GAY PRIDE PARADE WON’T BEND ITS RULES~bars Catholic League "Straight is Great" banner

[Vigilante]

Is this a TIT FOR TAT, or gay intolerance?

Bill Donohue comments on his exchange with officials from New York’s Heritage of Pride parade:

For the past few days I have been engaged in an e-mail conversation with officials from the Heritage of Pride parade, New York’s annual gay event; the dialogue has been cordial. I asked to join the parade under a banner that would read, “Straight is Great.” The purpose of my request was to see just how far they would go without forcing me to abide by their rules. It didn’t take long before they did.

Today, I informed Heritage of Pride officials that I objected to their rule requiring me to attend gay training sessions, or what they call “information” sessions. “I don’t agree with your rule,” I said. They responded by saying that attendance was “mandatory.”

The St. Patrick’s Day parade has mandatory rules, too. It bars groups representing their own cause from marching, which is why pro-life Catholics—not just gays—are barred from participating under their own banner. But only gays complain: they refuse to abide by the rules. Indeed, they went into federal court seeking to force a rule change. They lost. In 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that private parades have a First Amendment right to determine their own rules.

It is hypocritical for gay activists to complain about having to abide by the mandatory rules of the St. Patrick’s Day parade, and then inform me that I cannot march in their parade unless I respect their mandatory rules, rules that I reject.

Good luck to the Heritage of Pride participants. I may be watching it from afar, but I sure won’t be downing a Guinness afterwards.

GAY PRIDE PARADE WON'T BEND ITS RULES - Catholic League

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Is this a TIT FOR TAT, or gay intolerance?

Bill Donohue comments on his exchange with officials from New York’s Heritage of Pride parade:

For the past few days I have been engaged in an e-mail conversation with officials from the Heritage of Pride parade, New York’s annual gay event; the dialogue has been cordial. I asked to join the parade under a banner that would read, “Straight is Great.” The purpose of my request was to see just how far they would go without forcing me to abide by their rules. It didn’t take long before they did.

Today, I informed Heritage of Pride officials that I objected to their rule requiring me to attend gay training sessions, or what they call “information” sessions. “I don’t agree with your rule,” I said. They responded by saying that attendance was “mandatory.”

The St. Patrick’s Day parade has mandatory rules, too. It bars groups representing their own cause from marching, which is why pro-life Catholics—not just gays—are barred from participating under their own banner. But only gays complain: they refuse to abide by the rules. Indeed, they went into federal court seeking to force a rule change. They lost. In 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that private parades have a First Amendment right to determine their own rules.

It is hypocritical for gay activists to complain about having to abide by the mandatory rules of the St. Patrick’s Day parade, and then inform me that I cannot march in their parade unless I respect their mandatory rules, rules that I reject.

Good luck to the Heritage of Pride participants. I may be watching it from afar, but I sure won’t be downing a Guinness afterwards.

GAY PRIDE PARADE WON'T BEND ITS RULES - Catholic League

Good Old Bill. There's a special place set aside for him, in Hell, by the little boys his priests raped.

 

[Vigilante]

Is this a TIT FOR TAT, or gay intolerance?

Bill Donohue comments on his exchange with officials from New York’s Heritage of Pride parade:

For the past few days I have been engaged in an e-mail conversation with officials from the Heritage of Pride parade, New York’s annual gay event; the dialogue has been cordial. I asked to join the parade under a banner that would read, “Straight is Great.” The purpose of my request was to see just how far they would go without forcing me to abide by their rules. It didn’t take long before they did.

Today, I informed Heritage of Pride officials that I objected to their rule requiring me to attend gay training sessions, or what they call “information” sessions. “I don’t agree with your rule,” I said. They responded by saying that attendance was “mandatory.”

The St. Patrick’s Day parade has mandatory rules, too. It bars groups representing their own cause from marching, which is why pro-life Catholics—not just gays—are barred from participating under their own banner. But only gays complain: they refuse to abide by the rules. Indeed, they went into federal court seeking to force a rule change. They lost. In 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that private parades have a First Amendment right to determine their own rules.

It is hypocritical for gay activists to complain about having to abide by the mandatory rules of the St. Patrick’s Day parade, and then inform me that I cannot march in their parade unless I respect their mandatory rules, rules that I reject.

Good luck to the Heritage of Pride participants. I may be watching it from afar, but I sure won’t be downing a Guinness afterwards.

GAY PRIDE PARADE WON'T BEND ITS RULES - Catholic League

Good Old Bill. There's a special place set aside for him, in Hell, by the little boys his priests raped.

Perhaps you should investigate if illegals rape more boys and girls than priests, may be of interest to the community!

 

[Pop23]

Is this a TIT FOR TAT, or gay intolerance?

Bill Donohue comments on his exchange with officials from New York’s Heritage of Pride parade:

For the past few days I have been engaged in an e-mail conversation with officials from the Heritage of Pride parade, New York’s annual gay event; the dialogue has been cordial. I asked to join the parade under a banner that would read, “Straight is Great.” The purpose of my request was to see just how far they would go without forcing me to abide by their rules. It didn’t take long before they did.

Today, I informed Heritage of Pride officials that I objected to their rule requiring me to attend gay training sessions, or what they call “information” sessions. “I don’t agree with your rule,” I said. They responded by saying that attendance was “mandatory.”

The St. Patrick’s Day parade has mandatory rules, too. It bars groups representing their own cause from marching, which is why pro-life Catholics—not just gays—are barred from participating under their own banner. But only gays complain: they refuse to abide by the rules. Indeed, they went into federal court seeking to force a rule change. They lost. In 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that private parades have a First Amendment right to determine their own rules.

It is hypocritical for gay activists to complain about having to abide by the mandatory rules of the St. Patrick’s Day parade, and then inform me that I cannot march in their parade unless I respect their mandatory rules, rules that I reject.

Good luck to the Heritage of Pride participants. I may be watching it from afar, but I sure won’t be downing a Guinness afterwards.

GAY PRIDE PARADE WON'T BEND ITS RULES - Catholic League

And all that voted against are products of straights

It don't get funnier than that folks!

Seriously, you just can't make this chit up.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Is this a TIT FOR TAT, or gay intolerance?

Bill Donohue comments on his exchange with officials from New York’s Heritage of Pride parade:

For the past few days I have been engaged in an e-mail conversation with officials from the Heritage of Pride parade, New York’s annual gay event; the dialogue has been cordial. I asked to join the parade under a banner that would read, “Straight is Great.” The purpose of my request was to see just how far they would go without forcing me to abide by their rules. It didn’t take long before they did.

Today, I informed Heritage of Pride officials that I objected to their rule requiring me to attend gay training sessions, or what they call “information” sessions. “I don’t agree with your rule,” I said. They responded by saying that attendance was “mandatory.”

The St. Patrick’s Day parade has mandatory rules, too. It bars groups representing their own cause from marching, which is why pro-life Catholics—not just gays—are barred from participating under their own banner. But only gays complain: they refuse to abide by the rules. Indeed, they went into federal court seeking to force a rule change. They lost. In 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that private parades have a First Amendment right to determine their own rules.

It is hypocritical for gay activists to complain about having to abide by the mandatory rules of the St. Patrick’s Day parade, and then inform me that I cannot march in their parade unless I respect their mandatory rules, rules that I reject.

Good luck to the Heritage of Pride participants. I may be watching it from afar, but I sure won’t be downing a Guinness afterwards.

GAY PRIDE PARADE WON'T BEND ITS RULES - Catholic League

Good Old Bill. There's a special place set aside for him, in Hell, by the little boys his priests raped.

Perhaps you should investigate if illegals rape more boys and girls than priests, may be of interest to the community!

In this case I care about God's Rapists, Bill's protected class.

 

[Pop23]

The police that guard the parade, the firefighters, the EMTs, the banner makers etc.

All products of straights

True story

 

[Moonglow]

Is this a TIT FOR TAT, or gay intolerance?

Bill Donohue comments on his exchange with officials from New York’s Heritage of Pride parade:

For the past few days I have been engaged in an e-mail conversation with officials from the Heritage of Pride parade, New York’s annual gay event; the dialogue has been cordial. I asked to join the parade under a banner that would read, “Straight is Great.” The purpose of my request was to see just how far they would go without forcing me to abide by their rules. It didn’t take long before they did.

Today, I informed Heritage of Pride officials that I objected to their rule requiring me to attend gay training sessions, or what they call “information” sessions. “I don’t agree with your rule,” I said. They responded by saying that attendance was “mandatory.”

The St. Patrick’s Day parade has mandatory rules, too. It bars groups representing their own cause from marching, which is why pro-life Catholics—not just gays—are barred from participating under their own banner. But only gays complain: they refuse to abide by the rules. Indeed, they went into federal court seeking to force a rule change. They lost. In 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that private parades have a First Amendment right to determine their own rules.

It is hypocritical for gay activists to complain about having to abide by the mandatory rules of the St. Patrick’s Day parade, and then inform me that I cannot march in their parade unless I respect their mandatory rules, rules that I reject.

Good luck to the Heritage of Pride participants. I may be watching it from afar, but I sure won’t be downing a Guinness afterwards.

GAY PRIDE PARADE WON'T BEND ITS RULES - Catholic League

Good Old Bill. There's a special place set aside for him, in Hell, by the little boys his priests raped.

Perhaps you should investigate if illegals rape more boys and girls than priests, may be of interest to the community!

Priest are held to a higher standard than illegals....

 

[Vigilante]

Good Old Bill. There's a special place set aside for him, in Hell, by the little boys his priests raped.

Perhaps you should investigate if illegals rape more boys and girls than priests, may be of interest to the community!

In this case I care about God's Rapists, Bill's protected class.

But you forget the 2 M's, Mexicans, and muslims! Talk of your protected class! Perhaps Norway's RAPE TRADGEDY will come here shortly as muslim infiltration continues

Norway: 90% of all violent rapes in Oslo committed by Muslims

 

[Moonglow]

The police that guard the parade, the firefighters, the EMTs, the banner makers etc.

All products of straights

True story

Not if they were from artificially inseminated lesbian mothers.....

 

[Vigilante]

Good Old Bill. There's a special place set aside for him, in Hell, by the little boys his priests raped.

Perhaps you should investigate if illegals rape more boys and girls than priests, may be of interest to the community!

Priest are held to a higher standard than illegals....

That's funny, as when I say that about our president, I get static for that remark!

 

[Pop23]

And.......

The soldiers that fought for their freedom to assemble

Yup, products of straights

 

[Moonglow]

Perhaps you should investigate if illegals rape more boys and girls than priests, may be of interest to the community!

Priest are held to a higher standard than illegals....

That's funny, as when I say that about our president, I get static for that remark!

Has Obama raped/molested any children as of late?

 

[Pop23]

The police that guard the parade, the firefighters, the EMTs, the banner makers etc.

All products of straights

True story

Not if they were from artificially inseminated lesbian mothers.....

Name um, prove me wrong

Then I'll just have to say 99.999999% of them, products of straights

Better?

 

[Moonglow]

And.......

The soldiers that fought for their freedom to assemble

Yup, products of straights

Yet gays are restricted to march in the Saint Patty Day parade...made possible by straights..

 

[birddog]

Queers suck! (In more ways than one!)

 

[Vigilante]

Priest are held to a higher standard than illegals....

That's funny, as when I say that about our president, I get static for that remark!

Has Obama raped/molested any children as of late?

Not as of late.....

 

[Vigilante]

And.......

The soldiers that fought for their freedom to assemble

Yup, products of straights

Yet gays are restricted to march in the Saint Patty Day parade...

Are they required to go to "shamrock indoctrination?"

 

[Moonglow]

The police that guard the parade, the firefighters, the EMTs, the banner makers etc.

All products of straights

True story

Not if they were from artificially inseminated lesbian mothers.....

Name um, prove me wrong

Then I'll just have to say 99.999999% of them, products of straights

Better?

There are always variables......ty

 

[Moonglow]

And.......

The soldiers that fought for their freedom to assemble

Yup, products of straights

Yet gays are restricted to march in the Saint Patty Day parade...

Are they required to go to "shamrock indoctrination?"

only if they get a shamrock shake at McDonald's..

 

[Pop23]

And.......

The soldiers that fought for their freedom to assemble

Yup, products of straights

Yet gays are restricted to march in the Saint Patty Day parade...made possible by straights..

Start a thread