saveliberty
Diamond Member
- Oct 12, 2009
- 58,756
- 10,843
- 2,030
The fact that he collects the funds in the first place is part of the involuntary servitude.It breaks down in that the employer would be stealing from the employee if they kept the funds.How does that negate anythng I said?
Facts:
-The employer collects income/payroll/sales tax revenue for the government.
-The employer is not compensated for this service
-The employer is under threat of legal action if he does not perform this service.
If you think can show how what I listed above does not fall into the defintion below, please do.
Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
He is collecting for the employee and the employee's benefit. It isn't government money until it reaches the government.