Gun Stocks Up After Mass Shooting

Status
Not open for further replies.

DumpTrump

Active Member
Sep 18, 2017
60
14
31
Gun stocks rose Monday following the deadliest mass shooting in American history late Sunday night. A gunman in a hotel room at the Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas killed at least 50 people attending an outdoor concert and wounded over 400 more.



Gun stocks up after Las Vegas shooting


 
Guns stocks?

stock-blanks-img_16076.jpg
 
More Stephen Paddocks in the near future.

At least you blame the person instead of an object that can't do a damn thing without the person misusing it.

I blame the person, yes. Without firearms, he would have found another way; something set him off(.)

Too many want to blame the gun.

Yes, but the guilt lies solely on the individual, in this case, so far, a cipher:

Police said they believe the shooting was a "lone wolf" attack, one not linked to a militant group and not carried out by multiple shooters. His motive remains unclear.

Lombardo said that police found multiple rifles in Paddock's room. "We located numerous firearms within the room that he occupied. All’s we know is that they were rifles," he said.

Read more: What we know about the Las Vegas shooting massacre at the Route 91 Festival

Local media reports indicate that Paddock was a middle class man who owned a home worth $350,000 near a golf course in Mesquite.

According to public records, Paddock has had multiple pilot licenses dating back to 2004, has acted as a manager of an apartment complex and was also an auditor for defense and aerospace company Lockheed Martin.
 
More Stephen Paddocks in the near future.

At least you blame the person instead of an object that can't do a damn thing without the person misusing it.

I blame the person, yes. Without firearms, he would have found another way; something set him off(.)

Too many want to blame the gun.

Yes, but the guilt lies solely on the individual, in this case, so far, a cipher:

Police said they believe the shooting was a "lone wolf" attack, one not linked to a militant group and not carried out by multiple shooters. His motive remains unclear.

Lombardo said that police found multiple rifles in Paddock's room. "We located numerous firearms within the room that he occupied. All’s we know is that they were rifles," he said.

Read more: What we know about the Las Vegas shooting massacre at the Route 91 Festival

Local media reports indicate that Paddock was a middle class man who owned a home worth $350,000 near a golf course in Mesquite.

According to public records, Paddock has had multiple pilot licenses dating back to 2004, has acted as a manager of an apartment complex and was also an auditor for defense and aerospace company Lockheed Martin.

Liberals, including the Hollywood folks, have already called for gun control measures to be put in place.
 
More Stephen Paddocks in the near future.

At least you blame the person instead of an object that can't do a damn thing without the person misusing it.

I blame the person, yes. Without firearms, he would have found another way; something set him off(.)

Too many want to blame the gun.

Yes, but the guilt lies solely on the individual, in this case, so far, a cipher:

Police said they believe the shooting was a "lone wolf" attack, one not linked to a militant group and not carried out by multiple shooters. His motive remains unclear.

Lombardo said that police found multiple rifles in Paddock's room. "We located numerous firearms within the room that he occupied. All’s we know is that they were rifles," he said.

Read more: What we know about the Las Vegas shooting massacre at the Route 91 Festival

Local media reports indicate that Paddock was a middle class man who owned a home worth $350,000 near a golf course in Mesquite.

According to public records, Paddock has had multiple pilot licenses dating back to 2004, has acted as a manager of an apartment complex and was also an auditor for defense and aerospace company Lockheed Martin.

Liberals, including the Hollywood folks, have already called for gun control measures to be put in place.

Might stop a few "heat of the moment" shootings, but so could further restrictions on knives, and vehicles.
 
Liberals, including the Hollywood folks, have already called for gun control measures to be put in place.

There is no way anyone will be able to do anything about guns so long as there are more guns than people in this country. It's a liberal pipe dream to get rid of guns, just like it's a Conservative racist pipe dream to get rid of 11,000,000 illegal immigrants. Neither is realistic and both will never happen.

What we should do is mandate that any and all gun transactions should be subject to a background check, because that's just good sense. I don't think we should ban assault rifles or anything of the sort. If we were going to ban anything, I'd ban the handguns since those are the primary culprits of all gun deaths, be they homicides, suicides, and/or accidents. Handguns are the problem, not assault rifles. The right wing is correct in that big, scary looking guns aren't really responsible for a lot of deaths outside of these mass shootings, which are also rare. But handguns rack up the body count daily and are what should be banned or at least more strictly regulated - i.e. having fingerprint IDs on all guns manufactured moving forward, just like all cars had to be manufactured with seat belts following seat belt laws in the 1970s-80s...they put in seat belt laws, and deaths from car accidents dropped by 50% from 1980 - today. So if guns had safety mechanisms, they too would see fewer deaths. Why is that controversial?
 
More Stephen Paddocks in the near future.

At least you blame the person instead of an object that can't do a damn thing without the person misusing it.

I blame the person, yes. Without firearms, he would have found another way; something set him off(.)

Too many want to blame the gun.
The man was a madman. Without a gun, tell us how he could have wounded over four hundred and killed over fifty?
 
17 people die every day in america from gun violence.

4 people have died in the country of England in the past 4 YEARS. Australia's numbers are lower than that. What's the big difference...?
 
More Stephen Paddocks in the near future.

At least you blame the person instead of an object that can't do a damn thing without the person misusing it.

I blame the person, yes. Without firearms, he would have found another way; something set him off(.)

Too many want to blame the gun.
The man was a madman. Without a gun, tell us how he could have wounded over four hundred and killed over fifty?

Bomb.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top