Habeas Corpus...Senate Panel vote in favor of its restoration.

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by Bullypulpit, Jun 12, 2007.

  1. Bullypulpit
    Offline

    Bullypulpit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,849
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Ratings:
    +379
    On Friday, with little fanfare, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted on a bill that would restore the cornerstone of American jurisprudence, <i>habeas corpus</i>.

    It was effectively stripped from the Constitution by the Military Commissions Act which essentially states that ANYONE, including US citizens, can be declared an enemy combatant by Presidential fiat, ANYWHERE. This means the whole world, including America, is a battlefield, and there are no rights on a battlefield.

    For those who have forgotten, the Military Commissions Act

    <blockquote> * Allows the president alone to decide who is and who is not an enemy of this country.
    * Eliminates the Constitution’s due process right to habeas corpus for people the president decides are enemies of our country, and permits the government to keep hundreds of detainees imprisoned indefinitely and without charge.
    * Lets the president make up his own rules on what is torture and abuse, instead of simply following the rules in the Geneva Conventions; and
    * Removes accountability for top government officials, which means that we can’t know that torture and abuse has stopped and won’t happen again. - <a href=https://secure.aclu.org/site/Advocacy?id=557>ACLU</a></blockquote>

    Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy and Republican ranking member Arlen Specter both supported the bill. This bill, S 185, makes it clear that the issue is not simply a partisan one, but rather a patriotic one, in the truest sense of the word.

    It should be noted that all of the other Republicans on the Judiciary Committee voted against the bill...An odd contradiction since they DID take an oath to support and defend the Constitution, and that oath supercedes any loyalty to party and president.

    It would behoove us all to contact our congressional representatives and urge them, in the strongest possible language to support this bill.

    For the text of the bill and similar legislation in the House, go <a href=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-185>HERE</a>
     
  2. Care4all
    Offline

    Care4all Warrior Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    32,685
    Thanks Received:
    6,603
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +11,029
    Thank Goodness! Jimminee Christmas!
     
  3. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    There is hope for us all.

    I will never forget the day I watched the Attorney General Of the US say the contitution does not guarantee Habeas corpus.

    It will go down in history as complete idiots statement.
     
  4. Psychoblues
    Offline

    Psychoblues Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    2,701
    Thanks Received:
    142
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    North Missisippi
    Ratings:
    +143
    I have written before on this subject and received great support from self avowed rEpublicans as to the importance of the Writs of Habeas Corpus.



    This is good news for those of us that belive in it's necessity in the American way of life that we so enjoy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
  5. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,513
    Thanks Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,922
    You obviously missed the news yesterday where the 4th Circuit court ( well part of it) ruled 2-1 US legal residents and citizens INSIDE the boarders can NOT be treated in the manner of removing their rights. The White House has called for a total 4th Circuit review, but I suspect that will be a lose for them too. And I also believe if forced to the Supreme Court the Constitution will win.

    However this only applies to ONE individual and has no bearing on the tribunal or the rest of the hundreds of terrorists held. Just as the Senate proposal only applies to people INSIDE the Country at the time of their detainment,
     
  6. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    I hope you are right.

    This very right leaning SCOTUS scares me.
     
  7. Psychoblues
    Offline

    Psychoblues Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    2,701
    Thanks Received:
    142
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    North Missisippi
    Ratings:
    +143
    Anytime a Presidential election and a stopping of the vote count is decided on a 5/4 Supreme Court decision, the citizens under that court system should be very afraid.



    It just ain't American, IMHO.
     
  8. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    Correct. The DNC should start appointing judges, with the senate confirming. Gottcha.
     
  9. Psychoblues
    Offline

    Psychoblues Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    2,701
    Thanks Received:
    142
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    North Missisippi
    Ratings:
    +143
    I didn't say that, YOU did.


    Is your sarcasm equally as venomous as it is considered that the RNC appoints judges?
     
  10. Bullypulpit
    Offline

    Bullypulpit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,849
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Ratings:
    +379
    No, all available candidates should be placed in a pool and ranked according to their qualifications, and be assigned a number to be picked at random. Names and party affiliations would not be known, only their qualifications.
     

Share This Page