GOP Debate: November 10, 2015

[The Rabbi]

JOBS?

Where are all those Republican JOBS - now and in the future? They ain't got a clue! They can't govern! Just bash Obama!

The Killer Question:

...in seven years under President Obama, the U.S. has added an average of 107,000 jobs a month. Under President Clinton, the economy added about 240,000 jobs a month. Under George W. Bush, it was only 13,000 a month. If you win the nomination, you'll probably be facing a Democrat named Clinton. How are you going to respond to the claim that Democratic presidents are better at creating jobs than Republicans?​

The Killer Question Republicans Couldn't Answer Tuesday Night

The question of course is absurd. The average job creation under Bush was much higher for most of his presidency. Take out the losses during hte Democratic Congressional recession and Bush is head and shoulders above Obama. Like on everything else.

Actually, no, job creation under his first term was very poor also.

What DOES skew the numbers is including the first 6 months of Obama's term....which really does lower his numbers tremendously, even though he had nothing to do with it.

Wrong. The Clinton recession resulted in many jobs lost. Even so job creation was higher than under the Obama recession.

 

[Lakhota]

JOBS?

Where are all those Republican JOBS - now and in the future? They ain't got a clue! They can't govern! Just bash Obama!

The Killer Question:

...in seven years under President Obama, the U.S. has added an average of 107,000 jobs a month. Under President Clinton, the economy added about 240,000 jobs a month. Under George W. Bush, it was only 13,000 a month. If you win the nomination, you'll probably be facing a Democrat named Clinton. How are you going to respond to the claim that Democratic presidents are better at creating jobs than Republicans?​

The Killer Question Republicans Couldn't Answer Tuesday Night

The question of course is absurd. The average job creation under Bush was much higher for most of his presidency. Take out the losses during hte Democratic Congressional recession and Bush is head and shoulders above Obama. Like on everything else.

Actually, no, job creation under his first term was very poor also.

What DOES skew the numbers is including the first 6 months of Obama's term....which really does lower his numbers tremendously, even though he had nothing to do with it.

Wrong. The Clinton recession resulted in many jobs lost. Even so job creation was higher than under the Obama recession.

Didn't you hear the "Killer Question" from debate moderator Gerard Baker, the editor-in-chief of The Wall Street Journal?

 

[Nyvin]

JOBS?

Where are all those Republican JOBS - now and in the future? They ain't got a clue! They can't govern! Just bash Obama!

The Killer Question:

...in seven years under President Obama, the U.S. has added an average of 107,000 jobs a month. Under President Clinton, the economy added about 240,000 jobs a month. Under George W. Bush, it was only 13,000 a month. If you win the nomination, you'll probably be facing a Democrat named Clinton. How are you going to respond to the claim that Democratic presidents are better at creating jobs than Republicans?​

The Killer Question Republicans Couldn't Answer Tuesday Night

The question of course is absurd. The average job creation under Bush was much higher for most of his presidency. Take out the losses during hte Democratic Congressional recession and Bush is head and shoulders above Obama. Like on everything else.

Actually, no, job creation under his first term was very poor also.

What DOES skew the numbers is including the first 6 months of Obama's term....which really does lower his numbers tremendously, even though he had nothing to do with it.

Wrong. The Clinton recession resulted in many jobs lost. Even so job creation was higher than under the Obama recession.

No, Job creation has been MUCH higher under Obama. The Dot.Com recession (which Clinton had almost nothing to do with) was not responsible for FOUR YEARS of poor job growth.

Bush was a failure, accept it and move on.

 

[The Rabbi]

JOBS?

Where are all those Republican JOBS - now and in the future? They ain't got a clue! They can't govern! Just bash Obama!

The Killer Question:

...in seven years under President Obama, the U.S. has added an average of 107,000 jobs a month. Under President Clinton, the economy added about 240,000 jobs a month. Under George W. Bush, it was only 13,000 a month. If you win the nomination, you'll probably be facing a Democrat named Clinton. How are you going to respond to the claim that Democratic presidents are better at creating jobs than Republicans?​

The Killer Question Republicans Couldn't Answer Tuesday Night

The question of course is absurd. The average job creation under Bush was much higher for most of his presidency. Take out the losses during hte Democratic Congressional recession and Bush is head and shoulders above Obama. Like on everything else.

Actually, no, job creation under his first term was very poor also.

What DOES skew the numbers is including the first 6 months of Obama's term....which really does lower his numbers tremendously, even though he had nothing to do with it.

Wrong. The Clinton recession resulted in many jobs lost. Even so job creation was higher than under the Obama recession.

No, Job creation has been MUCH higher under Obama. The Dot.Com recession (which Clinton had almost nothing to do with) was not responsible for FOUR YEARS of poor job growth.

Bush was a failure, accept it and move on.

Yes neither Clinton nor Obama was responsible for anything. Only Bush is responsible. Even after 7 years.
The truth is the average unemployment rate under Bush was probably half what it is under Obama. And thats not counting all the people who have dropped out and gone on disability due to Obama's lousy economy.
Democrat policies are failures 100% of the time.

 

[edthecynic]

The question of course is absurd. The average job creation under Bush was much higher for most of his presidency. Take out the losses during hte Democratic Congressional recession and Bush is head and shoulders above Obama. Like on everything else.

Wrong. The Clinton recession resulted in many jobs lost. Even so job creation was higher than under the Obama recession.

And there is a perfect example of the typical Right-wing hypocritical double standard.
When a Republican is president with a Democratic Congress, anything bad is the fault of Congress and when a Democrat is president and Congress is Republican anything bad is fault of the president.

 

[SwimExpert]

The question of course is absurd. The average job creation under Bush was much higher for most of his presidency. Take out the losses during hte Democratic Congressional recession and Bush is head and shoulders above Obama. Like on everything else.

Wrong. The Clinton recession resulted in many jobs lost. Even so job creation was higher than under the Obama recession.

And there is a perfect example of the typical Right-wing hypocritical double standard.
When a Republican is president with a Democratic Congress, anything bad is the fault of Congress and when a Democrat is president and Congress is Republican anything bad is fault of the president.

No, that's just an example of Rabbi's stupidity. Rabbi is not a conservative. He's an American hating terrorist. See the difference?

 

[edthecynic]

The truth is the average unemployment rate under Bush was probably half what it is under Obama. And thats not counting all the people who have dropped out and gone on disability due to Obama's lousy economy.

More people went on disability Bush's last 6 lousy economic years than Obama's first 6. And Bush's average UE rate hangs on the coattails of Clinton's great economy that he passed on to Bush, whereas Obama's average is dragged down by Bush's coattails, but you knew that already.