interests of Putin and Russia above that of his own country and is essentially a foreign agent, and a turncoat. More plainly, it's quite possible that President Trump is a traitor.

What say you?

I say that Trump is taking a hard line with Iran, which is an important Ally of Russia, which puts the whole "Trump is beholden to Russia" thing in Jeopardy.

Not to mention, the whole "Trump is beholden to Russia" thing is moronic to begin with.
 
An American President convicted of treason would be quite a spectacle. Imagine the ratings!

The Constitution says you are barking up the wrong tree!
The Constitution prohibits broadcasting treason trials?

No, the Constitution prevents trials because no treason has occured by the definition contained in the document itself.
Oh...so you know all of what is there in the investigation, eh?

No, I know that we are not at war with Russia so that precludes any charges of treason. Learn to read, dumbass!
 
Read the indictments, loser.

The "server" is irrelevant.
There is no investigation. Having reading comprehension problems ?

Russia is nothing but big deflection, to take attention away from Mexico, Guatemala, China, and millions of illegal alien voters, where the real election damage is being done.

And you're participating in that deflection right now, by all your yammering about Russia. Not doing much good though. At least according to polls. In a left-slanted poll (USA Today Suffolk University poll), out of 20 choices of issues considered to be most important to affect the vote, Russia/Election meddling came in DEAD LAST, with only 5 choices out of 1000 people polled.

The top choices were >>

1. Immigration/Border Security (123 choices)

2. Gun Control/Second Amendment (119 choices)

3. Taxes/Fees (103 choices)

The categories of Integrity/Character and Oppose/Get Rid of/Impeach Trump also came in near the bottom with only 14 and 12 choices.

https://www.suffolk.edu/documents/SUPRC/3_1_2018_tables.pdf
 
Last edited:

Really? Trump has lived a selfish and a hedonist lifestyle for his entire life. It's not a stretch.
I agree with that statement but I think your scenario is a bit far fetched. If Trump was being blackmailed by the Russians, someone in the White House would have blown the whistle.

I doubt if there are many people in his administration that would fall on their sword for him. Trump doesn't inspire loyalty among his staff which is why he values it so highly. He is a user and his staff is using him to build a resume.

We have had many presidents, such as JFK, Reagan, Clinton, and Obama where their staff idolized them and would do anything for them but that's not Trump. The only people that are truly devoted to him is his family which is why he has brought them into his administration. They are among the precious few that he trusts.
 
Let’s see he’s snagged one minnow on some tax stuff from over 10 years ago whom he basically tortured and that’s it
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top