Really? So we are suppose to worry about something that has no meaning, purpose, or reason for existing?
The question was serious: What purpose does glacial ice serve in nature?
Your answer is an assumption that it serves no purpose, so the logical conclusion is, why should we worry about keeping it?
However, you assumption is wrong, it does serve a purpose, as does everything in nature, a very scientific purpose actually. But the reason I asked this question, in spite of knowing the answer myself, is because if you look through all your environut science, the information is omitted. The reason they won't tell you, is because the answer negates concern for the environment and places the concern on human survival, something which your scientists and corporations cannot profit from.
what purpose do the rocky mountains serve?
what purpose does the continent of antarctica serve?
what purpose does a grain of sand serve?
why am i existing?
what the fuck is this shit?
I can answer all those questions, and they all serve a purpose in nature.
For Antarctica ... you do realize that's pretty much the same question I asked, right?
Nature is a big picture system, not a tiny fragment of one. Like the data environuts use, there is a lot you are ignoring to scare people who know too little on the subject.
sure, darling.
come on, answer those awesome questions.