blastoff
Undocumented Reg. User
I admire Mueller as a tireless source of loony circle jerkable razzmatazz.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Constitution prohibits broadcasting treason trials?An American President convicted of treason would be quite a spectacle. Imagine the ratings!
The Constitution says you are barking up the wrong tree!
The Constitution prohibits broadcasting treason trials?An American President convicted of treason would be quite a spectacle. Imagine the ratings!
The Constitution says you are barking up the wrong tree!
People keep talking about collusion despite the fact that collusion is not a crime. However, conspiracy to hack into the DNC email system AND obstruction of justice are both crimes and would qualify as high crimes and misdemeanors for the purposes of impeachment.
But what if that's not the least of it?
After all, isn't it strange that Trump never says anything bad or negative about Putin? Isn't it also extremely odd that Trump keeps denying Russian interference in the 2016 election despite overwhelming evidence provided by numerous intelligence agencies? And why hasn't Trump enacted the sanctions that congress overwhelmingly voted on last year?
Let me propose a possible theory of what happened in the past and what's happening behind the scenes now: Years ago, Trump struck a bargain with the devil (so to speak). He agreed to help Russians launder money (which is, of course, illegal) in exchange for payment. For the most part, these transactions mostly flew under the radar. However, the Russians would certainly have evidence of all of these transactions although they would certainly have no incentive to blow the whistle on Trump. But once Trump ran for president and WON the election, the Russians would now have leverage over Trump. That leverage would give the Russians the power to blackmail Trump. At this point, Trump had a choice. One choice was the choice of a patriot: refuse to give in to the blackmail and risk the possibility that the money laundering scheme would go public. The other choice is the choice of a traitor who would place his own personal interest above the interests of the USA while also betraying his oath of office. In other words, Trump is quite possibly putting the interests of Putin and Russia above that of his own country and is essentially a foreign agent, and a turncoat. More plainly, it's quite possible that President Trump is a traitor.
What say you?
People keep talking about collusion despite the fact that collusion is not a crime. However, conspiracy to hack into the DNC email system AND obstruction of justice are both crimes and would qualify as high crimes and misdemeanors for the purposes of impeachment.
But what if that's not the least of it?
After all, isn't it strange that Trump never says anything bad or negative about Putin? Isn't it also extremely odd that Trump keeps denying Russian interference in the 2016 election despite overwhelming evidence provided by numerous intelligence agencies? And why hasn't Trump enacted the sanctions that congress overwhelmingly voted on last year?
Let me propose a possible theory of what happened in the past and what's happening behind the scenes now: Years ago, Trump struck a bargain with the devil (so to speak). He agreed to help Russians launder money (which is, of course, illegal) in exchange for payment. For the most part, these transactions mostly flew under the radar. However, the Russians would certainly have evidence of all of these transactions although they would certainly have no incentive to blow the whistle on Trump. But once Trump ran for president and WON the election, the Russians would now have leverage over Trump. That leverage would give the Russians the power to blackmail Trump. At this point, Trump had a choice. One choice was the choice of a patriot: refuse to give in to the blackmail and risk the possibility that the money laundering scheme would go public. The other choice is the choice of a traitor who would place his own personal interest above the interests of the USA while also betraying his oath of office. In other words, Trump is quite possibly putting the interests of Putin and Russia above that of his own country and is essentially a foreign agent, and a turncoat. More plainly, it's quite possible that President Trump is a traitor.
What say you?
People keep talking about collusion despite the fact that collusion is not a crime. However, conspiracy to hack into the DNC email system AND obstruction of justice are both crimes and would qualify as high crimes and misdemeanors for the purposes of impeachment.
But what if that's not the least of it?
After all, isn't it strange that Trump never says anything bad or negative about Putin? Isn't it also extremely odd that Trump keeps denying Russian interference in the 2016 election despite overwhelming evidence provided by numerous intelligence agencies? And why hasn't Trump enacted the sanctions that congress overwhelmingly voted on last year?
Let me propose a possible theory of what happened in the past and what's happening behind the scenes now: Years ago, Trump struck a bargain with the devil (so to speak). He agreed to help Russians launder money (which is, of course, illegal) in exchange for payment. For the most part, these transactions mostly flew under the radar. However, the Russians would certainly have evidence of all of these transactions although they would certainly have no incentive to blow the whistle on Trump. But once Trump ran for president and WON the election, the Russians would now have leverage over Trump. That leverage would give the Russians the power to blackmail Trump. At this point, Trump had a choice. One choice was the choice of a patriot: refuse to give in to the blackmail and risk the possibility that the money laundering scheme would go public. The other choice is the choice of a traitor who would place his own personal interest above the interests of the USA while also betraying his oath of office. In other words, Trump is quite possibly putting the interests of Putin and Russia above that of his own country and is essentially a foreign agent, and a turncoat. More plainly, it's quite possible that President Trump is a traitor.
What say you?
Boy.... you just joined the stupid club...
Trump....puts troops in Poland, hurts putin.
Trump makes deal to put 10.5 billion dollars of Patriot missiles in Poland
Trump pushes American energy production...hurts putin.
Trump building up U.S. military....hurts putin.
Trump increases sanctions against Russian oligarchs...hurts putin.
Trump killed 200 Russian mercenaries working for putin... hurts putin.
Trump gave deadly weapons to Ukraine, to kill Russians.... hurts putin.
Trump told NATO to pay for and rebuild their militaries... hurts putin.
Trump told Germany to stop giving Russia billions of dollars...hurts putin.
Trump attacked Syria after chemical weapons attack...hurts putin.
Trump ended obama Iran deal...hurts putin.
Just gave 200 million more to Ukraine to fight putin.
Media Will Have A Hard Time Spinning Trump's Latest Move That Hurts Russia
U.S. troops head to Russian border in Poland as Trump shifts NATO view
US and Poland strike $10.5 billion missile defense deal | DW | 18.11.2017
"the investigation" ? LOL. There is no "investigation", and never has been. In order for LE investigations to occur, crimes have to have occurred, and then those crimes are investigated. In this case, no one has identified any crime, and there is nothing to investigate.Says who? You?
The server was never central to the investigation. Only to your dopey narrative.
"the investigation" ? LOL. There is no "investigation", and never has been. In order for investigations to occur, crimes have to have occurred, and then those crimes are investigated. In this case, no one has identified any crime, and there is nothing to investigate.The indictments are too late. The DNC (and the crooked Obama FBI)Tell us all how the server would in any way reveal the names of the russian intelligence officers behind the attack and the who ,how and in what ways it was then disseminated and ultimately financed.
You can't. Obviously the server was not required to assemble this detailed analysis.
It's a dopey narrative without thought or substance.
These latest indictments are soley about the 2016 election and the russian operation, dope. I suggest you read them.
already sealed their fate when they hid their server from the FBI (and the American people). They threw away any credibility they might have had. Anything that happens after that, is mush.
The Demmies have already moved on from Russian collusion and meddling. Their issue now is going to obstruction of justice. I don't see how they're going to get anywhere with that, though.
Maybe Mueller can get his cozy buddies in the Muslim Brotherhood front groups to mount some kind of smear campaign against Trump. Mueller's probably just itching to do that, Islamist traitor that he is.
Now reply to my post about the Democrat riggers, Mr Dodge.
The indictments are too late
Says who? You?
The server was never central to the investigation. Only to your dopey narrative.
All this is, is a ludicrous, sham witch hunt striving to bring down Trump's presidency. Sessions should never have been appointed AG. There never should have been any investigation. Mueller should have been in prison years ago for his own treasonous activities with CAIR, ISNA, MPAC, NAIT, HAMAS, OIC, etc.
Says ME.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...WSRGovtPurgeAndActiveMeasures5Dec2013.pdf?V=1
People keep talking about collusion despite the fact that collusion is not a crime. However, conspiracy to hack into the DNC email system AND obstruction of justice are both crimes and would qualify as high crimes and misdemeanors for the purposes of impeachment.
But what if that's not the least of it?
After all, isn't it strange that Trump never says anything bad or negative about Putin? Isn't it also extremely odd that Trump keeps denying Russian interference in the 2016 election despite overwhelming evidence provided by numerous intelligence agencies? And why hasn't Trump enacted the sanctions that congress overwhelmingly voted on last year?
Let me propose a possible theory of what happened in the past and what's happening behind the scenes now: Years ago, Trump struck a bargain with the devil (so to speak). He agreed to help Russians launder money (which is, of course, illegal) in exchange for payment. For the most part, these transactions mostly flew under the radar. However, the Russians would certainly have evidence of all of these transactions although they would certainly have no incentive to blow the whistle on Trump. But once Trump ran for president and WON the election, the Russians would now have leverage over Trump. That leverage would give the Russians the power to blackmail Trump. At this point, Trump had a choice. One choice was the choice of a patriot: refuse to give in to the blackmail and risk the possibility that the money laundering scheme would go public. The other choice is the choice of a traitor who would place his own personal interest above the interests of the USA while also betraying his oath of office. In other words, Trump is quite possibly putting the interests of Putin and Russia above that of his own country and is essentially a foreign agent, and a turncoat. More plainly, it's quite possible that President Trump is a traitor.
What say you?
I could see a few good ATTORNEYS better for the job than Sessions. Rudy Guiliani, Chris Christie, Ted Cruz, Ann Coulter, or any of the judges on Trump's list for SCOTUS nominations. Any of these would have had Hillary behind bars by now.Sessions is Tom Hayden.... Trump needs Michael Corleone to be his AG.....
"the investigation" ? LOL. There is no "investigation", and never has been. In order for LE investigations to occur, crimes have to have occurred, and then those crimes are investigated. In this case, no one has identified any crime, and there is nothing to investigate.Says who? You?
The server was never central to the investigation. Only to your dopey narrative.
All this is, is a ludicrous, sham witch hunt striving to bring down Trump's presidency. Sessions should never have been appointed AG. There never should have been any investigation. Mueller should have been in prison years ago for his own treasonous activities with CAIR, ISNA, MPAC, NAIT, HAMAS, OIC, etc.
Says ME.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...WSRGovtPurgeAndActiveMeasures5Dec2013.pdf?V=1
Oh...so you know all of what is there in the investigation, eh?The Constitution prohibits broadcasting treason trials?An American President convicted of treason would be quite a spectacle. Imagine the ratings!
The Constitution says you are barking up the wrong tree!
No, the Constitution prevents trials because no treason has occured by the definition contained in the document itself.
People keep talking about collusion despite the fact that collusion is not a crime. However, conspiracy to hack into the DNC email system AND obstruction of justice are both crimes and would qualify as high crimes and misdemeanors for the purposes of impeachment.
But what if that's not the least of it?
After all, isn't it strange that Trump never says anything bad or negative about Putin? Isn't it also extremely odd that Trump keeps denying Russian interference in the 2016 election despite overwhelming evidence provided by numerous intelligence agencies? And why hasn't Trump enacted the sanctions that congress overwhelmingly voted on last year?
Let me propose a possible theory of what happened in the past and what's happening behind the scenes now: Years ago, Trump struck a bargain with the devil (so to speak). He agreed to help Russians launder money (which is, of course, illegal) in exchange for payment. For the most part, these transactions mostly flew under the radar. However, the Russians would certainly have evidence of all of these transactions although they would certainly have no incentive to blow the whistle on Trump. But once Trump ran for president and WON the election, the Russians would now have leverage over Trump. That leverage would give the Russians the power to blackmail Trump. At this point, Trump had a choice. One choice was the choice of a patriot: refuse to give in to the blackmail and risk the possibility that the money laundering scheme would go public. The other choice is the choice of a traitor who would place his own personal interest above the interests of the USA while also betraying his oath of office. In other words, Trump is quite possibly putting the interests of Putin and Russia above that of his own country and is essentially a foreign agent, and a turncoat. More plainly, it's quite possible that President Trump is a traitor.
What say you?
People keep talking about collusion despite the fact that collusion is not a crime. However, conspiracy to hack into the DNC email system AND obstruction of justice are both crimes and would qualify as high crimes and misdemeanors for the purposes of impeachment.
But what if that's not the least of it?
After all, isn't it strange that Trump never says anything bad or negative about Putin? Isn't it also extremely odd that Trump keeps denying Russian interference in the 2016 election despite overwhelming evidence provided by numerous intelligence agencies? And why hasn't Trump enacted the sanctions that congress overwhelmingly voted on last year?
Let me propose a possible theory of what happened in the past and what's happening behind the scenes now: Years ago, Trump struck a bargain with the devil (so to speak). He agreed to help Russians launder money (which is, of course, illegal) in exchange for payment. For the most part, these transactions mostly flew under the radar. However, the Russians would certainly have evidence of all of these transactions although they would certainly have no incentive to blow the whistle on Trump. But once Trump ran for president and WON the election, the Russians would now have leverage over Trump. That leverage would give the Russians the power to blackmail Trump. At this point, Trump had a choice. One choice was the choice of a patriot: refuse to give in to the blackmail and risk the possibility that the money laundering scheme would go public. The other choice is the choice of a traitor who would place his own personal interest above the interests of the USA while also betraying his oath of office. In other words, Trump is quite possibly putting the interests of Putin and Russia above that of his own country and is essentially a foreign agent, and a turncoat. More plainly, it's quite possible that President Trump is a traitor.
What say you?
I say that Trump is taking a hard line with Iran, which is an important Ally of Russia, which puts the whole "Trump is beholden to Russia" thing in Jeopardy.
Every time Mueller takes the stageI admire Mueller as a tireless source of loony circle jerkable razzmatazz.
Oh...so you know all of what is there in the investigation, eh?The Constitution prohibits broadcasting treason trials?An American President convicted of treason would be quite a spectacle. Imagine the ratings!
The Constitution says you are barking up the wrong tree!
No, the Constitution prevents trials because no treason has occured by the definition contained in the document itself.
There is no investigation. Having reading comprehension problems ?Read the indictments, loser.
The "server" is irrelevant.
I agree with that statement but I think your scenario is a bit far fetched. If Trump was being blackmailed by the Russians, someone in the White House would have blown the whistle.
Really? Trump has lived a selfish and a hedonist lifestyle for his entire life. It's not a stretch.
Not if the only people in the white house who know for sure are his closest relatives.If Trump was being blackmailed by the Russians, someone in the White House would have blown the whistle.