Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Which is personal, subjective, and devoid of secular authority.Once again a Christian who admits Jesus can't do a simple act.
Jesus can do anything.... but it has to be in line with the Will of God/Jesus and the Holy Spirit....
You keep forgetting, we don't set the rules or parameters.
Once again a Christian who admits Jesus can't do a simple act.
Jesus can do anything.... but it has to be in line with the Will of God/Jesus and the Holy Spirit....
You keep forgetting, we don't set the rules or parameters.
Yes you do, you speak for the image, you make up his words and what he means in your own concious.
You do this for the apostles as well since they never wrote the books attributed to them your imagination replaces logic or truth.
You can believe that and will - that your choice - in the end we all get to find out the real truth....
If there is no God of the Bible then good and evil do not exist.How do we define good and evil if there is no higher power? Been thinking about this today.
What is good if there is nothing absolute? One would need to accept at least some form of natural law in the universe for their to be even and idea of good or evil. And if they don't exist, then how can we claim any action is good or evil?
Which is personal, subjective, and devoid of secular authority.Once again a Christian who admits Jesus can't do a simple act.
Jesus can do anything.... but it has to be in line with the Will of God/Jesus and the Holy Spirit....
You keep forgetting, we don't set the rules or parameters.
You keep forgetting: not everyone is a Christian, yet they're perfectly capable of setting the rules and parameters, determining what is good and evil, and conducting themselves as moral, responsible individuals.
If there is no God of the Bible then good and evil do not exist.How do we define good and evil if there is no higher power? Been thinking about this today.
What is good if there is nothing absolute? One would need to accept at least some form of natural law in the universe for their to be even and idea of good or evil. And if they don't exist, then how can we claim any action is good or evil?
They are merely personal opinions with Mother Teresa's definition as valid as Charles Mansons.
Jesus Christ who is the Word. He is the way, the truth and the life and no man can come to the Father except through the Son. Jesus Christ is God. HE defines good and evil. Which is why it important for people to study the King James Bible.Who decides what is good or evil?
Which is personal, subjective, and devoid of secular authority.Once again a Christian who admits Jesus can't do a simple act.
Jesus can do anything.... but it has to be in line with the Will of God/Jesus and the Holy Spirit....
You keep forgetting, we don't set the rules or parameters.
You keep forgetting: not everyone is a Christian, yet they're perfectly capable of setting the rules and parameters, determining what is good and evil, and conducting themselves as moral, responsible individuals.
Yeah it's like the time a person approached me to be saved, he was a drinker who just got out of prison trying to relay morality to me a non drinker who hasn't been to prison. Or like the time any Christian dared asked a Jew to give up Yhwh to come to Baal Jesus who they claim is one in the same.
Jesus Christ who is the Word. He is the way, the truth and the life and no man can come to the Father except through the Son. Jesus Christ is God. HE defines good and evil. Which is why it important for people to study the King James Bible.Who decides what is good or evil?
Which is personal, subjective, and devoid of secular authority.Once again a Christian who admits Jesus can't do a simple act.
Jesus can do anything.... but it has to be in line with the Will of God/Jesus and the Holy Spirit....
You keep forgetting, we don't set the rules or parameters.
You keep forgetting: not everyone is a Christian, yet they're perfectly capable of setting the rules and parameters, determining what is good and evil, and conducting themselves as moral, responsible individuals.
Yeah it's like the time a person approached me to be saved, he was a drinker who just got out of prison trying to relay morality to me a non drinker who hasn't been to prison. Or like the time any Christian dared asked a Jew to give up Yhwh to come to Baal Jesus who they claim is one in the same.
that's your problem.
you are looking at the messenger
instead of hearing the message
Without an ultimate giver of what is good and evil there is no such thing as good and evil, period. Dr Joseph Menegle didn't get up in the morning thinking what kind of evil he could come up with that day, he believed he was doing good.If there is no God of the Bible then good and evil do not exist.How do we define good and evil if there is no higher power? Been thinking about this today.
What is good if there is nothing absolute? One would need to accept at least some form of natural law in the universe for their to be even and idea of good or evil. And if they don't exist, then how can we claim any action is good or evil?
They are merely personal opinions with Mother Teresa's definition as valid as Charles Mansons.
Right and wrong- right path or wrong path still exist whether us dimwits get it straight or not. The argument isn't whether the piwer and source of life exists since life does exist the argument is in defining it to the most finite source.
Which is personal, subjective, and devoid of secular authority.Once again a Christian who admits Jesus can't do a simple act.
Jesus can do anything.... but it has to be in line with the Will of God/Jesus and the Holy Spirit....
You keep forgetting, we don't set the rules or parameters.
You keep forgetting: not everyone is a Christian, yet they're perfectly capable of setting the rules and parameters, determining what is good and evil, and conducting themselves as moral, responsible individuals.
Yeah it's like the time a person approached me to be saved, he was a drinker who just got out of prison trying to relay morality to me a non drinker who hasn't been to prison. Or like the time any Christian dared asked a Jew to give up Yhwh to come to Baal Jesus who they claim is one in the same.
that's your problem.
you are looking at the messenger
instead of hearing the message
You have no idea what you are saying, so why bother saying it instead of answering to the challenge you forfeited?
Jesus Christ who is the Word. He is the way, the truth and the life and no man can come to the Father except through the Son. Jesus Christ is God. HE defines good and evil. Which is why it important for people to study the King James Bible.Who decides what is good or evil?
And that statement is exactly why evil exists in this world and not properly recognized (disguised as light). It's why there's been thousands of wars and over 50 million murders inhis name and jails full of cross tattoos earings and necklaces.
It's also why our schools fall far behind nations without icon figurines ruling brainwashed minds.
What one believes does not change what is and therefore your wording is wrong, you mean to say there is no UNDERSTANDING of what is good or evil.Without an ultimate giver of what is good and evil there is no such thing as good and evil, period. Dr Joseph Menegle didn't get up in the morning thinking what kind of evil he could come up with that day, he believed he was doing good.If there is no God of the Bible then good and evil do not exist.How do we define good and evil if there is no higher power? Been thinking about this today.
What is good if there is nothing absolute? One would need to accept at least some form of natural law in the universe for their to be even and idea of good or evil. And if they don't exist, then how can we claim any action is good or evil?
They are merely personal opinions with Mother Teresa's definition as valid as Charles Mansons.
Right and wrong- right path or wrong path still exist whether us dimwits get it straight or not. The argument isn't whether the piwer and source of life exists since life does exist the argument is in defining it to the most finite source.
If a culture declares rape is good, then within that culture, it is good. However, I have never heard of a culture that thinks murder or rape of their own is good. There is no such thing as absolute good and evil. It's all reality to the culture. In an Islamic fundamentalist culture, men wearing silk or goal is a sin, yet a forced marriage would not be. If a Catholic marries outside the church it's considered a mortal sin. If a protestant marries outside of his religion it's not even considered wrong. In the 12th century, torturing a person to his death in the name of God was good while today it would be considered a heinous crime.Good and evil are subjective. What may have been good centuries ago may well be evil today and vice versa. What is good in one culture maybe evil in another. Morality which is a distinction between right and wrong can exist independent of belief in a higher power.How do we define good and evil if there is no higher power? Been thinking about this today.
What is good if there is nothing absolute? One would need to accept at least some form of natural law in the universe for their to be even and idea of good or evil. And if they don't exist, then how can we claim any action is good or evil?
So if one culture says rape is good, does that make it less evil? I don't see how that's possible or acceptable.
Why ask to have sex? Is that what god wants? Sex?I'm totally open to contact with extra-terrestrials, invisible or otherwise.Like I'd push an invisible alien away.God hasn't revealed himself to me yet. What now?
Well either he has and you pushed him away
Or he has not yet, but will.....
Well you won't be open minded with me... you just want to be silly
Use your ham radio. Ask them to come have sex with you.........
Where in the world did you dig that up? Try reading what I wrote again, this time slower.What one believes does not change what is and therefore your wording is wrong, you mean to say there is no UNDERSTANDING of what is good or evil.Without an ultimate giver of what is good and evil there is no such thing as good and evil, period. Dr Joseph Menegle didn't get up in the morning thinking what kind of evil he could come up with that day, he believed he was doing good.If there is no God of the Bible then good and evil do not exist.How do we define good and evil if there is no higher power? Been thinking about this today.
What is good if there is nothing absolute? One would need to accept at least some form of natural law in the universe for their to be even and idea of good or evil. And if they don't exist, then how can we claim any action is good or evil?
They are merely personal opinions with Mother Teresa's definition as valid as Charles Mansons.
Right and wrong- right path or wrong path still exist whether us dimwits get it straight or not. The argument isn't whether the piwer and source of life exists since life does exist the argument is in defining it to the most finite source.
Your reply proved my earliest posts on defining the Essence of Life to know what's in line or in opposition so it's no longer subjective or twisted and confused.
Then the part about Shalem is also relevant.
Of course evil people flooded the post so you were unaware, because they THINK they are doing right in their subjective opinions, because they've yet to focus on Shalem.
Which is personal, subjective, and devoid of secular authority.Jesus can do anything.... but it has to be in line with the Will of God/Jesus and the Holy Spirit....
You keep forgetting, we don't set the rules or parameters.
You keep forgetting: not everyone is a Christian, yet they're perfectly capable of setting the rules and parameters, determining what is good and evil, and conducting themselves as moral, responsible individuals.
Yeah it's like the time a person approached me to be saved, he was a drinker who just got out of prison trying to relay morality to me a non drinker who hasn't been to prison. Or like the time any Christian dared asked a Jew to give up Yhwh to come to Baal Jesus who they claim is one in the same.
that's your problem.
you are looking at the messenger
instead of hearing the message
You have no idea what you are saying, so why bother saying it instead of answering to the challenge you forfeited?
I'm just speaking truth. There is no debate, war, challenge or whatever you think there is in your mind.....
Where in the world did you dig that up? Try reading what I wrote again, this time slower.What one believes does not change what is and therefore your wording is wrong, you mean to say there is no UNDERSTANDING of what is good or evil.Without an ultimate giver of what is good and evil there is no such thing as good and evil, period. Dr Joseph Menegle didn't get up in the morning thinking what kind of evil he could come up with that day, he believed he was doing good.If there is no God of the Bible then good and evil do not exist.How do we define good and evil if there is no higher power? Been thinking about this today.
What is good if there is nothing absolute? One would need to accept at least some form of natural law in the universe for their to be even and idea of good or evil. And if they don't exist, then how can we claim any action is good or evil?
They are merely personal opinions with Mother Teresa's definition as valid as Charles Mansons.
Right and wrong- right path or wrong path still exist whether us dimwits get it straight or not. The argument isn't whether the piwer and source of life exists since life does exist the argument is in defining it to the most finite source.
Your reply proved my earliest posts on defining the Essence of Life to know what's in line or in opposition so it's no longer subjective or twisted and confused.
Then the part about Shalem is also relevant.
Of course evil people flooded the post so you were unaware, because they THINK they are doing right in their subjective opinions, because they've yet to focus on Shalem.
Menegle (who was a living human being filled your mumbo jumbo crap) believed he was doing good, just like Charles Manson. BECAUSE they did not believe a God exists that says thou shall not murder.
People who don't believe in the God of the Bible can pull a new definition of good and evil out of their ass whenever the mood strikes.
Ah, another Hitler was a Christian nutter.Where in the world did you dig that up? Try reading what I wrote again, this time slower.What one believes does not change what is and therefore your wording is wrong, you mean to say there is no UNDERSTANDING of what is good or evil.Without an ultimate giver of what is good and evil there is no such thing as good and evil, period. Dr Joseph Menegle didn't get up in the morning thinking what kind of evil he could come up with that day, he believed he was doing good.If there is no God of the Bible then good and evil do not exist.
They are merely personal opinions with Mother Teresa's definition as valid as Charles Mansons.
Right and wrong- right path or wrong path still exist whether us dimwits get it straight or not. The argument isn't whether the piwer and source of life exists since life does exist the argument is in defining it to the most finite source.
Your reply proved my earliest posts on defining the Essence of Life to know what's in line or in opposition so it's no longer subjective or twisted and confused.
Then the part about Shalem is also relevant.
Of course evil people flooded the post so you were unaware, because they THINK they are doing right in their subjective opinions, because they've yet to focus on Shalem.
Menegle (who was a living human being filled your mumbo jumbo crap) believed he was doing good, just like Charles Manson. BECAUSE they did not believe a God exists that says thou shall not murder.
People who don't believe in the God of the Bible can pull a new definition of good and evil out of their ass whenever the mood strikes.
What part of Charlie Manson thinking he was Jesus and Menegle *spit on his name* being Catholic do you not comprehend? Christians 50 million murders later believe in a god that makes them do it, radicalized Muslims do evil in belief of their distorted views of God. I think because you missed my earlier posts you don't know from which I speak.
