GOP, the party of high morals can be proud of

I know you are but what am I. Lol
i think he's the perfect person to talk about the sanctity of marriage. :eusa_whistle:

No way....

BJ Clinton is the poster child for "Marriage Sanctity"....

I am the owner of my own morals... That's about it...

I WILL laugh at and point out flaming hypocrisy, though....:lol:


BTW, I never voted for an adulterer, but that's just how I roll... Doesn't make me any better or worse than anyone else, though...
 
the fact that their beloved savior, Ronald Reagan was the first and only President who was previously divorced.
:clap2:
Was Ronald Reagan the first president to get divorced

Newt is trying to break that record...many, many times over.

Desperation is showing its petty head. You realize this line of obvious trolling did not work in Reagan's time and sure as hell won't mean anything now.

Remind us how Clinton was fine using his office to coerce female employees into having sex with him while he was married.
I heard an interview wit a retired secret service agent that was in the oval office with clinton and he said there was also drug use in the oval office. The left who support clinton need their heads examined.
 
Do you believe the bullshit of the OP?

You know, complaining about someone elses morals while ignoring the morals of your own side?

I think I stated my opinion in another post. ;)
No party is morally superior, and the OP is just an attempt to piss the right off. Of course we have had a few righties come in here preaching how the GOP must have more morals.

I thought the lefties claiming higher moral ground were funnier...:lol:

But I personally enjoyed California Girl. The woman treats everyone like they are beneath her, but she has more morals.
We all do it, but I think the worst thing one can do is believe someone is beneath them.
 
Desperation is showing its petty head. You realize this line of obvious trolling did not work in Reagan's time and sure as hell won't mean anything now.

Remind us how Clinton was fine using his office to coerce female employees into having sex with him while he was married.









You got that right. The purveyors of hate are reaching waaaaaaay back.

I agree, thank goodness the liberals are not doing it too.
He is talking about the hateful socialist idiotic left.
 
I know you are but what am I. Lol
No way....

BJ Clinton is the poster child for "Marriage Sanctity"....

I am the owner of my own morals... That's about it...

I WILL laugh at and point out flaming hypocrisy, though....:lol:


BTW, I never voted for an adulterer, but that's just how I roll... Doesn't make me any better or worse than anyone else, though...

Did Gore cheat or not cheat? Wasn't he accused but it was proven false?
Well if that was proven false I have never voted for adulterer. Of course The Gore/Bush election was the first time I could vote in a Presidential Election. LOL

Of course this all what we know of, sometimes they don't get caught. ;)
 
the fact that their beloved savior, Ronald Reagan was the first and only President who was previously divorced.
:clap2:
Was Ronald Reagan the first president to get divorced

Newt is trying to break that record...many, many times over.
"The nation is still recovering from a crushing recession that sent unemployment hovering above nine percent for two straight years. The president, mindful of soaring deficits, is pushing bold action to shore up the nation's balance sheet.

"Cloaking himself in the language of class warfare, he calls on a hostile Congress to end wasteful tax breaks for the rich. 'We're going to close the unproductive tax loopholes that allow some of the truly wealthy to avoid paying their fair share,' he thunders to a crowd in Georgia.

"Such tax loopholes, he adds, 'sometimes made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing, while a bus driver was paying 10 percent of his salary – and that's crazy.'

"Preacher-like, the president draws the crowd into a call-and-response. 'Do you think the millionaire ought to pay more in taxes than the bus driver,' he demands, 'or less?'

"The crowd, sounding every bit like the protesters from Occupy Wall Street, roars back: 'MORE!'

"The year was 1985. The president was Ronald Wilson Reagan.

How the GOP Became the Party of the Rich | Politics News | Rolling Stone
:eek: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Better to have morals and fail to attain them than to have none to start with.

Eh, I have to disagree. When a person fails to attain their own morals, they are no better than the person with no morals. But they've made their own situation worse by having been judgmental enough to formulate those morals in the first place. Thus, they have the greater offense.


In other words, you believe in giving a green light to child molesters, alcoholics and crack heads?

How truly sad you are.
 
I think I stated my opinion in another post. ;)
No party is morally superior, and the OP is just an attempt to piss the right off. Of course we have had a few righties come in here preaching how the GOP must have more morals.

I thought the lefties claiming higher moral ground were funnier...:lol:

But I personally enjoyed California Girl. The woman treats everyone like they are beneath her, but she has more morals.
We all do it, but I think the worst thing one can do is believe someone is beneath them.

meh... Your bias is showing...

CG could post the time and temperature and you'd argue it....
 
Better to have morals and fail to attain them than to have none to start with.

Eh, I have to disagree. When a person fails to attain their own morals, they are no better than the person with no morals. But they've made their own situation worse by having been judgmental enough to formulate those morals in the first place. Thus, they have the greater offense.


In other words, you believe in giving a green light to child molesters, alcoholics and crack heads?

How truly sad you are.
Bush, Jr. is an alcoholic.
 
I think I stated my opinion in another post. ;)
No party is morally superior, and the OP is just an attempt to piss the right off. Of course we have had a few righties come in here preaching how the GOP must have more morals.

I thought the lefties claiming higher moral ground were funnier...:lol:

But I personally enjoyed California Girl. The woman treats everyone like they are beneath her, but she has more morals.
We all do it, but I think the worst thing one can do is believe someone is beneath them.

An obviously devout Catyholic she is. I get negged by her everytime I mention pedo priests.

An Irish boy stands crying at the side of the road. A man asks What is wrong??
The boy says Me ma is dead.
Oh bejaysus the man says Do you want me to call Father O' Riley for you?
The boy replies No tanks mister, sex is the last ting on my mind at the moment.

Bracing for it now.
 
Last edited:
You think that Bill "I did not have sex with that woman" Clinton and womanizer JFK are somehow superior because they stayed married? :lmao:

This thread is a fail.

Personally I don't care about someone's personal moral failings.

JFK and Clinton were both ten times the President tham W Bush.

If Bush had been even half the President Clinton was I would have ordered a dozen blowjobs for him.
Interesting...since BOTH practiced infidelity.

You sure you want to anchor yourself to inmorailty?

I'm not "anchoring" myself to anything. It's their business and has nothing to do with being President.

Now....You sure you want to anchor yourself to being judgemental?
 
the fact that their beloved savior, Ronald Reagan was the first and only President who was previously divorced.
:clap2:
Was Ronald Reagan the first president to get divorced

Newt is trying to break that record...many, many times over.

I'll tell you what Jim...I don't give a shit if a president is divorced. Doesn't mean a thing to me.

In fact, I'll say this...in 1980, Ronald Reagan was what this country needed. Our country had lost faith... and I am not talking about the current "faux outrage" of the Tea Party. I am talking about a major lack of belief in this country.

The biggest problem is that people nowadays think that lightning can strike twice with a similar ideology. It can't. You see back then, we needed to scale back a little to get ahead in the long run. Our highways and bridges were still viable, Imports were just starting to take hold, and we still feared what turned out to be a crumbling Soviet Union.

30 years later, we have none of that. We have an infrastructure that is crumbling at our feet, Imports are our only access to inexpensive goods, and the boogie man that was the Soviet Union is long gone.

Because we thought Reagan's vision was how things are supposed to be permanently, we have virtually destroyed the people that we rely on to keep this country flush..... the Middle Class. We are the catalyst to growth and success. Without us, the country falls apart. When we grow weaker...so does the country. our GDP requires us to have money to spend. Our spending makes us the greatest economic power in the world.

The Corporate Structure and the banking industry tried to extend our downfall by offering cheap credit.... but now that's all but gone and people are not only broke, but overextended.

No... Reagan was a good thing... for his day. What we need now is to get rid of Corporatism, greed from the top, and to bolster our workforce. We need to get our buying power back. Once that happens, our country will stabilize.
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjsfWhNd9FU]"Spread the Wealth" (Ronald Reagan Blasts Obama) - YouTube[/ame]
 

Forum List

Back
Top