- Thread starter
- #21
The EPA sets limits on allowable pollution. Don't you think they should have some scientific basis for the limits they set? Knowing at what point the shrimp population is affected is valuable information.
Show me that there was not already scientific means to determine that without expending milliions more in taxpayer funds that were already in serious deficit related to spending.
Again, how much graft, corruption, indifference to the taxpayer, waste, and utter incompetence are you willing to tolerate and defend? Is there not some point at which we can all draw the line regardless of which political party is in power?
There is no doubt that there is graft, corruption, indifference and waste in every government. That does not mean that every expenditure is without merit. The government has a role on our society and we as a rule benefit from it
The government intended role in our society was to secure our rights and then leave us alone to live our lives.
And you're still not answering the question. How much graft, corruption, indifference to the taxpayer, waste, and utter competence are you willing to tolerate and defend just because all government spending doesn't fall into that category? Is there not some point at which we can all draw the line regardless of which political party is in power?