Mindful
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #421
Yet Yaxley actively demonizes Muslims. He falsely targeted a refugee child. Because he was a Muslim immigrant and Yaxley was riding high on the “immigrants/Muslims” are rapists bandwagon. How is scapegoating standing up to the establishment?Yes...so I cant understand how you can support people like Yaxley who's intent is to stir up hate towards targeted groups. Not rapists, but just rapists of a particular ethnic and religious category.That's right.
The left wing newspapers are full of it:
More than 100 antisemitic incidents recorded in UK every month as bigots 'become more confident'
Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group.
You call Yaxley a journalist and totally brush off the fact that he falsely accuses people and causes harm. As if it is like any other journalist.
Let me ask you this. We are are all familiar with the common antisemitic canards. And we are familiar with the similar canards spread about portraying muslims and immigrants broadly as rapists and pedos.
There are a lot of Jewish bankers and financiers. That is a fact, in part because finance was on of the only occupations Christians and Muslims historically allowd them. So if a person "reports" on this, broadly implicating Jews in the typical banking world domination scenario they love to push...is that "journalism" and is he a "journalist"? If he falsely accuses specific Jews of being involved in this...is that simply an acceptable byproduct of sloppy "journalism"?
I dont think any of questions on this, Yaxley or the examole I gave, is journalism. Not when it seeks to demonize an entire group of people and promote canards.
How can you buy into it?
None of that applies to me. I'm not buying into anything. Certainly not moral relevance, concerning Jews. I'm making up my own mind about current events.
This of yours:
"Even you buy into with remarks like "its their culture" blurring then all into one subhuman group."
This is not happening. The UK bends over backwards to accommodate Muslim culture. And a Muslim Pakistani woman comes on British TV to explain about their 'culture'. I think I posted that clip.
Yet you support Yaxley who’s actions are directed at Muslims (not just Paki’s), you seem to support the same rhetoric that was once directed at Jews, and is now directed at Muslims. You dodge the equivalency in tone, rhetoric, public and political sentiment that was present in the 1930’s and proclaim it false moral equivalence despite its obvious similarities.
I just find it really strange that who’s people were so brutally persecuted seems to support the same canards, rhetoric and promotion of stereotypes when directed against today’s target of choice.
It seems to me that hate and scapegoating should not be supported even benignly. When these factions are done with immigrants and Muslims, they will turn on the Jews again. It is simmering there right below the surface and governments today are scrambling to give them legitimate platforms.
That is what Yaxley represents. Not children. Not victims. But a scapegoat.
We're talking on two different platforms here. You are accusing me of all manner of heinous activities. When I've stated over and over again that Tommy Robinson us standing up to the British establishment for its appalling handling of the Rotherham scandal.
I am not demonising Muslims!
This is pointless. I'm done with this topic.