Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
YES, it is.......moron.
More people shot...............more casualties.
A .22 will usually go right through a person, an AR- 15 round expands and ricochets, damaging more body parts. increasing that chance of dying.
22WMR is a much more powerful round than .22LR. It has almost twice as much muzzle energy as .22LR in some rounds, which gives it more punch when it hits the target. When a round of .22WMR hits the target, it can penetrate almost three times as far as .22LR.
No, shit.A .22 WMR hollow point will expand too Idiot.
No, but it wobbles unlike a .22, expanding the hole in a person.And if a .223 round is not a hollow point it will not "expand".
The SAME round?Getting shot with an AR is no more deadly than getting shot with any other rifle that fires the same round.
Not moving the goal posts at all. I have always said that the AR is no more lethal than any other rifle that fires the same round.No, shit.
No, but it wobbles unlike a .22, expanding the hole in a person.
The SAME round?
Moving the goal post?
Of course, the round people use makes a difference.
Lighter weight, shorter and magazine capacity than other rifles NOT military style knockoffs.Not moving the goal posts at all. I have always said that the AR is no more lethal than any other rifle that fires the same round.
So it seems to me you are actually whining about the .223 round and not the rifle that fires it.
can you rewrite that word salad?Lighter weight, shorter and magazine capacity than other rifles NOT military style knockoffs.
NO, I'm not referring to sniper rifles either, the weapon the US military uses to clear a building or in combat.
Words to bigly?can you rewrite that word salad?
Except.. it generally holds more ammo.. Duh!The AR 15 is nothing but a semiautomatic rifle just like any other semiautomatic rifle.
So, incredibly, cars have not taken over as the weapon of choice for killing schoolchildren en masse. AR-15-style rifles have..AR-15-style rifles were around for more than 40 years before one was used in a mass killing, at an apartment in Crandon, Wis., in 2007. The shooter killed six people and then took his own life.
However, gunmen (and at least one gunwoman) have used AR-15-style weapons in most all of the deadliest shootings in this decade.
Fine admission.Don't care.
Dude the first line you wrote wasn't even a fucking sentence.Words to bigly?
Figures, wait for a grade school kid, to explain them bigly words for you.
WOW, so, if I added the words "Were the" in front of the word "Words", could you figure it out?Dude the first line you wrote wasn't even a fucking sentence.
Mini- 14?A mini 14 would kill just as many school kids as an AR 15 in the same amount of time and yet you whine about the AR 15 not the Mini 14
WOW, so, if I added the words "Were the" in front of the word "Words", could you figure it out?
Mini- 14?
Still a military style, lightweight knockoff.
If people were using mini-14's in mass shootings, or killing a bunch of people in the short time, I would want them restricted too.
View attachment 786036
Which one would a person grab to be most effective, maneuver with or better concealment?
I wouldn't grab a rifle as I am much better with handguns
NO, shit.Your argument is based on the popularity of a gun not its lethality
NO, shit.
WHY do you think it's so popular?
And YES, it's lethality.
PEOPLE, yes............I agree.Wrong. It's popular because it's fun to shoot
Worthless.which is why most people buy it Idiot.
Bullshit.PEOPLE, yes............I agree.
Worthless.
Unless you are expecting, an Army or 50 gangbangers breaking down your door.
Or..................Playing Rambo.
I bought rifles to hunt with, when I used to hunt, and pistols for self defense, which I rarely carry anyway unless going out of town.Bullshit.
That's your worthless opinion.
YES, they do..............until............they DON'T.over 20 million civilians own an AR 15 for LAWFUL purposes.
NOT even close to the point.It is 100% irrelevant if a minuscule fraction of a percent of the rifles are used in crimes.
They made it easier.The problem is the mentally ill people that will not keep guns away from the mentally ill people.
This link points out that Obama’s now over-ruled policy was passed in the wake of the Sandy Hook massacre where 20 little first graders and six of their heroic teachers were murdered by a young gun nut and armed maniac.They made it easier.
Trump Repeals Rule Designed To Block Gun Sales ...
NPR
https://www.npr.org › sections › thetwo-way › 2017/02/28
Feb 28, 2017 — The president signed a measure into law that rescinds an Obama-era rule aimed at blocking gun sales to certain mentally ill people.
On December 2, 2015, Donald Trump, then a presidential candidate, appeared on The Alex Jones Show, with Trump stating to Jones at the end: "your reputation is amazing. I will not let you down. You'll be very, very impressed, I hope." During the broadcast, Jones compared Trump to George Washington and said 90% of his listeners supported his candidacy. Jones and Trump both said the appearance was arranged by Roger Stone. — Wikipedia
Victims should sue the shooters parents into oblivionThey are relevant, another day, another.............................
Farmington, New Mexico mass shooting: 3 dead, 2 officers ...
View attachment 785998
KOAT
https://www.koat.com › article › farmington-active-sh...
6 hours ago — Farmington Police say a shooter killed 3 civilians and injured 2 police officers. Police also say 4 other people were injured in the mass ...
FARMINGTON, N.M. —
Multiple agencies are investigating after a shooter left several injured and multiple dead in Farmington.
Farmington Police say a shooter killed 3 civilians and injured 2 police officers. Police also say 4 other people were injured in the mass shooting.
Police Chief Steve Hebbe said in a statement that the shooter had fired at least 3 different weapons, including an AR style rifle.
What sense is there is unnecessary, ineffective, and unconstitutional restrictions om the exercise of the right to keep and bear arms?Sane conservatives, liberals and independents may also possess arms — but the nutty and aggrieved rightwing is extremely well armed, obsessed with conspiracies they believe require them to prepare for civil war, strongly opposed to “common sense” gun control measures....
Demostrate the necessary relationship claimed here.and create an atmosphere where enraged and unstable gun owners increasingly flip out and act on their various obsessions — killing either targeted groups or even totally innocent strangers.
