January-June Global Surface Mean Temperature Anomalies 1880 to 2009 - Interlinked Challenges
NCDC: Global Surface Temperature Anomalies
Data @ NASA GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis: Graphs
Data @ NASA GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis: 2007 Summation
State of the Climate | Global Analysis | Annual 2009
Signs From Earth: NOAA/NCDC: 2009 5th Warmest Year So Far: Global Temperature Anomalies Jan-Nov 2009 (images fixed)
Now if you subscribe to the conspiracy theory that every government agency, ours, and those of the rest of the world, are in on a global climate conspriracy, you can see from these sites these are the accepted figures from the data.
Another thing, Mud. When you make a bald statement such as you just did, it is incumbant upon you to provide the evidence that the chart is not correct. This is done by finding a credible scientific site that has evidence that contradicts the graph.
Well....for starters....
Seems NASA has been fingered as a dishonest broker in the Global Warming hoax. Why they've been lying to us all along I cannot imagine.
Maybe you might want to find a better source.
The first link reads like a fucken blog...not a science brief.
Click on links to other sites and it takes you to other blog sites.
Doesn't look official at all.
Basing your bullshit with someone else's bullshit is just that....Bullshit.
Nice try though.
So, NASA has figures that are very close to what every other government with satelites has, but they are part of the 'global warming conspiracy'.
No one to trust but me and thee, and we are not so sure of thee!
Further more, Mud, most of these sites are official government sites. Just because reality does not fit your ideological model does not change reality one whit.
Your fucken chart doesn't jive with historical records.
Reality is our government can't be trusted.
I'd rather believe scientists that don't have something to gain from fake findings then governmental officials and kook scientists that took bribes from Liberals.
Right now nobody can be trusted on this. Common-sense tells you that if they want to determine that CO2 is a poison then something shifty is going on here. I wouldn't be so suspicious if it weren't for all the assholes that are getting rich off of this hoax.
Last edited: