GOP lawmaker says Republicans were warned about FBI informant's credibility

[C_Clayton_Jones]

“Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO) told CNN GOP lawmakers were warned about the credibility of the information from a key informant in their investigation to impeach President Biden, who has been discredited and charged with lying to the FBI. Democratic lawmakers are now calling on Republicans to end their inquiry.”



Lack of credibility; House Republicans have only themselves to blame.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

“Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO) told CNN GOP lawmakers were warned about the credibility of the information from a key informant in their investigation to impeach President Biden, who has been discredited and charged with lying to the FBI. Democratic lawmakers are now calling on Republicans to end their inquiry.”



Lack of credibility; House Republicans have only themselves to blame.

It doesn't matter to them. Remember what they did with Hillary

 

[excalibur]

Smirnov is not a key informant. They never spoke with him. And even Democrats admit that the FBI told them Smirnov was trusted.

Ranking Oversight Democrat Jamie Raskin acknowledged the FBI’s briefing about credibility. Republicans say Director Christopher Wray also confirmed the FBI used Mr. Smirnov’s information in investigations until June 2023 (when the bribery claims went public). The FBI affirmed Mr. Smirnov’s credibility so long as it was useful to do so. (emphasis added)​

Sifting the FBI’s Garbage.

The FBI was telling Congress that Smirnov was still good back in 2023. This indictment smells. And further tarnishes the already tarnished FBI. House Oversight Committee Republicans say the FBI told Congress their source had worked for the bureau since 2010, had been paid roughly $200,000...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[DGS49]

The current and unsurprising Narrative is that if this guy is not credible, there is NOTHING to support the Biden corruption case.

Totally false. There are bank records, witnesses, and supporting facts. The truth will set you free.

 

[boevans]

Smirnov is not a key informant. They never spoke with him. And even Democrats admit that the FBI told them Smirnov was trusted.

Ranking Oversight Democrat Jamie Raskin acknowledged the FBI’s briefing about credibility. Republicans say Director Christopher Wray also confirmed the FBI used Mr. Smirnov’s information in investigations until June 2023 (when the bribery claims went public). The FBI affirmed Mr. Smirnov’s credibility so long as it was useful to do so. (emphasis added)​

Sifting the FBI’s Garbage.

The FBI was telling Congress that Smirnov was still good back in 2023. This indictment smells. And further tarnishes the already tarnished FBI. House Oversight Committee Republicans say the FBI told Congress their source had worked for the bureau since 2010, had been paid roughly $200,000...

www.usmessageboard.com

You are fibbing again, are you not, excalibur.

 

[boevans]

The current and unsurprising Narrative is that if this guy is not credible, there is NOTHING to support the Biden corruption case.

Totally false. There are bank records, witnesses, and supporting facts. The truth will set you free.

None of which adds up to anything jazzy only spazzy.

Do better, young warrior.

 

[excalibur]

You are fibbing again, are you not, excalibur.

Derp.

 

[excalibur]

“But here are the facts: the FD-1023 form, which we reviewed first-hand today, records what a Confidential Human Source told the FBI about conversations he had with individuals in Ukraine. The source, who has been described as highly credible by the FBI, told the FBI he could not provide any opinion on the underlying veracity of the information provided by these Ukrainian individuals.​

Ranking Member Raskin’s Statement Following Review of Debunked FBI Tip

Washington, D.C. (June 5, 2023)—Today, Rep. Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member of the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, issued the following statement after the FBI made the FD-1023 subpoenaed by Committee Republicans available for review and provided a briefing on the Trump Justice...

oversightdemocrats.house.gov

 

[0311]

The current and unsurprising Narrative is that if this guy is not credible, there is NOTHING to support the Biden corruption case.

Totally false. There are bank records, witnesses, and supporting facts. The truth will set you free.

He was an asset for the Russian FSB. He was engaging a disinformation campaign. That is the truth.

 

[0311]

You are fibbing again, are you not, excalibur.

Again, he is constant state of lying.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Democratic lawmakers are now calling on Republicans to end their inquiry.”

Of course they are. lolol.

They aren't interested in questioning the validity of it.

Which is why they aren't.

They're only interested in running with it.

Which is all they're doing, predictably.

Duh...

 

[Godboy]

“Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO) told CNN GOP lawmakers were warned about the credibility of the information from a key informant in their investigation to impeach President Biden, who has been discredited and charged with lying to the FBI. Democratic lawmakers are now calling on Republicans to end their inquiry.”



Lack of credibility; House Republicans have only themselves to blame.

You are making a lot of assumptions. Have they shown us the proof that he lied yet?

 

[Crepitus]

“Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO) told CNN GOP lawmakers were warned about the credibility of the information from a key informant in their investigation to impeach President Biden, who has been discredited and charged with lying to the FBI. Democratic lawmakers are now calling on Republicans to end their inquiry.”



Lack of credibility; House Republicans have only themselves to blame.

Rumor has it that the DOJ has known for months and months that the guy was a russian asset, and told the the prosecutor and congresscritters ages ago. I'm also hearing the the only reason Weiss indicted was that the judge knew as well and was about to give "discovery" to the defense and that that would have somehow but people like BIll Barr Gym Jordan, and the rest "at risk". Presumable of being exposed as frauds.

 

[IM2]

Smirnov is not a key informant. They never spoke with him. And even Democrats admit that the FBI told them Smirnov was trusted.

Ranking Oversight Democrat Jamie Raskin acknowledged the FBI’s briefing about credibility. Republicans say Director Christopher Wray also confirmed the FBI used Mr. Smirnov’s information in investigations until June 2023 (when the bribery claims went public). The FBI affirmed Mr. Smirnov’s credibility so long as it was useful to do so. (emphasis added)​

Sifting the FBI’s Garbage.

The FBI was telling Congress that Smirnov was still good back in 2023. This indictment smells. And further tarnishes the already tarnished FBI. House Oversight Committee Republicans say the FBI told Congress their source had worked for the bureau since 2010, had been paid roughly $200,000...

www.usmessageboard.com

Liar.

 

[IM2]

Of course they are. lolol.

They aren't interested in questioning the validity of it.

Which is why they aren't.

They're only interested in running with it.

Which is all they're doing, predictably.

Duh...

The inquiry ebnded when Smirnoff admitted he made it up.

 

[IM2]

“But here are the facts: the FD-1023 form, which we reviewed first-hand today, records what a Confidential Human Source told the FBI about conversations he had with individuals in Ukraine. The source, who has been described as highly credible by the FBI, told the FBI he could not provide any opinion on the underlying veracity of the information provided by these Ukrainian individuals.​

Ranking Member Raskin’s Statement Following Review of Debunked FBI Tip

Washington, D.C. (June 5, 2023)—Today, Rep. Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member of the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, issued the following statement after the FBI made the FD-1023 subpoenaed by Committee Republicans available for review and provided a briefing on the Trump Justice...

oversightdemocrats.house.gov

It's over.

 

[IM2]

The current and unsurprising Narrative is that if this guy is not credible, there is NOTHING to support the Biden corruption case.

Totally false. There are bank records, witnesses, and supporting facts. The truth will set you free.

The truth is that it's over.

 

[Natural Citizen]

You are making a lot of assumptions. Have they shown us the proof that he lied yet?

They're not interested in investigating whether there is any proof that he lied.

They're only interested in running with the narrative that he did.

They're relying on the illusion of validity that merely running with it rather than questioning it provides. Again, predictably. It's convenient.

It's laughable, really.

By just running with it, they're, as usual, hoping that people will just fall in line with the program and not question anything...

 

[Natural Citizen]

Also loling at Ken Buck.

Is he the most predictable frontman to put out there to sell this gag or what? lol...

 

[Natural Citizen]

The current and unsurprising Narrative is that if this guy is not credible, there is NOTHING to support the Biden corruption case.

Totally false. There are bank records, witnesses, and supporting facts. The truth will set you free.

^^^ Pretty much this ^^^