Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Sorry Care, but the same argument cam be made for the Dem impeachments of Trump. There were no crimes, in either impeachment.Okay...you are right...it seems...?
Just need a high crime and misdemeanor, treason, or Bribery...before or after holding office, and 2/3s of the Senate, voting to convict, for removal.
Still not an issue with Biden, because Congress still hasn't found a Crime after 10 months of searching... it will be no different with this new impeachment inquiry, which seems to be a dog and pony show by the house...imho.
Nope. Sworn testimony supports my view. Even some of of his fellow Republicans agree that what he did was wrong, just not impeachable (because impeachment is, in reality, a political not legal process).Correct. Just as you shouldn’t go after Trump for no valid reason other than hate.
False. It is akin to punishing an errant child. (The Dims.). Reinforce the message that what you did is unacceptable. See? Now that it’s being done to you, you don’t like it.
Nonsense. Of course it is.
Claiming that he abused his powers at all is just you being a partisan hack. He ain’t. By contrast, there is excellent reason to believe that Potato did. Worth looking into.
Nonsense.
Zzz. Nonsense.
No. I’m saying you folks need to be taught that if you don’t want none, don’t start. Payback is a bitch. But learning this case, it’s warranted.
I like a good joke!False. Again, there is plenty of evidence to support the investigation.
Your ilk is merely afraid of what a full investigation is likely to show.
Meh….an investigation may be warranted but an impeachment inquiry? They can’t even decide what it is he is supposed to accused of that they are going to find evidence for.No. You won’t. You won’t even acknowledge that investigation is already warranted.
Nope. Sworn testimony supports my view.
Repeating yourself isn’t a valid argument. Youre still wrong. And even if some Republicans happened to agree with you, that’s also just a fallacious form of argument.Even some of of his fellow Republicans agree that what he did was wrong, just not impeachable (because impeachment is, in reality, a political not legal process).
It isn’t based on any butthurt. It’s to teach your ok a lesson. And, as I said earlier, at least this time there is a good basis to commence an investigation.Now if you think Biden did something wrong, sure look into it. But it shouldn’t be based on Trumpian Butthurt.
Zzz. Weak rebuttal.Said every Jr High kid ever….
No joke. Not funny. Your unwillingness to admit it is actually more long the lines of “pathetic.”I like a good joke!
I’m not running a campaign. Sadly, Potato is — using the DOJ as a tool. Highly inappropriate.Nah…you go for it. It’s the only plank on your platform after all :
The investigation is the inquiry. WTF are you trying to parse?Meh….an investigation may be warranted but an impeachment inquiry?
Sure I can. And many others already have. Your unwillingness to perceive reality is a you problem.They can’t even decide what it is he is supposed to accused of that they are going to find evidence for.
Well, we have the tape of Trump pressing Zelensky to go after Biden for starters. Then the military aid mysteriously held up by Trump at the same time for no particular reason. Then Giuliani harassing the Ukrainians telling them it’s in their best interest to do as Trump says. Then diplomats being told that Zelensky could get a White House visit if he plays ball on Trump’s demands.No. It’s not. I have consistently denied that claim. And there’s zero support for your present contention.
When?And yes. She did.
You do?Well, we have the tape of Trump pressing Zelensky to go after Biden for starters.
Was it? For no particular reason?Then the military aid mysteriously held up by Trump at the same time for no particular reason.
Generally, don’t folks advocating for a government advise the other party that it would be in their interest to do as asked?Then Giuliani harassing the Ukrainians telling them it’s in their best interest to do as Trump says.
Zzz. I’m sure nobody in the history of the White House has ever dangled a visit with the President before.Then diplomats being told that Zelensky could get a White House visit if he plays ball on Trump’s demands.
So far, no evidence of anything along the lines of your contention. As expected.There’s plenty of support, if you aren’t kept ignorant of it.
try opening your eyes. I swear, if you try it, you might actually be able to see what you pretend to be looking for.When?
You obviously stayed away from any real news or the impeachment trials, so like most trumpers, you do not know the FACTS and EVIDENCE that was presented..... it was kept from you, by your Trump Media complex... Sad....
Even though he is a republican and even from Oklahoma he actually has a point.
Rare I know but lightning does strike occasionally, lol.
He even said it on newmax, I would imagine much to the disappointment of the hosts.
OPinions?
GOP senator says Biden can’t be impeached for pre-presidential actions
Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) is warning House Republicans that President Biden could not be impeached and removed from office for any conduct or crimes committed before he was elected…thehill.com
So that is what republicans are going to impeach him on, eh?Child Molester about 8 years in prison.
Because the 4 second blurt, out of the 3600 second Rant, was meaningless. And the rioters left to the capitol before the 4 second CYA comment was said by trump.Why did Nancy edit out peacefully protest for the J6 hearings?
I accept your admission.Whatever helps you sleep at night, kid.
Because the 4 second blurt, out of the 3600 second Rant, was meaningless. And the rioters left to the capitol left before the 4 second CYA comment was said by trump.
She’s correct – and you’re wrong, as usual.Unlike Democrats, the Republicans are not conducting a clown show process in the media. The assumption there are no crimes are baseless.
Forcing Biden to resign is the most likely goal anyway. It's an election year, Harris would take over and be an incumbent candidate. Democrats would have to throw a woman of color who is allegedly of sound mind and in good health under the bus for no apparent reason. A person who was hand picked to take the reigns in such an event. Good luck with that.
I would not vote for a criminal, either – which is why I would never vote for the likes of Trump.If irrefutable evidence of past crimes come to light... whether they lead to Impeachment or not... would it affect your decision to vote for Biden in 2024?
It’s a transcript. Its easy to find.You do?
Yes. There was no stated reason. It was out of the blue, and out of the ordinary.Was it? For no particular reason?
The ask was to help Trump attack his political opponent.Generally, don’t folks advocating for a government advise the other party that it would be in their interest to do as asked?
Not in exchange for attacking a political opponent.Zzz. I’m sure nobody in the history of the White House has ever dangled a visit with the President before.
Your ignorance is a choice.So far, no evidence of anything along the lines of your contention. As expected.
So far no evidence of anything along the lines of your contention. As expected.try opening your eyes. I swear, if you try it, you might actually be able to see what you pretend to be looking for.
It depends if he reported the earningsEven though he is a republican and even from Oklahoma he actually has a point.
Rare I know but lightning does strike occasionally, lol.
He even said it on newmax, I would imagine much to the disappointment of the hosts.
OPinions?
GOP senator says Biden can’t be impeached for pre-presidential actions
Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) is warning House Republicans that President Biden could not be impeached and removed from office for any conduct or crimes committed before he was elected…
You’re being even duller than usual.It’s a transcript. Its easy to find.
Yes. There was no stated reason. It was out of the blue, and out of the ordinary.
The ask was to help Trump attack his political opponent.
Not in exchange for attacking a political opponent.
Your ignorance is a choice.
So far no evidence of anything along the lines of your contention. As expected.
What earnings?It depends if he reported the earnings
The ones he’s being accused of taking? Really?What earnings?
You’re worried about whether he reported the money you imagined he took?The ones he’s being accused of taking? Really?
I don’t imagine anything. I’m merely following the investigationYou’re worried about whether he reported the money you imagined he took?
Seems like you might be putting the cart before the horse.
