Gary Johnson would not close Guantanamo Bay

Kevin_Kennedy

Defend Liberty
Aug 27, 2008
18,450
1,823
205
[youtube]cRlGXuGHfrc[/youtube]

Rather disappointing. Looks like Ron Paul will be the only candidate worth voting for again.
 
the guy takes one position you disagree with and you toss him under the bus??

Ron Paul is a national loser. Even conservatives can't stand the guy. And his supporters are just nuts.
 
the guy takes one position you disagree with and you toss him under the bus??

Ron Paul is a national loser. Even conservatives can't stand the guy. And his supporters are just nuts.

Yes, when it's an issue as important as this I certainly do. Why should I vote for somebody who I agree with on most things, when I can vote for somebody I agree with on more things?

Well nobody said you had to vote for Ron Paul, and I don't think you speak for all conservatives.
 
What better place to put the dirtbags??

Barry Boy made that promise while campaigning. He became Prez and reality hit him right in the chops.

No one wants these dirtbags and Congress has made it impossible to put them on American soil.

Gitmo is the perfect place for all dirtbags terrorist bastards.
 
What better place to put the dirtbags??

Barry Boy made that promise while campaigning. He became Prez and reality hit him right in the chops.

No one wants these dirtbags and Congress has made it impossible to put them on American soil.

Gitmo is the perfect place for all dirtbags terrorist bastards.

If they're guilty of a crime then you have to put them on trial, and if not then you have to let them go. It's unconstitutional to hold people in prison indefinitely. Not to mention the torture going on.
 
What better place to put the dirtbags??

Barry Boy made that promise while campaigning. He became Prez and reality hit him right in the chops.

No one wants these dirtbags and Congress has made it impossible to put them on American soil.

Gitmo is the perfect place for all dirtbags terrorist bastards.

If they're guilty of a crime then you have to put them on trial, and if not then you have to let them go. It's unconstitutional to hold people in prison indefinitely. Not to mention the torture going on.

Unless you want to consider state of the art medical treatment, well balanced meals and exercise facilities torture I don't think you can make any case for torture.

What you are describing is what we do with criminals. The people at Gitmo are not criminals in that sense. They are POWs. We can keep them as long as we want.
 
the guy takes one position you disagree with and you toss him under the bus??

Ron Paul is a national loser. Even conservatives can't stand the guy. And his supporters are just nuts.

Social conservatives can't stand him because he doesn't want to legislate what you can do in your own home, what plants you can grow on your property, be the worlds hall monitor, etc.


Fiscal conservatives he's the only real choice, as he's the only person in government who isn't a hardcore far left fiscal liberal.
 
the guy takes one position you disagree with and you toss him under the bus??

Ron Paul is a national loser. Even conservatives can't stand the guy. And his supporters are just nuts.

Yes, when it's an issue as important as this I certainly do. Why should I vote for somebody who I agree with on most things, when I can vote for somebody I agree with on more things?

Well nobody said you had to vote for Ron Paul, and I don't think you speak for all conservatives.

He can't speak for conservatives because he isn't one, he's a republican.


Those things are on 2 completely opposite ends of the spectrum.
 
the guy takes one position you disagree with and you toss him under the bus??

Ron Paul is a national loser. Even conservatives can't stand the guy. And his supporters are just nuts.

Social conservatives can't stand him because he doesn't want to legislate what you can do in your own home, what plants you can grow on your property, be the worlds hall monitor, etc.


Fiscal conservatives he's the only real choice, as he's the only person in government who isn't a hardcore far left fiscal liberal.

Dr Drekk delivers! Ill-informed, illogical and wrong. I salute your stupidity, sir!
 
the guy takes one position you disagree with and you toss him under the bus??

Ron Paul is a national loser. Even conservatives can't stand the guy. And his supporters are just nuts.

Social conservatives can't stand him because he doesn't want to legislate what you can do in your own home, what plants you can grow on your property, be the worlds hall monitor, etc.


Fiscal conservatives he's the only real choice, as he's the only person in government who isn't a hardcore far left fiscal liberal.

Don't waste your breath on Rabbi. He's a socialist conservative who wants big brother to legislate your morality.
 
What better place to put the dirtbags??

Barry Boy made that promise while campaigning. He became Prez and reality hit him right in the chops.

No one wants these dirtbags and Congress has made it impossible to put them on American soil.

Gitmo is the perfect place for all dirtbags terrorist bastards.

If they're guilty of a crime then you have to put them on trial, and if not then you have to let them go. It's unconstitutional to hold people in prison indefinitely. Not to mention the torture going on.

Unless you want to consider state of the art medical treatment, well balanced meals and exercise facilities torture I don't think you can make any case for torture.

What you are describing is what we do with criminals. The people at Gitmo are not criminals in that sense. They are POWs. We can keep them as long as we want.

And where does it say that in the Constitution?
 
the guy takes one position you disagree with and you toss him under the bus??

Ron Paul is a national loser. Even conservatives can't stand the guy. And his supporters are just nuts.

Social conservatives can't stand him because he doesn't want to legislate what you can do in your own home, what plants you can grow on your property, be the worlds hall monitor, etc.


Fiscal conservatives he's the only real choice, as he's the only person in government who isn't a hardcore far left fiscal liberal.

Dr Drekk delivers! Ill-informed, illogical and wrong. I salute your stupidity, sir!

The only way to think the Republican party is the least bit conservative is if you weren't in the United States from 2001-2007 and have zero access to the budgets from that time period.

So in other words if you're a foreigner who can't read, hear or use sign language, that's about the only way you could think the Republican party is conservative.
 
the guy takes one position you disagree with and you toss him under the bus??

Ron Paul is a national loser. Even conservatives can't stand the guy. And his supporters are just nuts.

Social conservatives can't stand him because he doesn't want to legislate what you can do in your own home, what plants you can grow on your property, be the worlds hall monitor, etc.


Fiscal conservatives he's the only real choice, as he's the only person in government who isn't a hardcore far left fiscal liberal.

Don't waste your breath on Rabbi. He's a socialist conservative who wants big brother to legislate your morality.

Through huge taxes, huge spending, huge bureacracies, hence not a conservative.
 
What better place to put the dirtbags??

Barry Boy made that promise while campaigning. He became Prez and reality hit him right in the chops.

No one wants these dirtbags and Congress has made it impossible to put them on American soil.

Gitmo is the perfect place for all dirtbags terrorist bastards.

If they're guilty of a crime then you have to put them on trial, and if not then you have to let them go. It's unconstitutional to hold people in prison indefinitely. Not to mention the torture going on.


These dirtbags are enemy combatants. Most were picked up on battle fields trying to kill americans.

As enemy combatants they can be held until the war is over.

Let me know when the jihadists stop trying to kill us.

Don't think you will find any mention of Islamic dirtbags in the Constitution.
 
Last edited:
What better place to put the dirtbags??

Barry Boy made that promise while campaigning. He became Prez and reality hit him right in the chops.

No one wants these dirtbags and Congress has made it impossible to put them on American soil.

Gitmo is the perfect place for all dirtbags terrorist bastards.

If they're guilty of a crime then you have to put them on trial, and if not then you have to let them go. It's unconstitutional to hold people in prison indefinitely. Not to mention the torture going on.


These dirtbags are enemy combatants. Most were picked up on battle fields trying to kill americans.

As enemey combatants they can be held until the war is over.

Let me know when the jihadists stop trying to kill us.

Don't think you will find any mention of Islamic dirtbags in the Constitution.

And where does it say that we can declare people "enemy combatants," or that we can hold said "enemy combatants" indefinitely in the Constitution?
 
If they're guilty of a crime then you have to put them on trial, and if not then you have to let them go. It's unconstitutional to hold people in prison indefinitely. Not to mention the torture going on.


These dirtbags are enemy combatants. Most were picked up on battle fields trying to kill americans.

As enemey combatants they can be held until the war is over.

Let me know when the jihadists stop trying to kill us.

Don't think you will find any mention of Islamic dirtbags in the Constitution.

And where does it say that we can declare people "enemy combatants," or that we can hold said "enemy combatants" indefinitely in the Constitution?


How about the Supreme Court and the Attorney General.

Kagan Enemy Combatants | Solicitor general nominee says 'enemy combatants' can be held without trial - Los Angeles Times
 
These dirtbags are enemy combatants. Most were picked up on battle fields trying to kill americans.

As enemey combatants they can be held until the war is over.

Let me know when the jihadists stop trying to kill us.

Don't think you will find any mention of Islamic dirtbags in the Constitution.

And where does it say that we can declare people "enemy combatants," or that we can hold said "enemy combatants" indefinitely in the Constitution?


How about the Supreme Court and the Attorney General.

Kagan Enemy Combatants | Solicitor general nominee says 'enemy combatants' can be held without trial - Los Angeles Times

You understand our bureacrats do unconstitutional things, correct?
 
These dirtbags are enemy combatants. Most were picked up on battle fields trying to kill americans.

As enemey combatants they can be held until the war is over.

Let me know when the jihadists stop trying to kill us.

Don't think you will find any mention of Islamic dirtbags in the Constitution.

And where does it say that we can declare people "enemy combatants," or that we can hold said "enemy combatants" indefinitely in the Constitution?


How about the Supreme Court and the Attorney General.

Kagan Enemy Combatants | Solicitor general nominee says 'enemy combatants' can be held without trial - Los Angeles Times

Well I said in the Constitution, not where has the government said it can do whatever it wants. I can find that information easily enough on my own.
 

Forum List

Back
Top