Hamilton Brown, Slave owner and alleged Great times 3 grandfather of Kamala

Expanded civil rights lol
Some peoples definitions 9f words and phrases are so appaling its humorous.
I defined nothing, but just out of curiosity, what's your definition of "Expanded civil rights" and "9f words"?
 
Expanded civil rights is a fallacy. Its either equal or its not.
Sorry, too incoherent to merit any polite response. But a quick illustration for your edification:



Different looking starting materials at times, different things being applied at others.. All always applied equally. You got nuthin.
 
Last edited:
Her great great ... grandmother drew no benefit from having been owned, neither from having been raped. Neither did any child of that rape. None of the two, nor their offspring, inherited the fruit of slave labor - rather they provided this fruit to the ownership class.

But the White-privilege peddlers try to forge a case against Harris out of being the victims' great great ... grandchild. This is literally insane. There is no plausible other explanation for that bullshit.
 
Her great great ... grandmother drew no benefit from having been owned, neither from having been raped. Neither did any child of that rape. None of the two, nor their offspring, inherited the fruit of slave labor - rather they provided this fruit to the ownership class.

But the White-privilege peddlers try to forge a case against Harris out of being the victims' great great ... grandchild. This is literally insane. There is no plausible other explanation for that bullshit.

Imagine the callousness of Conservative blaming poor Kamala Harris because one of her ancestors was raped
 
Imagine the callousness of Conservative blaming poor Kamala Harris because one of her ancestors was raped

No imagination needed, it's unfolding right on these pages. But, as we know, Conservatives are such forgiving people, they'd immediately accept their daughter's rapist as a member of their family. That would be logically necessary to arrive at the conclusion that Harris's family owned slaves.

Also, of course, they are still defining who is black, and who isn't. Mighty white of them, don't you think? Having first invented the "one drop rule", they deviate a bit from that nowadays. But hey, being a bit flexible with reality isn't a vice. It isn't just okay, it's required for a conservative.

Whatever... their callousness, their depravity know no bounds.
 
Her great great ... grandmother drew no benefit from having been owned, neither from having been raped. Neither did any child of that rape. None of the two, nor their offspring, inherited the fruit of slave labor - rather they provided this fruit to the ownership class.

But the White-privilege peddlers try to forge a case against Harris out of being the victims' great great ... grandchild. This is literally insane. There is no plausible other explanation for that bullshit.

Her great great ... grandmother drew no benefit from having been owned, neither from having been raped.

What proof do you have of either?
 
Her great great ... grandmother drew no benefit from having been owned, neither from having been raped. Neither did any child of that rape. None of the two, nor their offspring, inherited the fruit of slave labor - rather they provided this fruit to the ownership class.

But the White-privilege peddlers try to forge a case against Harris out of being the victims' great great ... grandchild. This is literally insane. There is no plausible other explanation for that bullshit.

Her great great ... grandmother drew no benefit from having been owned, neither from having been raped.

What proof do you have of either?

Why, have you drawn some benefit from having been owned or raped?
 
Her great great ... grandmother drew no benefit from having been owned, neither from having been raped. Neither did any child of that rape. None of the two, nor their offspring, inherited the fruit of slave labor - rather they provided this fruit to the ownership class.

But the White-privilege peddlers try to forge a case against Harris out of being the victims' great great ... grandchild. This is literally insane. There is no plausible other explanation for that bullshit.

Her great great ... grandmother drew no benefit from having been owned, neither from having been raped.

What proof do you have of either?

Why, have you drawn some benefit from having been owned or raped?


Have you any proof she was raped, or owned?
 
I'll take that as a "No."
The OP supplies the evidence of rape and slavery.


Does it?

did you miss the phrase, " If this is true," in the OP?
Nope, didn't miss it. One could say that about almost anything. What purpose does questioning the story's veracity serve you?

Why do you insist on believing a possible lie?

Even Snopes gives it an "unproven" rating.

 
I'll take that as a "No."
The OP supplies the evidence of rape and slavery.


Does it?

did you miss the phrase, " If this is true," in the OP?
Nope, didn't miss it. One could say that about almost anything. What purpose does questioning the story's veracity serve you?

Why do you insist on believing a possible lie?

Even Snopes gives it an "unproven" rating.
Again, almost anything can be characterized as "unproven" or "a possible lie." So..
"What purpose does questioning the story's veracity serve you?"
 

Forum List

Back
Top