Neotrotsky
Council to Supreme Soviet
If the discussion was on economic value, then Boedicca should have stated that when I gave her ample opportunity to define "net value" (her term). It doesn't change my point though which is that the government can, and does, provide value to the country and to its citizens. To claim otherwise is just wrong.
You said government creates value. The only way to create value is for the output to be worth more than the inputs. You still haven't described how government does that other than to point out the obvious bromide of the military. The military is one of the few constitutionally valid purposes of the federal government, and is a fraction of government spending (and was largely unaffected by The Stimulus Bill).
So, please describe all The Value we got from the massive increase in federal spending since the Dems took over Congress in 2006?
I will never be able to show it to you because you don't think of "value" the same way I do. You are thinking of it purely from a money stand point but then you completely drop that when it comes to areas of Government you like. There can be now way for me to prove something to you if your own definition changes. I can prove A and you'll simply change your definition of A. It's pointless.
The rest of us here know that a Government is not inherently evil. Even the Founding Fathers knew that. A Government can benefit an economy greatly, even if you disagree.
I would disagree about the Founding Fathers.
They knew that any Social Contract with a gov't limits your rights.
Since gov't has a "monopoly" in terms of its power, it can be very dangerous if not controlled. As such, the Constitution was meant to limit the Federal gov't and box it in, if you will.
Washington-
A government is like fire, a handy servant, but a dangerous master.