- Moderator
- #81
A person's sanity can be judged by the content of their 'message', genius.
So thoroughly documenting and researching your message is insane?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A person's sanity can be judged by the content of their 'message', genius.
Glen Beck is obviously not totally sane.
Which is oddly only obvious people who want to attack the messenger rather than deal with the message.
Umm I have tried to ignore the message of crazy people all my life and it has served me well.
But if you like people who bark like a dog at politicians and such on national tv....
Enjoy.
And yet, they elected him by a 2:1 margin over the best candidate the Republicans had to offer
Best candidate? Right...
And yet, they elected him by a 2:1 margin over the best candidate the Republicans had to offer
Best candidate? Right...
McCain was selected by a landslide at the GOP convention. Did you miss that part?
So maybe saying liberals will need to be shot in the head has hurt his ratings.
Beck has gone to a format where you really have to watch every day, one show builds on another. I can't watch every day (listen really...on XM) so I don't go out of my way to listen anymore. O'Reilly I still go out of my way to listen to.
Sounds like a form of INDOCTRINATION
how do you indoctrinate people by telling them to look up the information for yourself?
I can't figure out why any self-respecting conservative (if there is such a thing) would want a bonafide charlatan/kook like Glenn Beck to be a leading figure in the world of conservatism. When a lunatic con artist poses as a serious messenger of the right, and his ratings are through the roof,
what does that say about the right?
Best candidate? Right...
McCain was selected by a landslide at the GOP convention. Did you miss that part?
He had no opposition at the convention.
McCain was selected by a landslide at the GOP convention. Did you miss that part?
He had no opposition at the convention.
That is because republicans selected him in a landslide in the primaries. He had it wrapped up by super Tuesday in February
If McCain wasn't the best available Republican...who was?
He had no opposition at the convention.
That is because republicans selected him in a landslide in the primaries. He had it wrapped up by super Tuesday in February
If McCain wasn't the best available Republican...who was?
great, so then by your logic, reagan was the best president for his landslide wins
McCain was selected by a landslide at the GOP convention. Did you miss that part?
He had no opposition at the convention.
That is because republicans selected him in a landslide in the primaries. He had it wrapped up by super Tuesday in February
If McCain wasn't the best available Republican...who was?
Actually, no, the Republicans didn't select him. He was elected because of open primaries where non-Republicans voted in overwhelming numbers for him to the point where it became obvious that there would not be a clear victory at the convention if everyone remained. At that point all his opponents dropped out.He had no opposition at the convention.
That is because republicans selected him in a landslide in the primaries. He had it wrapped up by super Tuesday in February
If McCain wasn't the best available Republican...who was?
As for who was better:
Romney
Thompson
Paul
Guiliani
In fact, the only person i can says that He was better than is Huckabee.
But then, you'll probably ignore all this and continue to pretend that McCain was the best there was or that the Republicans overwhelmingly supported him.
But don't take my word for it, or Avatar's or Rightwinger's, watch for yourself and make your own decision.
I just watched Beck show...it's been awhile...and let me tell ya, he was outstanding.
After reading this thread and then immediately watching the show, I understand more than ever why the left hates him and wants him off the air.
Two things that should be foremost in the minds of the reader of this thread...not once has any of Beck's detractors given a single example...only their talking points...and Beck is the first to say you should do your own research, not just take his word for it.
If I was on the left, I'd be afraid too...and make no mistake, that's what these Beck attack threads are...a manifestation of fear.
Beck makes a compelling fact based argument, using his opponents own word...just like we saw recently in the Obamacare decision in Florida...to puctuate the discussion and underscore his points.
But don't take my word for it, or Avatar's or Rightwinger's, watch for yourself and make your own decision.
**Actually, no, the Republicans didn't select him. He was elected because of open primaries where non-Republicans voted in overwhelming numbers for him to the point where it became obvious that there would not be a clear victory at the convention if everyone remained. At that point all his opponents dropped out.*
That is because republicans selected him in a landslide in the primaries. He had it wrapped up by super Tuesday in February
If McCain wasn't the best available Republican...who was?
As for who was better:
Romney
Thompson
Paul
Guiliani
In fact, the only person i can says that He was better than is Huckabee.
But then, you'll probably ignore all this and continue to pretend that McCain was the best there was or that the Republicans overwhelmingly supported him.
Internet posters may have but voters did not. How many delegates did they win? Combined, they did not win as many as McCain. Republican Voters decided McCain was the best candidate to represent them
*
Not even close
I just watched Beck show...it's been awhile...and let me tell ya, he was outstanding.
After reading this thread and then immediately watching the show, I understand more than ever why the left hates him and wants him off the air.
Two things that should be foremost in the minds of the reader of this thread...not once has any of Beck's detractors given a single example...only their talking points...and Beck is the first to say you should do your own research, not just take his word for it.
If I was on the left, I'd be afraid too...and make no mistake, that's what these Beck attack threads are...a manifestation of fear.
Beck makes a compelling fact based argument, using his opponents own word...just like we saw recently in the Obamacare decision in Florida...to puctuate the discussion and underscore his points.
But don't take my word for it, or Avatar's or Rightwinger's, watch for yourself and make your own decision.
**Actually, no, the Republicans didn't select him. He was elected because of open primaries where non-Republicans voted in overwhelming numbers for him to the point where it became obvious that there would not be a clear victory at the convention if everyone remained. At that point all his opponents dropped out.
As for who was better:
Romney
Thompson
Paul
Guiliani
In fact, the only person i can says that He was better than is Huckabee.
But then, you'll probably ignore all this and continue to pretend that McCain was the best there was or that the Republicans overwhelmingly supported him.
Internet posters may have but voters did not. How many delegates did they win? Combined, they did not win as many as McCain. Republican Voters decided McCain was the best candidate to represent them
*
Not even close
Not true...the Missouri Republican Primary was nearly a three way tie.
But since Missouri was an all or nothing state, McCain's slight lead gave him all 55 delegates.
McCain 194,000 votes.
Huckabee 185,600 votes
Romney 172,300 votes
Paul 26,600 votes
Less than Paul's total seperated 1st from 3rd.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_Republican_primary,_2008
**Actually, no, the Republicans didn't select him. He was elected because of open primaries where non-Republicans voted in overwhelming numbers for him to the point where it became obvious that there would not be a clear victory at the convention if everyone remained. At that point all his opponents dropped out.
As for who was better:
Romney
Thompson
Paul
Guiliani
In fact, the only person i can says that He was better than is Huckabee.
But then, you'll probably ignore all this and continue to pretend that McCain was the best there was or that the Republicans overwhelmingly supported him.
Internet posters may have but voters did not. How many delegates did they win? Combined, they did not win as many as McCain. Republican Voters decided McCain was the best candidate to represent them
*
Not even close
Not true...the Missouri Republican Primary was nearly a three way tie.
But since Missouri was an all or nothing state, McCain's slight lead gave him all 55 delegates.
McCain 194,000 votes.
Huckabee 185,600 votes
Romney 172,300 votes
Paul 26,600 votes
Less than Paul's total seperated 1st from 3rd.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_Republican_primary,_2008