Hannity was for NSA surveillance before he was against it

[Smilodonfatalis]

Sean Hannity Displays Hypocrisy On NSA Surveillance (VIDEO)

Hannity is a jackass.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

regardless if we don't stop these hacks now it's going to get far worse.

 

[The Rabbi]

Sean Hannity Displays Hypocrisy On NSA Surveillance (VIDEO)

Hannity is a jackass.

I didnt realize you cared what Hannity thinks. I wont even look at the video because I know you are lying and dishonest.

 

[AquaAthena]

Sean Hannity Displays Hypocrisy On NSA Surveillance (VIDEO)

Hannity is a jackass.

And Joe Biden was against it before he was for it:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2qgU8kJt-0]Biden in 2006: NSA Collection of Phone Records Violates Privacy - YouTube[/ame]

 

[The Rabbi]

Sean Hannity Displays Hypocrisy On NSA Surveillance (VIDEO)

Hannity is a jackass.

And Joe Biden was against it before he was for it:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2qgU8kJt-0]Biden in 2006: NSA Collection of Phone Records Violates Privacy - YouTube[/ame]

Ditto Obama.

 

[JoeBlam]

What is it about NSA surveillance under Bush and now under Soetoro you don't understand? The agency is tasked with tracking potential terrorists ABROAD with ties to potential domestic cells...that means somewhere other than AMERICA....hello? WTF OVER?

 

[FJO]

Sean Hannity Displays Hypocrisy On NSA Surveillance (VIDEO)

Hannity is a jackass.

Obama was for traditional marriage before he was against it.

Obama is a jackass.

 

[Erand7899]

Somehow, liberal/socialists always seem to miss the mark when it comes to cause and effect, and that always leads them to dumbass conclusions concerning the opinions of others.

Reasonable people can support the NSA surveillance of terrorist phone calls, and still oppose the NSA collection of mass telephone data on all Americans. That goes right along with Americans supporting the use of DNA in criminal investigations, and still opposing the mass collection of DNA from all Americans.

 

[Smilodonfatalis]

Somehow, liberal/socialists always seem to miss the mark when it comes to cause and effect, and that always leads them to dumbass conclusions concerning the opinions of others.

Reasonable people can support the NSA surveillance of terrorist phone calls, and still oppose the NSA collection of mass telephone data on all Americans. That goes right along with Americans supporting the use of DNA in criminal investigations, and still opposing the mass collection of DNA from all Americans.

He was never opposed to the mass collection of telephone data until Obama became president.

 

[Smilodonfatalis]

Sean Hannity Displays Hypocrisy On NSA Surveillance (VIDEO)

Hannity is a jackass.

I didnt realize you cared what Hannity thinks. I wont even look at the video because I know you are lying and dishonest.

When have I ever lied or been dishonest?

 

[ScienceRocks]

Everything is measured. I'm not for surveillance that is against the 4th amendment of our constitution. It's funny how you fuckers charge your views when your thug is in power. LOL.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Somehow, liberal/socialists always seem to miss the mark when it comes to cause and effect, and that always leads them to dumbass conclusions concerning the opinions of others.

Reasonable people can support the NSA surveillance of terrorist phone calls, and still oppose the NSA collection of mass telephone data on all Americans. That goes right along with Americans supporting the use of DNA in criminal investigations, and still opposing the mass collection of DNA from all Americans.

He was never opposed to the mass collection of telephone data until Obama became president.

Surveillance of terrorist is a big difference from this mass collection weep throughout the population we're getting now. Get it?

Why is Obama so important to you?

 

[Smilodonfatalis]

Somehow, liberal/socialists always seem to miss the mark when it comes to cause and effect, and that always leads them to dumbass conclusions concerning the opinions of others.

Reasonable people can support the NSA surveillance of terrorist phone calls, and still oppose the NSA collection of mass telephone data on all Americans. That goes right along with Americans supporting the use of DNA in criminal investigations, and still opposing the mass collection of DNA from all Americans.

He was never opposed to the mass collection of telephone data until Obama became president.

Surveillance of terrorist is a big difference from this mass collection weep throughout the population we're getting now. Get it?

Why is Obama so important to you?

This mass collection of data occurred during the Bush administration. This story is nothing new. If first came out in 2006 in USA Today.

Obama is not important to me. I hate Obama. He's too conservative.