Georgia County Orders Elderly Black Voters Off Bus Taking Them To The Polls

[Correll]

You can't just ignore the meanings of words.


Definition of PARTISAN


Definition of partisan (Entry 2 of 3)

"1: feeling, showing, or deriving from strong and sometimes blind adherence to a particular party, faction, cause, or person : exhibiting, characterized by, or resulting from partisanship"


It is completely possible for the act of getting a certain group of voters to the polls, to be partisan, if you are doing it out of partisan motives.


Wait, what am I saying?


i forgot how completely dishonest you are.


Of course YOU can say it. But the response should be laughter at your obvious lie. And you.

So, based upon this definition of partisan, is there any vote that is not partisan?

That's the definition of partisan. Don't act like it is not.


And sure. Obviously. Just insert the word "not" at the beginning of the definition and you have how a vote, or a group of votes would be "not" partisan.


It is very odd that you have to have this explained to you.

So, one more time...is voting a partisan act in and of itself?

If depends on the voter. When I vote, it certainly is.


I am a partisan voter, for one example.

Is it a bad thing to be a partisan voter?

Not intrinsically, no. I did not say it was.

 

[Freiheit]

As usual, you left out key information that qualifies your bombastic thread title. Folks, go read the Atlanta Journal-Constitution article to get the full story. The OP is misleading.

You are being too kind the OP is lying. No one was denied his/her right to vote.

Rachel Maddow just finished a segment on this story. Republicans are evil. Voter suppression is evil.

Do you believe the Black Votes Matter is a nonpartisan group with nonpartisan goals?

So what?

Then it wouldn't matter to you if they were paid for their vote? Typical leftist mind set.
They may cast their vote. They have not been ordered not to vote. Your what so what? YOu didn't answer the question, so...what are you talking about?


Are you assuming the answer, that we both know, and just not stating it?


Sorry, that can't work. TOo many lefties have done shit like that, then walked it back when I crushed them.


You have to say it clearly.



Do you believe the Black Votes Matter is a nonpartisan group with nonpartisan goals?

Well if you look a little further you might find out that the Org is a Super Pak of Dark Money from the 501 527 bunch who are hardly nonpartisan. Someone call it round up the slaves, which I found racist but found out it was a Blk guy I knew from work. He said that why he was voting his way not their way. Well what ever turn ya on. Bros can be axxholes when they want.View attachment 223245

It makes no difference who paid for their transportation, dope.

Those folks were denied their right to vote.

As usual, you left out key information that qualifies your bombastic thread title. Folks, go read the Atlanta Journal-Constitution article to get the full story. The OP is misleading.

You are being too kind the OP is lying. No one was denied his/her right to vote.

Rachel Maddow just finished a segment on this story. Republicans are evil. Voter suppression is evil.

Do you believe the Black Votes Matter is a nonpartisan group with nonpartisan goals?

So what?

Err, what so what? YOu didn't answer the question, so...what are you talking about?


Are you assuming the answer, that we both know, and just not stating it?


Sorry, that can't work. TOo many lefties have done shit like that, then walked it back when I crushed them.


You have to say it clearly.



Do you believe the Black Votes Matter is a nonpartisan group with nonpartisan goals?

Well if you look a little further you might find out that the Org is a Super Pak of Dark Money from the 501 527 bunch who are hardly nonpartisan. Someone call it round up the slaves, which I found racist but found out it was a Blk guy I knew from work. He said that why he was voting his way not their way. Well what ever turn ya on. Bros can be axxholes when they want.View attachment 223245

It makes no difference who paid for their transportation, dope.

Those folks were denied their right to vote.

Were they told by any authority they could not vote? No. They were told they could not use the transportation provided by a suspect organization. Your claim that they were denied their right to vote is a blatant lie. Provining to all those who see your claim, your low moral character, ethical depravity and willingness to approve criminality.

 

[Avatar4321]

How is asking them to vote a different day for the same election voter suppression?

 

[busybee01]

Why would it be partisan?
You don’t think blacks vote independently?

Why are you too much of a pussy to answer a simple question?


Do you believe the Black Votes Matter is a nonpartisan group with nonpartisan goals?

The better question is:
Do you believe that blocking registered voters from voting is voter supression?

Voters have a right to vote. How they arrive at their polling place is irrelevant.

Using government funds, to get the voters there, using an organization that claims to be non-partisan but is completely partisan, is relevant.


Not to mention the always important factor of calling out libs on their bullshit.

What "govt funds"?
Can you show us that no republican voters were permitted on the bus?

1. It's a government facility. The residents would have to be gotten ready for the trip, not a minor issue. That's paid government employees and equipment being used. And I want to know who paid for that bus.


2. A group of voters does not have to be 100% biased to be biased, and thus partisan.

That does not pass the laugh test. You are the one who is partisan. You talk about things you have no clue about. Who paid for the bus is none of your business.

You are 110% biased so you are partisan.

 

[busybee01]

Using government funds, to get the voters there,

Why is this a bad thing, not that it seems that it happened.

using an organization that claims to be non-partisan but is completely partisan, is relevant.

So, what you are saying is that if someone is being driven to the polling place by a partisan they do not deserve to vote?

Nope. I did not say that. DId you see that? If so, seek medical attention.

Then why is it relevant?

There are reasons that partisan groups pretend to be NON-partisan. There are different rules and sometimes tax implications, not to mention that better PR, of pretending to be just helpful, instead of trying to advance your agenda.


And that is called lying.


AND, if they succeed in getting more of their vote out, because of operating under false pretenses, it could make a difference in the elections, and thus national policy.


That is very relevant to everything.

You have proved your partisanship. What you have described is voter suppression.

 

[busybee01]

How is asking them to vote a different day for the same election voter suppression?

They weren't asked to vote a different day. They were prevented from getting a ride to vote.

 

[busybee01]

Why is this a bad thing, not that it seems that it happened.


So, what you are saying is that if someone is being driven to the polling place by a partisan they do not deserve to vote?

Nope. I did not say that. DId you see that? If so, seek medical attention.

Then why is it relevant?

There are reasons that partisan groups pretend to be NON-partisan. There are different rules and sometimes tax implications, not to mention that better PR, of pretending to be just helpful, instead of trying to advance your agenda.


And that is called lying.


AND, if they succeed in getting more of their vote out, because of operating under false pretenses, it could make a difference in the elections, and thus national policy.


That is very relevant to everything.

More people voting should always be a good thing, even if they follow a different sheepherder than you do

There is nothing inherently good about higher voter participation.


If a person is to lazy to get to the polls, they are probably too lazy to educate themselves on the issues.

Some people are unable to get to the polls. Officials should go to these types of voters so they can vote.

 

[jc456]

“We knew it was an intimidation tactic,” Black Voters Matter co-founder LaTosha Brown said.

Dozens of black senior citizens in rural Georgia were ordered off a bus bound for the polls after county officials said the event constituted prohibited “political activity.”

A Jefferson County clerk reportedly told staff members from the Leisure Center in Louisville on Monday ― the first day of in-person early voting in Georgia ― that roughly 40 black people couldn’t take part in the trip after receiving a complaint from an unnamed caller.

The trip had been organized by the nonpartisan Black Voters Matter, which is embarking on a bus tour across several southern states with the goal of urging black people to vote. The caller said the bus, which was painted with the words “The South is Rising Tour,” should not be allowed to bring people to the polls, reported The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

Georgia County Orders Elderly Black Voters Off Bus Taking Them To The Polls

Evil. Really evil to discourage dozens of black senior citizens from voting. Evil.

Shitstain.....you are a liar......here....the important part you left out...democrats, cheating again....breaking the rules...again...

Georgia County Orders Elderly Black Voters Off Bus Taking Them To The Polls | HuffPost

Jefferson County Administrator Adam Brett said the trip, set to depart from a county-run senior center, was political and therefore violated guidelines imposed on county-sponsored events, the AJC reported.

Although Black Voters Matter is a nonpartisan organization, Jefferson County Democratic Party Chairwoman Diane Evans helped organize the event.

Officials “felt uncomfortable with allowing senior center patrons to leave the facility in a bus with an unknown third party,” Brett told the AJC. “No seniors at the Jefferson County senior center were denied their right to vote.”

Funny. What was UNKNOWN about this "unknown third party"? And yes, they were "denied their right to vote" at that time and place.

they explained it, can't you read?

 

[jc456]

Nope. I did not say that. DId you see that? If so, seek medical attention.

Then why is it relevant?

There are reasons that partisan groups pretend to be NON-partisan. There are different rules and sometimes tax implications, not to mention that better PR, of pretending to be just helpful, instead of trying to advance your agenda.


And that is called lying.


AND, if they succeed in getting more of their vote out, because of operating under false pretenses, it could make a difference in the elections, and thus national policy.


That is very relevant to everything.

More people voting should always be a good thing, even if they follow a different sheepherder than you do

There is nothing inherently good about higher voter participation.


If a person is to lazy to get to the polls, they are probably too lazy to educate themselves on the issues.

Some people are unable to get to the polls. Officials should go to these types of voters so they can vote.

sure, let's ask them if they know how to vote. See, what I don't want to see is someone assisting them to vote. hmmm that's illegal right?

 

[rightwinger]

Why would it be partisan?
You don’t think blacks vote independently?

Why are you too much of a pussy to answer a simple question?


Do you believe the Black Votes Matter is a nonpartisan group with nonpartisan goals?

Of course it is nonpartisan

If they kicked anyone off the bus who intended to vote Republican it would be partisan

You don’t think black people are capable of deciding who they want to vote for?
I never realized you were so racist

Fuck your race baiting, you race baiting piece of shit.



Blacks are certainly capable of deciding who they want to vote for.


But 90 plus percent decide to vote democratic, and that is why Black Votes Matter is not a non-partisan group.


It is just one more example of how not only are we not a serious country, but the media is a fucking joke, that they would print that shit, like it was not complete shit.


And that you would allow such utter shit to pass though the hole in the lower part of your face, says everything we need to know about you, and what kind of person you are.

You are the racist piece of shit. You apparently would like to see a election in which only Trump supporters are allowed to vote.

There is no evidence that Black Votes Matter is a partisan group. They did not ask anyone to vote a certain way. That matters little anyway. If Republican groups want to bus their voters in then I have no problem with that.

Blacks vote over 90 per cent dem. The local dem party was involved in the event. They pattern the name of their group after a far left/black racist organization.


Your denial of their partisanship is insanely dishonest.


You are a liar. And as you insulted me, for simply pointing out the truth, you are also a piece of shit asshole.

You don’t understand what partisanship is

They do not pay people to vote, they do not tell them who to vote for
They can vote for whoever they like

It’s just you who doesn’t want black people voting

 

[rightwinger]

WTF are you babbling about Klan Boy?

Black people voting is not partisan.......blocking their vote is

You can't just ignore the meanings of words.


Definition of PARTISAN


Definition of partisan (Entry 2 of 3)

"1: feeling, showing, or deriving from strong and sometimes blind adherence to a particular party, faction, cause, or person : exhibiting, characterized by, or resulting from partisanship"


It is completely possible for the act of getting a certain group of voters to the polls, to be partisan, if you are doing it out of partisan motives.


Wait, what am I saying?


i forgot how completely dishonest you are.


Of course YOU can say it. But the response should be laughter at your obvious lie. And you.

So, based upon this definition of partisan, is there any vote that is not partisan?

That's the definition of partisan. Don't act like it is not.


And sure. Obviously. Just insert the word "not" at the beginning of the definition and you have how a vote, or a group of votes would be "not" partisan.


It is very odd that you have to have this explained to you.

So, one more time...is voting a partisan act in and of itself?

If depends on the voter. When I vote, it certainly is.


I am a partisan voter, for one example.

I am a nonpartisan voter

 

[Avatar4321]

How is asking them to vote a different day for the same election voter suppression?

They weren't asked to vote a different day. They were prevented from getting a ride to vote.

You’re absolutely correct.

They could have easily voted the same day.

So again how was their vote suppressed?

 

[Avatar4321]

You can't just ignore the meanings of words.


Definition of PARTISAN


Definition of partisan (Entry 2 of 3)

"1: feeling, showing, or deriving from strong and sometimes blind adherence to a particular party, faction, cause, or person : exhibiting, characterized by, or resulting from partisanship"


It is completely possible for the act of getting a certain group of voters to the polls, to be partisan, if you are doing it out of partisan motives.


Wait, what am I saying?


i forgot how completely dishonest you are.


Of course YOU can say it. But the response should be laughter at your obvious lie. And you.

So, based upon this definition of partisan, is there any vote that is not partisan?

That's the definition of partisan. Don't act like it is not.


And sure. Obviously. Just insert the word "not" at the beginning of the definition and you have how a vote, or a group of votes would be "not" partisan.


It is very odd that you have to have this explained to you.

So, one more time...is voting a partisan act in and of itself?

If depends on the voter. When I vote, it certainly is.


I am a partisan voter, for one example.

I am a nonpartisan voter

And I’m an immortal time lord flying my Tardis through space and time

 

[busybee01]

The senior center was correct in what they did and acted within established policy. A RaT was involved in forming the bus ride, thus making it a partisan event.

The senior center was wrong. Voter suppression is not a established policy. If it is, they should be arrested. It is clear that Georgia's elections should be monitored by the federal government and any election changes should have to be approved by the civil rights division of DOJ. The fact that Trump and Republicans have ties to white supremacists means that will never happen. Minorities will see continued efforts by Republicans to make it more difficult to vote.

 

[jc456]

The senior center was correct in what they did and acted within established policy. A RaT was involved in forming the bus ride, thus making it a partisan event.

The senior center was wrong. Voter suppression is not a established policy. If it is, they should be arrested. It is clear that Georgia's elections should be monitored by the federal government and any election changes should have to be approved by the civil rights division of DOJ. The fact that Trump and Republicans have ties to white supremacists means that will never happen. Minorities will see continued efforts by Republicans to make it more difficult to vote.

so why aren't the families of those people taking them to the voting booths? since when is it your job?

 

[busybee01]

How is asking them to vote a different day for the same election voter suppression?

They weren't asked to vote a different day. They were prevented from getting a ride to vote.

You’re absolutely correct.

They could have easily voted the same day.

So again how was their vote suppressed?

Making it more difficult to vote is voter suppression. The fact they needed a ride to vote shows they need help.

 

[busybee01]

The senior center was correct in what they did and acted within established policy. A RaT was involved in forming the bus ride, thus making it a partisan event.

The senior center was wrong. Voter suppression is not a established policy. If it is, they should be arrested. It is clear that Georgia's elections should be monitored by the federal government and any election changes should have to be approved by the civil rights division of DOJ. The fact that Trump and Republicans have ties to white supremacists means that will never happen. Minorities will see continued efforts by Republicans to make it more difficult to vote.

so why aren't the families of those people taking them to the voting booths? since when is it your job?

Are you really that stupid? It is not a job, it is a service. There is a tradition of doing this in American politics. By the standard you are using, if I gave a ride to a voter then I could be prevented from doing that.

You cannot be honest, You do not want these people to vote because they will vote against your candidate.

 

[busybee01]

As usual, you left out key information that qualifies your bombastic thread title. Folks, go read the Atlanta Journal-Constitution article to get the full story. The OP is misleading.

You are being too kind the OP is lying. No one was denied his/her right to vote.

Do you believe the Black Votes Matter is a nonpartisan group with nonpartisan goals?

So what?

Then it wouldn't matter to you if they were paid for their vote? Typical leftist mind set.
They may cast their vote. They have not been ordered not to vote. Your what so what? YOu didn't answer the question, so...what are you talking about?


Are you assuming the answer, that we both know, and just not stating it?


Sorry, that can't work. TOo many lefties have done shit like that, then walked it back when I crushed them.


You have to say it clearly.



Do you believe the Black Votes Matter is a nonpartisan group with nonpartisan goals?

Well if you look a little further you might find out that the Org is a Super Pak of Dark Money from the 501 527 bunch who are hardly nonpartisan. Someone call it round up the slaves, which I found racist but found out it was a Blk guy I knew from work. He said that why he was voting his way not their way. Well what ever turn ya on. Bros can be axxholes when they want.View attachment 223245

It makes no difference who paid for their transportation, dope.

Those folks were denied their right to vote.

As usual, you left out key information that qualifies your bombastic thread title. Folks, go read the Atlanta Journal-Constitution article to get the full story. The OP is misleading.

You are being too kind the OP is lying. No one was denied his/her right to vote.

Do you believe the Black Votes Matter is a nonpartisan group with nonpartisan goals?

So what?

Err, what so what? YOu didn't answer the question, so...what are you talking about?


Are you assuming the answer, that we both know, and just not stating it?


Sorry, that can't work. TOo many lefties have done shit like that, then walked it back when I crushed them.


You have to say it clearly.



Do you believe the Black Votes Matter is a nonpartisan group with nonpartisan goals?

Well if you look a little further you might find out that the Org is a Super Pak of Dark Money from the 501 527 bunch who are hardly nonpartisan. Someone call it round up the slaves, which I found racist but found out it was a Blk guy I knew from work. He said that why he was voting his way not their way. Well what ever turn ya on. Bros can be axxholes when they want.View attachment 223245

It makes no difference who paid for their transportation, dope.

Those folks were denied their right to vote.

Were they told by any authority they could not vote? No. They were told they could not use the transportation provided by a suspect organization. Your claim that they were denied their right to vote is a blatant lie. Provining to all those who see your claim, your low moral character, ethical depravity and willingness to approve criminality.

If you have no way to get to the polls then you are denied the right to vote. If you stop people from getting a ride to the polls then you are denying them the right to vote. There is nothing suspect about the organization. You are the one using a blatant lie. Trump supporters have low moral character, ethical depravity, and approve criminality. Trump proved that when he supported a physical assault against a reporter.

 

[Avatar4321]

How is asking them to vote a different day for the same election voter suppression?

They weren't asked to vote a different day. They were prevented from getting a ride to vote.

You’re absolutely correct.

They could have easily voted the same day.

So again how was their vote suppressed?

Making it more difficult to vote is voter suppression. The fact they needed a ride to vote shows they need help.

I’m pretty sure the black men and women who fought for civil rights against Democrat oppressors can get to the polls without needing Democrats to organize them rides or looking over their shoulders

 

[ptbw forever]

White voters can generally get their own asses to the polls. They don't need a church bus. But if they did, and you heard about it, you would complain, and you know it.

So quit fucking whining and raise some funds to take old white Republicans to vote, loser.

There's nothing stopping you from doing the same thing.

You mean besides the media claiming he is creating a klan rally and subsequently getting him fired for his job?

When have you folks cared about what the media does??

And no one would claim it was a klan rally unless the klan declared it a rally....but that is a personal problem if that is your fear....

No one claimed unite the right was a klan rally except the media.

No one in the Tea Party claimed that they were starting a klan rally, but that didn’t stop MSNBC and CNN and the NAACP and the Democratic members of Congress from claiming they were simply because they believe white voices and white votes DON’T matter.

If every white person had a healthy self esteem and a healthy sense of pride in their culture and ancestry there would not be a Democratic Party for black people to vote for. That is why EVERYONE on the modern left seeks to restrict and prevent the right of assembly and the freedom of association for white people.

There were some actual white supremacist behind the Unite The Right rally.

They falsely advertised the rally as being about historical statues, and thus managed to get a lot of people to turn out.


Which is WHY you have good reason to think that they were not any White Supremacist there. Because the White Supremacists lied, and the vast majority of those that showed up, were not them.


Other than that, your post is right on.

Nonsense.

The guy who removed the statue is a black racist piece of shit who gained power in the Democratic Party to be deputy mayor of Charlottesville.

Who cares if “white supremacists” show up or not, they were also right about the statues.

I will take Richard Spencer any day over any Democrat because Democrats are a political party entirely comprised of anti-white racists.

When Nancy Pelosi’s grandson wants to be brown because he doesn’t see a future for white people in the country with the most white people in the world it is just time for the right to shut the fuck up and allow white nationalists to save what is left of white America.