Google executive admits election meddiling to prevennt Trump winning in 2020

[Marion Morrison]

Video re-upped

I listened to the first ten seconds of that video and shut it down. Cheap "something is going to get you" music in the background and the announcer with his voice masked as if he were ratting on Jimmy Hoffa or something.
C'mon.
P.T. Barnum said a sucker was born every minute. Don't be one of them.

That was a current Google worker. They say more are coming forward...we'll see.

So Project Veritas says.
Half the company could come forward, though, and it wouldn't matter, Marion. Google is a private company and of course employees have opinions and their beefs. And however much $$ Project Veritas is paying them. (Yeah, no link--that's conjecture.)

they are a privately owned MONOPOLY and should be prosecuted under anti-trust laws.

Where is the monopoly? Didn't I just find an article listing over a dozen other search engines? Explain, please.

Besides all that stuff that Jim posted, they own vast swaths of the nodes of the internet, around 50% of the cell phones run on their Android OS, and Chrome is the most popular browser. You can't even sign out of a Google account once you sign in on a cellphone, they crawl your contacts and everything. Even if you use a different browser and search engine, it's hard to get away from the Google servers. Just look and see what your browser is connecting to sometime.

"Googleapis", Adclick.Google.net" They're set up to where you pretty much have to go through them to get information, and they filter it.

U.S. desktop internet browser market share 2019 | Statistic

 

[Cecilie1200]

Google's role in what? Owning a private sector business which provides services to customers?.........

Oh man, are you that stupid? When Hosni Mubarak fell, Google bragged at how they had the power to topple the Egyptian regime.

When you control the flow of information you control almost everything, especially elections.

Wael Ghonim, the Google executive and Egyptian activist who played a key role in the popular uprising that toppled Hosni Mubarak, was on Wednesday lauded as "a hero" by his boss, Eric Schmidt.
Arab spring: Google's Wael Ghonim on the fall of Mubarak

So your position is that some things, like information, are too important to respect rights? So important that we need the government to have control of it?

 

[MindWars]

This out this AM it might be a recap i cann't listen at the moment..

Google had the video deleted from YouTube, but you can watch it here – and please download it and upload it to anywhere you can!
See The Report Google Censored About Their Election Meddling in 2020

 

[Weatherman2020]

Nothing here is surprising to anyone who witnessed the throttling of search terms like “Climategate”.

So we should allow purposeful misinformation to flow without fail?

This is how you people got this stupid. You are against it because you need more stupid people to join your Klan.

Misinformation is your myth that people control the weather and change sex at will, Dufus.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Nothing here is surprising to anyone who witnessed the throttling of search terms like “Climategate”.

Climategate? LOL

You denying that data was shown to be manipulated to support the Gorebal warming myth?

Never mind. You’re a Leftard therefore clueless to reality.

 

[skye]

" Google needs to be dismantled and scattered to the four winds. Traitors "

 

[beautress]

Gee, this is all too bad.

 

[HenryBHough]

The value of Google's effort should be reported as an "in kind" political contribution.

If not?

Criminal indictments. Lots of them.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

You want to blindly go along with who/whatever Alphabet Inc. deems fit for you to process?

Of course. As long as google helps the tard agenda, they're all for it.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Video re-upped

Not at 1:13 pm.

Google is scared!

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Nothing here is surprising to anyone who witnessed the throttling of search terms like “Climategate”.

So we should allow purposeful misinformation to flow without fail?

This is how you people got this stupid. You are against it because you need more stupid people to join your Klan.

Says a google programmed human.

You dont see the misinformation allowed from the sources you've been brainwashed to accept

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Why do we let these high tech monopolies run monopolies of our communications?

Google Insider to Project Veritas: Company Will 'Never' Let Somebody Like Trump Come to Power Again | Breitbart

A Google insider who spoke anonymously to Project Veritas claims the company is devoted to preventing anything like the 2016 election of Donald Trump from happening again.
The insider who spoke to Project Veritas also drew attention to the covert suppression of non-progressive voices on YouTube, a Google-owned platform, said that stopping President Donald Trump and other politicians like Trump has become a priority for the tech giant.

The insider claimed that the company did a “complete 180 in what they thought was important,” abandoning earlier ideals of self-expression and “giving everyone a voice” in favor of crackdowns on “hate.”

Previous leaks from Google support the insider’s account of a dramatic shift in thinking following the election of Trump. An internal company document titled “The Good Censor” leaked to Breitbart News last year admits that the company has undergone a “shift towards censorship,” in part as a response to the events of 2016.

Earlier in the year, recently-fired Google software engineer Mike Wacker spoke of a colleague who informed him that a manager at the company said the tech giant “need to stop hate [speech] and fake news because that’s how Trump won.”

Via Project Veritas’ interview with the insider:

There’s this façade about what they’re doing, but what they’re actually doing, what the employees are actually seeing inside the company is different. And, people need to know what’s going on with Google, and that they are not an objective piece – they’re not an objective source of information. They are a highly biased political machine that is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.

Right after Donald Trump won the election, in 2016, the company did a complete 180 in what they thought was important, before they thought self-expression, and giving everyone a voice was important, but now they’re like, “Hey, there’s a lot of hate.” And because there’s a lot of hate and misogyny, and racism, that’s the reason why Donald Trump got elected.

They started talking about the need to combat hate and racism online, and also at YouTube. They had the same talks by the CEO, Susan, and they talked about combating that and getting rid of unfairness.​

*They* assess their power as being able to do this, true or not, and that to me is clear evidence they need to be broken up NOW.

Having the number one controller of information in the world try to mess with elections is far more dangerous than a handful of Russians buying some stupid ads on Facebook. This is the real danger. Will you see CNN doing investigations about Google election interference? Not on your life

First, it's Project Veritas and Second, reported by Breitbart. It doesn't get much more sterling than that. But if that conversation is 100% true, it was still kind of confusing where the company's concern actually lies: with hate speech and phony Russian accounts, or with simply making Trump lose. Well, they can't do that; they aren't that powerful, and besides, I always use Google and I have no problem finding neutral and factual articles about anything that is happening in the news.

You might try watching the BANNED VIDEO. You might actually learn something.

 

[Deno]

Why do we let these high tech monopolies run monopolies of our communications?

Google Insider to Project Veritas: Company Will 'Never' Let Somebody Like Trump Come to Power Again | Breitbart

A Google insider who spoke anonymously to Project Veritas claims the company is devoted to preventing anything like the 2016 election of Donald Trump from happening again.
The insider who spoke to Project Veritas also drew attention to the covert suppression of non-progressive voices on YouTube, a Google-owned platform, said that stopping President Donald Trump and other politicians like Trump has become a priority for the tech giant.

The insider claimed that the company did a “complete 180 in what they thought was important,” abandoning earlier ideals of self-expression and “giving everyone a voice” in favor of crackdowns on “hate.”

Previous leaks from Google support the insider’s account of a dramatic shift in thinking following the election of Trump. An internal company document titled “The Good Censor” leaked to Breitbart News last year admits that the company has undergone a “shift towards censorship,” in part as a response to the events of 2016.

Earlier in the year, recently-fired Google software engineer Mike Wacker spoke of a colleague who informed him that a manager at the company said the tech giant “need to stop hate [speech] and fake news because that’s how Trump won.”

Via Project Veritas’ interview with the insider:

There’s this façade about what they’re doing, but what they’re actually doing, what the employees are actually seeing inside the company is different. And, people need to know what’s going on with Google, and that they are not an objective piece – they’re not an objective source of information. They are a highly biased political machine that is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.

Right after Donald Trump won the election, in 2016, the company did a complete 180 in what they thought was important, before they thought self-expression, and giving everyone a voice was important, but now they’re like, “Hey, there’s a lot of hate.” And because there’s a lot of hate and misogyny, and racism, that’s the reason why Donald Trump got elected.

They started talking about the need to combat hate and racism online, and also at YouTube. They had the same talks by the CEO, Susan, and they talked about combating that and getting rid of unfairness.​

*They* assess their power as being able to do this, true or not, and that to me is clear evidence they need to be broken up NOW.

Having the number one controller of information in the world try to mess with elections is far more dangerous than a handful of Russians buying some stupid ads on Facebook. This is the real danger. Will you see CNN doing investigations about Google election interference? Not on your life

First, it's Project Veritas and Second, reported by Breitbart. It doesn't get much more sterling than that. But if that conversation is 100% true, it was still kind of confusing where the company's concern actually lies: with hate speech and phony Russian accounts, or with simply making Trump lose. Well, they can't do that; they aren't that powerful, and besides, I always use Google and I have no problem finding neutral and factual articles about anything that is happening in the news.

Project Veritas and Breitbart are hated by all Tards because they expose the truth....

The exact opposite is true with cnn and all your other Tard media....

Not so sure about that, Deno. I've caught Breitbart pulling some pretty tricky nonsense and Project Veritas goes looking for the predetermined answer to their questions, not true investigation at all. If they don't find the answer the want, they manufacture it.

As for CNN, if they reported that the President was leading in the polls by 10 points, you'd believe them fine.

No Dumb Ass..

If cnn said Trump is up 10, I would know he was up 50 or more.....

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

and Project Veritas goes looking for the predetermined answer to their questions, not true investigation at all. If they don't find the answer the want, they manufacture it.

Got an example you'd like to share with the class?

 

[beautress]

Why do we let these high tech monopolies run monopolies of our communications?

Google Insider to Project Veritas: Company Will 'Never' Let Somebody Like Trump Come to Power Again | Breitbart

A Google insider who spoke anonymously to Project Veritas claims the company is devoted to preventing anything like the 2016 election of Donald Trump from happening again.
The insider who spoke to Project Veritas also drew attention to the covert suppression of non-progressive voices on YouTube, a Google-owned platform, said that stopping President Donald Trump and other politicians like Trump has become a priority for the tech giant.

The insider claimed that the company did a “complete 180 in what they thought was important,” abandoning earlier ideals of self-expression and “giving everyone a voice” in favor of crackdowns on “hate.”

Previous leaks from Google support the insider’s account of a dramatic shift in thinking following the election of Trump. An internal company document titled “The Good Censor” leaked to Breitbart News last year admits that the company has undergone a “shift towards censorship,” in part as a response to the events of 2016.

Earlier in the year, recently-fired Google software engineer Mike Wacker spoke of a colleague who informed him that a manager at the company said the tech giant “need to stop hate [speech] and fake news because that’s how Trump won.”

Via Project Veritas’ interview with the insider:

There’s this façade about what they’re doing, but what they’re actually doing, what the employees are actually seeing inside the company is different. And, people need to know what’s going on with Google, and that they are not an objective piece – they’re not an objective source of information. They are a highly biased political machine that is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.

Right after Donald Trump won the election, in 2016, the company did a complete 180 in what they thought was important, before they thought self-expression, and giving everyone a voice was important, but now they’re like, “Hey, there’s a lot of hate.” And because there’s a lot of hate and misogyny, and racism, that’s the reason why Donald Trump got elected.

They started talking about the need to combat hate and racism online, and also at YouTube. They had the same talks by the CEO, Susan, and they talked about combating that and getting rid of unfairness.​

*They* assess their power as being able to do this, true or not, and that to me is clear evidence they need to be broken up NOW.

Having the number one controller of information in the world try to mess with elections is far more dangerous than a handful of Russians buying some stupid ads on Facebook. This is the real danger. Will you see CNN doing investigations about Google election interference? Not on your life

First, it's Project Veritas and Second, reported by Breitbart. It doesn't get much more sterling than that. But if that conversation is 100% true, it was still kind of confusing where the company's concern actually lies: with hate speech and phony Russian accounts, or with simply making Trump lose. Well, they can't do that; they aren't that powerful, and besides, I always use Google and I have no problem finding neutral and factual articles about anything that is happening in the news.

Project Veritas and Breitbart are hated by all Tards because they expose the truth....

The exact opposite is true with cnn and all your other Tard media....

Not so sure about that, Deno. I've caught Breitbart pulling some pretty tricky nonsense and Project Veritas goes looking for the predetermined answer to their questions, not true investigation at all. If they don't find the answer the want, they manufacture it.

As for CNN, if they reported that the President was leading in the polls by 10 points, you'd believe them fine.

No Dumb Ass..

If cnn said Trump is up 10, I would know he was up 50 or more.....

Deno said: "If cnn said Trump is up 10, I would know he was up 50 or more...."
​

Outta the park, Mr. Deno!!!

 

[Cecilie1200]

Are you against private individuals or corporations having an opinion or something?.

If it's true, what they are doing is unethical and hypocritical, particularly considering it was Big Tech that jumped all over the fake news narrative after the election and started censoring other parties in the name of "integrity."

So you're not against them exercising their freedom of speech?

.

Of course, not. Do you?

Nope. It seems you and I don't care who Google supports or how loud they say it because Google has the same rights as Fox News I suppose.

You get that Google and Fox News are completely different types of businesses which do completely different types of things, right?

 

[Cecilie1200]

Why do we let these high tech monopolies run monopolies of our communications?

Google Insider to Project Veritas: Company Will 'Never' Let Somebody Like Trump Come to Power Again | Breitbart

A Google insider who spoke anonymously to Project Veritas claims the company is devoted to preventing anything like the 2016 election of Donald Trump from happening again.
The insider who spoke to Project Veritas also drew attention to the covert suppression of non-progressive voices on YouTube, a Google-owned platform, said that stopping President Donald Trump and other politicians like Trump has become a priority for the tech giant.

The insider claimed that the company did a “complete 180 in what they thought was important,” abandoning earlier ideals of self-expression and “giving everyone a voice” in favor of crackdowns on “hate.”

Previous leaks from Google support the insider’s account of a dramatic shift in thinking following the election of Trump. An internal company document titled “The Good Censor” leaked to Breitbart News last year admits that the company has undergone a “shift towards censorship,” in part as a response to the events of 2016.

Earlier in the year, recently-fired Google software engineer Mike Wacker spoke of a colleague who informed him that a manager at the company said the tech giant “need to stop hate [speech] and fake news because that’s how Trump won.”

Via Project Veritas’ interview with the insider:

There’s this façade about what they’re doing, but what they’re actually doing, what the employees are actually seeing inside the company is different. And, people need to know what’s going on with Google, and that they are not an objective piece – they’re not an objective source of information. They are a highly biased political machine that is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.

Right after Donald Trump won the election, in 2016, the company did a complete 180 in what they thought was important, before they thought self-expression, and giving everyone a voice was important, but now they’re like, “Hey, there’s a lot of hate.” And because there’s a lot of hate and misogyny, and racism, that’s the reason why Donald Trump got elected.

They started talking about the need to combat hate and racism online, and also at YouTube. They had the same talks by the CEO, Susan, and they talked about combating that and getting rid of unfairness.​

*They* assess their power as being able to do this, true or not, and that to me is clear evidence they need to be broken up NOW.

Having the number one controller of information in the world try to mess with elections is far more dangerous than a handful of Russians buying some stupid ads on Facebook. This is the real danger. Will you see CNN doing investigations about Google election interference? Not on your life

First, it's Project Veritas and Second, reported by Breitbart. It doesn't get much more sterling than that. But if that conversation is 100% true, it was still kind of confusing where the company's concern actually lies: with hate speech and phony Russian accounts, or with simply making Trump lose. Well, they can't do that; they aren't that powerful, and besides, I always use Google and I have no problem finding neutral and factual articles about anything that is happening in the news.

Project Veritas and Breitbart are hated by all Tards because they expose the truth....

The exact opposite is true with cnn and all your other Tard media....

Not so sure about that, Deno. I've caught Breitbart pulling some pretty tricky nonsense and Project Veritas goes looking for the predetermined answer to their questions, not true investigation at all. If they don't find the answer the want, they manufacture it.

As for CNN, if they reported that the President was leading in the polls by 10 points, you'd believe them fine.

Probably, because there's not a chance in the world of CNN reporting that unless he was up by 15.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Isn’t Google a corporate monolith without a political soul? My bet is “they” don’t care who is president or in congress as long as they can be influenced with googlebucks.

You do know that corporations are owned, run, and staffed by human beings, who DO have political preferences. Right?

 

[Cecilie1200]

Video re-upped

I listened to the first ten seconds of that video and shut it down. Cheap "something is going to get you" music in the background and the announcer with his voice masked as if he were ratting on Jimmy Hoffa or something.
C'mon.
P.T. Barnum said a sucker was born every minute. Don't be one of them.

That was a current Google worker. They say more are coming forward...we'll see.

So Project Veritas says.
Half the company could come forward, though, and it wouldn't matter, Marion. Google is a private company and of course employees have opinions and their beefs. And however much $$ Project Veritas is paying them. (Yeah, no link--that's conjecture.)

It matters to their customers, who were led to believe and expect something very different.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Isn’t Google a corporate monolith without a political soul? My bet is “they” don’t care who is president or in congress as long as they can be influenced with googlebucks.

For some reason, everyone seems to need to feel threatened these days. The leftards are out to get them.

Do you suppose that reason might possibly be because it's true?