Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
good lord
There is absolutely no evidence, at all, of a global flood.
The only thing that's global is the KT[?] boundary. [the line where dinos end]
Sorry, religion fail.
I think the aliens that built all the pyramids, with interior light bulbs, cleaned up all the proof of a global flood as they left to never ever return or speak to us again.
God only knows why they did this.
It's not a point, is the point. They're similar, they're not the same.
For Einstein to have existed, hundreds of years of research and theory had to have come first.
You don't just wake up and "Bing!" all of the knowledge is downloaded in all of our brains. Magic!
Yet, there are human skeletons thousands of years in India that are still radioactive, and the Egyptians somehow light the interiors of their pyramids without fire and smoke.
Yes, there's a world-wide conspiracy to keep this information hush so that
so that...
so tha....
stfu
All your evidence and facts backing al of this stuff up is fascinating!
Ok evidence that shows a much younger earth then man says.
Introduction:
Contrary to what we've been told over and over by the evolution-believing mass media, the "scientific" establishment, and old-Earth (slow) Creationists (who don't want God to receive too much glory), there are, in fact, numerous geophysical and astronomical clocks which point to a young age for the earth, solar system, and universe. In fact, such young-earth indicators are in the majority. But because the scientific establishment and the media are biased in favor of evolution, and against the Creator, and because evolution requires an old earth to appear plausible, the public at large is rarely informed of the mounting evidence that contradicts the old earth dogma of evolution.
In the pages that follow we discuss 22 clocks, or indicators that the Earth and Universe are young. Or to say it another way: there is a LOT of scientific evidence that suggests the Earth is perhaps only thousands of years old, and that the 4.5 billion year age that evolution-believing "scientists" have LOUDLY proclaimed -- over and over -- is incorrect.
Time Clocks:
A "clock" is any geophysical or astronomical process that is changing at a constant rate. Clocks may be used to estimate how long a process has been going on for. All clocks (including radiometric ones) require the use of at least three assumptions. These are:
1. The rate of change has remained constant throughout the past.
2. The original conditions are known.
3. The process has not been altered by outside forces.
In each of these cases it is not possible to prove that the assumptions are true. For example flooding can greatly alter sedimentation rates, and with clocks over 5,000 years old, the original conditions cannot be known with certainty. Therefore scientists must make a guess with regard to what they believe the original conditions might have been. The shorter the time involved, the more likely that a specific process has been constant, and unaltered by external influences.
The following clocks point to a young earth, solar system, and universe. Taken together, they suggest that the earth is quite young -- probably less than 10,000 years old.
For undisputed evidence of a young earth read further.
The Age of the Earth: Evidence for a Young Earth, Young Earth Evidences.
Is There Really Scientific Evidence for a Young Earth?
For the past several decades, the question of the age of the Earth has been a very divisive one among Christians. Many people (known as "Young-Earth Creationists") believe that the only valid interpretation of the Bible indicates that the Earth is 10,000 years old or less, and they also claim to have scientific evidence that supports this view of the Earth. At the same time, there are many others who believe that scientific evidence overwhelmingly supports the claim that the Earth is about 4.6 billion years old, while the Universe as a whole is 10 to 20 billion years old. Many people in this latter category affirm the intimate involvement of God in this process of creation.
It is not the purpose of this paper to discuss theology, but this author firmly believes that a literal interpretation of Genesis allows for an Old-Earth view that is consistent with mainstream science. I say this only to emphasize that this paper is not intended to oppose any Christian beliefs, or to tear down anyone's faith. Rather, the purpose of this paper is to ensure that our Faith is based firmly on Truth, and not merely wishful thinking.
Through the ages, many people have denied certain facts of nature because those facts did not fit into the belief system that they desired to hold to. Both Christians and atheists are commonly guilty of this error. It should be obvious that any Christian who believes that God is the ordainer and framer of this world, and that God is the initiator of all logic and scientific thought, should never take such a position. The purpose of this paper is to show that Young-Earth Creationists, however unintentionally, have in fact done this. Regardless of what we may think the Bible says, the facts of nature are also ordained by God, and it is not right deny them or to misrepresent them in order to support any particular belief system. The purpose of this paper is to set forth the facts of nature in light of the claims made by Young-Earth Creationist leaders in hope that, by better understanding the facts of nature, we will also come to a better understanding of God's greater source of revelation - the words of the Bible.
Please read further.
Is There Really Scientific Evidence for a Young Earth?
The sad part is, you can read all of this until you're blue in the face - but there's much more credible and peer reviewed evidence that points in the other direction and since you have an agenda, you take the lesser credible evidence because it suits said agenda. That's not rational.
Man tells us that non-life created life. Man tells us the non-intelligence created intelligence. Need you question mans teachings ?
It's not a point, is the point. They're similar, they're not the same.
For Einstein to have existed, hundreds of years of research and theory had to have come first.
You don't just wake up and "Bing!" all of the knowledge is downloaded in all of our brains. Magic!
Yet, there are human skeletons thousands of years in India that are still radioactive, and the Egyptians somehow light the interiors of their pyramids without fire and smoke.
Yes, there's a world-wide conspiracy to keep this information hush so that
so that...
so tha....
stfu
Man tells us that non-life created life. Man tells us the non-intelligence created intelligence. Need you question mans teachings ?
Man doesn't tell us, man studies and experiments.
btw - man wrote the Bible. Need you question man's teachings?
Man tells us that non-life created life. Man tells us the non-intelligence created intelligence. Need you question mans teachings ?
Man doesn't tell us, man studies and experiments.
btw - man wrote the Bible. Need you question man's teachings?
Yet, there are human skeletons thousands of years in India that are still radioactive, and the Egyptians somehow light the interiors of their pyramids without fire and smoke.
Yes, there's a world-wide conspiracy to keep this information hush so that
so that...
so tha....
stfu
No modern day leaders do not allow for God and creation to be taught in schools that is why you believe as you do you don't truly question what you're taught and there is no rival. is that not real science when they question their own assumptions to see if it stands up to scrutiny ?
man tells us that non-life created life. Man tells us the non-intelligence created intelligence. Need you question mans teachings ?
man doesn't tell us, man studies and experiments.
Btw - man wrote the bible. Need you question man's teachings?
sorry, science are conclusions based on presupposaitions.
Man tells us that non-life created life. Man tells us the non-intelligence created intelligence. Need you question mans teachings ?
Man doesn't tell us, man studies and experiments.
btw - man wrote the Bible. Need you question man's teachings?
There are no ways to properly test many of the theories taught in school they are merely inferrences of the mind.
Yes, there's a world-wide conspiracy to keep this information hush so that
so that...
so tha....
stfu
No modern day leaders do not allow for God and creation to be taught in schools that is why you believe as you do you don't truly question what you're taught and there is no rival. is that not real science when they question their own assumptions to see if it stands up to scrutiny ?
Except you're wrong. You don't know me, my origin, my Religious origins, my study, what I've read and scrutinized, what sized dick I have, who I've fucked, my first name, my address, my family dynamics, my community, what social gatherings I attend, what I'm worth, my favorite color, what inspires me, etc
etc
etc
etc
You're ignorant of all that is me yet claim what you claim because you need to rationalize somehow why some people don't believe as you do. That's a position of weak character and insecurity.
No modern day leaders do not allow for God and creation to be taught in schools that is why you believe as you do you don't truly question what you're taught and there is no rival. is that not real science when they question their own assumptions to see if it stands up to scrutiny ?
Except you're wrong. You don't know me, my origin, my Religious origins, my study, what I've read and scrutinized, what sized dick I have, who I've fucked, my first name, my address, my family dynamics, my community, what social gatherings I attend, what I'm worth, my favorite color, what inspires me, etc
etc
etc
etc
You're ignorant of all that is me yet claim what you claim because you need to rationalize somehow why some people don't believe as you do. That's a position of weak character and insecurity.
Don't need to know such things i have debated these issues for over 40 years and you're all pretty much the same and react the same way.
You and all naturalist are predictable.
Man doesn't tell us, man studies and experiments.
btw - man wrote the Bible. Need you question man's teachings?
There are no ways to properly test many of the theories taught in school they are merely inferrences of the mind.
I was pissed in school when my teachers never taught the blatantly obvious evidence of snakes being able to talk and man living inside a whale.
It's the anti-Bible agenda all the educators of the world had implanted in them by Satan.
No modern day leaders do not allow for God and creation to be taught in schools that is why you believe as you do you don't truly question what you're taught and there is no rival. is that not real science when they question their own assumptions to see if it stands up to scrutiny ?
Except you're wrong. You don't know me, my origin, my Religious origins, my study, what I've read and scrutinized, what sized dick I have, who I've fucked, my first name, my address, my family dynamics, my community, what social gatherings I attend, what I'm worth, my favorite color, what inspires me, etc
etc
etc
etc
You're ignorant of all that is me yet claim what you claim because you need to rationalize somehow why some people don't believe as you do. That's a position of weak character and insecurity.
Don't need to know such things i have debated these issues for over 40 years and you're all pretty much the same and react the same way.
You and all naturalist are predictable.
