Guns walking across america by right to bear arms.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by LilOlLady, Jul 23, 2012.

  1. LilOlLady
    Offline

    LilOlLady Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    7,583
    Thanks Received:
    619
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Reno, NV
    Ratings:
    +621
    GUNS WALKING ACROSS AMERICA BY RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS.

    After the incident in Colorado and other cities in this country, guns are killing innocent people. Guns to kill. If the Colorado gunman were not able to buy these guns and massive amounts of ammunition he could not have killed 12 people and injured 58. The answer is not having every one armed. We need a data base system to track guns and ammunition. We cannot keep track of gun here, how can we expect to keep them from being smuggled into Mexico? Whomever approved of Operation Wide Receiver and Fast and Furious need to have their heads examined. Too many children are being killed on the streets of our inner cities because guns are walking because of gun rights. 500 kids a year are accidentally killed by guns in their homes. Guns walking by gun rights.
    The difference between Fast and Furious and Operation Wide Receive is none that matters. We do not know how many innocent people Operation Wide Receiver killed but it is alleged that a gun from Fast and Furious killed one agent. Is that really a big difference? Most ridiculous article ever written excusing Operation Wide Receiver.

    Both operations were approved by AFT agents. Then why were the same surveillance tactics not used in both?
    What were the guns used for in Operation Wide Receiver? If not to kill?
    ATF agents involved in Fast and Furious have previously testified that they were ordered to stand down and not track them…By whom?

    Why was they left at the scene? And how do we know one of them were used to kill the agent? Sound way to convenient.
     
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2012
  2. buckeye45_73
    Offline

    buckeye45_73 Lakhota's my *****

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,275
    Thanks Received:
    869
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Ratings:
    +870
  3. Not2BSubjugated
    Offline

    Not2BSubjugated Callous Individualist

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    1,282
    Thanks Received:
    186
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    In a mysanthropic malaise
    Ratings:
    +186
    I'm sorry, but accidental gun deaths don't sway my opinion on this matter in the slightest. I absolutely refuse to give up my self defense capacity in order to compensate for the fact that there's a lot of idiots out there who can't handle the responsibilities that come with their's.

    I also refuse to trade in my right to that capacity on the argument that we might end up with less overall homicide victims if we all just surrendered that right to the police. The police get there just in time to clean shit up after the incident's finished, and I'd prefer not to be the corpse in a homicide case.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  4. buckeye45_73
    Offline

    buckeye45_73 Lakhota's my *****

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,275
    Thanks Received:
    869
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Ratings:
    +870

    AMEN brother!!!!!! Preach the word!!!!!!!!
     
  5. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    35,172
    Thanks Received:
    4,521
    Trophy Points:
    247
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +4,885
    It is REAL simple. You don't like my right as protected by the 2nd Amendment? You have recourse. Get enough votes in Congress to create an amendment removing the 2nd and then get enough voters in 37 States to agree with you.

    Banning supposed assault weapons is a violation of the 2nd Amendment. Limiting magazine capacity is a violation of the 2nd Amendment. Banning firearms is a violation of the 2nd Amendment.

    You have no legal recourse other then an amendment to get what you want. So get to work.
     
  6. LilOlLady
    Offline

    LilOlLady Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    7,583
    Thanks Received:
    619
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Reno, NV
    Ratings:
    +621
    What is wrong with this picture. Three guns tracked back to Fast and Furious were accidently left at the scene of a murdered Agent. Why would drug cartel leave guns that they bought to use would conveniently leave them at the scene of a dead agent? Were they disposible guns that cannot be used but one. How many of the guns were used to shoot the agent? One of the three disappeared while in the hands of officers. Sound like those guns were planted near the agent to place the blame on Obama,etc. How many of Fast and Furious gun has been found near victims?
     
  7. Avatar4321
    Online

    Avatar4321 USMB Mod Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    61,955
    Thanks Received:
    6,749
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +7,005
    Guns don't kill people. I kill people
     
  8. daveman
    Offline

    daveman Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Messages:
    51,184
    Thanks Received:
    5,628
    Trophy Points:
    103
    Location:
    On the way to the Dark Tower.
    Ratings:
    +5,629
    TRANSLATION:

    [​IMG]
     
  9. OODA_Loop
    Offline

    OODA_Loop Account Terminated

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,950
    Thanks Received:
    468
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +521
    Infringe on the rights of the mentally ill to keep their murderous conditions privileged.

    Holmes' doctor could have stopped this before it started.
     
  10. old navy
    Offline

    old navy <<< Action Figures

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,740
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    U.S.
    Ratings:
    +378
    yep, I'm really interested in seeing what's in that patient record. If it is released of course. And if the shrink documented their sessions as required. She sounds lazy and incompetent to me.
     

Share This Page