Hard proof of PA voter fraud - charges filed.

citygator

Posting From Hunters Laptop
Gold Supporting Member
Jun 23, 2019
16,282
13,999
2,290
Charlotte
Well, with 7M votes cast in PA there are now 3, yes 3, documented cases of voter fraud. All 3 voted for Trump: Dead Mom, Returned in Sunglasses, another Dead Mom Vote.



 
Last edited:
They are when proof is provided to the courts.
Denying evidence doesn't allow the courts to decide- only a judge, who is not the courts, but a singular-
Yep trolls like him and the op ignore facts that roberts and all these other judges are either compromised with the dems having goods on them,have taken bribes,or has death threats if they were honest one ot corrupt with any scandals over their heads like roberts has.
 
They are when proof is provided to the courts.
Denying evidence doesn't allow the courts to decide- only a judge, who is not the courts, but a singular-
Yep trolls like him and the op ignore facts that roberts and all these other judges are either compromised with the dems having goods on them,have taken bribes,or has death threats if they were honest one ot corrupt with any scandals over their heads like roberts has.

Not a single judge on the Supreme Court was willing to side with Trump. Not a one.
 
Oh well too bad for you that judges just aren't interested in election fraud....

They are when proof is provided to the courts.
Per the PA constitution , only the legislature may change PA election laws. It was the election board,not elected by the people, that FRAUDULENTLY changed the law.

This is fact. Go ahead and dispute it. You can't so you won't
You're attempt to deflect will be why didn't the PA supreme court hear the case.
They clearly should have.
 
Well, with 7M votes cast in PA there are now 3, yes 3, documented cases of voter fraud. All 3 voted for Trump: Dead Mom, Returned in Sunglasses, another Dead Mom Vote.



Well..the judges that try and sentence these fools...will be interested, I'm sure!
 
Oh well too bad for you that judges just aren't interested in election fraud....

They are when proof is provided to the courts.
Per the PA constitution , only the legislature may change PA election laws. It was the election board,not elected by the people, that FRAUDULENTLY changed the law.

This is fact. Go ahead and dispute it. You can't so you won't
You're attempt to deflect will be why didn't the PA supreme court hear the case.
They clearly should have.

That was a deal the GOP made with the Dems. You can't rescind it after people have voted.
 
Well, with 7M votes cast in PA there are now 3, yes 3, documented cases of voter fraud. All 3 voted for Trump: Dead Mom, Returned in Sunglasses, another Dead Mom Vote.



Who brought the charges?

if affidavits aren’t evidence, neither is a charge? You haven’t seen anything different than what the affidavits said! Interesting you hypocrites continue to demonstrate your hypocrisy
 

Forum List

Back
Top