Fair&Balanced
Gold Member
- Apr 12, 2016
- 8,137
- 1,026
- 245
- Banned
- #61
Simple, because I don't think they have a RIGHT to do business with me. I am for full rights for EVERYONE, including the businessman who wants to discriminate with HIS business.If you approve of gays' rights, why did you say you don't want to be forced to do business with them?If you are too tender and fragile a flower to do business with someone based on who he/she loves, you shouldn't be in business. The transgenders didn't ask for alternative bathrooms. The people who are scared to death of them did.I don't believe I need to respect the right to interfere with others' rights. Nope. Not in this country.You don't have to appreciate them doing so. You do however have to respect their right to do so. And at no point did the so called Establishment clause ever suggest that religion shouldn't be in government. That is a complete false interpretation . In fact do you know that the very first person hired by the Congress was a Congressional Chaplain? Pretty strange move if they intended there to be no religion in government.
So, you're against militants forcing others to do business with them, or provide alternative bathrooms for them, that sort of thing? Me too.
That makes no sense. Either you are FOR protecting rights, are you aren't . How you feel about the person, or even the right they are exercising, should be irrelevant.
With your reasoning, the majority could at any time say " If you don't believe in God, shut your mouth" or any other justification for taking rights away from others.
Either we all have rights, or none of us do. I don't approve of gays, at all. They don't need my approval, they only need my recognition of their rights.
THAT is exactly what I'm talking about. Each side stubbornly defends only the rights of certain groups. Pathetic