SmarterThanTheAverageBear
Gold Member
- Aug 22, 2014
- 29,410
- 4,280
- 280
- Banned
- #41
I started to look up the data as posted the last time we engaged bear, but it's a waste of my time.
I quoted the law there on the raising of prices on that thread. You didn't say untrue then. I showed that data there.
Who cares what you think...............aka a DICTATOR MENTALITY...........OBEY..............same as ALLOW over a freaking lunch. Alabama told the Feds and you quite frankly to STFU............and it appears there isn't a damned thing you can do about it.
ROLL TIDE!
If you posted some data in the other thread, I missed it.
Anyway, there isn't a damned thing I want to do if you and others are too stupid to figure out how to make good food that qualifies for OVS reimbursement. That's your choice.
You finally understand that............That's your choice..............We choose not to OBEY........Now you understand...............
Alabama has said to hell with this BS............And that is that.
Wait... when did I say you didn't have a choice to be stupid?
That is a matter of opinion. Some believe that the Gov't is too big for it's britches and need a new mommy to tell them what to eat, drink, and how to live their lives.
Others, like my self, think it's about time for them to mind their own damned business on what our kids eat. Or our State for that matter. The lunches in Alabama will be just fine without a bunch of Federal Red Tape. Argument ended.
If you need a nanny to tell you how to live then that's your problem and not mine.
I'm sorry sir, but you are not very smart.
First of all, you didn't answer my question. When did I say you didn't have a choice in regards to school lunches?
Secondly, if you TRULY thought government should butt out of what your kids ate for lunch, you would be packing their lunches and this would be irrelevant.
I will ask again, do you support drug testing welfare recipients?