GREAT AGAIN: 90% Of Workers Likely To See More Money In Paycheck -- Next Month!...

[Dschrute3]

Thank you President Trump!


The U.S. Treasury and the IRS on Thursday put out new guidance and withholding tables for employers that incorporate changes from the new tax law.

Under those new tables, the Treasury estimates that 90% of people who get a paycheck are likely to see more in take-home pay, as soon as February. Employers will have until Feb. 15 to incorporate the changes in their payroll systems.

The major changes affecting individuals include new tax brackets, (mostly) lower income tax rates,...

More:
90% Of Workers Likely To See More Money In Paycheck Next Month
DRUDGE REPORT 2018®

Can’t even use a respectable source.
You love your lying media because it tells you what you want to hear.

Wow, you sound so bitter butthurt. You may wanna see a doctor for that. You losin it, kid.

 

[Dschrute3]

And it only cost a mere 1.5 trillion (at minimum) dollars for people to get a couple sawbucks more in the check. I am sure our grandchildren will not mind footing that bill for that.

Prove it , that it won't bring in more revenue

The "more revenue" was already factored into the cost.

so it will probably cost closer to 3

So where is your crystal ball, how many times did we lower taxes when we were not in a recession and unemployment was at basically full unemployment?

calm down, chuckles

reagan tried to sell the same bulshit

it didn't work then and it won't work now

enjoy your extra $12/ week- it will evaporate in 2 years

Aw, such cranky butthurt. Time for a diaper change, kid. Run along and get Mommy.

 

[Dschrute3]

Cue the liberal sour grapes parade.

Yup, good news for Americans is 'bad news' for hateful Democrats. They desperately want the Economy to tank, so they can blame it all on their Trump Boogeyman. They aren't good folks.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Thank you President Trump!


The U.S. Treasury and the IRS on Thursday put out new guidance and withholding tables for employers that incorporate changes from the new tax law.

Under those new tables, the Treasury estimates that 90% of people who get a paycheck are likely to see more in take-home pay, as soon as February. Employers will have until Feb. 15 to incorporate the changes in their payroll systems.

The major changes affecting individuals include new tax brackets, (mostly) lower income tax rates,...

More:
90% Of Workers Likely To See More Money In Paycheck Next Month
DRUDGE REPORT 2018®

LefTards-
“But, but, but...this is BULLSHIT!
How is ShaQuita, DaShawn, Guadalupe and Gustavo whom are all on the .gov tit gonna benefit from this?”

 

[Dschrute3]

Thank you President Trump!


The U.S. Treasury and the IRS on Thursday put out new guidance and withholding tables for employers that incorporate changes from the new tax law.

Under those new tables, the Treasury estimates that 90% of people who get a paycheck are likely to see more in take-home pay, as soon as February. Employers will have until Feb. 15 to incorporate the changes in their payroll systems.

The major changes affecting individuals include new tax brackets, (mostly) lower income tax rates,...

More:
90% Of Workers Likely To See More Money In Paycheck Next Month
DRUDGE REPORT 2018®

LefTards-
“But, but, but...this is BULLSHIT!
How is ShaQuita, DaShawn, Guadalupe and Gustavo whom are all on the .gov tit gonna benefit from this?”

That is actually a good point. Much of the Democrat voter-base is made up of folks who won't work and rely solely on Government to take care of them. If you don't work, this news is irrelevant. All they wanna hear is that their Freebies are gonna keep coming. I suspect some of the butthurts on this thread are those kind of Democrat folks.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Thank you President Trump!


The U.S. Treasury and the IRS on Thursday put out new guidance and withholding tables for employers that incorporate changes from the new tax law.

Under those new tables, the Treasury estimates that 90% of people who get a paycheck are likely to see more in take-home pay, as soon as February. Employers will have until Feb. 15 to incorporate the changes in their payroll systems.

The major changes affecting individuals include new tax brackets, (mostly) lower income tax rates,...

More:
90% Of Workers Likely To See More Money In Paycheck Next Month
DRUDGE REPORT 2018®

LefTards-
“But, but, but...this is BULLSHIT!
How is ShaQuita, DaShawn, Guadalupe and Gustavo whom are all on the .gov tit gonna benefit from this?”

That is actually a good point. Much of the Democrat voter-base is made up of folks who rely solely on Government to take care of them. If you don't work, this news is irrelevant. All they wanna hear is that their Freebies are gonna keep coming. I suspect some of the butthurts on this thread are those kind of Democrat folks.

Oh, 100% without a doubt.
Democrats hate seeing the people that DESERVE a break receive a break.
They want ShaQuita with her six pet humans/money trees/children and the heroine addiction to always benefit....ALWAYS.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

And it only cost a mere 1.5 trillion (at minimum) dollars for people to get a couple sawbucks more in the check. I am sure our grandchildren will not mind footing that bill for that.

The debt is concerning, but I find it quite hypocritical that the same people who never batted an eye at the $10 trillion added during the Obama administration are now concerned about $1.5 trillion. Likewise, the people who could care less about the $1.5 trillion never stopped slamming the increasing debt when they weren't in the White House. The truth is the debt is just an electioneering slogan and nobody really cares about the destruction they are sewing.

That said, I am in favor of tax policies that keep more money in the hands of those who earn it. The problem isn't a lack of taxation. The federal government has been raking in historic levels of revenues. The problem is the amount of money they are spending and the government is rife with waste in every sector.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

And it only cost a mere 1.5 trillion (at minimum) dollars for people to get a couple sawbucks more in the check. I am sure our grandchildren will not mind footing that bill for that.

The debt is concerning, but I find it quite hypocritical that the same people who never batted an eye at the $10 trillion added during the Obama administration are now concerned about $1.5 trillion. Likewise, the people who could care less about the $1.5 trillion never stopped slamming the increasing debt when they weren't in the White House. The truth is the debt is just an electioneering slogan and nobody really cares about the destruction they are sewing.

Spot on. For the zealots on both sides debt only matters when the wrong person is sitting in the white house.

That said, I am in favor of tax policies that keep more money in the hands of those who earn it. The problem isn't a lack of taxation. The federal government has been raking in historic levels of revenues. The problem is the amount of money they are spending and the government is rife with waste in every sector.

Again, you are correct. We do not have a revenue problem, we have a spending addiction on both sides of the aisle.

 

[Meathead]

Thank you President Trump!


The U.S. Treasury and the IRS on Thursday put out new guidance and withholding tables for employers that incorporate changes from the new tax law.

Under those new tables, the Treasury estimates that 90% of people who get a paycheck are likely to see more in take-home pay, as soon as February. Employers will have until Feb. 15 to incorporate the changes in their payroll systems.

The major changes affecting individuals include new tax brackets, (mostly) lower income tax rates,...

More:
90% Of Workers Likely To See More Money In Paycheck Next Month
DRUDGE REPORT 2018®

There'll be riots. People will want the government to have that money!

 

[BrokeLoser]

And it only cost a mere 1.5 trillion (at minimum) dollars for people to get a couple sawbucks more in the check. I am sure our grandchildren will not mind footing that bill for that.

The debt is concerning, but I find it quite hypocritical that the same people who never batted an eye at the $10 trillion added during the Obama administration are now concerned about $1.5 trillion. Likewise, the people who could care less about the $1.5 trillion never stopped slamming the increasing debt when they weren't in the White House. The truth is the debt is just an electioneering slogan and nobody really cares about the destruction they are sewing.

That said, I am in favor of tax policies that keep more money in the hands of those who earn it. The problem isn't a lack of taxation. The federal government has been raking in historic levels of revenues. The problem is the amount of money they are spending and the government is rife with waste in every sector.

The problem is....most of Hussein’s spending was that of Robin Hood folklore whereas DJT’s spending has cycled back to the people contributing.

p.s.- you really need to train those bi’s and delts...short concentration curls and lateral dumbbell raises.

 

[Dragonlady]

Democrats are already complaining that it's not enough.

There are two things wrong with it.

1. This is a tax cut paid for with borrowed money. Which is to say, it’s no tax cut at all. It’s a deficit building machine to increase national debt. Bad choices all around.

2. The increase isn’t coming in the form of wages. Trump promised corporations would give raises from the tax savings. Where are they?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The problem is....most of Hussein’s spending was that of Robin Hood folklore whereas DJT’s spending has cycled back to the people contributing.
.

True, those who contributed to the Trump campaign and win have had the money come back to them 10 fold.

 

[Doc1]

Democrats are already complaining that it's not enough.

There are two things wrong with it.

1. This is a tax cut paid for with borrowed money. Which is to say, it’s no tax cut at all. It’s a deficit building machine to increase national debt. Bad choices all around.

2. The increase isn’t coming in the form of wages. Trump promised corporations would give raises from the tax savings. Where are they?

False. Tax "Cuts" don't have to "paid" for, that is a stupid "Lefty" talking point. The money belongs to those that "EARNED" it. NOT the Government.

 

[BrokeLoser]

The problem is....most of Hussein’s spending was that of Robin Hood folklore whereas DJT’s spending has cycled back to the people contributing.
.

True, those who contributed to the Trump campaign and win have had the money come back to them 10 fold.

More of HRC’s contributors have benefited...no?
SHIT...are you suggesting Trump is working for Hillary’s campaign contributors?

 

[deanrd]

Wow, a couple of dollars a week.

Unfortunately for the GOP, new healthcare costs will be in before the midterms.

Republicans have been fiddling with healthcare. They own it now.

 

[Dragonlady]

Democrats are already complaining that it's not enough.

There are two things wrong with it.

1. This is a tax cut paid for with borrowed money. Which is to say, it’s no tax cut at all. It’s a deficit building machine to increase national debt. Bad choices all around.

2. The increase isn’t coming in the form of wages. Trump promised corporations would give raises from the tax savings. Where are they?

False. Tax "Cuts" don't have to "paid" for, that is a stupid "Lefty" talking point. The money belongs to those that "EARNED" it. NOT the Government.

Taxes are your share of the costs of living in a First World country. Roads, schools, police departments, infrastructure, the court system, the military, aren’t going to pay for themselves.

You want comfort and security, it’s not cheap. And you just let the wealthy and the corporations off the hook for their share.

 

[Redfish]

Democrats are already complaining that it's not enough.

There are two things wrong with it.

1. This is a tax cut paid for with borrowed money. Which is to say, it’s no tax cut at all. It’s a deficit building machine to increase national debt. Bad choices all around.

2. The increase isn’t coming in the form of wages. Trump promised corporations would give raises from the tax savings. Where are they?

False. Tax "Cuts" don't have to "paid" for, that is a stupid "Lefty" talking point. The money belongs to those that "EARNED" it. NOT the Government.

Taxes are your share of the costs of living in a First World country. Roads, schools, police departments, infrastructure, the court system, the military, aren’t going to pay for themselves.

You want comfort and security, it’s not cheap. And you just let the wealthy and the corporations off the hook for their share.

spoken like a true Marxist. all money belongs to the government (er, the ruling elites) right, comrade?

do you own any stock? do you have a 401K? this will increase your net worth. Is party the only thing that occupies your little skull?

 

[Redfish]

Wow, a couple of dollars a week.

Unfortunately for the GOP, new healthcare costs will be in before the midterms.

Republicans have been fiddling with healthcare. They own it now.

now that the mandate is gone, healthcare costs will be going back down. You will be able to buy the policy that you want and need. But I understand you, if Trump did it, its bad. You are pathetic.

 

[Doc1]

Democrats are already complaining that it's not enough.

There are two things wrong with it.

1. This is a tax cut paid for with borrowed money. Which is to say, it’s no tax cut at all. It’s a deficit building machine to increase national debt. Bad choices all around.

2. The increase isn’t coming in the form of wages. Trump promised corporations would give raises from the tax savings. Where are they?

False. Tax "Cuts" don't have to "paid" for, that is a stupid "Lefty" talking point. The money belongs to those that "EARNED" it. NOT the Government.

Taxes are your share of the costs of living in a First World country. Roads, schools, police departments, infrastructure, the court system, the military, aren’t going to pay for themselves.

You want comfort and security, it’s not cheap. And you just let the wealthy and the corporations off the hook for their share.

LOL, the "go too" canard for the "Left". Roads, Schools, infrastructure blah, blah, blah. Cut the shit, you know it's about your giveaways and free shit. You know it's about keeping your minority block voting for your side, and you know that it's about all of your little political games. You people have been saying the same shit my whole life yet NOTHING ever changes.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The problem is....most of Hussein’s spending was that of Robin Hood folklore whereas DJT’s spending has cycled back to the people contributing.
.

True, those who contributed to the Trump campaign and win have had the money come back to them 10 fold.

More of HRC’s contributors have benefited...no?
SHIT...are suggesting Trump is working for Hillary’s campaign contributors?

Now you are starting to catch on.

Remember, prior to running for POTUS, Trump was a Clinton campaign contributor.

Same group of people control both parties, have for decades.