Hamas refuses to recognize " 67 borders"

[proudveteran06]

Hamas accepts 1967 borders, but will never recognize Israel, top official saysIsrael News - Haaretz Israeli News source


Hamas would be willing to accept a Palestinian state within 1967 borders, a leader of the militant group, Mahmoud Zahar, told the Palestinian news agency Ma'an on Wednesday, adding, however, that Hamas would never recognize Israel since such a move would counter the group's aim to "liberate" all of Palestine.


So much for " International Law"


Speaking to Ma'an on Wednesday, Zahar, hinting at the possible political line of a future Palestinian unity cabinet, said that recognizing Israel would "preclude the right of the next generations to liberate the lands," wondering: "What will be the fate of the five million Palestinians in the diaspora?"

Could you imagine what would happen if Israel were stupid enough to allow " Right of Return?" There would be Civil War


Regarding the bottom; O.K. with me! Let there be a " Palestinian State" with some Israelis in the W.BANK, ISRAEL HAVING CONTROL OF E. JERUSALEM but even more important "NO RIGHT OF RETURN" !

Palestinian leaders plan to ask the United Nations General Assembly in September to recognize a Palestinian state in all the lands Israel occupied in 1967.

 

[aris2chat]

stepping stones. 67 today, all the mandate tomorrow.....

Israel will not accept a palestinian government that includes hamas let alone that adopts it's charter.

 

[RoccoR]

et al,

This is all HAMAS political double-talk.

If they accept the 1967 Border, then what is on the other side of the border from the Palestinian State?

Double-talk... Means nothing.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[proudveteran06]

et al,

This is all HAMAS political double-talk.

If they accept the 1967 Border, then what is on the other side of the border from the Palestinian State?

Double-talk... Means nothing.

Most Respectfully,
R

Answer is simple. With " Right of Return". their goal is to start Jihad WITHIN Israel . They admit they want to liberate all of " Palestine" ( Which doesn't exist) Just one more reason why there will never be " Right of Return" They also admit that a " truce". is NOT " peace".

 

[Phoenall]

Hamas accepts 1967 borders, but will never recognize Israel, top official saysIsrael News - Haaretz Israeli News source


Hamas would be willing to accept a Palestinian state within 1967 borders, a leader of the militant group, Mahmoud Zahar, told the Palestinian news agency Ma'an on Wednesday, adding, however, that Hamas would never recognize Israel since such a move would counter the group's aim to "liberate" all of Palestine.


So much for " International Law"


Speaking to Ma'an on Wednesday, Zahar, hinting at the possible political line of a future Palestinian unity cabinet, said that recognizing Israel would "preclude the right of the next generations to liberate the lands," wondering: "What will be the fate of the five million Palestinians in the diaspora?"

Could you imagine what would happen if Israel were stupid enough to allow " Right of Return?" There would be Civil War


Regarding the bottom; O.K. with me! Let there be a " Palestinian State" with some Israelis in the W.BANK, ISRAEL HAVING CONTROL OF E. JERUSALEM but even more important "NO RIGHT OF RETURN" !

Palestinian leaders plan to ask the United Nations General Assembly in September to recognize a Palestinian state in all the lands Israel occupied in 1967.

And the UNGA must refuse or admit that their resolutions are no longer binding. They cant just ignore the details of many of their resolutions or they will see anarchy and war

 

[P F Tinmore]

There are not, and there never were, any "1967 borders." Those are just the 1949 armistice lines that were specifically not to be political or territorial boundaries.

So what is this flap about Hamas not recognizing them?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Hamas accepts 1967 borders, but will never recognize Israel, top official saysIsrael News - Haaretz Israeli News source


Hamas would be willing to accept a Palestinian state within 1967 borders, a leader of the militant group, Mahmoud Zahar, told the Palestinian news agency Ma'an on Wednesday, adding, however, that Hamas would never recognize Israel since such a move would counter the group's aim to "liberate" all of Palestine.


So much for " International Law"


Speaking to Ma'an on Wednesday, Zahar, hinting at the possible political line of a future Palestinian unity cabinet, said that recognizing Israel would "preclude the right of the next generations to liberate the lands," wondering: "What will be the fate of the five million Palestinians in the diaspora?"

Could you imagine what would happen if Israel were stupid enough to allow " Right of Return?" There would be Civil War


Regarding the bottom; O.K. with me! Let there be a " Palestinian State" with some Israelis in the W.BANK, ISRAEL HAVING CONTROL OF E. JERUSALEM but even more important "NO RIGHT OF RETURN" !

Palestinian leaders plan to ask the United Nations General Assembly in September to recognize a Palestinian state in all the lands Israel occupied in 1967.

So much for " International Law"

What point are you trying to make?

 

[proudveteran06]

There are not, and there never were, any "1967 borders." Those are just the 1949 armistice lines that were specifically not to be political or territorial boundaries.

So what is this flap about Hamas not recognizing them?

So you admit Hamas has no intention of obeying " International Law". I have always said the Arabs never believed in it. Thanks for proving my point. If they don't recognize those" borders" Israel doesn't have to either .

 

[proudveteran06]

Hamas accepts 1967 borders, but will never recognize Israel, top official saysIsrael News - Haaretz Israeli News source


Hamas would be willing to accept a Palestinian state within 1967 borders, a leader of the militant group, Mahmoud Zahar, told the Palestinian news agency Ma'an on Wednesday, adding, however, that Hamas would never recognize Israel since such a move would counter the group's aim to "liberate" all of Palestine.


So much for " International Law"


Speaking to Ma'an on Wednesday, Zahar, hinting at the possible political line of a future Palestinian unity cabinet, said that recognizing Israel would "preclude the right of the next generations to liberate the lands," wondering: "What will be the fate of the five million Palestinians in the diaspora?"

Could you imagine what would happen if Israel were stupid enough to allow " Right of Return?" There would be Civil War


Regarding the bottom; O.K. with me! Let there be a " Palestinian State" with some Israelis in the W.BANK, ISRAEL HAVING CONTROL OF E. JERUSALEM but even more important "NO RIGHT OF RETURN" !

Palestinian leaders plan to ask the United Nations General Assembly in September to recognize a Palestinian state in all the lands Israel occupied in 1967.

So much for " International Law"

What point are you trying to make?

Israel is being criticized for not obeying " International Law" by refusing the " Two State Solution" along the 67 Lines that were never recognized, Yet when Hamas says their goal is to " liberate all of Palestine" and State they are not for a PERMANENT " Two State Solution" that's not stating for all the world to hear they intent not to abide by " International Law"? Another things Pro Palestinians are noted for; Racism and Hypocrisy.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Hamas accepts 1967 borders, but will never recognize Israel, top official saysIsrael News - Haaretz Israeli News source


Hamas would be willing to accept a Palestinian state within 1967 borders, a leader of the militant group, Mahmoud Zahar, told the Palestinian news agency Ma'an on Wednesday, adding, however, that Hamas would never recognize Israel since such a move would counter the group's aim to "liberate" all of Palestine.


So much for " International Law"


Speaking to Ma'an on Wednesday, Zahar, hinting at the possible political line of a future Palestinian unity cabinet, said that recognizing Israel would "preclude the right of the next generations to liberate the lands," wondering: "What will be the fate of the five million Palestinians in the diaspora?"

Could you imagine what would happen if Israel were stupid enough to allow " Right of Return?" There would be Civil War


Regarding the bottom; O.K. with me! Let there be a " Palestinian State" with some Israelis in the W.BANK, ISRAEL HAVING CONTROL OF E. JERUSALEM but even more important "NO RIGHT OF RETURN" !

Palestinian leaders plan to ask the United Nations General Assembly in September to recognize a Palestinian state in all the lands Israel occupied in 1967.

So much for " International Law"

What point are you trying to make?

Israel is being criticized for not obeying " International Law" by refusing the " Two State Solution" along the 67 Lines that were never recognized, Yet when Hamas says their goal is to " liberate all of Palestine" and State they are not for a PERMANENT " Two State Solution" that's not stating for all the world to hear they intent not to abide by " International Law"? Another things Pro Palestinians are noted for; Racism and Hypocrisy.

The two state solution is not sanctioned by international law. Actually, imposing a two state solution contravenes international law.

 

[Roudy]

LOL in Tinmore's dream world, Hamas will one day capture all of Israel and rename it The Islamic Khalifate of Palestine. It's just a sign of his mental illness.

 

[P F Tinmore]

LOL in Tinmore's dream world, Hamas will one day capture all of Israel and rename it The Islamic Khalifate of Palestine. It's just a sign of his mental illness.

After there is peace, there will be no reason for Hamas to exist as a political force.

 

[Phoenall]

There are not, and there never were, any "1967 borders." Those are just the 1949 armistice lines that were specifically not to be political or territorial boundaries.

So what is this flap about Hamas not recognizing them?

A change of tune tinman after demanding the world recognises the pre 67 borders. The fact is the UN stated at the same time as they said the armistice lines were not borders that the parties had to negotiate a settlement and mutually agreed borders.

So were are the Palestinians attempts at negotiating those borders ?

 

[P F Tinmore]

There are not, and there never were, any "1967 borders." Those are just the 1949 armistice lines that were specifically not to be political or territorial boundaries.

So what is this flap about Hamas not recognizing them?

A change of tune tinman after demanding the world recognises the pre 67 borders. The fact is the UN stated at the same time as they said the armistice lines were not borders that the parties had to negotiate a settlement and mutually agreed borders.

So were are the Palestinians attempts at negotiating those borders ?

I have never recognized the so called '67 borders.

The Palestinians do not have to negotiate borders.

 

[MJB12741]

Excellent point Tinmore. A two state solution is not only in violatrion of international but would only result in two states at endless war.

The remedy for this conflict is a one state solution whereby an agreement is reached to transport the Palestinians back to their indigenous homelands. LET THERE BE PEACE ALREADY!

What point are you trying to make?

Israel is being criticized for not obeying " International Law" by refusing the " Two State Solution" along the 67 Lines that were never recognized, Yet when Hamas says their goal is to " liberate all of Palestine" and State they are not for a PERMANENT " Two State Solution" that's not stating for all the world to hear they intent not to abide by " International Law"? Another things Pro Palestinians are noted for; Racism and Hypocrisy.

The two state solution is not sanctioned by international law. Actually, imposing a two state solution contravenes international law.

 

[aris2chat]

What point are you trying to make?

Israel is being criticized for not obeying " International Law" by refusing the " Two State Solution" along the 67 Lines that were never recognized, Yet when Hamas says their goal is to " liberate all of Palestine" and State they are not for a PERMANENT " Two State Solution" that's not stating for all the world to hear they intent not to abide by " International Law"? Another things Pro Palestinians are noted for; Racism and Hypocrisy.

The two state solution is not sanctioned by international law. Actually, imposing a two state solution contravenes international law.

>>United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, in a message read out by Robert Serry, United Nations Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process, said the political stalemate posed “great risks to the prospects of a two-State solution”, and continued inaction could result in further instability. “The parties should realize that not making a choice in favour of peace and coexistence within the two-State framework is the most detrimental choice of all.” <<

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel is being criticized for not obeying " International Law" by refusing the " Two State Solution" along the 67 Lines that were never recognized, Yet when Hamas says their goal is to " liberate all of Palestine" and State they are not for a PERMANENT " Two State Solution" that's not stating for all the world to hear they intent not to abide by " International Law"? Another things Pro Palestinians are noted for; Racism and Hypocrisy.

The two state solution is not sanctioned by international law. Actually, imposing a two state solution contravenes international law.

>>United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, in a message read out by Robert Serry, United Nations Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process, said the political stalemate posed “great risks to the prospects of a two-State solution”, and continued inaction could result in further instability. “The parties should realize that not making a choice in favour of peace and coexistence within the two-State framework is the most detrimental choice of all.” <<

What does that have to do with my post?

 

[Roudy]

LOL in Tinmore's dream world, Hamas will one day capture all of Israel and rename it The Islamic Khalifate of Palestine. It's just a sign of his mental illness.

After there is peace, there will be no reason for Hamas to exist as a political force.

So peace to you means the total collapse of the state of Israel.

Are there any good psychiatrists in your neighborhood? You are off your rockers buddy.

 

[jillian]

et al,

This is all HAMAS political double-talk.

If they accept the 1967 Border, then what is on the other side of the border from the Palestinian State?

Double-talk... Means nothing.

Most Respectfully,
R

Answer is simple. With " Right of Return". their goal is to start Jihad WITHIN Israel . They admit they want to liberate all of " Palestine" ( Which doesn't exist) Just one more reason why there will never be " Right of Return" They also admit that a " truce". is NOT " peace".

it's simpler than jihad... they reproduce at greater rates than jews. they would simply take over by virtue of demographics under a so-called "right of return".

I think Jordan should take in their people.

 

[Roudy]

Tinmore thinks that 6 million Jews are going to somehow give up and lay down their arms and let the Islamic animals run all over their country. That's why being a die hard Hamas supporter like Tinmore requires a person to have a pretty acute level of mental illness.