Gov. O'Malley Trolls Sarah Palin Perfectly: Invite Her To Run For President

Shrillary is in the NEWS daily yet here they are ranting over a FORMER politician Hastert and Governor Palin. or some FORMER supposed Tea party person and porn. and the losers marches on and on.

vote out these ugly people from our lives COMPLETLY come 2016 folks


Let's get something clear, for stupid fucks like you who don't get it.

Dennis Hastert, a REPUBLICAN, had SEX with young BOYS against their will while he was the wrestling coach at a High School in Illinois. He paid millions in $$ to cover it up.

Now, you just chew on that for a second.

Yet another Republican all for "family values".

:puke:

Were he a Democrat, you would be shrieking like a banshee, word-salad-girl.

And soon-to-be Madam President Clinton is in the news for good reason: she is a TOWERING figure in US poliltics.

You, on the other hand, are not.


Let's get something clear for really stupid fucks like you.....no one is defending hasstert on our side....if he did it we want him in jail....

you assholes...you know bill clinton has serious allegations of multiple rapes and known instances of sexual assault against women vulnerable to his power and that he was caught with a rich asshole with sex slaves....and you stupid fucks actually defend him.......and his wife who helped him cover it up....

now who is the real stupid fuck, moron......
There have never been any serious allegations of rape or sexual assault by Bill Clinton. He chased after women the way many men do. People like you just don't mind committing the sin of baring false witness to promote a political agenda.


Wrong....Juanita Broaddrick
She made the charge 20 years after she alleges the offense took place. It was discredited by numerous news agencies and over 2/3's of the general public rejected her claims and judged them to be false. Her allegation was judged by most to be just another attempt at fame and profit. No legal or civil action ever showed any support for her claims. Even her attempt to obtain government or legal documents was judged by a court to be frivolous and rejected.


She isn't the only one......look at the list...and she was a woman whose business was regulated by then Attorney General for the State of Arkansas bill clinton.........

He choses his victims because he can control them.....just like any sexual predator does...
 
Let's get something clear, for stupid fucks like you who don't get it.

Dennis Hastert, a REPUBLICAN, had SEX with young BOYS against their will while he was the wrestling coach at a High School in Illinois. He paid millions in $$ to cover it up.

Now, you just chew on that for a second.

Yet another Republican all for "family values".

:puke:

Were he a Democrat, you would be shrieking like a banshee, word-salad-girl.

And soon-to-be Madam President Clinton is in the news for good reason: she is a TOWERING figure in US poliltics.

You, on the other hand, are not.


Let's get something clear for really stupid fucks like you.....no one is defending hasstert on our side....if he did it we want him in jail....

you assholes...you know bill clinton has serious allegations of multiple rapes and known instances of sexual assault against women vulnerable to his power and that he was caught with a rich asshole with sex slaves....and you stupid fucks actually defend him.......and his wife who helped him cover it up....

now who is the real stupid fuck, moron......
There have never been any serious allegations of rape or sexual assault by Bill Clinton. He chased after women the way many men do. People like you just don't mind committing the sin of baring false witness to promote a political agenda.


Wrong....Juanita Broaddrick
She made the charge 20 years after she alleges the offense took place. It was discredited by numerous news agencies and over 2/3's of the general public rejected her claims and judged them to be false. Her allegation was judged by most to be just another attempt at fame and profit. No legal or civil action ever showed any support for her claims. Even her attempt to obtain government or legal documents was judged by a court to be frivolous and rejected.


She recanted. She said none of the accusations were true.


Yeah...show that link.......
 
'After launching his campaign on Saturday, O'Malley, a Democrat, was immediately criticized by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, who was the Republican nominee for vice president in 2008. She accused O'Malley of being an "anti-freedom politician."'

Neither Palin nor any other republican is an a position to accuse someone of being 'anti-freedom,' given conservative opposition to gay Americans' freedom to marry and a woman's freedom to decide whether to have a child or not.

In fact, it's republicans who, for the most part, are hostile to expressions of freedom and individual liberty.


That is bullshit moron.......democrats are the ones going after free speech, freedom of religion, and the 2nd Amendment as well as private property rights
 
So this O'Mally moron
Is trying to get the democratic nomination for President by.....attacking Sarah Palin???

Does that idiot know what party he's running in and who his opponent is?

What an idiot.

So, you didn't read the OP, right?

Oh wait, yer a Rightie, I don't really expect you to be able to read, anyway.

Says the far left drone!
 
The gay left never passes up a chance to malign a pretty woman, especially a republican. More evidence that the sissies have taken over the democrat party.

They really hate women from what I've seen. Unless of course they have a D next to their names. then they want to kiss the ground they walk on like good little SUBJECTS/sheep of THE PARTY


Actually, the powerful democrat women give the democrat women who are lower on the economic ladder to their male democrat politicians for sex........see ted "the swimmer" kennedy and bill "the serial sexual predator" clinton....as well as the liberals in control of hollywood....and the sexual predators in our public education system.....I bet they don't vote republican...
 
So this O'Mally moron
Is trying to get the democratic nomination for President by.....attacking Sarah Palin???

Does that idiot know what party he's running in and who his opponent is?

What an idiot.

So, you didn't read the OP, right?

Oh wait, yer a Rightie, I don't really expect you to be able to read, anyway.

Yes I read it. My comment remains. What's the matter? You don't get it? Knock me over with a feather!
 
So this O'Mally moron
Is trying to get the democratic nomination for President by.....attacking Sarah Palin???

Does that idiot know what party he's running in and who his opponent is?

What an idiot.

So, you didn't read the OP, right?

Oh wait, yer a Rightie, I don't really expect you to be able to read, anyway.

Yes I read it. My comment remains. What's the matter? You don't get it? Knock me over with a feather!


So, if that is the case, why the silly comment. O'Malley knows who he is running against in his own party, and he also knows what a troll Palin can be, as she stuggles mightly to suck some oxygen out of the room. He handled her quite well.
 
So far, O'Malley reminded us what a horrible job Obama has done and he's railing against a Facebook poster


Don't forget...he helped create the Boston police dept. that everyone is bitching about........

It is ok this guy does not stand a chance the chosen one of Hilary.

He is yet another light weight in a party that is trying to show they do offer "real choices" for the DNC nominee.
 
And on o'malley and the cops in Baltimore...

martin o'malley...a typical democrat stepping on minorities to gain political power.....

The Wire Creator Demolishes Baltimore Crime Myths Pushed by Martin O Malley - Breitbart

David Simon’s Detailed Accusations

In the Marshall Project interview, David Simon comes across as a straight shooter who has a lot to get off his chest. The burning of Baltimore seems to have hit him on a gut level, and he wants to confess the behind-the-scenes facts he’s known for years.

Simon’s stories in the interview have the ring of truth because they are so densely packed with details Simon picked up in the years he worked on The Wire, talking with insiders over a couple of drinks late into the evening.

Given the obsession with race shared by the Obama Administration and mainstream media, it’s notable that David Simon downplays the racial aspect of what went wrong in Baltimore. As he says he learned working on the book Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets:

The most brutal cops in our sector of the Western District were black. The guys who would really kick your ass without thinking twice were black officers. If I had to guess and put a name on it, I’d say that at some point, the drug war was as much a function of class and social control as it was of racism.

Simon’s essential thesis is that in order to bring down crime stats to pump up his future political ambitions, Democrat Martin O’Malley took actions that destroyed the quality of policing in Baltimore.

As an example, look at Simon’s assertion that under Mayor O’Malley, the police began to do massive sweeps for no other reason than to gin up arrest numbers.

They actually had police supervisors stationed with printed forms at the city jail – forms that said, essentially, you can go home now if you sign away any liability the city has for false arrest, or you can not sign the form and spend the weekend in jail until you see a court commissioner. And tens of thousands of people signed that form.

Simon points out how one of the unintended consequences was to further drive a wedge between the black community and police, a situation that Simon believes came to a head in the Freddie Grey riots. It’s the sort of thing that won’t show up just from looking at crime statistics. Simon offers an indictment of how O’Malley’s lawless law enforcement impacted the black citizens of Baltimore:

O’Malley defends the wholesale denigration of black civil rights to this day. Never mind what it did to your jury pool: now every single person of color in Baltimore knows the police will lie — and that’s your jury pool for when you really need them for when you have, say, a felony murder case. But what it taught the police department was that they could go a step beyond the manufactured probable cause, and the drug-free zones and the humbles – the targeting of suspects through less-than-constitutional procedure. Now, the mass arrests made clear, we can lock up anybody, we don’t have to figure out who’s committing crimes, we don’t have to investigate anything, we just gather all the bodies — everybody goes to jail.

Simon also describes how O’Malley’s emphasis on making arrests to pump up numbers twisted the normal incentives for good police work. Both the incomes and career advancement of police officers became tied not to fighting real crime, but to conducting activities that would give O’Malley the stats he could brag about. Simon explains how police officers making legitimate collars spent longer on cases, which meant they racked up less overtime, so:
 
So far, O'Malley reminded us what a horrible job Obama has done and he's railing against a Facebook poster


Don't forget...he helped create the Boston police dept. that everyone is bitching about........

It is ok this guy does not stand a chance the chosen one of Hilary.

He is yet another light weight in a party that is trying to show they do offer "real choices" for the DNC nominee.


He might be a tool of hilary......someone to help cover her as she runs, since his time in Baltimore is going to really be a problem.....
 
And on o'malley and the cops in Baltimore...

martin o'malley...a typical democrat stepping on minorities to gain political power.....

The Wire Creator Demolishes Baltimore Crime Myths Pushed by Martin O Malley - Breitbart

David Simon’s Detailed Accusations

In the Marshall Project interview, David Simon comes across as a straight shooter who has a lot to get off his chest. The burning of Baltimore seems to have hit him on a gut level, and he wants to confess the behind-the-scenes facts he’s known for years.

Simon’s stories in the interview have the ring of truth because they are so densely packed with details Simon picked up in the years he worked on The Wire, talking with insiders over a couple of drinks late into the evening.

Given the obsession with race shared by the Obama Administration and mainstream media, it’s notable that David Simon downplays the racial aspect of what went wrong in Baltimore. As he says he learned working on the book Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets:

The most brutal cops in our sector of the Western District were black. The guys who would really kick your ass without thinking twice were black officers. If I had to guess and put a name on it, I’d say that at some point, the drug war was as much a function of class and social control as it was of racism.

Simon’s essential thesis is that in order to bring down crime stats to pump up his future political ambitions, Democrat Martin O’Malley took actions that destroyed the quality of policing in Baltimore.

As an example, look at Simon’s assertion that under Mayor O’Malley, the police began to do massive sweeps for no other reason than to gin up arrest numbers.

They actually had police supervisors stationed with printed forms at the city jail – forms that said, essentially, you can go home now if you sign away any liability the city has for false arrest, or you can not sign the form and spend the weekend in jail until you see a court commissioner. And tens of thousands of people signed that form.

Simon points out how one of the unintended consequences was to further drive a wedge between the black community and police, a situation that Simon believes came to a head in the Freddie Grey riots. It’s the sort of thing that won’t show up just from looking at crime statistics. Simon offers an indictment of how O’Malley’s lawless law enforcement impacted the black citizens of Baltimore:

O’Malley defends the wholesale denigration of black civil rights to this day. Never mind what it did to your jury pool: now every single person of color in Baltimore knows the police will lie — and that’s your jury pool for when you really need them for when you have, say, a felony murder case. But what it taught the police department was that they could go a step beyond the manufactured probable cause, and the drug-free zones and the humbles – the targeting of suspects through less-than-constitutional procedure. Now, the mass arrests made clear, we can lock up anybody, we don’t have to figure out who’s committing crimes, we don’t have to investigate anything, we just gather all the bodies — everybody goes to jail.

Simon also describes how O’Malley’s emphasis on making arrests to pump up numbers twisted the normal incentives for good police work. Both the incomes and career advancement of police officers became tied not to fighting real crime, but to conducting activities that would give O’Malley the stats he could brag about. Simon explains how police officers making legitimate collars spent longer on cases, which meant they racked up less overtime, so:
Things are so much better in Baltimorgue now.
 
So this O'Mally moron
Is trying to get the democratic nomination for President by.....attacking Sarah Palin???

Does that idiot know what party he's running in and who his opponent is?

What an idiot.

So, you didn't read the OP, right?

Oh wait, yer a Rightie, I don't really expect you to be able to read, anyway.

Yes I read it. My comment remains. What's the matter? You don't get it? Knock me over with a feather!


So, if that is the case, why the silly comment. O'Malley knows who he is running against in his own party, and he also knows what a troll Palin can be, as she stuggles mightly to suck some oxygen out of the room. He handled her quite well.

Because, knucklehead, he's spending a lot of time bashing Palin instead of Hillary. Does he know Palin isn't running? I mean, he must since he asked her to. The guy is seriously confused.
 
So this O'Mally moron
Is trying to get the democratic nomination for President by.....attacking Sarah Palin???

Does that idiot know what party he's running in and who his opponent is?

What an idiot.

So, you didn't read the OP, right?

Oh wait, yer a Rightie, I don't really expect you to be able to read, anyway.

Yes I read it. My comment remains. What's the matter? You don't get it? Knock me over with a feather!


So, if that is the case, why the silly comment. O'Malley knows who he is running against in his own party, and he also knows what a troll Palin can be, as she stuggles mightly to suck some oxygen out of the room. He handled her quite well.

Because, knucklehead, he's spending a lot of time bashing Palin instead of Hillary. Does he know Palin isn't running? I mean, he must since he asked her to. The guy is seriously confused.
It started out with her bashing him on her facebook page. How did he bash her? What did he say? I thought he just kind of mocked her be giving a polite and well mannered response. Has he gone on to say mean things about her?
 

Forum List

Back
Top