g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 127,168
- 70,897
- 2,605
Remind me why interracial couples should have special rights to marriage the rest of us don't.Remind me why gays should have special rights to marriage the rest of us dont.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Remind me why interracial couples should have special rights to marriage the rest of us don't.Remind me why gays should have special rights to marriage the rest of us dont.
Coercing a vote is a felony. She is trying to coerce a vote. She should be charged and tried.
Argument #1.Remind me why interracial couples should have special rights to marriage the rest of us don't.Remind me why gays should have special rights to marriage the rest of us dont.
The right to marry someone of the same sex. You already had the right to marry someone of the opposite sex, just like normal people. But you pushed for a special right known as "gay marriage." Note there is no "straight marriage" there is only marriage.So what special right are you referring to, Rabbi?
The right to marry someone of the same sex. You already had the right to marry someone of the opposite sex, just like normal people. But you pushed for a special right known as "gay marriage." Note there is no "straight marriage" there is only marriage.So what special right are you referring to, Rabbi?
So both are equal. So whats the big deal?The right to marry someone of the same sex. You already had the right to marry someone of the opposite sex, just like normal people. But you pushed for a special right known as "gay marriage." Note there is no "straight marriage" there is only marriage.So what special right are you referring to, Rabbi?
It's not special if you can do it too. It's simply equal (in most states now too)
So both are equal. So whats the big deal?The right to marry someone of the same sex. You already had the right to marry someone of the opposite sex, just like normal people. But you pushed for a special right known as "gay marriage." Note there is no "straight marriage" there is only marriage.So what special right are you referring to, Rabbi?
It's not special if you can do it too. It's simply equal (in most states now too)
Note there is no "straight marriage" there is only marriage.
Ok,let's put aside the gay thing for a minute. So this is how we are going to b governed now? Someone puts a hint of,something out(which may or may not be true) and now we are going to vote for or against legislation on the basis of Peyton place drama? So the legislator turns the spotlight on a trumped up issue and that is going to determine how laws are made. This theme is all over the ops these days. Woman cheats on husband so she can't be against abortion type birth control. Man cheats on wife so he can't believe that marriage should only be between a man and a woman. It is irrational and nonsensical. If you are not a perfect human being(and none of us are) then you can't advocate for any boundaries on human behavior or any mores for society. If there is not,a collective that believes,in some,form of,cultural structure then we devolve into,anarchy. See the men are pigs op in the health section for,proof,of just,such a descent into our darker selves. Our politics is populated by a plague of classless mental pygmies unable to persuade but more than happy to blackmail.
Have a drink on me.
WTF does that mean?Argument #1.Remind me why interracial couples should have special rights to marriage the rest of us don't.Remind me why gays should have special rights to marriage the rest of us dont.
It is quite simple. The lesbian legislator is pointing out the serious logical flaw in the anti-gay marriage argument that gay marriage undermines "family values".Ok,let's put aside the gay thing for a minute. So this is how we are going to b governed now? Someone puts a hint of,something out(which may or may not be true) and now we are going to vote for or against legislation on the basis of Peyton place drama? So the legislator turns the spotlight on a trumped up issue and that is going to determine how laws are made. This theme is all over the ops these days. Woman cheats on husband so she can't be against abortion type birth control. Man cheats on wife so he can't believe that marriage should only be between a man and a woman. It is irrational and nonsensical. If you are not a perfect human being(and none of us are) then you can't advocate for any boundaries on human behavior or any mores for society. If there is not,a collective that believes,in some,form of,cultural structure then we devolve into,anarchy. See the men are pigs op in the health section for,proof,of just,such a descent into our darker selves. Our politics is populated by a plague of classless mental pygmies unable to persuade but more than happy to blackmail.
Have a drink on me.
Coercing a vote is a felony. She is trying to coerce a vote. She should be charged and tried.
Vote how I tell you to vote or I will expose you is not leveling the playing field. It is coercing a vote by way of threat.
Vote how I tell you to vote or I will expose you is not leveling the playing field. It is coercing a vote by way of threat.
Is it? Republicans don't seem to think so.I think blackmail is a felony, isn't it?