Harvard study: Hey, maybe we’re placing too much emphasis on a college education

By giving schools more money to set up these programs.

You know throwing money at the problem.

The type of thing the right screams about every time someone tries to fix our schools.

No, idiot, by allowing businesses to set up, and run, the programs, just like they do in Europe.

And to pay for them? Or use socialist funds?


We had somewhat of that kind of system of Vo-Tech schools here in KY. They got sucked into the community college system about 10 years or so ago and now cost 10X as much.
And no longer provide the vocational type of education they once did.
 
You know what else has increased exponetially, the number of students.

We have relegated education to the back burner.

The right excoriates teachers and pays them dirt wages.

You keep spouting the talking points, and ignoring the facts.

We spend more money per student on education than we did in the past, yet we end up with students who perform lower academically. The problem is not that we do not spend enough money, it is that we are not spending money the right way. That is what most people who talk about throwing more money at the problem are talking about when they say that, and more money is not the solution. Unless, that is, you think it makes sense to have schools that cannot afford supplies for the classrooms because they have to pay administrators salaries and test students for arbitrary standards.
 
By giving schools more money to set up these programs.

You know throwing money at the problem.

The type of thing the right screams about every time someone tries to fix our schools.

No, idiot, by allowing businesses to set up, and run, the programs, just like they do in Europe.

And to pay for them? Or use socialist funds?


We had somewhat of that kind of system of Vo-Tech schools here in KY. They got sucked into the community college system about 10 years or so ago and now cost 10X as much.
And no longer provide the vocational type of education they once did.

The Vo-Techs were great but that was too much of a problem for Community Colleges, who are largely becoming 4 year state colleges.

And no place to learn how to fix air conditioners anymore outside of private schools.
 
By giving schools more money to set up these programs.

You know throwing money at the problem.

The type of thing the right screams about every time someone tries to fix our schools.

No, idiot, by allowing businesses to set up, and run, the programs, just like they do in Europe.

And to pay for them? Or use socialist funds?


We had somewhat of that kind of system of Vo-Tech schools here in KY. They got sucked into the community college system about 10 years or so ago and now cost 10X as much.
And no longer provide the vocational type of education they once did.

If the business community wants to get the benefit of the program they have to invest in it. I might be willing to allow businesses willing to do so to claim a tax exemption even though it goes against my policy of not using taxes to shape policy.
 
No, idiot, by allowing businesses to set up, and run, the programs, just like they do in Europe.

And to pay for them? Or use socialist funds?


We had somewhat of that kind of system of Vo-Tech schools here in KY. They got sucked into the community college system about 10 years or so ago and now cost 10X as much.
And no longer provide the vocational type of education they once did.

If the business community wants to get the benefit of the program they have to invest in it. I might be willing to allow businesses willing to do so to claim a tax exemption even though it goes against my policy of not using taxes to shape policy.

No tax exemption needed. If it's a cost they bear to train potential employees, they deduct it. If they fund a non-profit, they deduct it.
 
And to pay for them? Or use socialist funds?


We had somewhat of that kind of system of Vo-Tech schools here in KY. They got sucked into the community college system about 10 years or so ago and now cost 10X as much.
And no longer provide the vocational type of education they once did.

If the business community wants to get the benefit of the program they have to invest in it. I might be willing to allow businesses willing to do so to claim a tax exemption even though it goes against my policy of not using taxes to shape policy.

No tax exemption needed. If it's a cost they bear to train potential employees, they deduct it. If they fund a non-profit, they deduct it.

Good point.
 
There is a philosophy in American education that we do not prepare the kids for "something"; we prepare them for "anything and everything". Theoretical magical thinking. What we are doing, is preparing most of them for "nothing".

I teach about 60 seniors right now. Only a handful have applied to four year colleges. Yet if you asked them what they are doing after high school, 90% of them would say "college". They have not even taken the SATs. They are PROGRAMMED with that response, even though they have no idea what it entails.

Many will go on to community college and perhaps a few will finish. But community college is becoming nothing more than the 13th grade, simply because the kids have been offered no other path. It is causing "arrested development" as the Harvard study has claimed.

False promises and wasted tax dollars. If a teacher were ever truly honest with a kid who had a 4th grade reading level that college was not a viable option, he or she would find a letter in their file with a recommendation for "re-education/sensitivity camp". So we lie and wish them luck.
 
One good vo-tech opportunity right now that none of our leaders seem to see is specialized training for repair of electric and hybrid autos.
I guess no lobbiest has mentioned it to them?
 
There is a philosophy in American education that we do not prepare the kids for "something"; we prepare them for "anything and everything". Theoretical magical thinking. What we are doing, is preparing most of them for "nothing".

I teach about 60 seniors right now. Only a handful have applied to four year colleges. Yet if you asked them what they are doing after high school, 90% of them would say "college". They have not even taken the SATs. They are PROGRAMMED with that response, even though they have no idea what it entails.

Many will go on to community college and perhaps a few will finish. But community college is becoming nothing more than the 13th grade, simply because the kids have been offered no other path. It is causing "arrested development" as the Harvard study has claimed.

False promises and wasted tax dollars. If a teacher were ever truly honest with a kid who had a 4th grade reading level that college was not a viable option, he or she would find a letter in their file with a recommendation for "re-education/sensitivity camp". So we lie and wish them luck.

There is alot of specified training at community college level.

Teaching kids about the world is not teaching them nothing.
 
I did not say "teaching them nothing" They are "taught" plenty. I said "preparing them for nothing".

How's that community college degree working out for you?
 
I had 22 months of vo-tech education and another 5,000 or so classroom hours of additional tech training in my life. I was making $75/hr when I quit working a few years ago.

But then I am absolutely brilliant in technical matters.
 
Last edited:
A new report released by Harvard Wednesday states in some of the strongest terms yet that such a “college for all” emphasis may actually harm many American students – keeping them from having a smooth transition from adolescence to adulthood and a viable career…

“It would be fine if we had an alternative system [for students who don’t get college degrees], but we’re virtually unique among industrialized countries in terms of not having another system and relying so heavily on higher education,” says Robert Schwartz, who heads the Pathways to Prosperity project at Harvard’s Graduate School of Education.

The United States can learn from other countries, particularly in northern Europe, Professor Schwartz says. In Austria, Denmark, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, and Switzerland, for instance, between 40 and 70 percent of high-schoolers opt for programs that combine classroom and workplace learning, many of them involving apprenticeships. These pathways result in a “qualification” that has real currency in the labor market…

“If we persist with the illusion that everyone is going to college, then we’re cheating those kids who aren’t going,” Professor Ferguson says. “A majority of the workforce does not have a college degree, and a majority of the things those people do are going to continue not requiring a college degree.”

Harvard study: Hey, maybe we’re placing too much emphasis on a college education Hot Air

Really? No shit? :eusa_doh:

Score one for common sense.

The question is: how do we fix the ridiculous mindset? :eusa_wall:

By more trade classes in high schools. I don't know what happened to "shop" which was an elective when I was in high school. It included a variety of choices, such as carpentry and machinery, and many MANY of my classmates who knew they couldn't afford college were enrolled. And they were never looked down upon.

The other "mindset" is that community colleges are somehow inferior, which is also not the case. They are much cheaper to attend, and frankly more congenial with fewer "cliques" to put up with.
 
By giving schools more money to set up these programs.

You know throwing money at the problem.

The type of thing the right screams about every time someone tries to fix our schools.


hmmm.... I sorta agree with you. more training facilities for trades in high schools is a great idea. business fundamentals training too.

wasnt it the left that did their best to phase out concrete lifeskill training in schools? insisting that everyone should take an academic track and go to college? I don't believe that conservatives would object to reinstating work preparedness in schools, even if they were called evil for supporting it.

Uh no, the "left" isn't to blame for everything, sorry to inform. Local school boards are responsible for setting curriculum, not the government and not even state governments. And my experience having served on a school board is that they are comprised of a lot of elitists who are more concerned with their children's image than with their studies. Oh, and not all "elitists" are lefties either. Far from it!!
 
I did not say "teaching them nothing" They are "taught" plenty. I said "preparing them for nothing".

How's that community college degree working out for you?

So you are a education snob huh?

So if you see community college as something bad I can asume you would also insult the people who never college track and take shop classes in high school.

Public school is there to teach Americans about the world and educate them so they can be an informed citizenry.

It is NOT designed to teach them how to be merely workers.


Do you have any idea how much it costs a school to build, supply and insure a shop class?
 
The truth of the matter is that many are not smart enough to go to college and do well - That's just the way it is, and it's not anyone's "Fault." One of the biggest problems this country faces IMO is that we don't exactly know what to do with these individuals; We don't want them to leech off the public dole, but we don't want to protect their jobs from outsourcing, either. It's unfortunate that we have a culture to pressure such people to go to college and inevitably fail out, because they just aren't smart enough - All the effort and dedication in the world will not help. Simply, their natural intelligence is not enough.

As far as the college degree itself- Mini nailed it, it's a proving ground. You're showing that you're intelligent and driven enough to earn the degree, so you're likely to be intelligent and driven enough to do well in a professional work environment. It's a barometer for character. Most people I know aren't even working in the field in which they majored.

Myself - I went to a vocational-style trade school after high school, then became an entrepreneur, then went back to "Real" college while still self-employed, and the college helped me enormously; Management and business theory, economics, business law courses, hell I've even employed things I've learned in statistics and other math courses to my business. But that doesn't mean it's for everyone, and certainly doesn't mean the college grad is automatically the best candidate for the job.

I too didn't enter college until ten years after I'd graduated high school. But I had taken two years of secretarial training in high school, something I could (and did) fall back on if I failed to get a job I wanted in journalism. Now I'm sure basic computer training is added to "secretarial" curriculae, but for me it was typing and shorthand (both of which I still use, although the latter not so much). My college degree came in fits and starts because I was working and had to take night classes, which is also something the younger generation doesn't do enough of. So many have been programmed to believe they have to attend a high profile college, complete with the fraternity/sorority affiliations and be a part of the "in crowd" or that's not "college."
 
I would agree too many are shoved into 4-year academic colleges. For many fields the academic basis is necessary, for many others a 2-year degree is sufficient, for skilled trades often little classroom instruction is needed at all.

But post-secondary education in general is here to stay. We simply don't have an economy that has much room for unskilled workers, and that's not going to change. What we need to be doing is improving technical and trade school and programs, going back to formalized apprenticeship programs, and coming up with new programs like those in some areas where 2-year community colleges are targeting degrees or certifications in specialties of local interest.

And for goodness' sake, parents need to stop building their kids' college applications in elementary school and believing they or their children are failures if they don't get into Harvard!

I wonder if I'll ever learn to read ahead. You've said basically the same thing I did (and I swear I didn't copy it!!).
 
People can think and work at the same time.

Not teaching kids the basics and teaching them only what they need to be a low level worker is cheap but stupid.

It's possible to teach physics by analyzing all facets of a modern car. Then the worker not only knows how to produce something but also has a good foundation of Science. Instead, the solution has been to teach them physics in a very boring way which results in someone who barely understands the material and can't fix a car.

That said, there isn't much value to a "thinker" who really doesn't know anything practical and in many cases they never learned how to think or learn, they just regurgitate.

That's why good teachers are so desperately needed in all elementary schools. By the time a student reaches 8th grade, s/he should have not just been taught the mechanics, but taught to learn to learn.
 
It's possible to teach physics by analyzing all facets of a modern car. Then the worker not only knows how to produce something but also has a good foundation of Science. Instead, the solution has been to teach them physics in a very boring way which results in someone who barely understands the material and can't fix a car.

That said, there isn't much value to a "thinker" who really doesn't know anything practical and in many cases they never learned how to think or learn, they just regurgitate.

And to do these programs you need good teachers who require more payment than the 23,000 a year most starting teachers make.

Not necessarily true, but first you need teachers that know Physics *and* know how to fix a car. How many people with degrees in Education do? The money isn't the immediate problem, it's the structure of the system.

You need an investment in schools to change them and EVERY time in my 50+ years talk of fixing schools comes up the right just ends up screaming "throwing money at the problem" and ends any attempts to make it better.

There's a decent basis for that, education funding has increased exponentially while the quality of the result has sunk. Simply spending more money won't fix it and I don't think our schools need more money, just better priorities in spending the money they have.

I did an internship at a TV repair shop when I was in high school. I fetched tools, held flashlights, and wrote estimates for a few hours a week. It counted as one elective class for my diploma. Along the way, I learned how to fix a TV and received one of the best presentations of electrical circuits. This program did not cost the school one dime but was cancelled. Why do you think they did that?

Maybe because Mrs. Snotnose wielded enough influence to use budget money for new cheerleading outfits instead of a trade program to learn icky electronics. I'm telling ya, school boards have way too much power.
 
I think high schools need to be teaching kids how to live in the real world, how to manage money, how to pay hills, basic house hold things like changing a light bulb, etc. have any of you guys spent time with an actual high school student these days? the ones I have dealt with have no clue what is going on in the world and don't have a fucking clue on what it takes to live on their own, high school is doing nothing to prepare them for the real world.

Parents are to blame for much of that. I'm always shocked when I see some documentary or docu-drama where the kids appear to be little angels, dutifully studying in their rooms, when all along they're playing video games, texting, or whatever until the wee hours of the morning, then the parent(s) are surprised when the kids can't get out of bed in the morning.
 

Forum List

Back
Top