- Mar 31, 2009
- 95,057
- 71,581
- 3,605
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
GREAT!: Jobless Claims Lowest Since 1969...
- Thread starter Dschrute3
- Start date
- Aug 4, 2009
- 282,057
- 145,668
- 2,615
The goalpost has been movedNone of that mattered when Obama was president according to Tramp and his shill Russia Limbaugh. All that mattered was the "not in labor force" number was the "REAL" unemployment number.Because they choose not work for a multitude of reasons. Some are children, some are retired, some are stay at home parents, some are financially well off enough they do not need to work.
May 25, 2012
RUSH: And I know that 88 million Americans are not working but they're eating, and it's a statistic that worries me.
It's quite telling that 88 million are not working but they're eating.
October 15, 2013
RUSH: We've got a lot of people -- look, 90 million Americans -- I love to put it this way 'cause I think it's the proper perspective. Ninety million Americans are not working, Donna, but they're eating.
May 02, 2014
RUSH: 92,594,000 Americans are not working. They're all eating.
May 21, 2015
RUSH: Here's the bottom line: 93 million Americans are not working, and they are all eating. I know I say that a lot. I say it a lot on purpose because I'm trying to make a point. Ninety-three million Americans not working but they're eating.
You are right, none of that mattered then and it does not matter now. Do you really think any of the partisan zealtos are going to be like "Oh yeah, we did say that, our bad"? They will just pretend it never happened, that is the very nature of being a partisan zealot.
What good does it do to repeat it now?
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOW who would have seen that coming?
That is what partisanship is all about, moving the goalpost to wherever it best fits your partisan view.
I’m using the goalpost right where Trump left it
Unemployed means not employed. 172 million are not employed
- Aug 4, 2009
- 282,057
- 145,668
- 2,615
Link or admit you lieThe goalpost has been movedNone of that mattered when Obama was president according to Tramp and his shill Russia Limbaugh. All that mattered was the "not in labor force" number was the "REAL" unemployment number.Because they choose not work for a multitude of reasons. Some are children, some are retired, some are stay at home parents, some are financially well off enough they do not need to work.
May 25, 2012
RUSH: And I know that 88 million Americans are not working but they're eating, and it's a statistic that worries me.
It's quite telling that 88 million are not working but they're eating.
October 15, 2013
RUSH: We've got a lot of people -- look, 90 million Americans -- I love to put it this way 'cause I think it's the proper perspective. Ninety million Americans are not working, Donna, but they're eating.
May 02, 2014
RUSH: 92,594,000 Americans are not working. They're all eating.
May 21, 2015
RUSH: Here's the bottom line: 93 million Americans are not working, and they are all eating. I know I say that a lot. I say it a lot on purpose because I'm trying to make a point. Ninety-three million Americans not working but they're eating.
You are right, none of that mattered then and it does not matter now. Do you really think any of the partisan zealtos are going to be like "Oh yeah, we did say that, our bad"? They will just pretend it never happened, that is the very nature of being a partisan zealot.
What good does it do to repeat it now?
You moved them 15 million in two comments
- Aug 4, 2009
- 282,057
- 145,668
- 2,615
4.1% Unemployment, lowest in 18yrs. I guess that's not good enough for some. But i'll take it. Good on Trump.
52 % are unemployed
- Mar 31, 2009
- 95,057
- 71,581
- 3,605
4.1% Unemployment, lowest in 18yrs. I guess that's not good enough for some. But i'll take it. Good on Trump.
52 % are unemployed
You need to stop with your silliness....really
- Aug 4, 2009
- 282,057
- 145,668
- 2,615
4.1% Unemployment, lowest in 18yrs. I guess that's not good enough for some. But i'll take it. Good on Trump.
52 % are unemployed
You need to stop with your silliness....really
Only 157 million Americans are employed
Math not one of your strong points?
Dschrute3
Gold Member
- Dec 10, 2016
- 15,572
- 1,871
- 290
- Thread starter
- #68
4.1% Unemployment, lowest in 18yrs. I guess that's not good enough for some. But i'll take it. Good on Trump.
52 % are unemployed
You need to stop with your silliness....really
Only 157 million Americans are employed
Math not one of your strong points?
Oh Gawd, stop with the desperate trolling. 4.1% Unemployment, lowest in 18yrs, is good enough for most logical rational-thinking Americans.
edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,883
- 1,830
No, you don't know the difference between 152 million in the workforce and 172 million who are NOT.You moved them 15 million in two comments
- Aug 4, 2009
- 282,057
- 145,668
- 2,615
4.1% Unemployment, lowest in 18yrs. I guess that's not good enough for some. But i'll take it. Good on Trump.
52 % are unemployed
You need to stop with your silliness....really
Only 157 million Americans are employed
Math not one of your strong points?
Oh Gawd, stop with the desperate trolling. 4.1% Unemployment, lowest in 18yrs, is good enough for most logical rational-thinking Americans.
How do you get only 4.1 percent unemployed when there are only 157 million working?
You would need a workforce of 314 million to get 4 percent unemployment
Dschrute3
Gold Member
- Dec 10, 2016
- 15,572
- 1,871
- 290
- Thread starter
- #71
4.1% Unemployment, lowest in 18yrs. I guess that's not good enough for some. But i'll take it. Good on Trump.
52 % are unemployed
You need to stop with your silliness....really
Only 157 million Americans are employed
Math not one of your strong points?
Oh Gawd, stop with the desperate trolling. 4.1% Unemployment, lowest in 18yrs, is good enough for most logical rational-thinking Americans.
How do you get only 4.1 percent unemployed when there are only 157 million working?
You would need a workforce of 314 million to get 4 percent unemployment
- Aug 4, 2009
- 282,057
- 145,668
- 2,615
Please forgive SmellyIrishAss.........reading comprehension is not one of her strengthsNo, you don't know the difference between 152 million in the workforce and 172 million who are NOT.You moved them 15 million in two comments
- Aug 4, 2009
- 282,057
- 145,668
- 2,615
You failed math didn’t you?52 % are unemployed
You need to stop with your silliness....really
Only 157 million Americans are employed
Math not one of your strong points?
Oh Gawd, stop with the desperate trolling. 4.1% Unemployment, lowest in 18yrs, is good enough for most logical rational-thinking Americans.
How do you get only 4.1 percent unemployed when there are only 157 million working?
You would need a workforce of 314 million to get 4 percent unemployment
- Mar 31, 2009
- 95,057
- 71,581
- 3,605
No, you don't know the difference between 152 million in the workforce and 172 million who are NOT.You moved them 15 million in two comments
Good grief, you don't have the first clue...as usual. Such an annoyance
- Mar 31, 2009
- 95,057
- 71,581
- 3,605
You failed math didn’t you?You need to stop with your silliness....really
Only 157 million Americans are employed
Math not one of your strong points?
Oh Gawd, stop with the desperate trolling. 4.1% Unemployment, lowest in 18yrs, is good enough for most logical rational-thinking Americans.
How do you get only 4.1 percent unemployed when there are only 157 million working?
You would need a workforce of 314 million to get 4 percent unemployment
You're looking hysterically sad,moron
Fake News
Why are 172 million Americans out of the workforce?
Where did you pull that number out of? Your ass?
Why of course not.....
157 million in the workforce out of a population of 328 million
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
Those lazy ass toddlers need to get a job!!!
- Mar 31, 2009
- 95,057
- 71,581
- 3,605
Fake News
Why are 172 million Americans out of the workforce?
Where did you pull that number out of? Your ass?
Why of course not.....
157 million in the workforce out of a population of 328 million
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
Those lazy ass toddlers need to get a job!!!
Woooosh, right over the loon's noodles. Bank it
- Aug 4, 2009
- 282,057
- 145,668
- 2,615
Fake News
Why are 172 million Americans out of the workforce?
Where did you pull that number out of? Your ass?
Why of course not.....
157 million in the workforce out of a population of 328 million
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
Those lazy ass toddlers need to get a job!!!
Freeloaders
That is what Conservatives call them
- Aug 4, 2009
- 282,057
- 145,668
- 2,615
You have yet to prove my numbers wrongYou failed math didn’t you?Only 157 million Americans are employed
Math not one of your strong points?
Oh Gawd, stop with the desperate trolling. 4.1% Unemployment, lowest in 18yrs, is good enough for most logical rational-thinking Americans.
How do you get only 4.1 percent unemployed when there are only 157 million working?
You would need a workforce of 314 million to get 4 percent unemployment
You're looking hysterically sad,moron
I provided the proof you asked for
You just rely on your fabricated claims
Similar threads
- Replies
- 74
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 17
- Views
- 598
- Replies
- 433
- Views
- 8K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 8
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8158
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 474
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-