Get ready for synthetic meat

[Independent thinker]

Report: Some lab-grown meat pushed by WEF and Bill Gates as a remedy for climate change is made of 'immortalized' cancer cells | Blaze Media

Technocrats appear keen to preclude the masses from eating real meat in hopes of combatting the specter of climate change and making more money. While there is a significant push under way for people to surrender steaks, burgers, and hot dogs and instead eat bugs and algae, climate alarmists and...

www.theblaze.com

Essentially, scientists have figured out a way to make meat cells to reproduce without stopping, much like a cancer cell.

They say it will be used to feed the world and that people will get used to the taste and like it.

I think Bill Gates wants to start using it in food at the end of this year.

Isn't science great!

This may wind up being one of the better things we've done in a number of ways. But, the beyond fake meat stuff was totally stupid from the get go. It's filled with so many preservatives and long named stuff, it just plain is no good for you.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Democrats aim to take it away from you. You'll eat the bugs.

.

Only after they manage to take away my chickens and all my friends' livestock.

The losers in the dem shitholes are the ones who will eat bugs.

Look at how easy it was to convince them that tofu was good food!

.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

.

Only after they manage to take away my chickens and all my friends' livestock.

The losers in the dem shitholes are the ones who will eat bugs.

Look at how easy it was to convince them that tofu was good food!

The NWO will deem your chickens a hazard and democrats will show up to take yours away.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

The NWO will deem your chickens a hazard and democrats will show up to take yours away.

.

They can try.

It'll be fun.

.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

.

They can try.

It'll be fun.

.

Democrats have bio labs where they are working on viruses to kill your chickens, cows, and pigs.

 

[Natural Citizen]

I won't be eating that shit. I'll just shoot my own rabbit, wood pigeon, pheasant etc..

These rabbits around here don't know how good they have it. Not much better than pan fried rabbit. Growing up in the sticks, that was a staple.

But I leave em be to go about their business. They keep my Black Eyed Susans pruned down. And eat the weeds outta the yard.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

These rabbits around here don't know how good they have it. Not much better than pan fried rabbit. Growing up in the sticks, that was a staple.

But I leave em be to go about their business. They keep my Black Eyed Susans pruned down. And eat the weeds outta the yard.

.

They're looking tastier by the second, especially after one of them stripped a significant amount of bark off my apple tree.

I just picked up a bunny gun.

.

 

[toobfreak]

.Only after they manage to take away my chickens and all my friends' livestock.

I don't know what the big deal is with synthetic beef! I mean, is has been fully approved now by the USDA from decades of research testing with their pen of fully synthetic cows! Boy, Howdy!

 

[Flopper]

Just like people in NY and CA won't require us to but only EV's if we want a new car?

Force is ALWAYS part of the leftist program.

It will become harder to say no to EVs. Manufactures have started reducing the number of gas powered models and that will continue. As the number of sales of gasoline cars decreases, the prices will rise. Also the cost of licensing gasoline vehicles will rise as states and countries look for funds to combat global warming. The new technologies and features that make cars safer and more user friendly will be going into electric cars. By 2040, when GM and Ford stops all production of gas powered cars globally, the desirability of gasoline powered cars will be so low, there will be practically no demand for them.

The transition will be similar to the transition from horse drawn wagons to gasoline vehicles, the transition from incandescent bulbs to LEDs, and the transition from buses and trains to airlines for interstate travel. The government and other forces make the old technology less desirable while increasing the desirability of the new. As more people adopt the new technology, the features and the advantages relative to the old technology increases and that spurs more and more transitions.

 

[sparky]

Look your prey, or farm animal in the eye, put a bullet in it's brain, wipe it's a**, off it's head, and put it on a plate to feed the fam

~S~

 

[BackAgain]

I’m looking forward to artificial veggies. Maybe they won’t taste so — yeeech.

 

[martybegan]

It will become harder to say no to EVs. Manufactures have started reducing the number of gas powered models and that will continue. As the number of sales of gasoline cars decreases, the prices will rise. Also the cost of licensing gasoline vehicles will rise as states and countries look for funds to combat global warming. The new technologies and features that make cars safer and more user friendly will be going into electric cars. By 2040, when GM and Ford stops all production of gas powered cars globally, the desirability of gasoline powered cars will be so low, there will be practically no demand for them.

The transition will be similar to the transition from horse drawn wagons to gasoline vehicles, the transition from incandescent bulbs to LEDs, and the transition from buses and trains to airlines for interstate travel. The government and other forces make the old technology less desirable while increasing the desirability of the new. As more people adopt the new technology, the features and the advantages relative to the old technology increases and that spurs more and more transitions.

Then why are they being banned?

Horses were replaced naturally by cars, not by government force.

incandescents were banned as well.

What is it with lefty bastards like you and government force?

EV's will not be better or even equal to ICE vehicles until you can charge a battery as fast as you can fill a gas tank.

 

[Captain Caveman]

No one will require you or anyone else to eat synthetic meat. There are advantages to synthetic meet that will convince a lot people to give up beef during this century but we will be eating cows well into the future.

What makes synthetic meats desirable:

• Zero Animal Cruelty
• Less saturated fat means people will live longer
• Less antibiotic resistance could save people's lives
• No growth hormones
• No bacterial contamination
• It will eventually be cheaper than conventional meat
• Global hunger could be reduced

I was going to include saving the rainforest but that ship has sailed

7 reasons why lab-grown meat will be better

Lab-grown meat, or “clean” meat, is meat that is produced by taking a small sample of animal cells and then replicating them outside of an animal. It is set to change the world and will be on supermarket shelves and restaurant tables in the very near future.

www.worldanimalprotection.org.au

If the climate activists were intelligent, they wouldn't worry about cows, they would be worried about avocados. Eating 2 avocados is the equivalent of driving a VW Golf for a year.

Carbon Footprint of Avocado vs 73 Other Foods (Avocado Offset Calculator)

The growing process and deforestation, then to ship, fly, haul by road and train, all the fruits and vegetables around the planet is the problem. Some 90% of UK's fruit and veg are imported, yet they're worried about a cow farting.

And a cow farts because it has four stomachs, Ruminants, and Pseudoruminants such as camels fart because of three stomachs. In all, there are some 200+ known species with 3 & 4 stomachs.

So if the climate brigade are wanting to reduce farting animals and increase fruit and veg consumption, they need to get their thinking caps on, because when their co2 levels increase at the same rate as their efforts, they're gonna glue themselves to public objects at an alarming rate.

 

[Flopper]

Then why are they being banned?

Horses were replaced naturally by cars, not by government force.

incandescents were banned as well.

What is it with lefty bastards like you and government force?

EV's will not be better or even equal to ICE vehicles until you can charge a battery as fast as you can fill a gas tank.

Without the ban; that is the gradual phase out of ICEs, manufactures would not put the research dollars into EVs to produce vehicles that people would want. In effect, government is creating a an artificial demand for EVs by limiting the supply of ICEs and increasing the desirability of EVs.
Given the importance of converting to EVs, governments has to start the ball rolling just as it did with LEDs. Before government mandated a phase out of filament bulbs, a 60 watt equivalent LED bulb would cost $25. No one would pay that price and manufactures would not produce them. Last week I saw a sale price on a 60watt equivalent LEDs for 79 cents. The result today is we are paying less to light our homes and business and we don't have buy and install light bulbs every month.

If the governments of the world did not take action to stop the sale ICEs, a major cause of global climate change, automakers would be selling ICEs until there wasn't enough people left on earth to buy them. When the incentive is profits, the fate of planet is not a concern.

 

[martybegan]

Without the ban; that is the gradual phase out of ICEs, manufactures would not put the research dollars into EVs to produce vehicles that people would want. In effect, government is creating a an artificial demand for EVs by limiting the supply of ICEs and increasing the desirability of EVs.
Given the importance of converting to EVs, governments has to start the ball rolling just as it did with LEDs. Before government mandated a phase out of filament bulbs, a 60 watt equivalent LED bulb would cost $25. No one would pay that price and manufactures would not produce them. Last week I saw a sale price on a 60watt equivalent LEDs for 79 cents. The result today is we are paying less to light our homes and business and we don't have buy and install light bulbs every month.

If the governments of the world did not take action to stop the sale ICEs, a major cause of global climate change, automakers would be selling ICEs until there wasn't enough people left on earth to buy them. When the incentive is profits, the fate of planet is not a concern.

Sorry but your doom and gloom AGW excuse for government force is bullshit.

It's government force for bullshit reasons, and like a good little bottom, you bend over and present your ass for reaming with a smile on your face.

 

[Flopper]

Sorry but your doom and gloom AGW excuse for government force is bullshit.

It's government force for bullshit reasons, and like a good little bottom, you bend over and present your ass for reaming with a smile on your face.

IF you don't except AGW as fact, then there is no point in continuing the discussion because the need for transition to EVs is based on AGW.

 

[martybegan]

IF you don't except AGW as fact, then there is no point in continuing the discussion because the need for transition to EVs is based on AGW.

What I don't accept is even if AGW is happening, why we need to ruin our lives and lower our standard of living to fight it.

It's just an excuse for socialists to get what they want via subterfuge. Most AGW proponents are watermelons, Green on the outside, red on the inside.

Humans adjust, that's what we do. What we don't need to do is give up our standards of living because some people can't deal with a changing earth.

 

[Flopper]

What I don't accept is even if AGW is happening, why we need to ruin our lives and lower our standard of living to fight it.

It's just an excuse for socialists to get what they want via subterfuge. Most AGW proponents are watermelons, Green on the outside, red on the inside.

Humans adjust, that's what we do. What we don't need to do is give up our standards of living because some people can't deal with a changing earth.

The real problem for most people is that it is an "inconvenient truth" and they don't want to make the sacrifices needed to prevent disasters that will mostly occur long after they are gone. You are correct when you say we will adjust. I believe that will be the primary response to climate change. Over the decades and centuries as the ocean rises, we will abandon our ocean waterfronts. As temperatures rise in various regions, people will migrate to cooler climates. When the yield from grain crops on the great plains fall, farmers will move north to Canada. When we no longer can support the great herds of cattle, most people will adjust their diet. We will adjust and adjust and adjust until the population is low enough that greenhouse gases will hopefully fall and the climate will stabilize.

And the great thing about this is you will not have to make any sacrifices as that will be done by those that follow you. And there will be no need for government to force people to adjust, they will do it voluntarily because they won't have much choice.

I believe our meager response to global climate change will only lessen the impact slightly. It certainly is not going stop it because there is no way it can be stopped. It would require all major nations of earth to work together, something that has never happened and they would have to make scarifies they would never agree to.

 

[martybegan]

The real problem for most people is that it is an "inconvenient truth" and they don't want to make the sacrifices needed to prevent disasters that will mostly occur long after they are gone. You are correct when you say we will adjust. I believe that will be the primary response to climate change. Over the decades and centuries as the ocean rises, we will abandon our ocean waterfronts. As temperatures rise in various regions, people will migrate to cooler climates. When the yield from grain crops on the great plains fall, farmers will move north to Canada. When we no longer can support the great herds of cattle, most people will adjust their diet. We will adjust and adjust and adjust until the population is low enough that greenhouse gases will hopefully fall and the climate will stabilize.

And the great thing about this is you will not have to make any sacrifices as that will be done by those that follow you. And there will be no need for government to force people to adjust, they will do it voluntarily because they won't have much choice.

I believe our meager response to global climate change will only lessen the impact slightly. It certainly is not going stop it because there is no way it can be stopped. It would require all major nations of earth to work together, something that has never happened and they would have to make scarifies they would never agree to.

Humans adjust. the demanded sacrifices are asked of the lesser, and ignored by the "better".

The whole AGW scam is nothing more than making people expect less from their lives, where the whole concept of CLASSIC liberalism was for them to expect more.

 

[Flopper]

Humans adjust. the demanded sacrifices are asked of the lesser, and ignored by the "better".

The whole AGW scam is nothing more than making people expect less from their lives, where the whole concept of CLASSIC liberalism was for them to expect more.

And humans will adjust, and adjust, and adjust until there is nothing left to adjust. Then the climate will stabilize.